ORIGINAL PAPER
Psychophysiological responses of women with polycystic ovary syndrome during sessions of high-intensity interval training
1
Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Psychobiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
3
Department of Toco-Gynaecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
Submission date: 2020-12-18
Acceptance date: 2021-03-17
Publication date: 2022-02-17
Hum Mov. 2022;23(4):112-122
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The study described psychophysiological responses (perceived exertion, affective response) of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) throughout 10 sessions of high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
Methods:
Overall, 12 physically inactive women with PCOS (age: 26.2 ± 4.1 years; body mass index: 28.5 ± 6.3 kg/m2) performed 10 running HIIT sessions of 50 min [10 × 1-min intervals, 90% of maximal heat rate (HRmax); 3-min active recovery periods, 70% HRmax], including 5-min warm-up and cool-down, with 48-hour intervals. HRmax, rating of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg CR10 scale), and affective responses (Feeling Scale) were assessed in the last 10 s of each interval and recovery period. Each session responses were grouped into session parts (beginning, 1–3; middle, 4–7; end, 8–10) for intervals and recovery periods separately. The generalized estimating equation model served to compare %HRmax, RPE, and affective valence between session parts.
Results:
The intensities of intervals (p < 0.001) and recovery (p < 0.001) increased from session beginning to end, as did RPE of intervals (p < 0.001) and recovery (p < 0.001). Interval affective responses were lower at end compared with beginning (p < 0.040). HIIT intensity (%HRmax) presented a small coefficient of variation (CV, ca. 3%); RPE exhibited medium CV (ca. 20%) between 10 HIIT sessions.
Conclusions:
Psychophysiological responses of physically inactive PCOS women to running HIIT demonstrate positive affective valence at the beginning of HIIT sessions. As the session progresses, affective valence decreases to neutral and RPE increases.
The study described psychophysiological responses (perceived exertion, affective response) of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) throughout 10 sessions of high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
Methods:
Overall, 12 physically inactive women with PCOS (age: 26.2 ± 4.1 years; body mass index: 28.5 ± 6.3 kg/m2) performed 10 running HIIT sessions of 50 min [10 × 1-min intervals, 90% of maximal heat rate (HRmax); 3-min active recovery periods, 70% HRmax], including 5-min warm-up and cool-down, with 48-hour intervals. HRmax, rating of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg CR10 scale), and affective responses (Feeling Scale) were assessed in the last 10 s of each interval and recovery period. Each session responses were grouped into session parts (beginning, 1–3; middle, 4–7; end, 8–10) for intervals and recovery periods separately. The generalized estimating equation model served to compare %HRmax, RPE, and affective valence between session parts.
Results:
The intensities of intervals (p < 0.001) and recovery (p < 0.001) increased from session beginning to end, as did RPE of intervals (p < 0.001) and recovery (p < 0.001). Interval affective responses were lower at end compared with beginning (p < 0.040). HIIT intensity (%HRmax) presented a small coefficient of variation (CV, ca. 3%); RPE exhibited medium CV (ca. 20%) between 10 HIIT sessions.
Conclusions:
Psychophysiological responses of physically inactive PCOS women to running HIIT demonstrate positive affective valence at the beginning of HIIT sessions. As the session progresses, affective valence decreases to neutral and RPE increases.
REFERENCES (52)
1.
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med. 2013;43(10):927–954; doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0066-5.
2.
Gibala MJ, Little JP, MacDonald MJ, Hawley JA. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012;590(5):1077–1084; doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.224725.
3.
Keating SE, Johnson NA, Mielke GI, Coombes JS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on body adiposity. Obes Rev. 2017;18(8):943–964; doi: 10.1111/obr.12536.
4.
Batacan RB, Duncan MJ, Dalbo VJ, Tucker PS, Fenning AS. Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(6):494–503; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095841.
5.
Caldas Costa E, Ferezini de Sá JC, Stepto NK, Bezerra Barbosa Costa I, Farias-Junior LF, Da Nóbrega Tomaz Moreira S, et al. Aerobic training improves quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(7):1357–1366; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001579.
6.
Dos Santos IK, de Souza Nunes FAS, Queiros VS, Cobucci RN, Bruch Dantas P, Mafaldo Soares G, et al. Effect of high-intensity interval training on metabolic parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0245023; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245023.
7.
Almenning I, Rieber-Mohn A, Lundgren KM, Shetelig Løvvik T, Krohn Garnæs K, Moholdt T. Effects of high intensity interval training and strength training on metabolic, cardiovascular and hormonal outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138793; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138793.
8.
Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2841–2855; doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew218.
9.
Kakoly NS, Khomami MB, Joham AE, Cooray SD, Misso ML, Norman RJ, et al. Ethnicity, obesity and the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes in PCOS: a systematic review and meta-regression. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(4):455–467; doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy007.
10.
Le MT, Nguyen VQH, Truong QV, Le DD, Le VNS, Cao NT. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance syndrome among infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a cross-sectional study from Central Vietnam. Endocrinol Metab. 2018;33(4):447–458; doi: 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.4.447.
11.
Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):364–379; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004.
12.
Dos Santos IK, Ashe MC, Cobucci RN, Mafaldo Soares G, de Oliveira Maranhão TM, Moreira Silva Dantas P. The effect of exercise as an intervention for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(16):e19644; doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019644.
13.
Benham JL, Yamamoto JM, Friedenreich CM, Rabi DM, Sigal RJ. Role of exercise training in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2018;8(4):275–284; doi: 10.1111/cob.12258.
14.
Moran LJ, Hutchison SK, Norman RJ, Teede HJ. Lifestyle changes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD007506; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007506.pub2.
15.
Harrison CL, Stepto NK, Hutchison SK, Teede HJ. The impact of intensified exercise training on insulin resistance and fitness in overweight and obese women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;76(3):351–357; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04160.x.
16.
Samadi Z, Bambaeichi E, Valiani M, Shahshahan Z. Evaluation of changes in levels of hyperandrogenism, hirsutism and menstrual regulation after a period of aquatic high intensity interval training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10(1):187; doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_360_18.
17.
Aktaş HŞ, Uzun YE, Kutlu O, Pençe HH, Özçelik F, Çil EÖ, et al. The effects of high intensity-interval training on vaspin, adiponectin and leptin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2019;1–6; doi: 10.1080/13813455.2019.1662450.
18.
Patten RK, Boyle RA, Moholdt T, Kiel I, Hopkins WG, Harrison CL, et al. Exercise interventions in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2020;11:606; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00606.
19.
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I-M, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med. Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–1359; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
20.
Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Jennings EG, Marcus BH. Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10-min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity? Ann Behav Med. 2012;44(1):43–51; doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9362-9.
21.
Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Ciccolo JT, Lewis BA, Albrecht AE, Marcus BH. Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9(3):231–245; doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.04.002.
22.
Rhodes RE, Kates A. Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(5):715–731; doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5.
23.
Decker ES, Ekkekakis P. More efficient, perhaps, but at what price? Pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in low-active women with obesity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017;28:1–10; doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.09.005.
24.
Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Vazou S. Affective responses to increasing levels of exercise intensity in normal-weight, overweight, and obese middle-aged women. Obesity. 2010;18(1):79–85; doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.204.
25.
Hardcastle SJ, Ray H, Beale L, Hagger MS. Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1505; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01505.
26.
Ekkekakis P. The dual-mode theory of affective responses to exercise in metatheoretical context: I. Initial impetus, basic postulates, and philosophical framework. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;2(1):73–94; doi: 10.1080/17509840802705920.
27.
Farias-Junior LF, Browne RAV, Astorino TA, Costa EC. Physical activity level and perceived exertion predict intask affective valence to low-volume high-intensity interval exercise in adult males. Physiol Behav. 2020;224:112960; doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112960.
28.
Farias-Junior LF, Browne RAV, Freire YA, Oliveira-Dantas FF, Araújo Moura Lemos TM, Leite Galvão-Coelho N, et al. Psychological responses, muscle damage, inflammation, and delayed onset muscle soreness to high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous exercise in overweight men. Physiol Behav. 2019;199:200–209; doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.028.
29.
Frazão DT, de Farias Junior LF, Dantas TCB, Krinski K, Elsangedy HM, Prestes J, et al. Feeling of pleasure to high-intensity interval exercise is dependent of the numer of work bouts and physical activity status. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152752; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152752.
30.
Knottnerus A, Tugwell P. STROBE – a checklist to strengthen the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):323; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.006.
31.
The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):19–25; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004.
32.
Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17(4):338–345.
33.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–1395; doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
34.
World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: obesity and overweight. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
35.
Huxley R, Mendis S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist:hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk – a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(1):16–22; doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.68.
36.
Schuindt da Silva V, Soares Vieira MF. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) Global: international accreditation scheme of the competent anthropometrist. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2020;22:e70517; doi: 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e70517.
37.
Malachias MVB, Gomes MAM, Nobre F, Alessi A, Feitosa AD, Coelho EB. 7th Brazilian guideline of arterial hypertension: Chapter 2 – Diagnosis and classification. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;107(3 Suppl. 3):7–13; doi: 10.5935/abc.20160152.
38.
Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1989;11(3):304–317; doi: 10.1123/jsep.11.3.304.
39.
Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ. The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med. 2011;41(8):641–671; doi: 10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000.
40.
Alves ED, Leme Gonçalves Panissa V, Barros BJ, Franchini E, Takito MY. Translation, adaptation, and reproducibility of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) and Feeling Scale to Brazilian Portuguese. Sport Sci Health. 2019;15(2):329–336; doi: 10.1007/s11332-018-0516-4.
41.
Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381; doi: 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012.
42.
Lee O, Jung J-W. Validity of Borg’s category ratio 10 scale during maximal-graded exercise testing [in Korean]. Exerc Sci. 2016;25(2):92–99; doi: 10.15857/KSEP.2016.25.2.92.
43.
Robertson RJ, Noble BJ. Perception of physical exertion: methods, mediators, and applications. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997;25:407–452; doi: 10.1249/00003677-199700250-00017.
44.
Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
45.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 2013.
46.
Teede HJ, Misso ML, Deeks AA, Moran LJ, Stuckey BGA, Wong JLA, et al. Assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: summary of an evidencebased guideline. Med J Aust. 2011;195(6):65–112; doi: 10.5694/mja11.10915.
47.
Cabanac M. Physiological role of pleasure. Science. 1971;173(4002):1103–1107; doi: 10.1126/science.173.4002.1103.
48.
Krinski K, Machado DGS, Lirani LS, DaSilva SG, Costa EC, Hardcastle SJ, et al. Let’s walk outdoors! Self-paced walking outdoors improves future intention to exercise in women with obesity. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2017;39(2):145–157; doi: 10.1123/jsep.2016-0220.
49.
Fennell C, Peroutky K, Glickman EL. Effects of supervised training compared to unsupervised training on physical activity, muscular endurance, and cardiovascular parameters. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol. 2016;5(4):00184; doi: 10.15406/mojor.2016.05.00184.
50.
World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
51.
Cyarto EV, Brown WJ, Marshall AL. Retention, adherence and compliance: important considerations for home- and group-based resistance training programs for older adults. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(5):402–412; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.020.
52.
Argent R, Daly A, Caulfield B. Patient involvement with home-based exercise programs: can connected health interventions inf luence adherence? JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(3):e47; doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8518.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
