eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2023
vol. 25
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes on the social health of patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD): a semi-experimental study

Mohammad Heidari
1
,
Parviz Nadimi Harandi
2
,
Jaefar Moghaddasi
3
,
Soleiman Kheiri
4
,
Amirhossein Azhari
5

  1. Community-Oriented Nursing Midwifery Research Center, Nursing and Midwifery School, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  3. Department of Adults and Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Modeling in Health Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  5. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine Chamran Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2023; 25(3): 283–287
Online publish date: 2023/09/30
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Golabchi A, Sokot Arani S, Mousavi G, et al. Comparison of the effect of video-training based technique by video and group discussion on the level of stress, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy of patients undergoing pacemaker and cardiac implantation defibrillator. JMIS 2019; 5(1): 12–20.
2. Pasyar N, Rambod M, Nikoo MH, et al. An Evaluation of the Association between Quality of Life and Psychological Issues in Patients with Automated Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. J Caring Sci 2022; 11(1): 28–35.
3. Hu J, Fitzgerald SM, Owen AJ, et al. Social isolation, social support, loneliness and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a cross-sectional study among older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36(11): 1795–1809.
4. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, et al. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 2016; 102(13): 1009–1016.
5. Pedersen SS, Spinder H, Erdman RA, et al. Poor perceived social support in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients and their partners: cross-validation of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Psychosomatics 2009; 50(5): 461–467.
6. NasrAbadi T, Sharafi S, FallahTafti B, et al. Investigating the effect of continuous care model on social health status of family caregivers in hospitalized patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JSSU 2016; 24(6): 513–523.
7. Davoodvand S, Haghighizadeh M, Elahi N. Effectiveness of short-term cardiac rehabilitation on clinical manifestations in post-MI Patients. Journal of Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery 2017; 15(3): 66–73.
8. Rotter I, Miko A, Hilicka Z, et al. Influence of chronic kidney disease on the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation in patients after cardiac surgery. Fam Med Prim Care Rev 2021; 23(4): 470–474.
9. Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2019; 140(1): e69–e89.
10. Mampuya WM. Cardiac rehabilitation past, present and future: an overview. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2012; 2(1): 38–49.
11. Salisbury C. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: the role of the community nurse. Nurs Stand 1996; 10(23): 49–51.
12. Oerkild B, Frederiksen M, Hansen JF, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is an attractive alternative to no cardiac rehabilitation for elderly patients with coronary heart disease: results from a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2012; 2(6): e001820.
13. Stefanakis M, Batalik L, Antoniou V, et al. Safety of home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Heart Lung 2022; 55: 117–126.
14. Denboba D, McPherson MG, Kenney MK, et al. Achieving family and provider partnerships for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 2006; 118(4): 1607–1615.
15. Thomas MJ, Simpson J, Riley R, et al. The impact of home-based physiotherapy interventions on breathlessness during activities of daily living in severe COPD: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2010; 96(2): 108–119.
16. Drwal KR, Forman DE, Wakefield BJ, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation during COVID-19 pandemic: highlighting the value of home-based programs. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26(11): 1322–1324.
17. Babapour Kheiroddin J, Toosi F, Hekmati I. Study of determinant factors role of students’ social well-being. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches 2010; 4(16): 1–19.
18. Borzou SR, Amiri S, Salavati M, et al. Comparing the effects of education of the first phase of cardiac rehabilitation on self-efficacy of men and women after heart surgery: a clinical trial study. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2017; 4(1): 52–58.
19. Lima AP, Nascimento IO, Oliveira ACA, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation in Brazil’s public health care: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8(11): e13901.
20. Du Q, Salem Y, Liu HH, et al. A home-based exercise program for children with congenital heart disease following interventional cardiac catheterization: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18(1): 1–9.
21. Vanhees L, Kornaat M, Defoor J, et al. Effect of exercise training in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Eur Heart J 2004; 25(13): 1120–1126.
22. Limoee K, MolaviNejad S, Asadizaker M, et al. Effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation on health related quality of life of patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Hayat 2019; 25(2): 124–137.
Copyright: © 2023 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.