Full text
2/2026
vol. 28
Original paper
Biopsychosocial predictors of improvement in outpatient physiotherapy for chronic low back pain
Department for Physical Therapy, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Faculty of Health Sciences, Libertas International University, Zagreb, Croatia
Alma Mater Europea – AMEU, Maribor, Slovenia
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Croatia
University Centre Varaždin, University North, Varaždin, Croatia
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2026; 28(2): 150–157
Data publikacji online: 2026/06/22
- Duarte ST, Nunes C, Costa D, et al. Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12(4): e053848.
- Duarte ST, Moniz A, Costa D, et al. Low back pain management in primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review on models of care. BMJ Open 2024; 14(5): e079276.
- Traeger A, Buchbinder R, Harris I, et al. Diagnosis and management of low-back pain in primary care. CMAJ 2017; 189(45): E1386–E1395.
- Schuster S, Lončarić Kelečić I, Bilić M, et al. Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study. Croat Med J 2024; 65(6): 473–482.
- Mihlberg E, Arnbak BAM. Prognostic factors for long-term improvement in pain and disability among patients with persistent low back pain. Chiropr Man Therap 2024; 32(1): 26.
- Vidal R, Grotle M, Johnsen MB, et al. Prediction models for outcomes in people with low back pain receiving conservative treatment: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2025; 177: 111593.
- Ahmed S, Visca R, Gogovor A, et al. Implementation of an integrated primary care prevention and management program for chronic low back pain (LBP): patient-reported outcomes and predictors of pain interference after six months. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24(1): 611.
- Petrelis M, Krekoukias G, Michopoulos I, et al. Predictors for Poor Outcomes at Six Months on Pain, Disability, Psychological and Health Status in Greek Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain After Receiving Physiotherapy: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Pract 2025; 15(3): 63.
- Jhangiani RS, Chiang ICA, Cuttler C, et al. Research Methods in Psychology. Surrey–Richmond–Langley–Cloverdale: Kwantlen Polytechnic University; 2019.
- Curtis EA, Comiskey C, Dempsey O. Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Res 2016; 23(6): 20–25.
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA 2013; 310(20): 2191–2194.
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Calculate Your Body Mass Index – Metric BMI Calculator [cited 10.11.2025]. Available from URL: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmi-m.htm.
- Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 2006; 15(1): S17.
- Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30(11): 1331–1334.
- Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94(2): 149–158.
- Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive meas-ure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8(2): 1441–1444.
- Jurinić A, Graberski-Matasović M, Pogorelić M. [Reability of the Croatian version of Rolland-Morris Questionnarie in functional evaluation of persons with mechanically caused low-back pain]. In: Jurinić A, ed. Od struke do profesije. Zagreb: Croatian Society of Physiotherapists; 2002: 87–92 (in Croatian).
- Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, et al. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disa-bility Questionnaire for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(1): 45–52.
- Macedo LG, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Responsiveness of the 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(3): 458.
- EuroQol Group. EQ-5D User Guides – EQ-5D [cited 10.11.2025]. Available from URL: https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides/.
- Soer R, Reneman MF, Speijer BL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine J 2012; 12(11): 1035–1039.
- Hout B, Van, Janssen MF, Feng YS, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health 2012; 15(5): 708–715.
- Cheng LJ, Chen LA, Cheng JY, et al. Systematic review reveals that EQ-5D minimally important differences vary with treatment type and may decrease with increasing baseline score. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 174: 111487.
- Nolan CM, Longworth L, Lord J, et al. The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: Validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference. Thorax 2016; 71(6): 493–500.
- Pate JW, Simons LE, Rush G, et al. The concept of pain inventory for adults (COPI-adult). Clin J Pain 2022; 38(1): 32–40.
- Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, et al. Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Ann Card Anaesth 2019; 22(1): 67.
- Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod 2013; 38(1): 52.
- Hernandez G, Garin O, Dima AL, et al. EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) Validity in Assessing the Quality of Life in Adults With Asthma: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21(1): e10178.
- Min-Sun K, Chan-Jeoung P, Seung N, et al. Effective and Practical Complete Blood Count Delta Check Method and Criteria for the Quality Control of Automated Hematology Analyzers. Ann Lab Med 2023; 43(5): 418–424.
- Brydges CR. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology. Innov Aging 2019; 3(4): igz036.
- Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112(1): 155–159.
- Alkubaisi S, Abdulghafor Y. Patient perspectives on choosing hospitals over primary healthcare clinics: barriers and preferences in health service utilization. Fam Med Prim Care Rev 2025; 27(3): 275–279.
- Keen S, Lomeli-Rodriguez M, Williams ACC. Exploring how people with chronic pain understand their pain: a qualitative study. Scand J Pain 2021; 21(4): 743–753.
- Ram A, Booth J, Thom JM, et al. Are Improvements in Pain Neurophysiology Knowledge Following Pain Science Edu-cation Associated With Improved Outcomes in People With Chronic Pain?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain 2023; 39(1): 41–52.
- Wand BM, Cashin AG, McAuley JH, et al. The Fit-for-Purpose Model: Conceptualizing and Managing Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain as an Information Problem. Phys Ther 2023; 103(2): pzac151.
- Bunzli S, Smith A, Schütze R, et al. Making Sense of Low Back Pain and Pain-Related Fear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47(9): 628–636.
- Zhao X, Boersma K, Gerdle B, et al. Fear network and pain extent: Interplays among psychological constructs related to the fear-avoidance model. J Psychosom Res 2023; 167: 111176.
Copyright: © 2026 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.