About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Ethics in publishing
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Our reviewers
Ethics in publishing
Guide for reviewers
Books and Events
Books
Events
REVIEW PAPER
Recent trends in applying functional electrical stimulation in the management of spastic paraplegia induced by spinal cord injury: a systematic review
1
Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India
2
Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India
Submission date: 2020-09-19
Acceptance date: 2021-01-11
Publication date: 2023-03-21
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(1):58-64
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
aesthethic physiotherapyneurosciences neurology neurophysiologyphysical activity and sports of handicapped
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Functional electrical stimulation is one of the latest emerging trends in the field of electrotherapy in physiotherapy practice. It is nowadays used as an orthotic device for functional activity. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in spasticity of lower extremity in spinal cord injury patients.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The systematic literature search covered articles published in years 2000–2020. The databases considered for the literature search were PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) applied for the search included "functional electrical stimulation", "lower limb", "rehabilitation", "spasticity", "spinal cord injury". The records were assessed for the risk of bias with the RoB 2 Cochrane tool.
Results:
The statistical evidence suggests functional electrical stimulation to be equivalent to other modes of treatment. The overall observation of the within-group results and the feedback from the patients indicate that functional electrical stimulation is superior to all other interventions in improving the functional activities of daily life.
Conclusions:
From the evidence collected within the limitations of the present systematic review, it can be concluded that the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation allows to apply it as an adjunct to the standard treatments available with more priority.
Functional electrical stimulation is one of the latest emerging trends in the field of electrotherapy in physiotherapy practice. It is nowadays used as an orthotic device for functional activity. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in spasticity of lower extremity in spinal cord injury patients.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The systematic literature search covered articles published in years 2000–2020. The databases considered for the literature search were PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) applied for the search included "functional electrical stimulation", "lower limb", "rehabilitation", "spasticity", "spinal cord injury". The records were assessed for the risk of bias with the RoB 2 Cochrane tool.
Results:
The statistical evidence suggests functional electrical stimulation to be equivalent to other modes of treatment. The overall observation of the within-group results and the feedback from the patients indicate that functional electrical stimulation is superior to all other interventions in improving the functional activities of daily life.
Conclusions:
From the evidence collected within the limitations of the present systematic review, it can be concluded that the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation allows to apply it as an adjunct to the standard treatments available with more priority.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Da Cunha MJ, Rech KD, Salazar AP, Pagnussat AS. Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve improves post-stroke gait speed when combined with physiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(1):101388; doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.012.
2.
Matsumoto S, Shimodozono M, Noma T. Rationale and design of the therapeutic effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation for lower extremity in patients with convalescent poststroke hemiplegia (RALLY) study: study protocol for a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e026214; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026214.
3.
Berenpas F, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC, van Alfen N. Long-term use of implanted peroneal functional electrical stimulation for stroke-affected gait: the effects on muscle and motor nerve. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):86; doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0556-2.
4.
Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M. Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961;42:101–105.
5.
Kantrowitz A, Schamaun M. Paraplegic dogs: urinary bladder evacuation with direct electric stimulation. Science. 1963;139(3550):115–116; doi: 10.1126/science.139.3550.115.
6.
Carnstam B, Larsson LE, Prevec TS. Improvement of gait following functional electrical stimulation. I. Investigations on changes in voluntary strength and proprioceptive reflexes. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1977;9(1):7–13.
7.
Kralj A, Bajd T, Turk R, Krajnik J, Benko H. Gait restoration in paraplegic patients: a feasibility demonstration using multichannel surface electrode FES. J Rehabil R D. 1983;20(1):3–20.
8.
Gracanin F. Functional electrical stimulation in external control of motor activity and movements of paralysed extremities. Research and clinical practice and applied technology in Yugoslavia. Int Rehabil Med. 1984;6(1):25–30; doi: 10.3109/09638288409166966.
9.
Bajd T, Kralj A, Turk R, Benko H, Sega J. Use of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11(2):96–102; doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(89)90115-5.
10.
Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, Wood DE, Norton JA, Singleton C, et al. Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(12):1577–1583; doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90333-7.
11.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898; doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
12.
Sivaramakrishnan A, Solomon JM, Manikandan N. Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury – a pilot randomized cross-over trial. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;41(4):397–406; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1390930.
13.
Ralston KE, Harvey L, Batty J, Bonsan LB, Ben M, Cusmiani R, et al. Functional electrical stimulation cycling has no clear effect on urine output, lower limb swelling, and spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised cross-over trial. J Physiother. 2013;59(4):237–243; doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70200-5.
14.
Kapadia N, Masani K, Craven BC, Giangregorio LM, Hitzig SL, Richards K, et al. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on walking competency. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37(5):511–524; doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000263.
15.
Yaşar E, Yılmaz B, Göktepe S, Kesikburun S. The effect of functional electrical stimulation cycling on late functional improvement in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(12):866–869; doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.19.
16.
Giangregorio L, Craven C, Richards K, Kapadia N, Hitzig SL, Masani K, et al. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on body composition. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(5):351–360; doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000041.
17.
Marquez-Chin C, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review. Biomed Eng Online. 2020;19(1):34; doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00773-4.
18.
Bailes A, Caldwell C, Clay M, Tremper M, Dunning K, Haynes E, et al. Activity and participation outcomes in children with hemiplegia following functional electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis use. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(S5):76; doi: 10.1111/dmcn.2_12886.
19.
Nagai MK, Marquez-Chin C, Popovic MR. Why is functional electrical stimulation therapy capable of restoring motor function following severe injury to the central nervous system? In: Tuszynski MH (ed.), Translational neuroscience. Fundamental approaches for neurological disorders. Boston: Springer; 2016; 479–498.
20.
Marquez-Chin C, Bolivar-Tellería I, Popovic MR. Brain-computer interfaces for neurorehabilitation: enhancing functional electrical stimulation. In: Diez P (ed.), Smart wheelchairs and brain-computer interfaces. London: Academic Press; 2018; 425–451.
21.
Popovic MR, Craven BC. Functional electrical stimulation therapy: individualized neuroprosthesis for grasping and reaching. In: Söderback I (ed.), International handbook of occupational therapy interventions. New York: Springer; 2009; 99–107.
22.
Bajd T, Kralj A, Stefancic M, Lavrac N. Use of functional electrical stimulation in the lower extremities of incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Artif Organs. 1999;23(5):403–409; doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06360.x.
23.
Kralj A, Bajd T, Turk R, Šavrin R, Benko H. Eleven years of experience in FES assisted gait of spinal cord injured patients. J Biomech. 1994;27(6):805.
24.
Granat M, Keating JF, Smith ACB, Delargy M, Andrews BJ. The use of functional electrical stimulation to assist gait in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14(2):93–97; doi: 10.3109/09638289209167078.
25.
Granat MH, Ferguson ACB, Andrews BJ, Delargy M. The role of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury – observed benefits during gait studies. Spinal Cord. 1993;31(4):207–215; doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.39.
26.
Kressler J, Ghersin H, Nash MS. Use of functional electrical stimulation cycle ergometers by individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(2):123–126; doi: 10.1310/sci2002-123.
27.
Maležič M, Hesse S. Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic patients: a modified programme of treatment. Spinal Cord. 1995;33(3):126–131; doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.28.
28.
Maležič M, Hesse S, Schewe H, Mauritz K-H. Restoration of standing, weight-shift and gait by multichannel electrical stimulation in hemiparetic patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):169–179; doi: 10.1097/00004356-199406000-00007.
29.
Gallien P, Brissot R, Eyssette M, Tell L, Barat M, Wiart L, et al. Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation for spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord. 1995;33(11):660–664; doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.138.
30.
Kobetic R, Triolo RJ, Marsolais EB. Muscle selection and walking performance of multichannel FES systems for ambulation in paraplegia. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1997;5(1):23–29; doi: 10.1109/86.559346.
31.
Veltink PH, Donaldson N. A perspective on the control of FES-supported standing. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6(2):109–112; doi: 10.1109/tre.1998.681176.
32.
Kamnik R, Bajd T, Kralj A. Functional electrical stimulation and arm supported sit-to-stand transfer after paraplegia: a study of kinetic parameters. Artif Organs. 1999;23(5):413–417; doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06367.x.
33.
Bonaroti D, Akers J, Smith BT, Mulcahey MJ, Betz RR. A comparison of FES with KAFO for providing ambulation and upright mobility in a child with a complete thoracic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1999;22(3):159–166; doi: 10.1080/10790268.1999.11719565.
34.
Verhaagen J, McDonald JW III (eds.). Handbook of clinical neurology. Spinal cord injury. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.
35.
Ibáñez J, González-Vargas J, Azorín JM, Akay M, Pons JL (eds.). Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation II. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation. October 18–21, 2016, Segovia, Spain. Cham: Springer; 2017.
36.
Lin VW (ed.). Spinal cord medicine. Principles and practice, 2nd ed. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2010.
37.
Thomaz SR, Cipriano G Jr, Formiga MF, Fachin-Martins E, Bernardelli Cipriano GF, Rodrigues Martins W, et al. Effect of electrical stimulation on muscle atrophy and spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury – a systematic review with meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(4):258–266; doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0250-z.
38.
Weidner N, Rupp R, Tansey KE (eds.). Neurological aspects of spinal cord injury. Cham: Springer; 2017.
39.
Acton QA (ed.). Spinal cord injury: new insights for the healthcare professional: 2013 edition. Atlanta: Scholarly Editions; 2013.
40.
Tuszynski MH (ed.), Translational neuroscience. Fundamental approaches for neurological disorders. Boston: Springer; 2016.
41.
Selzer ME, Clarke S, Cohen LG, Kwakkel G, Miller RH (eds.). Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
42.
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dietz V (eds.). Neurorehabilitation technology. Cham: Springer; 2016.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
