eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2018
vol. 14
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Clinical research

Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial

David Rodriguez Sanz, Francisco Unda Solano, Daniel López López, Irene Sanz Corbalan, Carlos Romero Morales, Cesar Calvo Lobo

Arch Med Sci 2018; 14, 4: 871–879
Online publish date: 2017/09/26
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
Oral ibuprofen (OI) and median nerve neural mobilization (MNNM) are first line treatments for patients who suffer cervicobrachial pain (CP). OI may produce side effects which are not tolerated by all subjects who suffer CP, whereas MNNM has no known side effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of both treatments (OI vs. MNNM) in CP.

Material and methods
This investigation was a blinded parallel randomized clinical trial (NCT02593721). Sixty-two participants diagnosed with CP were recruited and randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 31), which received MNNM or 1200 mg/day OI treatment for 6 weeks. The numeric rating scale for pain intensity was the primary outcome. The cervical rotation range of motion (CROM) and the upper limb function were the secondary outcomes.

Results
The results showed that OI treatment (η2 = 0.612–0.755) was clearly superior to MNNM (η2 = 0.816–0.821) in all assessments (p < 0.05) except for the CROM device results, which were equivalent to those of the MNNM group (p > 0.05). Three subjects were discharged because of OI side effects.

Conclusions
Oral ibuprofen may be superior to MNNM for pain reduction and upper limb function increase of subjects with CP. Nevertheless, both treatments were effective. Median nerve neural mobilization may be considered an effective non-pharmaceutical treatment option in subjects with CP. Regarding OI adverse effects, our findings challenge the role of pharmacologic versus manual therapy as possible treatments that may improve pain intensity and upper limb functionality in subjects with CP.

keywords:

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, musculoskeletal manipulations, rehabilitation, upper extremity

