ISSN: 2544-4395
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Instructions for Reviewers Journal's Reviewers Special information Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2020
vol. 28
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Physiotherapy and rehabilitation students’ opinions on anatomy education: a cross-sectional survey study

Begumhan Turhan
1

1.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey
Online publish date: 2020/05/07
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
The study aim was to establish physiotherapy students’ opinions about anatomy education, to explore attitudes towards studying anatomy, and thus to evaluate possibilities to improve anatomy education.

Methods
Second-year physiotherapy students (98 females, 57 males) voluntarily participated in this study. Data were obtained by a questionnaire, which consisted of 35 questions.

Results
The participants’ mean age was 22 ± 1.77 years. The grade point average of females was higher than that of males (p = 0.001). Although the study duration per week and grade point average were moderately correlated in females (r = 0.397, p = 0.001), no correlation was determined in males. The statement ‘Anatomy courses motivate me for my carrier’ achieved the highest mean score (1.45 ± 0.8). The least mean score (0.21 ± 0.2) regarded the association between the given anatomy education and clinical practice. For 75.48% of the students, the endocrine system was the most interesting. The musculoskeletal system was learnt the best (69.03%). Video records and course notes given by the lecturer were the most beneficial studying materials for practical and theoretical anatomy lectures, respectively (p < 0.05). The textbook recommended by the lecturer turned out the least beneficial material for both practical (1.74 ± 0.82) and theoretical (1.17 ± 0.83) anatomy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions
It is anticipated that interactive educators will be more helpful to teach the lessons. Moreover, it seems that anatomy education in physiotherapy and rehabilitation departments may need revisions to enhance students’ motivation and improve academic learning.

keywords:

basic science, anatomy education, physiotherapy education, anatomy curriculum

Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe