eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 13
General surgery
Original paper

Early closure of the protective ileostomy after rectal resection should become part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol: a randomized, prospective, two-center clinical trial

Stanisław Kłęk, Magdalena Pisarska, Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska, Tomasz Cegielny, Ryszard Choruz, Jerzy Sałówka, Piotr Szybinski, Michał Pędziwiatr

Videosurgery Miniinv 2018; 13 (4): 435–441
Online publish date: 2018/11/13
View full text
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
Protective loop ileostomy (PLI) is used to reduce the anastomotic leak rate after resection of the rectum. It is an effective, yet burdensome procedure contradicting the aims of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) by slowing down recovery. Early closure (EC) of the PLI has the potential to change the situation, and it should become part of ERAS.

To analyze the effectiveness of EC in ERAS patients.

Material and methods
A randomized clinical trial was performed between October the 1st, 2016 and December the 31st, 2017. Fifty-eight adult patients (24 females, 34 males, mean age: 55.7 and 56.2) operated on for rectal carcinoma according to the ERAS protocol with PLI were randomly assigned to the late (L) or early (E) closure group (14 days after discharge). Time to start adjuvant chemotherapy, complication rate, and health care costs were analyzed.

There were no significant differences between groups regarding the length of surgery (83.2 ±15.9 vs. 87.1 ±21.7 min, in E and L, respectively), intraoperative blood loss (15.2 ±7.5 vs. 17.3 ±11.1 ml, respectively), median hospital stay, or the time to pass flatus and stool. The difference in the time needed to start the adjuvant treatment (38.7 ±5.7 vs. 33.2 ±5.8 days, p < 0.01), was compensated by the reduction of time living with a stoma (17.2 vs. 299.0 days) and health care costs: (43.68 vs. 698.42 USD).

Early closure is a safe and effective therapeutic approach, improving the recovery. Therefore it should be implemented as part of the ERAS protocol for rectal cancer patients.


protective stomy, colorectal cancer, loop ileostomy

Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, et al. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 931-91.
Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, et al. Adherence to the ERAS protocol is associated with 5-year survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg 2016; 40: 1741-7.
Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 466-77.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 783-800.
Jannasch O, Klinge T, Otto R, et al. Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 34: 36884-93.
Klein M. Postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colorectal anastomotic leakage. NSAIDs and anastomotic leakage. Dan Med J 2012; 59: B4420.
Brown SR, Mathew R, Keding A, et al. The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 916-23.
Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, et al. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 76-81.
Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, et al. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 37-43.
den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1066-75.
Penninckx F. Anastomotic leakage: a disaster or a challenge with an impact on survival after rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 237-8.
Richards CH, Campbell V, Ho C, et al. Smoking is a major risk factor for anastomotic leak in patients undergoing low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 628-33.
Sajid MS, Ahamd A, Miles WF, B et al. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 209-19.
Damen N, Spilsbury K, Levitt M, et al. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 763-8.
Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, et al. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 51-7.
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, et al. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 462-79.
Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F, et al. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 1502-9.
Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55: 1562-7.
Huser N, Michalskie C, Erkan M, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of the role of the defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 52-60.
Robertson JP, Wells CI, Vather R, et al. Effect of diversion ileostomy on the occurrence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59: 194-200.
Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M, et al. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1011-7.
Menegaux F, Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N, et al. Closure of small bowel stomas on postoperative day 10. Eur J Surg 2002; 168: 713-5.
Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, et al. Early closure of a temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 284-90.
Robertson JP, Puckett J, Vather R, et al. Early closure of temporary loop ileostomies: a systematic review. Ostomy Wound Manage 2015; 61: 50-7.
Marjanovic G, Hopt TH Physiologie der Anastomosenheilung. Der Chirurg 2011; 82: 41-7.
Des Guetz G, Nicolas P, Perret GY, et al. Does delaying adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery for colorectal cancer impair survival? A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1049-55.
Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, et al. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 305: 2335-42.
Day AR, Middleton G, Smith RV, et al. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy following colorectal cancer resection is associated with an improved survival. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 368-72.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187-96.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37: 259-84.
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37: 285-305.
Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Kisielewski M, et al. ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes? Med Oncol 2016; 33: 56-9.
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe