eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


1/2018
vol. 13
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Cosmetic effects of skin-crease camouflage incision versus longitudinal incision following carotid endarterectomy

Arkadiusz Kazimierczak, Anita Rybicka, Pawel Rynio, Piotr Gutowski, Ireneusz Wiernicki

Videosurgery Miniinv 2018; 13 (1): 102–110
Online publish date: 2018/01/10
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
Despite the increasing use of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) nonetheless remains a more medically beneficial method of treatment for carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, one possibility for progress within this procedure may be to use minimally invasive carotid surgery, especially when the scar is in plain sight: the use of the natural wrinkles (skin crease) as a camouflage of the skin incision provides significant cosmetic improvements.

Aim
To compare the cosmetic effects of classic and trans-wrinkle CEA. To assess the distance between the carotid artery bifurcation (CAB) and the skin-crease incision whilst attempting CEA.

Material and methods
It was a randomized prospective study with two groups: patients undergoing classic surgery (control group; n = 100) and skin-crease trans-wrinkle camouflaged CEA (study group; n = 100). Follow-up was at 2 months and 1 year.

Results
The medical results of the treatment were similar in both groups. The cumulative count of strokes and myocardial infarctions was 0.5% within 30 days, and after one year 3.5% (and 5.5% including cases of death). The superiority of the transverse crease being hidden compared to the conventional longitudinal technique was proven in the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score, respectively 11.4 ±1.0 vs. 14.1 ±3.4 (p = 0.0001) after 2 months and 13.5 ±2.8 vs. 14.1 ±3.4 (p = 0.039) after a year.

Conclusions
Trans-wrinkle incision gives better cosmetic results, can be safely performed in most cases, and offers a comfortable approach during CEA.

keywords:

carotid endarterectomy, skin-crease incision, randomized control study, scar assessment

references:
Ascher E, Hingorani A, Marks N, et al. Mini skin incision for carotid endarterectomy (CEA): a new and safe alternative to the standard approach. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 1089-93.
De Troia A, Mosso F, Biasi L, et al. Carotid endarterectomy with mini-invasive access in locoregional anaesthesia. Acta Biomed l’Ateneo Parm 2008; 79: 123-7.
Dalsing MC. The training of carotid endarterectomy during an era of controversy. A personal experience. Am Surg 1990; 56: 476-86.
Mendes GAC, Zabramski JM, Elhadi AM, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: comparison of complications between transverse and longitudinal incision. Neurosurgery 2014; 75: 110-5.
Marcucci G, Antonelli R, Gabrielli R, et al. Short longitudinal versus transverse skin incision for carotid endarterectomy: Impact on cranial and cervical nerve injuries and esthetic outcome. J Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 52: 145-52.
Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1998; 97: 501-9.
Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 2006; 37: 577-617.
Christianson D, Rizzo D. Provision of Karnofsky performance score (KPS) versus ECOG performance score (ECOG PS) to CIBMTR, Forms Man. Append. L-Karnofsky/Lansky Perform. Status 2009; 1-5.
White SJ, Freedman LS. Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study. Br J Cancer 1978; 37: 849-57.
Kukowska A, Dziadziuszko R, Jassem J. Metody losowego przydziału leczenia w badaniach klinicznych. Onkologia 2005; 1: 151-6.
Langer K. On the anatomy and physiology of the skin – II. Skin Tension. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31: 93-106.
AbuRahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA. Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 1502-10.
Lawrence PF, Alves JC, Jicha D, et al. Incidence, timing, and causes of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27: 329-37.
Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YM, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1960-7.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 726-32.
Wachal K, Koczewski P, Gabriel M, et al. Isolated internal carotid artery dissection in a long-distance runner. Videosurgery Miniinv 2016; 11: 304-8.
Deck M, Kopriva D. Patient and observer scar assessment scores favour the late appearance of a transverse cervical incision over a vertical incision in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for stroke risk reduction. Can J Surg 2015; 58: 245-9.
Sajid MS, Vijaynagar B, Singh P, et al. Literature review of cranial nerve injuries during carotid endarterectomy. Acta Chir Belg 2007; 107: 25-8.
Stavrou D, Haik J, Weissman O, et al. Patient and observer scar assessment scale: how good is it? J Wound Care 2009; 18: 171-6.
Van Der Wal MBA, Tuinebreijer WE, Bloemen MCT, et al. Rasch analysis of the patient and o Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 13-23.
Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 1999; 30: 1751-8.
Hertzer NR, Feldman BJ, Beven EG, et al. A prospective study of the incidence of injury to the cranial nerves during carotid endarterectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980; 151: 781-4.
Evans WE, Mendelowitz DS, Liapis C, et al. Motor speech deficit following carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg 1982; 196: 461-4.
AbuRahma AF, Choueiri MA. Cranial and cervical nerve injuries after repeat carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32: 649-54.
  
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe