About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Ethics in publishing
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Our reviewers
Ethics in publishing
Guide for reviewers
Books and Events
Books
Events
ORIGINAL PAPER
Effects of brief and prolonged cold application on maximal isometric handgrip strength
1
Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile
2
Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
3
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
Submission date: 2020-04-07
Acceptance date: 2020-06-15
Publication date: 2021-11-24
Physiother Quart. 2021;29(4):1-8
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
basic scienceclinical scienceneurosciences neurology neurophysiologysport physiotherapyphysical activity and sports of handicapped
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Neuromuscular effects of cold highlight a decrease in nerve conduction velocity, which supports its analgesic impact, and muscle tone and strength reduction. However, it has been suggested that cold could increase strength with short-time applications. The study aimed to compare the effects of brief and prolonged cold application on maximal isometric handgrip strength.
Methods:
The controlled randomized clinical trial involved 112 volunteers (56 men and 56 women, mean age: 22 ± 2.1 years), randomly assigned to brief cooling group (BC, n = 36), prolonged cooling group (PC, n = 40), and control group (n = 36). BC received quick icing in anterior forearm, while PC and control group received ice pack application and no treatment, respectively. Three sessions with 3-day intervals were performed. Handgrip strength was assessed with hand-held dynamometry before and after treatment. The main outcome was maximal isometric strength difference (MISdiff).
Results:
There were statistically significant between-group differences in MISdiff in the 3 sessions (S1: p = 0.018; S2: p < 0.001; S3: p < 0.0001), showing a strength increase in BC (p < 0.0001) and decrease in PC (p = 0.025) at the end of the sessions. In addition, a post-intervention strength increase in BC was highlighted when analysing the sessions individually (S1: p = 0.0003; S2: p = 0.00147; S3: p = 0.0001).
Conclusions:
Brief cold seems a good strategy to increase maximal isometric strength, although the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms must be further studied. Brief cooling could be considered as an ergogenic low-cost support when isometry training is required. In turn, a strength decrease after prolonged cooling was observed.
Neuromuscular effects of cold highlight a decrease in nerve conduction velocity, which supports its analgesic impact, and muscle tone and strength reduction. However, it has been suggested that cold could increase strength with short-time applications. The study aimed to compare the effects of brief and prolonged cold application on maximal isometric handgrip strength.
Methods:
The controlled randomized clinical trial involved 112 volunteers (56 men and 56 women, mean age: 22 ± 2.1 years), randomly assigned to brief cooling group (BC, n = 36), prolonged cooling group (PC, n = 40), and control group (n = 36). BC received quick icing in anterior forearm, while PC and control group received ice pack application and no treatment, respectively. Three sessions with 3-day intervals were performed. Handgrip strength was assessed with hand-held dynamometry before and after treatment. The main outcome was maximal isometric strength difference (MISdiff).
Results:
There were statistically significant between-group differences in MISdiff in the 3 sessions (S1: p = 0.018; S2: p < 0.001; S3: p < 0.0001), showing a strength increase in BC (p < 0.0001) and decrease in PC (p = 0.025) at the end of the sessions. In addition, a post-intervention strength increase in BC was highlighted when analysing the sessions individually (S1: p = 0.0003; S2: p = 0.00147; S3: p = 0.0001).
Conclusions:
Brief cold seems a good strategy to increase maximal isometric strength, although the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms must be further studied. Brief cooling could be considered as an ergogenic low-cost support when isometry training is required. In turn, a strength decrease after prolonged cooling was observed.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Aciksoz S, Akyuz A, Tunay S. The effect of self-administered superficial local hot and cold application methods on pain, functional status and quality of life in primary knee osteoarthritis patients. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23–24):5179–5190; doi: 10.1111/jocn.14070.
2.
Cameron MH. Superficial cold and heat. In: Cameron MH, Physical agents in rehabilitation. From research to practice, 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2012; 129–172.
3.
Swenson C, Swärd L, Karlsson J. Cryotherapy in sports medicine. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996;6(4):193–200; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1996.tb00090.x.
4.
Herrera E, Sandoval MC, Camargo DM, Salvini TF. Effect of walking and resting after three cryotherapy modalities on the recovery of sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity in healthy subjects. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(3):233–240; doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011000300010.
5.
Mac Auley DC. Ice therapy: how good is the evidence? Int J Sports Med. 2001;22(5):379–384; doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15656.
6.
Leite M, Ribeiro F. Liquid Ice fails to cool the skin surface as effectively as crushed ice in a wet towel. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(6):393–398; doi: 10.3109/09593980903229240.
7.
Ostrowski J, Purchio A, Beck M, Leisinger J. Effectiveness of salted ice bag versus cryocompression on decreasing intramuscular and skin temperature. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28(2):120–125; doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0173.
8.
Tomchuk D, Rubley MD, Holcomb WR, Guadagnoli M, Tarno JM. The magnitude of tissue cooling during cryotherapy with varied types of compression. J Athl Train. 2010;45(3):230–237; doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.3.230.
9.
Love HN, Pritchard KA, Hart JM, Saliba SA. Cryotherapy effects, part 1: Comparison of skin temperatures and patient-reported sensations for different modes of administration. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2013;18(5):22–30; doi: 10.1123/ijatt.18.5.22.
10.
Cataldi JK, Pritchard KA, Hart JM, Saliba SA. Cryotherapy effects, part 2: Time to numbness onset and numbness duration. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2013;18(5):26–28; doi: 10.1123/ijatt.18.5.26.
11.
Otte JW, Merrick MA, Ingersoll CD, Cordova ML. Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness alters cooling time during cryotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1501–1505; doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34833.
12.
Dhavalikar M, Narkeesh A, Gupta N. Effect of skin temperature on nerve conduction velocity and reliability of temperature correction formula in Indian females. J Exerc Sci Physiother. 2009;5(1):24–29.
13.
McMeeken J, Lewis MM, Cocks S. Effects of cooling with simulated ice on skin temperature and nerve conduction velocity. Aust J Physiother. 1984;30(4):111–114; doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60682-6.
14.
Lowdon BJ, Moore RJ. Temperature changes in muscle during cold therapy and following a sustained contraction. Aust J Sports Med. 1977;2:9–12.
15.
Herrera E, Sandoval MC, Camargo DM, Salvini TF. Motor and sensory nerve conduction are affected differently by ice pack, ice massage, and cold water immersion. Phys Ther. 2010;90(4):581–591; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090131.
16.
Clarke RS, Hellon RF, Lind AR. The duration of sustained contractions of the human forearm at different muscle temperatures. J Physiol. 1958;143(3):454–473; doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006071.
17.
Zhang Z, Lyon TD, Kadow BT, Shen B, Wang J, Lee A, et al. Conduction block of mammalian myelinated nerve by local cooling to 15–30°C after a brief heating. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115(3):1436–1445; doi: 10.1152/jn.00954.2015.
18.
Lee JM, Warren MP, Mason SM. Effects of ice on nerve conduction velocity. Physiotherapy. 1978;64(1):2–6.
19.
McGown HL. Effects of cold application on maximal isometric contraction. Phys Ther. 1967;47(3):185–192; doi: 10.1093/ptj/47.3.185.
20.
Knuttsson E. Topical cryotherapy in spasticity. Scand J Rehab Med. 1970;2(4):159–163; doi: 10.2340/16501977197024159163.
21.
Carmona Alcantara C, Blanco J, De Oliveira LM, Sávio Ribeiro PF, Herrera E, Nakagawa TH, et al. Cryotherapy reduces muscle hypertonia, but does not affect lower limb strength or gait kinematics post-stroke: a randomized controlled crossover study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26(4):267–280; doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1593613.
22.
Cavalcanti Garcia L, Carmona Alcântara C, Lopes Santos G, Almeida Monção JV, Russo TL. Cryotherapy reduces muscle spasticity but does not affect proprioception in ischemic stroke: a randomized sham-controlled crossover study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(1):51–57; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001024.
23.
Santos MTBT, Oliveira LM. Use of cryotherapy to enhance mouth opening in patients with cerebral palsy. Spec Care Dentist. 2004;24(4):232–234; doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2004.tb01698.x.
24.
Germano AMC, Schlee G, Milani TL. Effect of cooling foot sole skin receptors on Achilles tendon reflex. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53(6):965–971; doi: 10.1002/mus.24994.
25.
Goff B. The application of recent advances in neurophysiology to Miss M. Rood’s concept of neuromuscular facilitation. Physiotherapy. 1972;58(12):409–415.
26.
Surburg PR, Schrader JW. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in sports medicine: a reassessment. J Athl Train. 1997;32(1):34–39.
27.
Hrbek J. Proprioceptive-motor circuits governing striated muscles. Structure, function and disorders. Praha: SPN; 1981.
28.
Manuel M, Zytnicki D. Alpha, beta and gamma motoneurons: functional diversity in the motor system’s final pathway. J Integr Neurosci. 2011;10(3):243–276; doi: 10.1142/S0219635211002786.
29.
Hounsgaard J. Motor neurons. Compr Physiol. 2017;7(2):463–484; doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160025.
30.
Vieira A, Oliveira AB, Costa JR, Herrera E, Salvini TF. Cold modalities with different thermodynamic properties have similar effects on muscular performance and activation. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(10):873–880; doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333283.
31.
De la Barra Ortiz HA, Opazo Cancino J, Minzer Goluboff N, Andrade Obando G, Herrera Jara M, González Vera M. Effects of ascending and descending direct current on grip strength assessed through dynamometry and myofeedback: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Quart. 2020;28(2):1–8; doi: 10.5114/pq.2020.92471.
32.
Bohannon RW. Dynamometer measurements of hand-grip strength predict multiple outcomes. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;93(2):323–328; doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.93.2.323.
33.
Chopp-Hurley JN, Wiebenga EG, Gatti AA, Maly MR. Investigating the test-retest reliability and validity of hand-held dynamometry for measuring knee strength in older women with knee osteoarthritis. Physiother Can. 2019;71(3):231–238; doi: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0051.
34.
Bellace JV, Healy D, Besser MP, Byron T, Hohman L. Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System’s Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in normal population. J Hand Ther. 2000;13(1):46–51; doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(00)80052-6.
35.
Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Aging. 2011;40(4):423–429; doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051.
36.
Schrama PPM, Stenneberg MS, Lucas C, van Trijffel E. Intraexaminer reliability of hand-held dynamometry in the upper extremity: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(12):2444–2469; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.019.
37.
Watanabe T, Owashi K, Kanauchi Y, Mura N, Takahara M, Ogino T. The short-term reliability of grip strength measurement and the effects of posture and grip span. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(3):603–609; doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.12.007.
38.
Hawkins SW, Hawkins JR. Clinical applications of cryotherapy among sports physical therapists. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(1):141–148.
39.
Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2004;7(3):395–399; doi: 10.36076/ppj.2004/7/395.
40.
Mallette MM, Green LA, Gabriel DA, Cheung SS. The effects of local forearm muscle cooling on motor unit properties. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(2):401–410; doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3782-y.
41.
Yu R, Ong S, Cheung O, Leung J, Woo J. Reference values of grip strength, prevalence of low grip strength, and factors affecting grip strength values in Chinese adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(6):551.e9–551.e16; doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.006.
42.
Wang Y-C, Bohannon RW, Li X, Sindhu B, Kapellusch J. Hand-grip strength: normative reference values and equations for individuals 18 to 85 years of age residing in the United States. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(9):685–693; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7851.
43.
Kamen G. Neural issues in the control of muscular strength. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004;75(1):3–8; doi: 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609127.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
