eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2019
vol. 15
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Otolaryngology
Basic research

Matrix metalloproteinases, inhibitor of metalloproteinases mRNA and protein expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Weronika Lucas Grzelczyk, Artur Wróbel-Roztropiński, Janusz Szemraj, Magdalena Cybula, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Bogna Zielińska-Kaźmierska, Magdalena Józefowicz-Korczyńska

Arch Med Sci 2019; 15 (3): 784–791
Online publish date: 2019/04/30
Article file
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are characterized by an aggressive growth pattern and early metastatic spread [1]. Laryngeal cancer is the 20th most common cancer in Europe, with around 39,900 new cases diagnosed in 2012 (1% of the total) [2]. Laryngeal carcinoma is the second most common malignancy of the head and neck worldwide [3]. The incidence is also higher in males than in females with predominant histological squamous cell carcinoma type [4]. Survival rates of laryngeal cancer patients range from 73% to 92% for early disease stage (I and II) and from 50% to 64% for advanced disease stage (III and IV) [4]. The diagnosis of neck lymph node metastases is an essential requirement for clinical staging and treatment, and is now widely accepted as the most important factor in HNSCC prognosis [5]. Despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and therapy, the 5-year survival rates for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) have not increased over the last 20 years [6].

The most important risk factors are smoking, alcohol consumption and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection [7, 8].

Carcinogenesis of head and neck tumors is a process of multiple steps, in which there are genetic effects that lead to deregulation of cell metabolism. The development of local regional and distant metastases begins with the initiation of the primary tumor and ends with the establishment of metastatic clones throughout the host. Several processes including the differential expression of cell adhesion molecules, release of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and angiogenesis occur at multiple points in the metastatic cascade [9].

Numerous reports have shown that MMPs are directly implicated in almost every biological process, involving matrix remodeling throughout the mammalian life span, from embryo implantation to cell death or necrosis [10]. The MMPs have been implicated in the physiological and pathological remodeling of the tissues. They belong to a family of proteases known as the metzincin superfamily. Extracellular matrix (ECM) is degraded by various proteases, the MMP family having a pivotal role. Numerous studies have indicated that MMPs (including MMP-7 and especially gelatinases) and their respective tissue inhibitors have an important role in carcinogenesis [1, 11]. For example, both MMP-2 and MMP-9 degrade cleaved collagen more efficiently than other gelatinolytic MMPs, and MMP-7 is a more potent proteoglycanase than MMP-9 [12].

These enzymes (MMPs) are associated with tumor cell invasion of the basement membrane and stroma, blood vessel penetration, and metastasis [13].

The activity of these enzymes is tightly regulated in a number of ways, such as transcriptional regulation, proteolytic activation, and interaction with tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) [14]. A family of tissue inhibitors of TIMPs is capable of inhibiting fully activated MMPs, and the local balance between MMPs and TIMPs seems to be crucial in the control of tumor invasion and metastasis. The most studied of these inhibitors are TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 [11]. The expression and involvement of several MMPs and TIMPs in LSCC have been determined in several studies. However, these studies showed relatively conflicting results concerning their contribution to the clinicopathological findings and prognosis of the patients with LSCC [1529]. Clinical trials effectively evaluating the benefit of novel treatment options, as well as the identification of novel therapeutic targets and molecular markers, are needed to improve the survival and quality of life of LSCC patients [3, 5].

The aim of the present study was to investigate the mRNAs and protein expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-7, and their tissue inhibitor TIMP-2 in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and control subjects and additionally to evaluate a possible correlation with clinicopathological features.

Material and methods

Characteristics of study groups

The study group consisted of 96 (15 women and 81 men) patients with laryngeal squamous cell cancer, aged between 48 and 82 years, mean 62 ±8.0 years. All of the patients were treated surgically at the Department of Otolaryngology in the period 2012–2015; only patients without any history of previous radio- or chemotherapy were included. The primary tumor size and stage were classified according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [30, 31] (Table I).

Table I

Characterization of the patients with laryngeal cancer (n = 96)

FeatureNo. of patients (%)
Sex:
 Female15 (16)
 Male81 (84)
Age:
 < 6567 (70)
 > 6529 (30)
Primary tumor size (T):
 T116 (17)
 T212 (12)
 T320 (21)
 T448 (50)
Nodal involvement (N):
 Negative71 (74)
 Positive25 (26)
Histopathology grade:
 Well differentiated9 (9)
 Moderately differentiated75 (78)
 Poorly differentiated12 (13)
Clinical stage:
 I18 (19)
 II9 (9)
 III24 (25)
 IV45 (47)
Localization:
 Supraglottic29 (30)
 Glottic45 (47)
 Supraglottic, glottic and subglottic21 (22)
 Subglottic1 (1)
 Transglottic30 (31)

In order to evaluate the impact of the variables on the results of the mRNA and protein expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-7 and their tissue inhibitor TIMP-2, the patients were assessed with respect to sex (female, male); age (younger group – up to 65 years of age, older group – over 65 years of age); primary tumor size (T1, T2 vs. T3, T4); lymph node status (N0 – negative vs. N+ positive), histopathological staging (G1, G2, G3), clinical stage (I, II vs. III, IV), location of the carcinoma, and smoking duration (all the investigated patients were smokers from 20 to 100 pack-year smoking, mean 44 ±17 pack-year smoking).

The study design was approved by the Ethics Committee (RNN/203/13/KE).

Sample collection

Paired tissue samples of tumor and normal tissues were obtained from all surgically treated patients. After surgery, the samples were preserved and stored at –80°C. The tumor specimen was taken from the center of the tumor tissue. Normal tissue was used as the control. The adjacent normal tissues were used when the tissues were about 1.5–2 cm from the tumor border and were diagnosed as not having precancerous or cancerous lesions. The diagnosis of laryngeal cancer tissues was made by pathologists based on the histological analysis of tumor biopsies. All laryngeal carcinoma samples were pathologically confirmed as laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Blood samples from all the patients and from 100 healthy subjects were drawn before the surgical treatment and were allowed to clot before centrifugation. The control group consisted of 100 healthy subjects (47 women and 53 men), aged between 49 and 84 years, mean 65.5 ±7.5 years. Sera were removed, aliquoted and stored at –80°C until assayed.

RNA extraction and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissues using an RNA extraction reagent, TRIZOL (Invitrogen Life Technologies), according to the standard acid-guanidinium-phenol-chloroform method. The extracted RNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and only cases with preserved 28S, 18S and 5S ribosomal RNA bands indicating good RNA quality were used in the study. Total RNA was digested with DNase I (Gibco) at room temperature for 15 min. Five micrograms of digested RNA were reversely transcribed at 42°C for 60 min in a total 20 ml reaction volume using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, USA). The obtained cDNA was used in the real-time PCR reaction. Real-time PCR based on TaqMan technology was performed using a master mix prepared according to the FastStart Universal Probe Master (ROX) from Roche Applied Science. Probes and primers were designed using the online Universal ProbeLibrary.

Real-time PCR was carried out in a final volume of 50 μl, with 0.05 μg cDNA, 25 μl FastStart Universal Probe Master (ROX) 2x, 250 nM probe and 1 μM of each primer. Amplification was performed for 10 min at 95°C to activate FastStart Taq DNA polymerase and 40 rounds of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C for amplification and signal analysis. ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System from Applied Biosystems was used to detect amplifications. Each sample was assayed in triplicate in independent reactions. Real-time PCR data were automatically calculated with the data analysis module. The results were analyzed according to the 2ΔΔCt method. Validation of PCR efficiency was performed with a standard curve. Standard curves were prepared for each gene by serial dilution.

Protein analyses

For the quantitative detection of human serum MMP-2,-7,-9 and TIMP-2, the RayBio Human ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) from RayBiotech was used. Each serum sample was determined three times. Instructions and calculations of results were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Standards and samples were pipetted into the wells with the immobilized antibody specific for human MMP-2, -7, -9 and TIMP-2, and incubated. After incubation and washing, the biotinylated antihuman MMP-2, -7, -9 and TIMP-2 antibody was added. After washing away any unbound substances and the biotinylated antibody, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin was pipetted into the wells. The wells were again washed, a tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution was added to the wells and color developed in proportion to the amount of MMP-2, -7, -9 and TIMP-2 bound. The color development was stopped (Stop Solution) and the intensity of the color was measured by the Thermo Labsystems Multiskan Ascent 354 from Lab Recyclers at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

The data were described by means of simple descriptive statistics: the mean and median value for location and standard deviation and range for dispersion of quantitative data (protein concentration, gene expression) as well as the sample fraction for description of qualitative variables.

In statistical inference, non-parametric tests of significance were used (Wilcoxon test for paired data, Mann-Whitney U test for comparison of distributions in two independent groups).

Associations between covariates of interest were qualified by means of Spearman rank correlation coefficients. In all the analyses, the statistical significance was considered attained for p ≤ 0.05. All the calculations were derived by means of Statistica v12.0 software.

Results

MMP and TIMP mRNA expression

The gene expression of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, and TIMP-2 was investigated in laryngeal cancer tissues and normal tissues by RT-PCR. Mean values of gene expression of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 mRNA in the laryngeal cancer tissues were significantly higher than those in the normal tissues (p < 0.001), (Table II, Figure 1).

Table II

mRNA expression of MMPs and TIMP in laryngeal tumor vs. non-tumor tissue (data presented as mean ± SD)

MMPtumor tissueNon-tumor tissuep-value
MMP-20.31 ±0.100.09 ±0.03< 0.001
MMP-70.24 ±0.080.12 ±0.04< 0.001
MMP-90.30 ±0.140.13 ±0.04< 0.001
TIMP-20.26 ±0.080.12 ±0.03< 0.001
Figure 1

Distributions of mRNA expression of MMPs and TIMP in laryngeal tumor (neoplastic) vs. non-tumor tissue (controls) presented as mean with standard error (SE) and standard deviation (SD)

/f/fulltexts/AOMS/31363/AMS-15-31363-g001_min.jpg

In the present study, no significant relationship was found between the gene expression of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, TIMP-2 mRNA and clinicopathological features of LSCC patients, such as T stage, N stage, clinical stage, and histological grade.

Moreover, no association was observed between the patients’ age and sex or location of carcinoma and smoking duration.

Serum levels of MMP and TIMP

The pretreatment serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, and TIMP-2 were quantitatively measured by ELISA assay. The results were compared with the clinicopathological factors of the disease. Protein concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 were significantly higher in the sera of the laryngeal cancer patients than in healthy subjects (p < 0.001) (Table III, Figure 2).

Table III

Distributions of protein concentrations in serum in laryngeal cancer and healthy subjects

MMPlaryngeal cancer [ng/ml]Healthy subjects [ng/ml]p-value
MMP-2909 ±225495 ±89< 0.001
MMP-7244 ±50144 ±31< 0.001
MMP-9313 ±91171 ±31< 0.001
TIMP-2122 ±6459 ±17< 0.001
Figure 2

Distributions of protein concentration in serum in laryngeal cancer (neoplastic) and healthy subjects (controls) presented as mean with standard error (SE) and standard deviation (SD)

/f/fulltexts/AOMS/31363/AMS-15-31363-g002_min.jpg

There were no statistically significant differences between serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and the clinicopathological features of the disease concerning T stage, N stage, clinical stage, and differentiation, however with one exception: serum TIMP-2 levels were higher in the patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without lymph node metastasis, 113 ±52 ng/ml (N0) vs. 146 ±88 ng/ml (N1), p < 0.05.

No association was observed between the age, sex of patients or location of the carcinoma and smoking duration.

Discussion

In our series of 96 patients with laryngeal cancer, we found that the MMP mRNA gene expression in the tumor tissues is significantly higher than that in the normal tissues. We also observed that the serum levels of MMP proteins in these patients are significantly higher than those in healthy subjects, which suggests that they could be upregulated in tumorigenesis. Similar results were obtained in a few previous studies. The MMP expression was reported to be higher in the tumor tissue compared to the adjacent non-neoplastic tissues [1517]. Xie et al. [16], in a study including thirty-two patients, showed that both mRNA and protein expression levels of MMP-2, MMP-7 and MMP-9 were increased in supraglottic carcinoma tissue samples as compared to matched normal tissues and were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis.

