ORIGINAL PAPER
Penile Doppler ultrasonography and elastography evaluation in patients with erectile dysfunction
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2018-07-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-08-08
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-03
 
 
Pol J Radiol, 2018; 83: 491-499
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
To evaluate the relationship between erection grade, erectile function score, Doppler ultrasonography (US) indexes, and elasticity score (ES) according to Doppler US diagnosis in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

Material and methods:
Real-time strain type penile elastography was performed during penile Doppler US examination for 88 patients with ED. The diagnosis according to Doppler US was determined. Erection score according to the Erection Hardness Grading Scale was evaluated. A scoring for erectile function was performed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) was defined. The relationships, according to Doppler diagnosis, of ES, IIEF-5 score, SHIM scale, and erection score were evaluated.

Results:
Among the patients, 50 (57%) had abnormal penile Doppler US findings. According to Doppler US findings, patients were classified as normal (n = 38), borderline for arterial insufficiency (n = 4), arterial insufficiency (n = 5), and venous insufficiency (n = 41). The lowest erection hardness grades and IIEF-5 scores were detected in patients with arterial failure. When compared to the normal group, in terms of ES, the arterial failure borderline group and venous failure group had lower scores, and the arterial failure group had a higher score. However, the only significant difference was obtained in the left cavernous body of the venous failure group.

Conclusions:
Sonoelastography seems to add additional value for determination of stiffness of the penile cavernous body in routine evaluation of ED.

 
REFERENCES (46)
1.
NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83-90.
 
2.
Heikkilä A, Kaipia A, Venermo M, et al. Relationship of blood pressure and erectile dysfunction in men without previously diagnosed hypertension. J Sex Med 2017; 14: 1336-1341.
 
3.
Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54-61.
 
4.
Williams SK, Melman A. Novel therapeutic targets for erectile dysfunction. Maturitas 2012; 71: 20-27.
 
5.
Andersson KE, Wagner G. Physiology of penile erection. Physiol Rev 1995; 75: 191-236.
 
6.
Andersson KE. Pharmacology of penile erection. Pharmacol Rev 2001; 53: 417-450.
 
7.
Giuliano F, Rampin O. Neural control of erection. Physiol Behav 2004; 83: 189-201.
 
8.
Altinbas NK, Hamidi N, Yagci C. Penile Doppler ultrasound findings in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction. Ege J Med 2017; 56: 193-199.
 
9.
Anwar Z, Sinha V, Mitra S, et al. Erectile dysfunction: An underestimated presentation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Indian.
 
10.
J Psychol Med 2017; 39: 600-604.
 
11.
Blumentals WA, Gomez-Caminero A, Joo S, et al. Should erectile dysfunction be considered as a marker for acute myocardial infarction? Results from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 350-353.
 
12.
Rastrelli G, Corona G, Lotti F, et al. Flaccid penile acceleration as a marker of cardiovascular risk in men without classical risk factors. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 173-186.
 
13.
Blumentals WA, Gomez-Caminero A, Joo S, et al. Is erectile dysfunction predictive of peripheral vascular disease? Aging Male 2003; 6: 217-221.
 
14.
Veronelli A, Masu A, Ranieri R, et al. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in thyroid disorders: comparison with control subjects and with obese and diabetic patients. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 111-114.
 
15.
Peric S, Nisic T, Milicev M, et al. Hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Acta Myol 2013; 32: 106-109.
 
16.
Blumentals WA, Gomez-Caminero A, Brown RR, et al. A case-control study of erectile dysfunction among men diagnosed with panic disorder. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 299-302.
 
17.
Bookstein JJ, Valji K, Parsons L, et al. Pharmacoarteriography in the evaluation of impotence. J Urol 1987; 137: 333-337.
 
18.
Fitzgerald SW, Erickson SJ, Foley WD, et al. Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. Radiographics 1992; 12: 3-17.
 
19.
Lue TF, Hricak H, Marich KW, et al. Vasculogenic impotence evaluated by high-resolution ultrasonography and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Radiology 1985; 155: 777-781.
 
20.
Teloken PE, Park K, Parker M, et al. The false diagnosis of venous leak: prevalence and predictors. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2344-2349.
 
21.
Montague DK, Lakin MM. False diagnoses of venous leak impotence. J Urol 1992; 148: 1: 148-149.
 
22.
Kilic M, Serefoglu EC, Ozdemir AT, et al. The actual incidence of papaverine-induced priapism in patients with erectile dysfunction following penile colour Doppler ultrasonography. Andrologia 2010; 42: 1-4.
 
23.
Zhang JJ, Qiao XH, Gao F, et al. A new method of measuring the stiffness of corpus cavernosum penis with ShearWave™ Elastography. Br J Radiol 2015; 88: 20140671.
 
24.
Hamidi N, Altinbas NK, Gokce MI, et al. Preliminary results of a new tool to evaluate cavernous body fibrosis following radical prostatectomy: penile elastography. Andrology 2017; 5: 999-1006.
 
25.
Pereira JA, Bilhim T, Rio Tinto H, et al. Radiologic anatomy of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction: a systematized approach. Acta Med Port 2013; 26: 219-225.
 
26.
Patel U, Amin Z, Friedman E, et al. Colour flow and spectral Doppler imaging after papaverine-induced penile erection in 220 impotent men: study of temporal patterns and the importance of repeated sampling, velocity asymmetry and vascular anomalies. Clin Radiol 1993; 48: 18-24.
 
27.
Roy C, Saussine C, Tuchmann C, et al. Duplex Doppler sonography of the flaccid penis: potential role in the evaluation of impotence.
 
28.
J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 290-294.
 
29.
Quam JP, King BF, James EM, et al. Duplex and color Doppler sonographic evaluation of vasculogenic impotence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 1141-1147.
 
30.
Altinbas NK, Gundogdu Anamurluoglu E, Oz II, et al. Real-time sonoelastography of parotid gland tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36: 77-87.
 
31.
Ozturk A, Grajo JR, Dhyani M, et al. Principles of ultrasound elastography. Abdom Radiol 2018; 43: 773-785.
 
32.
Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, et al. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94: 487-495.
 
33.
Goldstein I, Mulhall JP, Bushmakin AG, et al. The erection hardness score and its relationship to successful sexual intercourse. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 2374-2380.
 
34.
Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 319-326.
 
35.
Turunç T, Deveci S, Güvel S, et al. The assessment of Turkish validation with 5 question version of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2007; 33: 45-49.
 
36.
Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1980; 229-239.
 
37.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
 
38.
Mutnuru PC, Ramanjaneyulu HK, Susarla R, et al. Pharmaco penile Duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: TC07-TC10.
 
39.
Turkay R, Inci E, Yenice MG, et al. Shear wave elastography: Can it be a new radiologic approach for the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction? Ultrasound 2017; 25: 150-155.
 
40.
Benson CB, Vickers MA. Sexual impotence caused by vascular disease: diagnosis with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 1149-1153.
 
41.
Virag R, Bouilly P, Frydman D. Is impotence an arterial disorder? A study of arterial risk factors in 440 impotent men. Lancet 1985; 1: 181-184.
 
42.
Lee WH, Kim YC, Choi HK. Psycogenic versus primary organic impotence. Int J Impot Res 1994; 6: 93-97.
 
43.
Riversi V, Tallis V, Trovatelli S, et al. Real time-elastosonography of the penis in patients with Peyronie’s disease. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2012; 84: 174-177.
 
44.
Richards G, Goldenberg E, Pek H, et al. Penile sonoelastography for the localization of a non‐palpable, non‐sonographically visualized lesion in a patient with penile curvature from Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 516-520.
 
45.
Inci E, Turkay R, Nalbant MO, et al. The value of shear wave elastography in the quantification of corpus cavernosum penis rigidity and its alteration with age. Eur J Radiol 2017; 89: 106-110.
 
46.
Zhang X, Zhou B, Miranda AF, et al. A novel noninvasive ultrasound vibro-elastography technique for assessing patients with erectile dysfunction and Peyronie disease. Urology 2018; 116: 99-105.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top