about us

graphics studio

contact

wersja polska
wersja polska

 



home          back
 
Medical journals > Polish Heart Journal > archive > 11/2004 > abstract
> log in
 
If You don't have an account,
> register
 
 
 
 
 
Polish Heart Journal  11/2004

abstract:
 

Differences between cardiologists and internists in the management of heart failure. Medical guidelines compared with every-day practice


Kardiol Pol 2004; 61: 431-435

authors: Sławomir Stawicki, Marek Roik, Mariusz Jasik, Dariusz Kosior, Piotr Scisło, Janusz Kochanowski, Krzysztof Dęmbe, Roman Steckiewicz, Waldemar Karnafel, Grzegorz Opolski,


Background: A marked progress in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) took place during the last decade. Large, randomised studies documented the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and beta-blockers in the reduction of mortality and morbidity in CHF.
Aim: To assess differences in the management of CHF patients between cardiologists and internists.
Methods: Medical records of 433 patients with CHF, aged 38-98 years, hospitalised between October 2000 and May 2002 in an academic centre, were retrospectively analysed. Cardiologists treated 241 patients, and internists - 192 patients. In addition, 12 randomly selected physicians who treated CHF patients, filled-in a questionnaire concerning CHF treatment. Next, the answers were compared with the actual treatment, documented in patients medical files.
Results: There were significant differences in the CHF treatment between cardiologists and internists. Cardiologists significantly more often prescribed ACE-I in NYHA class III patients (77% vs 58%, p=0.003), beta-blockers in all NYHA classes (80% vs 57%, p<0.001), loop diuretics in NYHA classes III and IV (76% vs 42%, p<0.001 and 91% vs 44%, p=0.005), and thiazides in NYHA class III patients (36% vs 11%, p<0.001). Internists more often used loop diuretics (37% vs 15%, p<0.001), digoxin (28% vs 7%, p<0.001) and aldosterone antagonists (24% vs 13%, p=0.022) in NYHA class II patients. All cardiologists and almost half of internists declared combined usage of ACE-I and beta-blockers at increasing dosages as the treatment was continued. The highest concordance between declared and actual medication concerned the concomitant use of ACE-I and beta-blockers.
Conclusions: Cardiologists used more often ACE-I and beta-blockers than internists in the treatment of CHF patients. A satisfactory knowledge of treatment guidelines was not associated with widespread usage of ACE-I and beta-blockers in every-day practice.



keywords:
 

chronic heart failure - pharmacotherapy - cardiologists - internists



> full text of the article > inform friend about the article
Polecamy
Konferencje:
Top Medical Trends 2010
12.03.2010 - 14.03.2010
pozostało 31 dni
III Naukowy Zjazd Polskiego Towarzystwa Kardiodiabetologicznego
15.04.2010 - 17.04.2010
pozostało 65 dni
Portret kobiety we wnętrzu. Aspekty kardiologiczne i varia
07.05.2010 - 08.05.2010
pozostało 87 dni
Książki:
Znaczenie kwasu acetylosalicylowego w chorobach układu sercowo-naczyniowego
Wydanie II

Redakcja: prof. dr hab. med. Andrzej Tykarski, prof. dr hab. med. Krzysztof J. Filipiak
 
Powikłania nadciśnienia tętniczego – poradnik dla lekarzy rodzinnych

pod redakcją Macieja Banacha, Michała Nowickiego, Aleksandra Gocha i Jacka Rysza

format A5
liczba stron 232
oprawa miękka
 
Współczesna terapia nadciśnienia tętniczego
Pod redakcją Jerzego Głuszka

format B5
liczba stron 184
oprawa twarda
 
Internet:
Studenci Medycyny i Farmacji
Portal adresowanych do studentów uczelni medycznych w Polsce i za granicą.
Przypadki Kliniczne
Forum umożliwiające lekarzom konsultowanie przypadków z innymi lekarzami.
privacy policy
advertising policy
contact us
This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here
Copyright by Termedia sp. z o.o.