ORIGINAL PAPER
In vivo assessment of thickness of the psoas major muscle in adult male subjects: evaluating occupation-based activity-related differences
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2016-12-04
 
 
Final revision date: 2017-02-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2017-02-23
 
 
Publication date: 2017-03-13
 
 
Arch Med Sci Civil Dis 2017;2(1):41-47
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
Other
 
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There is a notable scarcity of In vivo studies on the muscles of the posterior abdominal wall, and the psoas major muscle, which is important in occupation-related lumbopelvic mechanics, is not an exception. Hence, we determined the psoas major muscle thickness (PMMT) in an adult Nigerian population of different occupational groups with the aim of assessing the effect of unregulated occupation-related physical activity on the muscle while identifying its relationships with known anthropometric variables.
Material and methods: Eighty apparently healthy males between the ages of 18 and 30 were recruited for the study and divided into two groups: a control group of 40 relatively inactive subjects who were students and an age-matched quasi-experimental group of 40 artisans (manual labourers). B-mode ultrasound was used to measure the thickness of the psoas major muscle at the point of maximum thickness.
Results: The mean PMMT for the control group was 31.74 ±7.91 mm and did not significantly correlate with body mass index (r = –0.151, p < 0.05), body surface area (r = –0.255, p > 0.05), height (r = –0.186, p > 0.05), weight
(r = –0.244, p > 0.05), or age (r = 0.159, p > 0.05). However, PMMT was significantly greater in the artisan group (40.10 ±4.89 mm) than in the control group (31.74 ±7.91 mm) at p < 0.05.
Conclusions: This result is an obvious indication of the effect of unregulated occupation-related physical activity on the muscle, which may lead to a gradual alteration of normal lumbopelvic mechanics in these individuals.
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Juker D, McGill SM, Kropf P, Steffen T. Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of lumbar portions of psoas and abdominal wall during a wide variety of tasks. J Med Sci Sports 1998; 30: 301-10.
 
2.
Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine 2002; 27: e29-36.
 
3.
Little TL, Mamser J. Low back pain associated with internal snapping hip syndrome in competitive cyclist. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 308-9.
 
4.
Aagard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, et al. A mechanism foe increased contractile strength of human pinnate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscles architecture. J Physiol 2001; 53: 613-23.
 
5.
Quint U, Wilke HJ, Shirazi AA, Parniapour M, Loer F, Claes LE. Importance of the stability of the lumbar spine. Spine 1998; 23: 1937-45.
 
6.
Johston CAM, Wiley JP, Lindsay DM, Wiseman DA. Iliopsoas bursitis and tendinitis: a review. Sports Med 1998; 25: 271-83.
 
7.
LaBan MM. Iliopsoas weakness: a clinical sign of lumbar spinal stenosis. Am J Physiol Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 224-5.
 
8.
Wild JJ, Neal D. Use of high frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes of texture in living tissue. Lancet 1957; 1: 655-7.
 
9.
Fornage BD. The cause for ultrasound of muscles and tendons. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000; 4: 375-91.
 
10.
Bogduk N, Pearcy M, Hadfield G. Anatomy and biomechanics of psoas major. J Clin Biomech 1992; 7: 109-19.
 
11.
Egwu OA, Njoku CO, Ewunonu EO, Ukoha UU, Eteudo N, Mgbechi CE. Assessment of massteter muscle thickness in adult nigeraian population: an ultrasound based study. Int J Biomed Res 2012; 3: 143-6.
 
12.
Nourbakhsh MR, Arab AM. Relationship between mechanical factors and incidence of low back pain. J Orthoped Sports Phys Therapy 2002; 32: 447-60.
 
13.
Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J. Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain: scientific maneuvers. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 753-60.
 
14.
Petrous P. Ultrasound of muscles. Eur J Radiol 2002; 12: 35-43.
 
15.
Egwu OA, Bello E, Njoku CO. In vivo assessment of the diaphragm in young male healthy adults: occupation-based activity-related differences. Studia Medyczne 2014; 30: 221-7.
 
16.
Sofia B, Anna N, Marita H, Christer S, Yiva A. Ultrasound evaluation in combination with figer force measurements of the forearm musculus extensor digitorum communis in healthy subjects. BMC Med Imaging 2008; 8: 1-4.
 
17.
Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sarageant AJ. In vivo measurement of tricips surea complex architecture in man: implication of muscles fuction. J Physiol 1998; 2: 603-14.
 
18.
Sigrid P. Skeletal muscle ultrasound. Eur Translat J Myology 2010; 1: 145-55.
 
19.
Rutherford MO, Jones DA. Measurement of fiber pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps In vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 65: 433-7.
 
ISSN:2451-0637
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top