eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2019
vol. 15
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Rheumatology
Clinical research

Quality of life related to foot health status in women with fibromyalgia: a case-control study

Patricia Palomo-López, César Calvo-Lobo, Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias, David Rodriguez-Sanz, Rubén Sánchez-Gómez, Daniel López-López

Arch Med Sci 2019; 15 (3): 694–699
Online publish date: 2018/07/10
Article file
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Fibromyalgia may be considered as the most frequent central sensitization syndrome, with a higher prevalence in women who suffer from chronic widespread pain and other symptoms that lead to considerable functional impairment [1]. Its prevalence may reach up to 2.10% of the worldwide population, 2.31% of the European population, and 2.40% of the Spanish population. This painful syndrome may cause quality of life impairment in women who suffer it. In Spain, enormous economic costs were reported and reached up to 12,993 million euros per year [2].

Women were more likely to suffer from fibromyalgia, showing a younger age than patients diagnosed with other pain conditions and higher presence of several psychiatric comorbidities combined with other types of pain, such as headaches and connective tissue diseases. Consequently, women with fibromyalgia seemed to show a higher demand of medical outpatient services use [3].

Regarding health-related quality of life questionnaires applied to women who suffered from fibromyalgia, general quality of life tools, such as the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) [4], 15-Dimensions (15D) [5], Assessment of Quality of Life 8-Dimensions (AQoL-8D) [6], Short Form Health Survey 12-item (SF-12) [7] and 36-item (SF-36) [8], and specific condition tools, such as the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) [9], were used with adequate correlations between these questionnaires in this kind of population [10].

Although women with fibromyalgia did not seem to show a higher prevalence of stiffness or mobility abnormalities as well as hyperkeratosis or other foot problems, these patients may experience significantly more pain in the foot than healthy subjects and, consequently, demand more pain-killing drugs [11]. Based on these antecedents, foot health-related quality of life measurements may be necessary in order to determine the impact of fibromyalgia in women who suffer from this syndrome. For this purpose, the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) may be considered a foot and general health-related quality of life tool with specific foot domains (pain, foot function, foot health and footwear) and general wellbeing domains (general health, physical activity, social capacity and vigor) [12, 13].

To date, the FHSQ has not been applied to women who suffer from fibromyalgia [12, 13]. Thus, the main purpose of this study was to compare both foot and general health-related quality of life between women with fibromyalgia and healthy matched women. We hypothesized that women with fibromyalgia may present an impaired quality of life related to foot and general health.

Material and methods

Study design

An observational case-control study was performed following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) criteria [14]. From March to May 2018, a sample of 208 women was recruited by a consecutive sampling method from a university podiatric medicine and surgery unit which provided interventions for foot problems at the University of Extremadura (Plasencia, Spain).

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated by means of the difference between two independent groups using the G*Power 3.1.9.2 software [15] and the foot pain domain score (mean ± SD) from the FHSQ [12, 13] of a prior pilot study (n = 30) with two groups. A case group of 15 patients with fibromyalgia (FHSQ score for foot pain domain of 38.58 ±24.35) and a healthy matched control group of 15 subjects (FHSQ scores for foot pain domain score = 56.26 ±29.23) were used for the data analysis. Furthermore, a 2-tailed hypothesis, an effect size of 0.65, an α error probability of 0.01, a power (1 – β error probability) of 0.95, and an allocation ratio (N2/N1) of 1 were used in order to carry out the sample size calculation. Therefore, a total sample size of 170 participants, with 85 subjects per each group, was determined. Considering 20% of possible subjects lost to follow-up, 204 subjects would be necessary. Finally, 208 participants, 104 cases with fibromyalgia and 104 healthy matched controls, were included in the study.

Patients

A sample of 208 women, mean age of 55.00 ±8.25 years, was recruited from an outpatient clinic and divided into 2 groups, 104 women with fibromyalgia (for the case group) and 104 healthy matched women (for the control group).

For the control group, women older than 18 years old were included in the healthy-matched control group if they reported no spontaneous or chronic pain (at least during the prior 3 months) and no pain-related conditions and were not taking antidepressant or analgesic medications [16].

For the case group, women older than 18 years old diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to a validated experienced rheumatologist diagnosis, based on a combination of both 1990 and modified 2010 criteria, were included [1620]. Tender points were positively screened if patients experienced pain under a 4 kg pressure by means of digital palpation located at the 18 points proposed by the American College of Rheumatology [17]. In addition, the presence of fatigue, sleep disorders and other self-reported symptoms by the patient was considered [18].

Exclusion criteria considered for both groups were women older than 18 years old, prior existence of other types of rheumatic diseases different from fibromyalgia, neurological alterations, other systemic, neoplastic or inflammatory conditions, diagnosis of psychiatric illnesses (e.g. schizophrenia), non-controlled endocrine conditions (e.g. hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism or diabetes), pregnancy, non- or semi-independence in daily life activities, and difficulties understanding the instructions for completing the research course [16].

Outcome measurements

Demographic data such as age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were collected before self-reporting the questionnaire. The Spanish validated self-FHSQ (1.03 Version) was composed of 3 sections. Section one was composed of 13 questions and divided into 4 specific domains regarding foot health-related quality of life: foot function (four questions), foot pain (four questions), footwear (three questions), and general foot health (two questions). Adequate content, criterion, and construct validity (Cronbach α from 0.89 to 0.95) and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient reliability (ICC from 0.74 to 0.92) were reported for section one. Section two was composed of 4 overall health-related quality of life domains (physical activity, general health, social capacity and vigor), whose questions were largely adapted from the SF-36 [21]. Finally, section three included descriptive data such as socioeconomic status, comorbidities, satisfaction or medical record data. Each question showed several responses by means of a Likert ordinal scale, including only 1 response as the most correct. This tool generated different scores for each domain obtained by means of computer software, whose scores varied from 0 to 100. Considering the health-related quality of life, a score of 0 indicated the worst health status while 100 indicated the best health status [12, 13, 22, 23].

Ethics considerations

The Bioethics and Biosafety Committee of the Extremadura University (Spain) approved this study (approval code: 24/2018). All voluntary women signed the informed consent forms before beginning this study. Ethical standards concerning research on human beings according to the Helsinki Declaration (World Medical Association) and the Council of Europe Convention about human rights and biomedicine, and those standards of the UNESCO Universal Declaration about the Human Genome and Human Rights, as well as other national or institutional rules, were respected [24].

Statistical analysis

The FHSQ (v1.03) was used to obtain the foot and general health related quality of life scores. In all analyses, statistically significant differences with a P-value < .01 and a confidence interval (CI) of 99% were considered. Furthermore, all analyses were performed by means of the SPSS 22.0 software (Chicago, IL, USA).

First, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normality, and a normal distribution was considered with p-value > 0.01. Demographic data and FHSQ domains were non-parametric data. Thus, median and interquartile range (IR) as well as maximum and minimum (range) values were used to describe the total sample, women with fibromyalgia (case group), and healthy matched women (control group). The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differences between case and control groups.

Results

Demographic data

A total sample of 208 women between 26 and 83 years old with a median ± IR of 55.00 ±8.25 years completed the study. The sample was divided into 2 groups, 104 women with fibromyalgia (for the case group) and 104 healthy matched women (for the control group). Regarding Table I, demographic characteristics did not show any statistically significant difference (p > 0.01) between the groups.

Table I

Comparison of demographic characteristics of the total sample, women with fibromyalgia and healthy matched women with normalized reference values

ParameterTotal group
Median ± IR
n = 208
Fibromyalgia
Median ± IR
n = 104
Healthy controls
Median ± IR
n = 104
Mann-Whitney U
P-value
Age [years]55.00 ±8.25 (26–83)56.00 ±9.00 (26–83)55.00 ±5.00 (45–82)0.016
Weight [kg]70.00 ±15.00 (43–120)70.50 ±14.00 (50–90)70.00 ±17.50 (43–120)0.300
Height [m]1.60 ±0.07 (1.45–1.79)1.60 ±0.06 (1.45–1.75)1.61 ±0.09 (1.50–1.79)0.166
BMI [kg/m2]27.26 ±5.07 (18.59–43.51)27.47 ±3.90 (18.59–37.46)26.48 ±6.74 (18.75–43.51)0.627

[i] BMI – body mass index, IR – interquartile range. In all the analyses, p < 0.01 (with a 99% confidence interval) was considered statistically significant.

FHSQ domains

As shown in Table II, statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between case and control groups were found for all specific foot domains (foot pain, foot function, foot health and footwear) and general wellbeing domains (general health, physical activity, social capacity and vigor), showing a worse foot and general quality of life (with lower scores of all FHSQ domains) in the women with fibromyalgia compared to healthy matched women.

Table II

Comparison of FHSQ scores of the total sample, women with fibromyalgia and healthy matched women with normalized reference values

VariableTotal group
Median ± IR
n = 208
Fibromyalgia
Median ± IR
n = 104
Healthy controls
Median ± IR
n = 104
Mann-Whitney U
P-value
Foot pain48.12 ±49.38
(0–100)
35.62 ±25.00
(0–90)
76.50 ±34.00
(0–100)
< 0.001
Foot function59.37 ±57.00
(0–100)
37.50 ±37.50
(0–100)
88.00 ±31.00
(0–100)
< 0.001
Footwear25.00 ±50.00
(0–100)
00.00 ±41.67
(0–100)
42.00 ±43.67
(0–100)
< 0.001
General foot health25.00 ±47.50
(0–100)
25.00 ±25.50
(0–85)
43.00 ±35.00
(0–100)
< 0.001
General health40.00 ±40.00
(0–100)
20.00 ±30.00
(0–90)
60.00 ±30.00
(0–100)
< 0.001
Physical activity56.00 ±49.67
(0–100)
38.88 ±33.33
(0–100)
78.00 ±38.00
(11–100)
< 0.001
Social capacity50.00 ±53.13
(0–100)
37.50 ±37.50
(0–100)
75.00 ±38.00
(0–100)
< 0.001
Vigor37.50 ±31.25
(0–100)
25.00 ±31.25
(0–100)
44.00 ±32.00
(0–100)
< 0.001

[i] FHSQ – Foot Health Status Questionnaire, IR – interquartile range. In all the analyses, p < 0.01 (with a 99% confidence interval) was considered statistically significant.

Discussion

To the authors’ knowledge, the present study may be considered as the first research applying the FHSQ [12, 13, 22, 23] which demonstrates specific impairment of the foot health-related quality of life. According to the health-related quality of life questionnaires applied to women who suffered from fibromyalgia – both general quality of life questionnaires, such as the EQ-5D-5L [4], 15D [5], AQoL-8D [6], SF-12 [7] and SF-36 [8], and specific disease questionnaires, such as the FIQR [9] – our findings showed similar results with an impaired general-health related quality of life in women with fibromyalgia [10].

Although women who suffer fibromyalgia show similar foot characteristics of stiffness or mobility and hyperkeratosis or other conditions [11], our study showed a worse foot health related quality of life compared to healthy women. This may be due to the fact that these patients present a central sensitization process [1] as well as more foot pain and analgesic medication use than the general population [11]. Prior FHSQ studies have shown an impaired quality of life in some domains of the specific foot and general health for specific foot problems such as hallux valgus [25], calcaneal apophysitis [26], foot arch height [27], lesser toe deformities [28], plantar heel pain [29, 30], onychomycosis [31] or hyperkeratosis [32], as well as general conditions such as Alzheimer disease [33] and breast cancer [34]. Nevertheless, our findings showed the most significant results of health-related quality of life impairment for all foot specific and general domains of the FHSQ compared to these prior studies.

Implications for clinical practice

Although other studies have previously shown general health-related quality of life differences between women with fibromyalgia and healthy controls [810], our study added specific foot health-related quality of life domains such as foot pain, foot function, foot health and footwear. For the medical research field, the present study provides the quality of life differences related to overall health (general health = –29.04; physical activity = –28.37; social capacity = –24.30; vigor = –22.96 points) and specific foot health (foot pain = –31.69; foot function = –36.46; foot health = –20.95; footwear = –19.53 points) in women with fibromyalgia compared to healthy matched women. Future interventional studies, i.e. generic treatments such as pregabalin [35] or specific interventions such as foot trigger points dry needling [36, 37] and custom-made foot orthotics [38] in women with fibromyalgia, could use these clinical differences as key references in order to normalize the specific foot and general health-related quality of life. In line with prior research [8], we highlight that health authorities should pay more attention to improving the general and foot specific health-related quality of life in women with fibromyalgia.

Some limitations should be considered regarding the present study. First, the consecutive sampling method may be the main limitation of this research. Second, although adequate validity and reliability have been shown for the FHSQ [12, 13, 22, 23], its reliability has not yet been established specifically for women who suffer from fibromyalgia and should be considered for future studies. Finally, quality of life could be modified according to socio-demographic factors such as the origin of women with fibromyalgia from rural or urban areas [39] as well as physical factors such as reduced bone mineral density [40].

In conclusion, an impaired foot and general health-related quality of life was observed in women who suffered from fibromyalgia compared to healthy matched women.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Boomershine C , author. Fibromyalgia: the prototypical central sensitivity syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2015. 11:p. 131–45

2 

Cabo-Meseguer A, Cerdá-Olmedo G, Trillo-Mata JL , authors. Fibromialgia: prevalencia, perfiles epidemiológicos y costes económicos. Med Clin (Barc). 2017. 149:p. 441–8

3 

Arout CA, Sofuoglu M, Bastian LA, Rosenheck RA , authors. Gender differences in the prevalence of fibromyalgia and in concomitant medical and psychiatric disorders: a national veterans health Administration Study. J Women’s Heal. 2018. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6622

4 

Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. , authors. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011. 20:p. 1727–36

5 

Sintonen H , author. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001. 33:p. 328–36

6 

Richardson J, Sinha K, Iezzi A, Khan MA , authors. Modelling utility weights for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-8D. Qual Life Res. 2014. 23:p. 2395–404

7 

Brazier JE, Roberts J , authors. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004. 42:p. 851–9

8 

Roshan R, Shariatpanahi SS, Tavoli A, Qafori Z, Fathi-Ashtiani A , authors. Quality of life in women with fibromyalgia. Arch Med Sci. 2005. 1:p. 267–70

9 

Bennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, Ward R, Han BK, Ross RL , authors. The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009. 11:p. R120

10 

Collado-Mateo D, Chen G, Garcia-Gordillo MA, et al. , authors. Fibromyalgia and quality of life: mapping the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire to the preference-based instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017. 15:p. 114

11 

Padín Galea JM, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, de la Fuente JLM , authors. Characteristics of patients with fibromyalgia. Foot. 2017. 32:p. 27–9

12 

Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Dunne MP , authors. Health-related quality of life following podiatric surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001. 91:p. 164–73

13 

Landorf KB, Radford JA, Hudson S , authors. Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010. 3:p. 7

14 

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. , authors. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014. 12:p. 1500–24

15 

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A , authors. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007. 39:p. 175–91

16 

Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres M, Huertas-Hoyas E, Martínez-Piédrola R, et al. , authors. Balance deficiencies in women with fibromyalgia assessed using computerised dynamic posturography: a cross-sectional study in Spain. BMJ Open. 2017. 7:p. e016239

17 

Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. , authors. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990. 33:p. 160–72

18 

Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. , authors. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010. 62:p. 600–10

19 

Segura-Jiménez V, Aparicio VA, Álvarez-Gallardo IC, et al. , authors. Validation of the modified 2010 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in a Spanish population. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014. 53:p. 1803–11

20 

Segura-Jiménez V, Soriano-Maldonado A, Álvarez-Gallardo IC, Estévez-López F, Carbonell-Baeza A, Delgado-Fernández M , authors. Subgroups of fibromyalgia patients using the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the modified 2010 preliminary diagnostic criteria: the al-Ándalus project. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016. 34 2 Suppl 96:p. S26–33

21 

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD , authors. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992. 30:p. 473–83

22 

Landorf KB, Keenan AM , authors. An evaluation of two foot-specific, health-related quality-of-life measuring instruments. Foot Ankle Int. 2002. 23:p. 538–46

23 

Cuesta-Vargas A, Bennett P, Jimenez-Cebrian AM, Labajos-Manzanares MT , authors. The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2013. 22:p. 1739–43

24 

Holt GR , author. Declaration of Helsinki-the world’s document of conscience and responsibility. South Med J. 2014. 107:p. 407

25 

López López D, Callejo González L, Elena Losa Iglesias M, et al. , authors. Quality of life impact related to foot health in a sample of older people with hallux valgus. Aging Dis. 2016. 7:p. 45–52

26 

James AM, Williams CM, Haines TP , authors. Health related quality of life of children with calcaneal apophysitis: child and parent perceptions. Heal Qual Life Outcomes. 2016. 14:p. 1–7

27 

López López D, Bouza Prego Mde L, Requeijo Constenla A, Saleta Canosa JL, Bautista Casasnovas A, Tajes FA , authors. The impact of foot arch height on quality of life in 6-12 year olds. Colomb Med. 2014. 45:p. 168–72

28 

Lopez Lopez D, Martínez-Vázquez M, Losa-Iglesias ME, et al. , authors. Foot health-related quality of life among elderly with and without lesser toe deformities: a case-control study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018. 12:p. 251–5

29 

Irving DB, Cook JL, Young MA, Menz HB , authors. Impact of chronic plantar heel pain on health-related quality of life. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008. 98:p. 283–9

30 

Palomo López P, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Calvo Lobo C, López López D , authors. Impact of plantar fasciitis on the quality of life of male and female patients according to the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. J Pain Res. 2018. 11:p. 875–80

31 

Milobratović D, Janković S, Vukičević J, Marinković J, Janković J, Railić Z , authors. Quality of life in patients with toenail onychomycosis. Mycoses. 2013. 56:p. 543–51

32 

López-López D, Painceira-Villar R, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. , authors. Impact of the mechanical hyperkeratotic lesions and its association with quality of life: an observational case-control study. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2018 Mar 26. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14970

33 

López-López D, Grela-Fariña M, Losa-Iglesias M, et al. , authors. Clinical aspects of foot health in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. 15:p. 286

34 

Palomo López P, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R, et al. , authors. Clinical aspects of foot health and their influence on quality of life among breast cancer survivors: a case-control study. Cancer Manag Res. 2017. 9:p. 545–51

35 

Keshavarz K, Hashemi-Meshkini A, Gharibnaseri Z, Nikfar S, Kebriaeezadeh A, Abdollahi M , authors. A systematic cost-effectiveness analysis of pregabalin in the management of fibromyalgia: an Iranian experience. Arch Med Sci. 2013. 6:p. 961–7

36 

Tornero-Caballero MC, Salom-Moreno J, Cigarán-Méndez M, Morales-Cabezas M, Madeleine P, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C , authors. Muscle trigger points and pressure pain sensitivity maps of the feet in women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Med. 2016. 17:p. 1923–32

37 

Castro Sánchez AM, García López H, Fernández Sánchez M, et al. , authors. Improvement in clinical outcomes after dry needling versus myofascial release on pain pressure thresholds, quality of life, fatigue, pain intensity, quality of sleep, anxiety, and depression in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2018. p. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1461259

38 

Ferrari R , author. A cohort-controlled trial of the addition of customized foot orthotics to standard care in fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol. 2012. 31:p. 1041–5

39 

Depta A, Jewczak M, Skura-Madziała A , authors. Quality of life of patients from rural and urban areas in Poland with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. A study of the influence of selected socio-demographic factors. Arch Med Sci. 2017. 13:p. 1474–82

40 

Bączyk G, Samborski W, Jaracz K , authors. Evaluation of the quality of life of postmenopausal osteoporotic and osteopenic women with or without fractures. Arch Med Sci. 2016. 12:p. 819–27

Copyright: © 2018 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe