About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Ethics in publishing
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Our reviewers
Ethics in publishing
Guide for reviewers
Books and Events
Books
Events
ORIGINAL PAPER
Assessment of the sensorimotor integration development in primary school children from Wroclaw, Poland: a prospective observational study
1
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland
2
Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Submission date: 2021-04-07
Acceptance date: 2021-08-11
Publication date: 2022-06-06
Physiother Quart. 2022;30(4):7-13
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Senses are essential in the development of psychomotor functioning in healthy 7-year-old children who enter school. The aim of the study was to assess the level of sensorimotor integration in children starting school education.
Methods:
The study involved 82 children from primary schools. The first examination (T1) was carried out at the beginning of the 2018/2019 school year; the second examination (T2) was performed after a 6-month interval. The level of sensorimotor integration development was measured by the Southern California Sensory Integration Test (SCSIT) in 11 sensory categories.
Results:
In 10 out of the 11 SCSIT tests, the children obtained statistically significantly higher mean results after 6 months of education (T2) than at the beginning of the school year (T1) (p < 0.05). The scores achieved at T1 in SCSIT showed that the following risks of sensorimotor integration disorders were found most often: deep sensation disorders (kinaesthesia test) among 13.4% of the children and incorrect processing of superficial feeling (graphesthesia test) among 12.2%.
Conclusions:
The beginning of early childhood education is a difficult period for children to adapt to school requirements. With 7-year-old children starting school education, attention should be paid to their potential difficulties related to abnormalities in deep sensation, especially kinaesthesia (orientation in the positioning of the body parts) and graphesthesia (ability to ‘read’ shapes).
Senses are essential in the development of psychomotor functioning in healthy 7-year-old children who enter school. The aim of the study was to assess the level of sensorimotor integration in children starting school education.
Methods:
The study involved 82 children from primary schools. The first examination (T1) was carried out at the beginning of the 2018/2019 school year; the second examination (T2) was performed after a 6-month interval. The level of sensorimotor integration development was measured by the Southern California Sensory Integration Test (SCSIT) in 11 sensory categories.
Results:
In 10 out of the 11 SCSIT tests, the children obtained statistically significantly higher mean results after 6 months of education (T2) than at the beginning of the school year (T1) (p < 0.05). The scores achieved at T1 in SCSIT showed that the following risks of sensorimotor integration disorders were found most often: deep sensation disorders (kinaesthesia test) among 13.4% of the children and incorrect processing of superficial feeling (graphesthesia test) among 12.2%.
Conclusions:
The beginning of early childhood education is a difficult period for children to adapt to school requirements. With 7-year-old children starting school education, attention should be paid to their potential difficulties related to abnormalities in deep sensation, especially kinaesthesia (orientation in the positioning of the body parts) and graphesthesia (ability to ‘read’ shapes).
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Ayres AJ. Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1978.
2.
Grzywniak C. Neuropsychological maturity for school learning of six and seven-year-old children [in Polish]. Kraków: Scriptum; 2013.
3.
Taman FD, Kervancioglu P, Kervancioglu AS, Turhan B. The importance of volume and area fractions of cerebellar volume and vermian subregion areas: a stereological study on MR images. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020;36(1):165–171; doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04369-9.
4.
Chen J, Wu E-D, Chen X, Zhu L-H, Li X, Thorn F, et al. Rapid integration of tactile and visual information by a newly sighted child. Curr Biol. 2016;26(8):1069–1074; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.065.
5.
Dionne-Dostie E, Paquette N, Lassonde M, Gallagher A. Multisensory integration and child neurodevelopment. Brain Sci. 2015;5(1):32–57; doi: 10.3390/brainsci5010032.
6.
Bremner AJ, Spence C. The development of tactile perception. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2017;52:227–268; doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.12.002.
7.
Stephen JM, Romero L, Zhang T, Okada Y. Auditory and somatosensory integration in infants. Int Congr Ser. 2007;1300:107–110; doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2007.01.041.
8.
Matyja M, Osińska A, Rejdak K, Zawisza E. The assessment of sensory integration in infants in the course of neurodevelopmental treatment [in Polish]. Child Neurol. 2006;15(29):27–34.
9.