references:
Huisstede BM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW, Verhaar JA. Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature. BMC Musculoskel Disord 2006; 7: 7.
Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 1994; 117: 325-35.
Daffner SD, Hilibrand AS, Hanscom BS, Brislin BT, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Impact of neck and arm pain on overall health status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 2030-5.
Cowell IM, Phillips DR. Effectiveness of manipulative physiotherapy for the treatment of a neurogenic cervicobrachial pain syndrome: a single case study – experimental design. Manip Ther 2002; 7: 31-8.
Salt E, Wright C, Kelly S, Dean A. A systematic literature review on the effectiveness of non-invasive therapy for cervicobrachial pain. Manip Ther 2011; 16: 53-65.
Eubanks JD. Cervical radiculopathy: nonoperative management of neck pain and radicular symptoms. Am Fam Phys 2010; 81: 33-40.
Peolsson A, Söderlund A, Engquist M. Physical function outcome in cervical radiculopathy patients after physiotherapy alone compared with anterior surgery followed by physiotherapy: a prospective randomized study with a 2- year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: 300-7.
Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J 2011; 7: 265-72.
Dillingham TR. Evaluating the patient with suspected radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 5: 41-9.
Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon J, Hayes M, Hammer B. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther 2011; 19: 135-42.
Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, Aguilera AJ, Snyder AR. Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 632-42.
De-la-Llave-Rincón A, Puentedura EJ, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Clinical presentation and manual therapy for upper quadrant musculoskeletal conditions. J Man Manip Ther 2011; 19: 201-11.
Asghar W, Jamali F. The effect of COX-2-selective meloxicam on the myocardial, vascular and renal risks: a systematic review. Inflammopharmacology 2015; 23: 1-16.
Clark BD, Barr AE, Safadi FF. Median nerve trauma in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorder. J Neurotrauma 2003; 20: 681-95.
Bove GM. Epi-perineurial anatomy innervation, and axonal nociceptive mechanisms. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008; 12: 185-90.
Elvery R. Brachial plexus tension test and the pathoanatomical origin of the arm pain. In: Aspects of Manipulative Therapy. Idezak R (ed.). Lincoln Institute of Health Science, Melbourne 1979; 105-10.
Elliot MB, Barr AE, Kietrys DM, AL-Shatti T, Amin M, Barbe MF. Peripheral neuritis and increased spinal cord neurochemicals are induced in a model of repetitive motion injury with low forcé and repetition exposure. Brain Res J 2008; 1218: 103-13.
Dabbs V, Lauretti WJ. A risk assessment of cervical manipulation vs. NSAIDs for thetreatment of neck pain. J Manip Physiol Therap 1995; 18: 530-6.
Van der Velde G, Hogg-Johnson S, Bayoumi AM. Identifying the best treatment among common nonsurgical neck pain treatments: a decision analysis. J Manip Phys Ther 2009; 32: 209-18.
Sheather-Reid RB, Cohen M. Efficacy of analgesics in chronic pain: a series of N-of-1 studies. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998; 15: 244-52.
Nemes D, Amaricai E, Tanase D, Popa D, Catan L, Andrei D. Physical therapy vs. medical treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry: a randomized prospective study. Ann Agricult Environm Med 2013; 20: 301-6.
Borghi B, Aurini L, White PF. Treatment of chronic cervicalbrachial pain with periradicular injection of meloxicam. Minerva Anestesiol 2015 Sep 3 [Epub ahead of print].
Cohen ML, Arroyo JF, Champion GD, Browne CD. In search of the pathogenesis of refractory cervicobrachial pain syndrome. A deconstruction of the RSI phenomenon. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 432-6.
Day RO. Variability in response to NSAIDs: what progress? Agents Actions Suppl 1993; 44: 3-6.
Maguire TA. Ibuprofen: a model medicine for self-care of common conditions. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2013; 178: 43-6.
Butler D. Mobilisation of the Nervous System. 1st ed. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne 1991.
Butler D. The Sensitive Nervous System. 1st ed. Noigroup Publication, Adelaide, Australia 2000.
Butler D, Coppieters MW. Neurodynamics in a broader perspective. Man Ther 2007; 12: 7-8.
Coppieters MW, Butler DS. Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Manip Ther 2008; 13: 213-21.
Elvery RL, Hall TM. Neural tissue evaluation and treatment. Physical Therapy of the Shoulder. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1997.
Allison GT, Nagy BM, Hall TA. Randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain syndrome: a pilot study. Manual Therapy 2002; 7: 95-102.
Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, George SZ. Effects of upper extremity neural mobilization on thermal pain sensitivity: a sham-controlled study in asymptomatic participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 428-38.
Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Wouters LL, Janssens K. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003; 33: 369-78.
Kuchari E, Han S, Karłowicz-Bodalska K, Miśkiewicz K, Kutycka E. Safety of oral ibuprofen: analysis of data from the spontaneous reporting system in Poland. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceut 2014; 71: 687-90.
Rainsford KD. Ibuprofen: from invention to an OTC therapeutic mainstay. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2013; 178: 9-20.
Nee RJ, Vicenzino B, Jull GA, Cleland JA, Coppieters MW. Neural tissue management provides immediate clinically relevant benefits without harmful effects for patients with nerve related neck and arm pain: a randomized trial. J Physiother 2012; 58: 23-31.
Borenstein D, Wiesel S, Boden S. Low Back and Neck Pain. 3rd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia 2004; 771-849.
Sniezek PJ, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen, acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and acetaminophen and codeine for postoperative pain relief after Mohs surgery and cutaneous reconstruction. Dermatol Surg J 2011; 37: 1007-13.
Carlesso LC, Gross AR, Santaguida PL, Burnie S, Voth S, Sadi J. Adverse events associated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. Man Ther 2010; 15: 434-44.
Portenoy RK, Kanner RM. Nonopioid and adjuvant analgesics. In: Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM (eds.). FD Davis Company, Philadelphia 1996; 219, 247.
Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Gross AR, Walton DM, Santaguida PL. Treatment preferences amongst physical therapists and chiropractors for the management of neck pain: results of an international survey. Chiropr Man Therap 2014; 22: 11.
Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman D. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. J Am Med Assoc 2010; 303: 2058-64.
Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ. North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J 2009; 11: 64-72.
American Cancer Society. (2015). Complementary and Alternative Methods and Cancer http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/acspc-041660-pdf.pdf.
Cassileth BR, Deng GE, Gomez JE, Johnstone PA, Kumar N, Vickers AJ. American College of Chest Physicians. Complementary therapies and integrative oncology in lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007; 132: 340S-54S.
Williams AM, Davies A, Griffiths G. Facilitating comfort for hospitalized patients using non-pharmacological measures: preliminary development of clinical practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Pract 2009; 15: 145-55.
Weiner DK, Ernst E. Complementary and alternative approaches to the treatment of persistent musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2004; 20: 244-55.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 726-32.
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF. European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag 2011; 41: 1073-93.
Bahreini M, Jalili M, Moradi-Lakeh MA. Comparison of three self-report pain scales in adults with acute pain. J Emerg Med 2015; 48: 10-8.
Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994; 56: 217-26.
Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63: 174-88.
Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Does the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scoring system only measure disability due to injuries to the upper limb? J Bone Joint Surg 2006; 88: 524-7.
Audette I, Dumas JP, Côté JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 318-23.
Fletcher JP, Bandy WD. Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38: 640-5.
Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreax L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes inchronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149-58.
Cleland JA, Whitman JM, Fritz JM, Palmer JA. Manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 802-11.
Imani F, Motavaf M, Safari S, Alavian SM. The therapeutic use of analgesics in patients with liver cirrhosis: a literature review and evidence based recommendations. Hepat Mon 2014; 14: e23539.
Savva C, Giakas G. The effect of cervical traction combined with neural mobilization on pain and disability in cervical radiculopathy. A case report. Manip Ther 2013; 18: 443-6.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (April 01, 2015). FDA Meeting Topic: NDAC Meeting on Risks of NSAIDs.http: //www.fda.gov/ ohrms/dockets/ ac/ 02/ briefing /3882B2 _04_Wyeth-Ibuprophen.pdf. On March 03, 2016.
Unzueta A, Vargas HE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced hepatoxicity. Clin Liver Dis 2013; 17: 43-56.
Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion: comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 98-104.
McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Dose-response in direct comparisons of different doses of aspirin, ibuprofen and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in analgesic studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63; 271-8.
Santos FM, Silva JT, Giardini AC. Neural mobilization reverses behavioral and cellular changes that characterize neuropathic pain in rats. Molecul Pain 2012; 8: 57.
Kowalczyk B, Feluś J. Arthrogryposis: an update on clinical aspects, etiology, and treatment strategies. Arch Med Sci 2016; 12: 10-24.
Kałka D, Karpiński Ł, Gebala J, et al. Sexual health of male cardiac patients – present status and expectations of patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Med Sci 2017; 13: 302-10.
Ficklscherer A, Stapf J, Meissner KM, et al. Testing the feasibility and safety of the Nintendo Wii gaming console in orthopedic rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study. Arch Med Sci 2016; 12: 1273-8.
FEATURED PRODUCTS
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe