eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2023
vol. 18
 
Share:
Share:
Thoracic surgery
Systematic review/Meta-analysis

Comparison between preoperative hook-wire and liquid material localization for pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

Si-Jia Wang
1
,
Xing-Xing Gao
2
,
Hui Hui
2
,
Na Li
2
,
Yun Zhou
2
,
Hai-Tao Yin
1

  1. Department of Radiotherapy, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
  2. Department of Radiotherapy, First Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
Videosurgery Miniinv 2023; 18 (3): 401–409
Online publish date: 2023/08/04
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Computed tomography (CT) scans routinely identify pulmonary nodules (PNs) during lung cancer screenings [13]. For PNs with a high risk of malignancy, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is commonly suggested for comprehensive resection, demonstrating lower morbidity and reduced hospital stay than thoracotomy [4]. However, challenges arise when PNs are diminutive (< 10 mm in diameter) or situated in deep regions > 5 mm from the pleura. In such instances, the lack of precise nodule identification can result in approximately 63% of VATS procedures converting to thoracotomy [5]. Consequently, preoperative localization of PNs becomes critical for guiding precise VATS resections [6, 7].

Numerous localization materials, including hook-wire (HW), coil, radio-label, localization needle, and various liquid materials (LMs), are employed in preoperative PN localization [710]. The most commonly used are HW and LMs [1117]. However, comparisons between the safety, successful localization rate, and postoperative outcomes between HW localization (HWL) and LMs localization (LML) remain inconclusive. Thus, a gap exists for a more detailed meta-analysis focusing on comparative studies to assess the relative safety and efficacy of HWL and LML in VATS-based PN resection.

Aim

This meta-analysis aimed to juxtapose the safety and effectiveness of preoperative CT-guided localization of PNs using HW and LM.

Material and methods

Study selection

This meta-analysis, registered at INPLASY.COM under reference number INPLASY202350082, was executed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [18].

The PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify relevant studies published as of March 2023 using the following strategy: “(((hook wire) AND (((((glue) OR (lipiodol)) OR (blood)) OR (indocyanine green)) OR (blue))) AND (nodule)) AND ((lung) OR (pulmonary)).”

The criteria for the inclusion of studies were as follows:

  1. The studies should be comparative in nature.

  2. The studies shoiuld involve patients with PNs.

  3. The interventions under consideration should be preoperative HWL vs. LML.

  4. There were no language restrictions for the studies.

Conversely, studies were excluded based on the following criteria:

  1. If the study was not comparative in nature.

  2. If the study did not implement CT-guided localization.

  3. If the publication was a case report, letter, or review.

Data extraction

Data pertinent to the study were extracted independently by 2 authors from eligible studies. Discrepancies that arose were resolved by consultation with a third author. The baseline data extracted comprised the country, year of publication, first author, patient count, study design, gender ratio, age, PN count, PN-pleura distance, and PN diameter. The outcome data included technical success rates for localization, total complication rate, localization duration, pneumothorax rate, pulmonary haemorrhage rate, duration of VATS, and length of postoperative hospital stay.

Quality assessment

The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was employed to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This involved assigning a risk of bias (low, high, or unclear), including reporting, selection, detection, attrition, performance, and other forms of bias. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) [19] was utilized for non-RCTs. The scale allocated points based on 3 criteria: selection (4 points), exposure (3 points), and comparability (2 points). A study with a NOS score of 7 or higher indicates a high-quality study.

Definitions

Technical success for HWL was defined as the visibility of the HW without dislodgement, whereas for LML, technical success was denoted by the visibility of the LM on the lung surface without diffusion away from the injection site [14]. The duration of localization was defined as the interval between the moment the patient was positioned on the CT bed and the successful insertion of the localization materials [20]. The extent of VATS was operationally defined as the interval between the commencement of the incision and the final closure of the wound [20]. The duration of hospital stay after surgery was defined as the period between the completion of VATS and the discharge of the patient [20].

Statistical analysis

The meta-analysis and associated analyses were executed using RevMan v5.3 and Stata v12.0. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for categorical data, while continuous data were evaluated using pooled mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was appraised using the I2 statistic and Q test, with an I2 greater than 50% signifying significant heterogeneity. Random-effect models were employed in cases of significant heterogeneity, whereas fixed-effect models were utilized otherwise. Sensitivity analyses were performed using a “leave one out” approach to identify sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted using different LMs (methylene blue, indocyanine green, and medical glue). Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05.

Results

Study selection

The flowchart of this meta-analysis is shown in Figure 1. A total of 7 studies were included in this meta-analysis from 142 relevant studies. Of the 7 studies, 6 studies were retrospective [1115, 17], and one study was a prospective non-RCT [16] (Table I). These 7 studies were from several countries, including China, the USA, and Korea. These 7 studies included 551 patients (583 PNs) who had undergone CT-guided HWL and 551 patients (612 PNs) who had undergone LML (Table II). As the LMs, methylene blue [11, 13], indocyanine green [12, 14], medical glue [15, 17], and lipiodol [16] were used by 2, 2, 2, and 1 study, respectively. All 7 studies exhibited NOS scores of 8.

Figure 1

Meta-analysis flow chart

/f/fulltexts/WIITM/51204/WIITM-18-51204-g001_min.jpg
Table I

Baseline data of the included studies

First authorYearCountryDesignNOS
Chu [11]2022ChinaRetrospective8
Ding [12]2021ChinaRetrospective8
Kleedehn [13]2016USARetrospective8
Lin [14]2022ChinaRetrospective8
Pan [15]2020ChinaRetrospective8
Park [16]2020KoreaProspective non-randomized trial8
Zhang [17]2022ChinaRetrospective8

[i] NOS – Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Table II

Baseline data of the patients in the included studies

AuthorGroupsLiquid materialsPatients (n)Age [years]M/FNodules (n)Nature of nodules (solid/GGN)Diameter [mm]Lesion-pleura distant [mm]
Chu [11]Hook-wireMethylene blue1075443/64135Not given89
Liquid11254.541/71151Not given910
Ding [12]Hook-wireIndocyanine green9253.126/669513/826.78.4
Liquid6551.316/498513/726.39.2
Kleedehn [13]Hook-wireMethylene blue5260.316/3652Not given109.2
Liquid5762.625/3257Not given10.614.7
Lin [14]Hook-wireIndocyanine green4149.69/32424/3878.8
Liquid5348.212/41555/506.811.1
Pan [15]Hook-wireMedial glue6058.739/2160Not given10.33.8
Liquid6055.535/2560Not given11.33
Park [16]Hook-wireLipiodol12559.664/61125All GGN13.817.2
Liquid12060.950/70120All GGN15.019.5
Zhang [17]Hook-wireMedial glue745138/3674Not given9.420.6
Liquid8448.935/4984Not given1018

[i] M – male, F – female, GGN – ground-glass nodule.

Successful localization rates

Six studies reported successful localization rates [1217], with 445 and 441 PNs localized via HW and LM, respectively. The pooled successful localization rate was significantly higher in the LM group (LMG) (99.8%) than in the HW group (HWG) (99.8% vs. 96.0%, OR = 17; 95% CI: 0.05–0.53; p = 0.002, Figure 2 A). There was no significant heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 0%). The risk of publication bias was not significant (p = 0.077).

Figure 2

Pooled results for successful localization rates (A), the duration of localization (B), total complication rates (C), pneumothorax rates (D) in the LM and HW groups Pulmonary haemorrhage rates (E), VATS procedure duration (F), and postoperative hospital stay (G), in the LM and HW groups

/f/fulltexts/WIITM/51204/WIITM-18-51204-g002_min.jpg

Localization duration

Six studies reported the localization duration [11, 12, 1417], including 499 and 494 patients who underwent HWL and LML, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of the pooled localization duration (MD: –0.75; 95% CI: –2.68 to 1.18; p = 0.45, Figure 2 B). There was substantial heterogeneity noted among the studies (I2 = 93%), but no single study was identified as the source of this heterogeneity based on the sensitivity analyses conducted. The risk of publication bias was not significant (p = 0.835).

Total complication rate

Five studies reported the total complication rates [1114, 16], including 445 and 446 patients who underwent HWL and LML, respectively. The pooled total complication rate was substantially lower in the LMG (28.7%) than in the HWG (37.8%) (OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.12–2.04; p = 0.007, Figure 2 C). There was no significant heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 36%). The risk of publication bias was not significant (p = 0.124).

Pneumothorax rate

Six studies reported pneumothorax rates [11, 1317], including 487 and 525 patients who underwent HWL and LML, respectively. The pooled pneumothorax rates were comparable (24.4% vs. 18.7%) between the 2 groups (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 0.85–2.89; p = 0.15, Figure 2 D). The heterogeneity was significant (I2 = 66%), and the sensitivity analysis indicated that the source of significant heterogeneity was Park’s study [16]. However, when removing Park’s study [16], the pooled pneumothorax rate was significantly lower in the LMG than in the HWG (10.7% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.02). The risk of publication bias was not significant (p = 0.535).

Pulmonary haemorrhage rate

Six studies reported pulmonary haemorrhage rates [11, 1317], including 487 and 525 patients who underwent HWL and LML, respectively. The pooled pulmonary haemorrhage rate was substantially higher in the HWG (17.9%) than that in the LMG (5.7%) (OR = 3.79; 95% CI: 2.43–5.92; p < 0.0001, Figure 2 E), with no significance heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). The risk of publication bias was not significant (p = 0.159).

VATS duration

Three studies reported the VATS duration [11, 14, 16], including 270 and 285 patients who underwent HWL and LML, respectively. Pooled VATS duration was comparable between the 2 groups (MD = 1.39; 95% CI: –6.78–9.56; p = 0.74, Figure 2 F), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 39%). The risk of publication bias was not significant (p = 0.727).

Postoperative hospital stay

Two studies reported the duration of postoperative stay [11, 14], including 148 and 165 patients who underwent HWL and LML, respectively. Pooled postoperative stay duration was significantly lower in the LMG than in the HWG (MD = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.20–1.38; p = 0.009, Figure 2 G), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 37%). The risk of publication bias was not significant in the funnel plot.

Subgroup analyses

Table III shows the subgroup analysis based on the studies that compared HW with methylene blue localization. Three endpoints (pulmonary haemorrhage rates, pneumothorax, and total complication) could be pooled. The pooled total complication and pulmonary haemorrhage rates were significantly lower in the LMG than in the HWG. However, the pooled pneumothorax rates were comparable between the 2 groups.

Table III

Meta-analytic pooled results based on the studies based on hook-wire vs. methylene blue localization

VariableNumber of studiesOR/MD (95% CI), pHeterogeneity (I2)Favour
Total complication rate21.75 (1.02–3.00), 0.040%Liquid
Pneumothorax rate21.62 (0.90–2.91), 0.110%
Pulmonary haemorrhage rate26.53 (1.65–25.95), 0.0080%Liquid

[i] OR – odds ratio, MD – mean difference.

Table IV shows the subgroup analysis based on the studies that compared HW with indocyanine green localization. Three endpoints (technical success rate, localization duration, and total complication rate) could be pooled. All the 3 endpoints showed comparable values between the 2 groups.

Table IV

Meta-analytic pooled results based on the studies based on hook-wire vs. indocyanine green localization

VariableNumber of studiesOR/MD (95% CI), pHeterogeneity (I2)Favour
Technical success rate20.18 (0.02–1.59), 0.120%
Duration of localization21.61 (–2.12–5.34), 0.4088%
Total complication rate21.64 (0.97–2.78), 0.0778%

[i] OR – odds ratio, MD – mean difference.

Table V shows the subgroup analysis based on the studies that compared HW with medical glue localization. Four endpoints (localization duration, total complication, pneumothorax, and pulmonary haemorrhage rates) could be pooled. The pooled pulmonary haemorrhage rate was substantially lower in the LMG than in the HWG. However, the remaining 3 endpoints showed comparable values between the 2 groups.

Table V

Meta-analytic pooled results based on the studies based on hook-wire vs. medical glue localization

ParameterNumber of studiesOR/MD (95% CI), pHeterogeneity (I2)Favour
Duration of localization2–2.71 (–5.41– –0.01), 0.0584%
Total complication rate20.18 (0.02–1.58), 0.120%
Pneumothorax rate21.61 (0.21–12.57), 0.6579%
Pulmonary haemorrhage rate23.62 (1.06–12.35), 0.0462%Liquid

[i] OR – odds ratio, MD – mean difference.

Discussion

This meta-analysis compared the relative efficacy and safety of preoperative CT-guided HWL and LML for PNs. The results showed that LM was superior to HW in technical success and complication rates.

Technical success is critical for CT-guided localization, and the causes for technical failure vary based on the type of material used. With HW, the primary cause of failure is dislodgement or migration, whereas with LMs the main issue is diffusion [21, 22]. In this meta-analysis, the pooled rate of successful localization was notably higher in the group using LM compared to the group using HW. The technical success rate was notably high at 99.8% in the LMG, suggesting that LMs may be more effective than HW in localizing PNs. Factors contributing to HW dislodgement or migration include the incomplete release of the hook and patients’ respiratory movements [22]. However, the technical failure of LML can be mitigated by controlling the volume of the localization material [21].

Although the localization duration for both HW and LMs was comparable in this meta-analysis, significant heterogeneity was detected for this particular point (I2 = 93%), which questions the reliability of this finding. The variability in localization duration across different studies could be due to the varying experience levels of radiologists performing these procedures at different centres.

In comparing pooled total complication rates, it was found that LML is safer than HWL. Complications linked to localization primarily include pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage. The higher complication rate following HWL could be due to factors like dislodgement of the HW [23] and the rigid nature of the HW. This meta-analysis found that while the initial pooled pneumothorax rates were similar between the 2 groups, upon revising the significant heterogeneity, the pneumothorax rate was still significantly lower in the LMG.

