About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Ethics in publishing
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Our reviewers
Ethics in publishing
Guide for reviewers
Books and Events
Books
Events
ORIGINAL PAPER
Higher prevalence of trunk rotation among Egyptian students in urban than in countryside areas
1
Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
2
El-Wasta Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beni Suef, Egypt
3
Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
Submission date: 2020-09-17
Acceptance date: 2020-12-29
Publication date: 2023-03-21
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(1):34-38
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This study was conducted to compare the prevalence of trunk rotation in selected urban and countryside areas in Egypt.
Methods:
Overall, 840 male students aged 10–15 years were divided into 2 equal groups: group A, representing urban schools, and group B, representing countryside schools. Both groups were first screened with the Adams forward bend test; then, the Scoliometer HD application was used to determine the angle of trunk rotation. Children with a reading of 7° or more (≥ 20° Cobb angle) were referred to a medical facility and their parents were informed about the findings.
Results:
In group A, the Adams forward bend test showed a higher prevalence of trunk rotation (41.43%) than in group B (17.14%). The Scoliometer HD application readings (≥ 7°) indicated a significant difference between the 2 groups: group A result was 12.61% and group B result was 5%.
Conclusions:
Male students of urban schools exhibit a higher prevalence of trunk rotation than those of countryside schools.
This study was conducted to compare the prevalence of trunk rotation in selected urban and countryside areas in Egypt.
Methods:
Overall, 840 male students aged 10–15 years were divided into 2 equal groups: group A, representing urban schools, and group B, representing countryside schools. Both groups were first screened with the Adams forward bend test; then, the Scoliometer HD application was used to determine the angle of trunk rotation. Children with a reading of 7° or more (≥ 20° Cobb angle) were referred to a medical facility and their parents were informed about the findings.
Results:
In group A, the Adams forward bend test showed a higher prevalence of trunk rotation (41.43%) than in group B (17.14%). The Scoliometer HD application readings (≥ 7°) indicated a significant difference between the 2 groups: group A result was 12.61% and group B result was 5%.
Conclusions:
Male students of urban schools exhibit a higher prevalence of trunk rotation than those of countryside schools.
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Altaf F, Drinkwater J, Phan K, Cree AK. Systematic review of school scoliosis screening. Spine Deform. 2017;5(5):303–309; doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.03.009.
2.
Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(1):3–9; doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4.
3.
Sayed HA. Egypt’s demographic opportunity. Preliminary assessment based on 2017 census. Cairo: United Nations Population Fund, Egypt Country Office; 2018.
4.
Suh S-W, Modi HN, Yang J-H, Hong J-Y. Idiopathic scoliosis in Korean schoolchildren: a prospective screening study of over 1 million children. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(7):1087–1094; doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1695-8.
5.
Labelle H, Richards SB, De Kleuver M, Grivas TB, Luk KDK, Wong HK, et al. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the Scoliosis Research Society international task force. Scoliosis. 2013;8:17; doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-17.
6.
Wang C, Xu W, He S, Gu S, Zhao Y, Zhang J, et al. Differences in postoperative quality of life between adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis residing in urban and rural environments. Spine. 2010;35(6):652–656; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9fe3e.
7.
Kreider AR, French B, Aysola J, Saloner B, Noonan KG, Rubin DM. Quality of health insurance coverage and access to care for children in low-income families. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(1):43–51; doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3028.
8.
Dunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Nguyen M, Blasi PR, Lin JS. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018.
9.
Balg F, Juteau M, Theoret C, Svotelis A, Grenier G. Validity and reliability of the iPhone to measure rib hump in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):774–779; doi: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000000195.
10.
Grivas TB, Wade MH, Negrini S, O’Brien JP, Maruyama T, Hawes MC, et al. SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today? Scoliosis. 2007;2(1):17; doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-2-17.
11.
Talasila SSA, Gorantla M, Thomas V. A study on screening for scoliosis among school children in the age group of 10–14 using a cost effective and an innovative technique. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(6):2118–2123; doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20172187.
12.
Penha PJ, Ramos NLJP, de Carvalho BKG, Andrade RM, Schmitt ACB, João SMA. Prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Spine. 2018;43(24):1710–1718; doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002725.
13.
Hengwei F, Zifang H, Qifei W, Weiqing T, Nali D, Ping Y, et al. Prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese schoolchildren: a large, population-based study. Spine. 2016;41(3):259–264; doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001197.
14.
Assiri A, Mahfouz AA, Awadalla NJ, Abolyazid AY, Shalaby M, Abogamal A, et al. School screening for scoliosis among male adolescents in Abha City, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2019;8(4):190–195.
15.
Ciaccia MCC, de Castro JS, Rahal MA, Penatti BS, Selegatto IB, Giampietro JLM, et al. Prevalence of scoliosis in public elementary school students. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017;35(2):191–198; doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00008.
16.
Ugras AA, Yilmaz M, Sungur İ, Kaya İ, Koyuncu Y, Cetinus ME. Prevalence of scoliosis and cost-effectiveness of screening in schools in Turkey. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2010;23(1):45–48; doi: 10.3233/bmr-2010-0247.
17.
Franko OI, Bray C, Newton PO. Validation of a scoliometer smartphone app to assess scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8):e72–e75; doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31826bb109.
18.
Yawn BP, Yawn RA, Hodge D, Kurland M, Shaughnessy WJ, Ilstrup D, et al. A population-based study of school scoliosis screening. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1427–1432; doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1427.
19.
Yawn BP, Yawn RA. The estimated cost of school scoliosis screening. Spine. 2000;25(18):2387–2391; doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00019.
20.
Komang-Agung IS, Dwi-Purnomo SB, Susilowati A. Prevalence rate of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of school-based screening in Surabaya, Indonesia. Malays Orthop J. 2017;11(3):17–22; doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1711.011.
21.
Ohtsuka Y, Yamagata M, Arai S, Kitahara H, Minami S. School screening for scoliosis by the Chiba University Medical School screening program. Results of 1.24 million students over an 8-year period. Spine. 1988;13(11):1251–1257; doi: 10.1097/00007632-198811000-00008.
22.
Čanjak R, Jovović V, Stamatović M. Transversal analysis of scoliotic disorders at young adolescents from urban and rural areas. J Anthropol Soc Serb. 2018;53:55–60; doi: 10.5937/gads53-17713.
23.
Kamtsiuris P, Atzpodien K, Ellert U, Schlack R, Schlaud M. Prevalence of somatic diseases in German children and adolescents: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007;50(5–6):686–700; doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0230-x.
24.
Adobor RD, Rimeslatten S, Steen H, Brox JI. School screening and point prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 4000 Norwegian children aged 12 years. Scoliosis. 2011;6(1):23; doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-23.
25.
Ueno M, Takaso M, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Saito W, Shintani R, et al. A 5-year epidemiological study on the prevalence rate of idiopathic scoliosis in Tokyo: school screening of more than 250,000 children. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(1):1–6; doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-0009-z.
26.
Zheng Y, Wu X, Dang Y, Yang Y, Reinhardt JD, Dang Y. Prevalence and determinants of idiopathic scoliosis in primary school children in Beitang district, Wuxi, China. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(6):547–553; doi: 10.2340/16501977-2098.
27.
Wang W, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Sun C, Wang Z, Sun X, et al. Different curve pattern and other radiographical characteristics in male and female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2012;37(18):1586–1592; doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182511d0c.
28.
Boyle SE, Jones GL, Walters SJ. Physical activity, weight status and diet in adolescents: are children meeting the guidelines. Health. 2010;2(10):1142–1149; doi: 10.4236/health.2010.210167.
29.
Rocha JCT, Tatmatsu DIB, Vilela DA. Association between use of school backpacks and scoliosis in adolescents in public and private schools. Motricidade. 2012;8(S2):803–809.
30.
Gąciarz B, Ostrowska A, Pańków W. Social integration and professional activation of disabled people living in small towns and rural areas: determinants of success and failure [in Polish]. IFiS PAN; 2008.
31.
Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(2):179–184; doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000081.
32.
Chen JX, Kachniarz B, Gilani S, Shin JJ. Risk of malignancy associated with head and neck CT in children: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(4):554–566; doi: 10.1177/0194599814542588.
33.
Han MA, Kim JH. Diagnostic X-ray exposure and thyroid cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2018;28(2):220–228; doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0159.
34.
Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018;13(1):3; doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8.
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