Lane SJ, Ivey CK, May-Benson TA. Test of Ideational Praxis (TIP): preliminary findings and interrater and test-retest reliability with preschoolers. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(5):555–561; doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.012542.
10.
Stańczyk M. Sensory integration disorders and learning difficulties. Życie Szkoły. 2014;3:10–13.
11.
Holley PA. Why do some children learn more easily than others? Physical factors influencing effective learning. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2011.
12.
Przyrowski Z. Sensory integration. Theory, diagnosis, and therapy [in Polish]. Warszawa: Empis; 2013.
13.
Ayres AJ. Southern California Sensory Integration Tests: manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1980.
14.
Barutchu A, Crewther DP, Crewther SG. The race that precedes coactivation: development of multisensory facilitation in children. Dev Sci. 2009;12(3):464–473; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00782.x.
15.
Dekker TM, Ban H, van der Velde B, Sereno MI, Welchman AE, Nardini M. Late development of cue integration is linked to sensory fusion in cortex. Curr Biol. 2015;25(21):2856–2861; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.043.
16.
Nardini M, Bedford R, Mareschal D. Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(39):17041–17046; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001699107.
17.
Gori M, Sandini G, Burr D. Development of visuo-auditory integration in space and time. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012;6:77; doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00077.
18.
Hillock AR, Powers AR, Wallace NT. Binding of sights and sounds: age-related changes in multisensory temporal processing. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(3):461–467; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.041.
19.
Brodoehl S, Klingner C, Stieglitz K, Witte OW. Age-related changes in the somatosensory processing of tactile stimulation: an fMRI study. Behav Brain Res. 2013;238:259–264; doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.038.
20.
Condon C, Cremin K. Static balance norms in children. Physiother Res Int. 2014;19(1):1–7; doi: 10.1002/pri.1549.
21.
De Miguel-Etayo P, Gracia-Marco L, Ortega FB, Intemann T, Foraita R, Lissner L, et al. Physical fitness reference standards in European children: the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes. 2014;38(Suppl. 2):S57–S66; doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.136.
22.
Smits-Engelsman B, Duysens J. The line copy task for kinesthesia and internal movement representation: application in children. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27(5):682–694; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.03.005.
23.
Kagerer FA, Clark JE. Development of interactions between sensorimotor representations in school-aged children. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;34:164–177; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.02.001.
24.
Barela JA, Dias JL, Godoi D, Viana AR, de Freitas PB. Postural control and automaticity in dyslexic children: the relationship between visual information and body sway. Res Dev Disabl. 2011;32(5):1814–1821; doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.011.
25.
Chang Y-S, Gratiot M, Owen JP, Brandes-Aitken A, Desai SS, Hill SS, et al. White matter microstructure is associated with auditory and tactile processing in children with and without sensory processing disorder. Front Neuroanat. 2016;9:169; doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00169.
26.
Hong SY, Jung N-H, Kim KM. The correlation between proprioception and handwriting legibility in children. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2849–2851; doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.2849.
27.
Ebied AM, Kemp GJ, Frostick SP. The role of cutaneous sensation in the motor function of the hand. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):862–866; doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.12.005.
28.
Falk TH, Tam C, Schwellnus H, Chau T. Grip force variability and its effects on children’s handwriting legibility, form, and strokes. J Biomech Eng. 2010;132(11):114504; doi: 10.1115/1.4002611.
29.
Tse LFL, Thanapalan KC, Chan CCH. Visual-perceptual-kinesthetic inputs on influencing writing performances in children with handwriting difficulties. Res Dev Disabl. 2014;35(2):340–347; doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.013.
30.
Heep-Reymond M-C, Chakarov V, Schulte-Mönting J, Huethe F, Kristeva R. Role of proprioception and vision in handwriting. Brain Res Bull. 2009;79(6):365–370; doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.05.013.
31.
Mailloux Z, Mulligan S, Smith Roley S, Blanche E, Cermak S, Geppert Coleman G, et al. Verification and clarification of patterns of sensory integrative dysfunction. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(2):143–151; doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000752.
32.
May-Benson TA, Smith Roley S, Mailloux Z, Parham LD, Koomar J, Schaaf RC, et al. Interrater reliability and discriminative validity of the structural elements of the Ayres Sensory Integration Fidelity Measure. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(5):506–513; doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.010652.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