The duration of the VATS procedure was comparable between the 2 groups, implying that neither of the localization methods adversely affected the operative parameters. Even though the pooled postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LMG than in the HWG, this result should be further validated because only 2 studies were considered for this endpoint.

Subgroup analysis based on different LMs (methylene blue, medical glue, and indocyanine green) suggested that these LMs have a better safety profile than the HW. Even though no significant difference was seen in the total complication rate between indocyanine green and HW, a p-value of 0.07 indicated a tendency towards safer outcomes with the LM.

Nonetheless, this meta-analysis has several limitations. Firstly, the absence of any included RCTs could potentially bias the analysis results. Secondly, using different LMs in the studies could introduce additional bias, even though a subgroup analysis was performed based on different LMs. Finally, the majority of the investigations encompassed in this meta-analysis were executed in countries situated in Asia. Subsequent meta-analytic studies ought to endeavour to incorporate information from diverse global regions to expand the generalizability of the results.

Conclusions

The findings in this meta-analysis suggest that CT-guided LML is safer and more successful than HWL for patients with PNs before VATS resection.

Acknowledgments

Hai-Tao Yin and Yun Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Godoy MCB, Odisio EGLC, Truong MT, et al. Pulmonary nodule management in lung cancer screening: a pictorial review of lung-RADS Version 1.0. Radiol Clin North Am 2018; 56: 353-63.

2 

McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 910-9.

3 

Becker N, Motsch E, Trotter A, et al. Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening-Results from the randomized German LUSI trial. Int J Cancer 2020; 146: 1503-13.

4 

Wang JL, Xia FF, Dong AH, et al. Comparison between coil and hook-wire localization before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Videosurgery Miniinv 2022; 17: 441-9.

5 

Suzuki K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules: indications for preoperative marking. Chest 1999; 115: 563-8.

6 

Nardini M, Dunning J. Pulmonary nodules precision localization techniques. Future Oncol 2020; 16: 15-9.

7 

Park CH, Han K, Hur J, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of preoperative lung localization for pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2017; 151: 316-28.

8 

Ai M, Xu J. Computed tomography-guided simultaneous coil localization of multiple pulmonary nodules before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Videosurgery Miniinv 2022; 17: 245-51.

9 

Huang YY, Liu X, Shi YB, et al. Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for lung nodules: localization needle versus coil. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2022; 31: 948-53.

10 

Tang X, Jian HM, Guan Y, et al. Computed tomography-guided localization for multiple pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis. Videosurgery Miniinv 2021; 16: 641-7.

11 

Chu S, Wei N, Lu D, et al. Comparative study of the effect of preoperative hookwire and methylene blue localization techniques on post-operative hospital stay and complications in thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule surgery. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22: 336.

12 

Ding N, Wang K, Cao J, et al. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence imaging with iodized indocyanine green in preoperative pulmonary localization: comparative efficacy, safety, patient perception with hook-wire localization. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 707425.

13 

Kleedehn M, Kim DH, Lee FT, et al. Preoperative pulmonary nodule localization: a comparison of methylene blue and hookwire techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 1334-9.

14 

Lin J, Wang LF, Wu AL, et al. Preoperative lung nodule localization: comparison of hook-wire and indocyanine green. Videosurgery Miniinv 2023; 18: 149-56.

15 

Pan Y, Yu H, Lu W, et al. A comparative study of hook wire and medical glue injection in pulmonary nodule surgery. J Med Imaging 2020; 30: 2209-12.

16 

Park CH, Lee SM, Lee JW, et al. Hook-wire localization versus lipiodol localization for patients with pulmonary lesions having ground-glass opacity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 159: 1571-9.e2.

17 

Zhang H, Li Y, Chen X, et al. Comparison of hook-wire and medical glue for CT-guided preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 922573.

18 

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 1.

19 

Cook DA, Reed DA. Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education. Acad Med 2015; 90: 1067-76.

20 

Du J, Fu YF, Lv YN. Preoperative localization for lung nodules: a meta-analysis of bronchoscopic versus computed tomography guidance. Videosurgery Miniinv 2022; 17: 601-10.

21 

Park CH, Han K, Hur J, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of preoperative lung localization for pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2017; 151: 316-28.

22 

Yang Y, Qin C, Ma Y, et al. Application of computed tomography-guided hook-wire localization technique in thoracoscopic surgery for small pulmonary nodules (≤ 10 mm). J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 18: 99.

23 

Nakashima S, Watanabe A, Obama T, et al. Need for preoperative computed tomography-guided localization in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pulmonary resections of metastatic pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 212-8.

Copyright: © 2023 Fundacja Videochirurgii This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
  
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.