ORIGINAL PAPER
Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation with two different frequencies and combined training on lipid profile and body composition in overweight women
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Sport Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
 
 
Submission date: 2020-05-31
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-09-21
 
 
Publication date: 2022-09-26
 
 
Physiother Quart. 2022;30(3):79-85
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The study aimed to investigate the effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) and combined training on lipid profile and body composition in overweight women.

Methods:
Overall, 45 overweight (body mass index [BMI]: 27.73 ± 1.59 kg/m2) women (aged 32.89 ± 4.59 years) voluntarily participated in this study. They were randomly assigned to 3 groups: a WB-EMS group, who received WB-EMS (2 sessions/week, 20 min/session; first session each week: 85 Hz, 350 μs, 4 s pulse, 4 s rest; second session: 7–15 Hz, 350 μs, continuous pulse); a combined training group, who underwent aerobic and bodyweight resistance training (2 sessions/week, 20 min/session); and a control group. In all 3 groups, lipid profile and body composition were assessed before and after 8 weeks of intervention.

Results:
In the WB-EMS group, within-group comparison revealed significant differences in triglyceride, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, body weight, BMI, waist-hip ratio, waist circumference, body fat percentage, body fat mass, and lean body mass values (p ≤ 0.05); there was no significant difference only in fasting blood sugar. In the combined training group, a significant difference was only observed in BMI (p ≤ 0.05). In the post-intervention between-group comparison, there were significant differences only in high-density lipoprotein and body fat percentage (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions:
Since WB-EMS has positive effects on lipid profile and body composition, it may be a proper method for people who have limited time for exercise or are unable or unmotivated to practise conventional exercises.

 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Coutinho T, Goel K, de Sá DC, Carter RE, Hodge DO, Kragelund C, et al. Combining body mass index with measures of central obesity in the assessment of mortality in subjects with coronary disease: role of “normal weight central obesity”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(5):553–560; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.035.
 
2.
World Health Organization. Diabetes country profiles, 2016. Iran (Islamic Republic of). Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs....
 
3.
Jafari-Adli S, Jouyandeh Z, Qorbani M, Soroush A, Larijani B, Hasani-Ranjbar S. Prevalence of obesity and overweight in adults and children in Iran; a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014;13(1):121; doi: 10.1186/s40200-014-0121-2.
 
4.
Janghorbani M, Amini M, Willett WC, Gouya MM, Delavari A, Alikhani S, et al. First nationwide survey of prevalence of overweight, underweight, and abdominal obesity in Iranian adults. Obesity. 2007;15(11):2797–2808; doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.332.
 
5.
Kemmler W, Weissenfels A, Willert S, Shojaa M, von Stengel S, Filipovic A, et al. Efficacy and safety of low frequency whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) to improve health-related outcomes in non-athletic adults. A systematic review. Front Physiol. 2018;9:573; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00573.
 
6.
Kemmler W, Von Stengel S, Schwarz J, Mayhew JL. Effect of whole-body electromyostimulation on energy expenditure during exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(1):240–245; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31821a3a11.
 
7.
Von Stengel S, Bebenek M, Engelke K, Kemmler W. Whole-body electromyostimulation to fight osteopenia in elderly females: the randomized controlled Training and ElectroStimulation Trial (TEST-III). J Osteoporos. 2015;2015:643520; doi: 10.1155/2015/643520.
 
8.
Kemmler W, Schliffka R, Mayhew JL, von Stengel S. Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on resting metabolic rate, body composition, and maximum strength in postmenopausal women: the Training and Electro­Stimulation Trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1880–1887; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddaeee.
 
9.
Kemmler W, von Stengel S. Whole-body electromyostimulation as a means to impact muscle mass and abdominal body fat in lean, sedentary, older female adults: subanalysis of the TEST-III trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1353–1364; doi: 10.2147/CIA.S52337.
 
10.
Kemmler W, Teschler M, Weißenfels A, Bebenek M, Fröhlich M, Kohl M, et al. Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation versus high-intensity resistance exercise on body composition and strength: a randomized controlled study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:9236809; doi: 10.1155/2016/9236809.
 
11.
Wittmann K, Sieber C, von Stengel S, Kohl M, Freiberger E, Jakob F, et al. Impact of whole body electromyostimulation on cardiometabolic risk factors in older women with sarcopenic obesity: the randomized controlled FORMOsA-sarcopenic obesity study. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1697–1706; doi: 10.2147/CIA.S116430.
 
12.
Kemmler W, Kohl M, Freiberger E, Sieber C, von Stengel S. Effect of whole-body electromyostimulation and/or protein supplementation on obesity and cardiometabolic risk in older men with sarcopenic obesity: the randomized controlled FranSO trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):70; doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0759-6.
 
13.
Jee Y-S. The efficacy and safety of whole-body electromyostimulation in applying to human body: based from graded exercise test. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018;14(1):49–57; doi: 10.12965/jer.1836022.011.
 
14.
D’Ottavio S, Briotti G, Rosazza C, Partipilo F, Silvestri A, Calabrese C, et al. Effects of two modalities of whole-body electrostimulation programs and resistance circuit training on strength and power. Int J Sports Med. 2019;40(13):831–841; doi: 10.1055/a-0982-3311.
 
15.
Kemmler W, Bebenek M, Engelke K, von Stengel S. Impact of whole-body electromyostimulation on body composition in elderly women at risk for sarcopenia: the Training and ElectroStimulation Trial (TEST-III). Age. 2014;36(1):395–406; doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9575-2.
 
16.
Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(2):92–98; doi: 10.2340/1650197719702239298.
 
17.
Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Ward A. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12(3):175–181; doi: 10.1249/00005768-198023000-00009.
 
18.
Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Henschel A (eds.), Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 1961; 223–244.
 
19.
Zarei M, Hamedinia M, Haghighi A, Amini S. Effects of three combined aerobic-resistance exercise training protocols with different intensities on adiponectin, retinol binding protein 4 and lipid profile in men with type 2 diabetes [in Persian]. Sport Physiol. 2017;9(33):69–84.
 
20.
Arazi H, Jorbonian A, Asghari E. Comparison of concurrent (resistance-aerobic) and aerobic training on VO2max lipid profile, blood glucose and blood pressure in middle-aged men at risk for cardiovascular disease. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2013;20(5):627–638.
 
21.
Hosseini Kakhk A, Khalegh Zadeh H, Nematy M, Hamedi Nia M. The effect of combined aerobic-resistance training on lipid profile and liver enzymes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver under nutrition diet [in Persian]. Sport Physiol. 2015;7(27):65–84.
 
22.
Jahanshiri N, Bijeh N. Comparison of the effect of combined physical training (endurance, strength) with and without flaxseed on the levels of estrogen, lipid and body composition of inactive menopausal women. J Torbat Heydariyeh Univ Med Sci. 2018;6(3):26–36.
 
23.
Kemmler W, Kohl M, von Stengel S. Effects of high intensity resistance training versus whole-body electromyostimulation on cardio-metabolic risk factors in untrained middle aged males. A randomized controlled trial. J Sports Res. 2016;3(2):44–55; doi: 10.18488/journal.90/2016.3.2/90.2.44.55.
 
24.
Weiss EP, Jordan RC, Frese EM, Albert SG, Villareal DT. Effects of weight loss on lean mass, strength, bone, and aerobic capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(1):206–217; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001074.
 
eISSN:2544-4395
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top