Endoscopic necrosectomy under fluoroscopic guidance – a single center experience

Marian Smoczyński; Mateusz Jagielski; Anna Jabłońska; Krystian Adrych

doi:10.5114/wiitm.2015.52058

eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

2/2015
vol. 10

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Original paper

Endoscopic necrosectomy under fluoroscopic guidance – a single center experience

Marian Smoczyński

,

Mateusz Jagielski

,

Anna Jabłońska

,

Krystian Adrych

Videosurgery Miniinv 2015; 10 (2): 237–243

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2015.52058

Online publish date: 2015/06/09

View full text Get citation

PlumX metrics:

Introduction: Our report presents a technique of necrotic tissue removal during transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) that is an alternative to the one that has already been described in the literature.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic necrosectomy performed during transmural drainage of symptomatic WOPN.

Material and methods: Within the years 2012–2013, 64 patients underwent endoscopic treatment of symptomatic WOPN in our center. Eight patients underwent endoscopic necrosectomy during transmural drainage. Fragments of necrotic tissues were removed from the collection’s cavity under fluoroscopic guidance using a Dormia basket. The results and complications of treatment were compared retrospectively.

Results: Sixty-four patients with WOPN underwent transmural drainage under endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) guidance. Eight patients (12.5%, 5 women and 3 men, mean age 57.25 years) were qualified for endoscopic necrosectomy. Transmural transgastric access was made in 7 patients and transduodenal access in 1 patient. Additional percutaneous drainage was used in 2 patients. Active drainage was continued for 24 days (11–44 days). The mean number of endoscopic procedures was 4.75 (3–9). The average number of necrosectomy procedures during drainage was 1.75 (1–4). Complications of endotherapy occurred in 2/8 (25%) patients, and they were not directly connected with necrosectomy. Therapeutic success after the end of active drainage was achieved in all patients. During a 6-month follow-up no recurrence of the collection was observed.

Conclusions: Endoscopic necrosectomy under fluoroscopic guidance is an effective and safe method of minimally invasive treatment in a selected group of patients with symptomatic WOPN.

keywords:

Endoscopic necrosectomy under fluoroscopic guidance – a single center experience

Marian Smoczyński , Mateusz Jagielski , Anna Jabłońska , Krystian Adrych

endoscopic necrosectomy, endoscopic drainage, transmural drainage, walled-off pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatitis

Marian Smoczyński

,

Mateusz Jagielski

,

Anna Jabłońska

,

Krystian Adrych