ORIGINAL PAPER
Handball-specific skill acquisition by use of different instruction methods
 
More details
Hide details
1
German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
 
 
Submission date: 2019-10-02
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-05-14
 
 
Publication date: 2021-02-17
 
 
Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):45-53
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Instructions are one of the fundamental coaching methods for developing skills in sport. Recent research has shown that activating implicit learning processes through metaphorical or analogical instructions is as effective as the activation of explicit learning processes by instructing step-by-step movement rules. Nevertheless, these effects have not been investigated in youth handball yet, and past research has shown a lack of the systematic use of analogy instructions in general. For the first time, the current study investigated the effectiveness of step-by-step instructions and analogy instructions in young athletes’ learning of basic skills in team handball.

Methods:
A short-term intervention with a sample of 36 participants (9–10 years) was conducted. One group of the athletes were instructed with step-by-step movement rules, while the other group were instructed with analogies, in 3 different handball-specific tasks (stand throw, body feint, defence position). The athletes’ performances were rated by 15 handball coaches.

Results:
The conducted intervention resulted in small and task-dependent performance improvements under both instruction conditions. In the throwing task, no performance improvement was observed overall, whereas the participants improved in both instruction conditions in the feint task. As for the learning of the defence position, the participants in the analogy conditio improved more than the others.

Conclusions:
The current results are in line with recent investigations of different sports tasks and should motivate coaches and teachers in team sports to try to be ingenious and creative in developing functional analogies, metaphors, or pictorial instructions for skill acquisition.

 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Karcher C, Buchheit M. On-court demands of elite handball, with special reference to playing positions. Sports Med. 2014;44(6):797–814; doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0164-z.
 
2.
Wagner H, Finkenzeller T, Würth S, von Duvillard SP. Individual and team performance in team-handball: a review. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(4):808–816.
 
3.
Raab M, Masters RSW, Maxwell J, Arnold A, Schlapkohl N, Poolton J. Discovery learning in sports: implicit or explicit processes? Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;7(4):413–430; doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2009.9671917.
 
4.
Tzetzis G, Lola AC. The effect of analogy, implicit, and explicit learning on anticipation in volleyball serving. Int J Sport Psychol. 2015;46(2):152–166; doi: 10.7352/IJSP2015.46.152.
 
5.
Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Modelling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(10):793–811; doi: 10.1080/026404102320675648.
 
6.
Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23(5):1382–1414; doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9.
 
7.
Sun R, Slusarz P, Terry C. The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach. Psychol Rev. 2005;112(1):159–192; doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.159.
 
8.
Poolton JM, Zachry TL. So you want to learn implicitly? Coaching and learning through implicit motor learning techniques. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2007;2(1):67–78; doi: 10.1260/174795407780367177.
 
9.
Kal E, Prosée R, Winters M, van der Kamp J. Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203591; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203591.
 
10.
Masters R. Skill learning the implicit way – say no more! In: Farrow D, Baker J, MacMahon C (eds.), Developing sporting expertise: researchers and coaches put theory into practice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008; 89–103.
 
11.
Liao CM, Masters RS. Analogy learning: a means to implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(5):307–319; doi: 10.1080/02640410152006081.
 
12.
Lam WK, Maxwell JP, Masters RS. Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: performance and kinematic outcomes. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(2):179–191; doi: 10.1080/02640410802448764.
 
13.
Schücker L, Hagemann N, Strauss B. Analogy vs. technical learning in a golf putting task: an analysis of performance outcomes and attentional processes under pressure. Hum Mov. 2013;14(2):175–184; doi: 10.2478/humo-2013-0021.
 
14.
Such a beautiful day (an airman’s song) [in German]. 2016. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... u5n9-ZkRE.
 
15.
Fasold F, Memmert D, Unkelbach C. A theory-based intervention to prevent calibration effects in serial sport performance evaluations. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;18:47–52; doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.01.001.
 
16.
Mehrotra DV, Chan ISF, Berger RL. A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions. Biometrics. 2003;59(2):441–450; doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00051.
 
17.
Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Raab M. Benefits of an external focus of attention: common coding or conscious processing? J Sports Sci. 2006;24(1):89–99; doi: 10.1080/02640410500130854.
 
18.
Gabbett T, Masters R. Challenges and solutions when applying implicit motor learning theory in a high performance sport environment: examples from rugby league. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2011;6(4):567–575; doi: 10.1260/1747-9541.6.4.567.
 
19.
Calábria Lopes M. Effectiveness of implicit and explicit learning processes: acquisition of tactical knowledge and motor skills in basketball [in German]. PhD thesis. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University; 2011.
 
20.
Wałach-Biśta ZM. What do we want and what do we get from the coach? Preferred and perceived leadership in male and female team sports. Hum Mov. 2019;20(3):38–47; doi: 10.5114/hm.2019.79734.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top