Full text
1/2011
vol. 62
QUIZ WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
Data publikacji online: 2011/05/11
Article file
In June 2007, an otherwise healthy, 16-year-old male was referred by an orthodontist to the Department of Oral Surgery, Medical College, Jagiellonian University for extraction of retained tooth 43.
Orthopantomography revealed the 2 × 3 cm cystic radiolucency around retained tooth 43 with its apex reaching the inferior border of the mandibular body (Fig. 1) and displacement of the neighbouring teeth roots. Under local anaesthesia, both the retained tooth and the cyst were removed.
Macroscopically, the pathological specimen consisted of the cystic-like follicle (diam. 28 mm) with a tiny tumour in the wall (diam. 7 mm) and the tooth.
Microscopically, the tumour was assembled of whorled nodules interconnected by a lattice of thin epithelial strands. The columnar cells lined duct-like spaces with a lumen containing eosinophilic material. In the stroma, there were aggregates of eosinophilic hyaline material in-between the strands of epithelial cells (Fig. 2, 3 and 4; lens magnification 10×, 20×, 60×, respectively).
Jacek Czopek1, Tomasz Kaczmarzyk2
1Department of Pathomorphology
2Department of Oral Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
Orthopantomography revealed the 2 × 3 cm cystic radiolucency around retained tooth 43 with its apex reaching the inferior border of the mandibular body (Fig. 1) and displacement of the neighbouring teeth roots. Under local anaesthesia, both the retained tooth and the cyst were removed.
Macroscopically, the pathological specimen consisted of the cystic-like follicle (diam. 28 mm) with a tiny tumour in the wall (diam. 7 mm) and the tooth.
Microscopically, the tumour was assembled of whorled nodules interconnected by a lattice of thin epithelial strands. The columnar cells lined duct-like spaces with a lumen containing eosinophilic material. In the stroma, there were aggregates of eosinophilic hyaline material in-between the strands of epithelial cells (Fig. 2, 3 and 4; lens magnification 10×, 20×, 60×, respectively).
Jacek Czopek1, Tomasz Kaczmarzyk2
1Department of Pathomorphology
2Department of Oral Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
Answers should be sent to the Editorial Office by 12.05.2011. The correct answer will be announced in the next issue of the Polish Journal of Pathology. All participants with the highest number of correct answers to the quizzes published in vol. 62 (4 issues) will be entered into the prize draw for a book.
Copyright: © 2011 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