In our study, no significant relationship was found between both mRNA and protein expression of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and the clinicopathological features, such as histological grade, primary site, T stage, N stage, and clinical stage in LSCC patients. The data from the literature are diverse in this issue. The current study results are consistent with those achieved by Liu et al. [18], who, in a retrospective study of 72 LSCC patients, did not find any clinical and pathological correlations in protein expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9. Similarly, Krecicki et al. [19] did not indicate any significant correlation between MMP-2 protein expression and clinicopathological factors, e.g. histological grading, T category and nodal status. Moreover, Görögh et al. [32] estimating MMP-9 expression and metastasis formation or tumor size in HNSCC achieved similar results.

We studied serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 and found that they were significantly higher in the samples of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma tissues than in controls. In our research, the only significant correlation between concentrations of measured MMPs and TIMP and the clinicopathological features was detected for TIMP-2 protein and for patients with lymph node metastasis. Serum levels of TIMP-2 were higher in cases with lymph node metastasis than in those without it (p < 0.05).

To our knowledge, there are few papers in the literature on the MMP and TIMP expression levels in the sera of patients with LSCC [23, 24, 26, 29].

Lofti et al. [26], in a study including 20 patients, found that serum levels MMP-2 and MMP-9 were increased with the T stage compared with the healthy controls and MMP-2 was positively correlated with lymph node metastases. Another study investigated the pre-treatment and post-treatment gelatinase serum levels in 49 patients and showed a significant gradual decrease after treatment for pro-MMP-9, showing a possible role of this molecule as a tumor marker in laryngeal cancer [29].

In our study, all the patients we investigated were smokers, and most of them have at least a 30 pack-year smoking history. Cigarette smoke is thought to cause upregulation of MMPs. Especially MMP-9 has been implicated to be elevated in smoking status [33, 34]. The correlation between elevated serum levels of MMPs and smoking was not confirmed in our study. Similarly, Kalfert et al. [23] found no association between preoperative serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-9 and smoking habit in patients with laryngeal cancer, although they found a correlation between serum levels of MMP-1 and smoking habit in laryngeal cancer patients but not in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. These authors suggest that MMP-1 might represent the most important regulator of the cancer pathway in laryngeal cancer in smokers.

Furthermore, in the present study, the mRNA and protein expression of TIMP-2 did not depend on the tumor (T classification). Other research showed that the expression level of TIMP-2 in tissue increased with increasing cancer stage, thus suggesting the possible post-transcriptional removal of its mRNA [20]. On the other hand, Görögh et al. [32] reported TIMP-2 to be negatively correlated with lymph node metastases or tumor size in HNSCC, suggesting that TIMP-2 suppresses cancer spread in LSCC. However, Danilewicz et al. [22] evaluated the relationship between the expression of TIMP-2 and the presence or absence of lymph node metastases in LSCC and no correlation was substantiated.

Some authors have stated that high MMP expression is associated with clinicopathological features [16, 20, 21, 25, 28] and poor prognosis in laryngeal cancer patients, suggesting that this parameter could be used as a potential predictor [18, 22, 21, 27]. Liu et al. [25], in a meta-analysis including 48 English and 38 Chinese, reporting on 529 patients with laryngeal cancer, demonstrated that the high expression of MMP-2 protein in laryngeal cancer has a significant correlation with the tumor differentiation level and cervical lymph node metastasis. Wiegand et al. [35], in their meta-analysis (14 studies performed in 710 patients) on MMP-2 and metastases in lymph nodes in patients with HNSCC, found that MMP-2 possibly played a role in the metastatic behavior of HNSCC tumors.

MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression levels have been reported in a number of human cancer cell lines and various human tumors including those of the ovary, breast, liver, bladder, skin, head and neck, uterine cervix, and lungs [1, 9, 36] and also have been reported in several disease conditions including coronary heart disease [37].

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) can regulate the tumor microenvironment, and their expression and activation are increased in almost all human cancers compared with normal tissues [38].

The importance and ubiquity of biological roles of MMPs strongly suggest that MMP deregulation is an important pathogenic factor in many diseases and so too remains a promising vista for drug targeting [10].

We used two different laboratory techniques, QRT- PCR and ELISA, to measure the tissue expression and serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and TIMP-2. The MMPs that have been most extensively measured in LSCC in a number of studies are the gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9, and most of these studies have used immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization and gelatin zymography. The majority of publications concentrated on expression in the stroma. All these techniques show different analytical sensitivities so that different expression patterns could also reflect a higher or lower sensitivity of the procedures applied [39].

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, and TIMP-2 protein levels in the preoperative serum and mRNA expression in the laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma tissue were higher than in the healthy controls. These results may suggest that MMPs and TIMP are associated with laryngeal tumorigenesis. However, we did not find a clear correlation between the clinicopathological features of laryngeal cancer patients and expression levels of MMPs and TIMP. The results suggest that the measurement of serum MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 concentrations might be helpful to diagnose laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Hong SD, Hong SP, Lee JI, Lim CY , authors. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in oral squamous cell carcinomas with regard to the metastatic potential. Oral Oncol. 2000. 36:p. 207–13

2 

Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. , authors. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013. 49:p. 1374–403

3 

Mäkitie AA, Monni O , authors. Molecular profiling of laryngeal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009. 9:p. 1251–60

4 

Khoueir N, Matar N, Farah C, Francis E, Tabchy B, Haddad A , authors. Survival of T4aN0 and T3N+ laryngeal cancer patients: a retrospective institutional study and systematic review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2015. 36:p. 755–62

5 

Polanska H, Raudenska M, Gumulec J, et al. , authors. Clinical significance of head and neck squamous cell cancer biomarkers. Oral Oncol. 2014. 50:p. 168–77

6 

Li M, Tian L, Ren H, et al. , authors. MicroRNA-101 is a potential prognostic indicator of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and modulates CDK8. J Transl Med. 2015. 13:p. 271.

7 

Vojtechova Z, Sabol I, Salakova M, et al. , authors. Comparison of the miRNA profiles in HPV-positive and HPV-negative tonsillar tumors and a model system of human keratinocyte clones. BMC Cancer. 2016. 16:p. 382.

8 

Józefowicz-Korczyńska M, Mazerant M, Morshed K, Olejniczak I, Bojanowska-Poźniak K , authors. Wstępna ocena zależności pomiędzy zakażeniem HPV a wybranymi cechami nowotworu u chorych na raka krtani. Otorynolaryngologia. 2014. 13:p. 155–62

9 

Petruzzelli Guy J , author. The biology of distant metastases in head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001. 63:p. 192–201

10 

David Rodríguez D, Morriso CJ, Overall CM , authors. Matrix metalloproteinases: what do they not do? New substrates and biological roles identified by murine models and proteomics. Biochim Phiophys Acta. 2010. 1803:p. 139–54

11 

de Vicente JC, Lequerica-Fernandez P, Santamaria J, Fresno MF , authors. Expression of MMP-7 and MT1-MMP in oral squamous cell carcinoma as predictive indicator for tumor invasion and prognosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007. 36:p. 415–24

12 

Parks WC, Wilson CL, López-Boado YS , authors. Matrix metalloproteinases as modulators of inflammation and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004. 4:p. 617–29

13 

Nelson AR, Fingleton B, Rothenberg ML, Matrisian LM , authors. Matrix metalloproteinases: biologic activity and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 2000. 18:p. 1135–49

14 

Yamamoto K, Murph G, Troeberg L , authors. Extracellular regulation of metalloproteinases. Matrix Biol. 2015. 44-46:p. 255–63

15 

Kapral M, Strzałka-Mrozik B, Paluch J, Kowalczyk M, Jurzak M, Weglarz L , authors. Evaluation of gene expression of selected matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in laryngeal cancer. Farm Przegl Nauk. 2010. 10:p. 41–6

16 

Xie M, Sun Y, Li Y , authors. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in supraglottic carcinoma and its clinical implication for estimating lymph node metastases. Laryngoscope. 2004. 114:p. 2243–8

17 

Zhang H, Liu M, Sun Y, Lu J , authors. MMP-14 can serve as a prognostic marker in patients with supraglottic cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009. 266:p. 1427–34

18 

Liu WW, Zeng ZY, Wu QL, Hou JH, Chen YY , authors. Overexpression of MMP-2 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a potential indicator for poor prognosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005. 132:p. 395–400

19 

Krecicki T, Zalesska-Krecicka M, Jelen M, Szkudlarek T, Horobiowska M , authors. Expression of type IV collagen and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (type IV collagenase) in relation to nodal status in laryngeal cancer. Clin Otolarygol. 2001. 26:p. 469–72

20 

Christopoulos TA, Papageorgakopoulou N, Ravazoula P, et al. , authors. Expression of metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in squamous cell laryngeal carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2007. 18:p. 855–60

21 

Colović Z, Pesutić-Pisac V, Poljak NK, Racić G, Cikojević D, Kontić M , authors. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Coll Antropol. 2013. 37:p. 151–5

22 

Danilewicz M, Sikorska B, Wagrowska-Danilewicz M , authors. Prognostic significance of the immunoexpression of matrix metalloproteinase MMP2 and its inhibitor TIMP2 in laryngeal cancer. Med Sci Monit. 2003. 9:p. 42–7

23 

Kalfert D, Ludvikova M, Topolcan O, et al. , authors. Analysis of preoperative serum levels of MMP1, -2, and -9 in patients with site-specific head and neck squamous cell cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014. 34:p. 7431–41

24 

Klisho E, Savenkova O, Kondakova I, Perel’muter V, Choĭnzonov E, Shishkin D , authors. Assay of matrix metalloproteinase levels and their endogenous inhibitors in patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Vopr Onkol. 2007. 53:p. 26–31

25 

Liu RR, Li MD, Li T, Tan Y, Zhang M, Chen JC , authors. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) protein expression and laryngeal cancer prognosis: a metaanalysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015. 8:p. 2261–1

26 

Lotfi A, Mohammadi G, Saniee L, Mousaviagdas M, Chavoshi H, Tavassoli A , authors. Serum level of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and clinical significance. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015. 16:p. 6749–51

27 

Mallis A, Teymoortash A, Mastronikolis NS, Werner JA, Papadas TA , authors. MMP-2 expression in 102 patients with glottic laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012. 269:p. 639–42

28 

Papadas TA, Naxakis SS, Mastronikolis NS, Stathas T, Karabekos NC, Tsiambas E , authors. Determination of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) protein expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas based on digital image analysis. J BUON. 2013. 18:p. 977–81

29 

Tsiropoulos G, Papadas T, Triantaphyllidou IE , authors. Pre-treatment gelatinases serum levels and post-treatment changes in laryngeal cancer patients. Hippokratia. 2013. 17:p. 220–7

30 

American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC , author. urihttp://www.cancerstaging.orgwww.cancerstaging.org .

31 

Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) , author. urihttp://www.uicc.orgwww.uicc.org .

32 

Görögh T, Beier UH, Bäumken J, et al. , authors. Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: influence on tumor invasiveness and metastasis formation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck. 2006. 28:p. 31–9

33 

Palozza P, Simone RE, Catalano A, et al. , authors. Modulation of MMP-9 pathway by lycopene in macrophages and fibroblasts exposed to cigarette smoke. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2012. 11:p. 36–47

34 

Snitker S, Xie K, Ryan KA, et al. , authors. Correlation of circulating MMP-9 with white blood cell count in humans: effect of smoking. PLoS One. 2013. 25:p. e66277

35 

Wiegand S, Dünne AA, Müller HH, et al. , authors. Metaanalysis of the significance of matrix metalloproteinases for lymph node disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2005. 104:p. 94–100

36 

Kato K, Hara A, Kuno T, et al. , authors. Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in oral squamous cell carcinomas: manifestation and localization of their activity. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005. 131:p. 340–6

37 

Wu H, Shou X, Liang L, Yao X, Cheng G , authors. Correlation between plasma angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 in coronary heart disease. Arch Med Sci. 2016. 12:p. 1214–9

38 

Egeblad M, Werb Z , authors. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002. 2:p. 161–74

39 

Lichtinghagen R, Musholt PB, Lein M, et al. , authors. Different mRNA expression and protein expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and tissue inhibitor of metaloproteinases TIMP-1 in benign and malignat prostate tissue. Eur Urol. 2002. 42:p. 398–406

Copyright: © 2019 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe