eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 14
Systematic review/Meta-analysis

Skin perfusion pressure for the prediction of wound healing in critical limb ischemia: a meta-analysis

Xuanliang Pan, Chuangang You, Guoxian Chen, Huawei Shao, Chunmao Han, Lizhu Zhi

Arch Med Sci 2018; 14, 3: 481–487
Online publish date: 2016/09/08
View full text
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the value and efficacy of skin perfusion pressure (SPP) for the prediction of wound healing in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Material and methods
Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception until December 31, 2014 using combinations of the following keywords: skin perfusion pressure, limb ischemia, wound healing, prediction. Randomized controlled trials, 2-arm prospective studies, and retrospective studies that measured SPP in patients with limb ischemia were included. The outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of SPP for the prediction of wound healing.

Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean patient age ranged from 62.2 to 71.5 years, and the majority were male. The pooled sensitivity of SPP for the prediction of wound healing was 79.9% using 30 mm Hg as the cut-off, 67.1% using 40 mm Hg, and 76.1% for all included studies (95% CI: 73.9–84.9%, 55.8–76.8%, and 70.7–80.8%, respectively). The pooled specificity was 78.2% using 30 mm Hg, 84.2% using 40 mm Hg, and 82.1% for all included studies (95% CI: 61.5–89.0%, 74.0–90.9%, 73.7–88.3%, respectively).

Skin perfusion pressure can accurately predict wound healing in patients with critical limb ischemia.


amputation, limb ischemia, meta-analysis, skin perfusion pressure

Novo S, Coppola G, Milio G. Critical limb ischemia: definition and natural history. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord 2004; 4: 219-25.
Skóra J, Pupka A, Janczak D, et al. Combined autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell and gene therapy as the last resort for patients with critical limb ischemia. Arch Med Sci 2015; 11: 325-31.
Karanfilian RG, Lynch TG, Zirul VT, Padberg FT, Jamil Z, Hobson RW 2nd. The value of laser Doppler velocimetry and transcutaneous oxygen tension determination in predicting healing of ischemic forefoot ulcerations and amputations in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. J Vasc Surg 1986; 4: 511-6.
Varga M, Sixta B, Bem R, Matia I, Jirkovska A, Adamec M. Application of gentamicin-collagen sponge shortened wound healing time after minor amputations in diabetic patients – a prospective, randomised trial. Arch Med Sci 2014; 10: 283-7.
Holstein P. Level selection in leg amputation for arterial occlusive disease: a comparison of clinical evaluation and skin perfusion pressure. Acta Orthop Scand 1982; 53: 821-31.
Yamada T, Ohta T, Ishibashi H, et al. Clinical reliability and utility of skin perfusion pressure measurement in ischemic limbs: comparison with other noninvasive diagnostic methods. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 318-23.
Lo T, Sample R, Moore P, Gold P. Prediction of wound healing outcome using skin perfusion pressure and transcutaneous oximetry: a single-center experience in 100 patients. Wounds 2009; 21: 310-6.
Malvezzi L, Castronuovo JJ Jr, Swayne LC, Cone D, Trivino JZ. The correlation between three methods of skin perfusion pressure measurement: radionuclide washout, laser Doppler flow, and photoplethysmography. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15: 823-9.
Urabe G, Yamamoto K, Onozuka A, Miyata T, Nagawa H. Skin perfusion pressure is a useful tool for evaluating outcome of ischemic foot ulcers with conservative therapy. Ann Vasc Dis 2009; 2: 21-6.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: W65-94.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529-36.
Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 820-6.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-58.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-88.
Utsunomiya M, Nakamura M, Nagashima Y, Sugi K. Predictive value of skin perfusion pressure after endovascular therapy for wound healing in critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther 2014; 21: 662-70.
Castronuovo JJ Jr, Adera HM, Smiell JM, Price RM. Skin perfusion pressure measurement is valuable in the diagnosis of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 629-37.
Adera HM, James K, Castronuovo JJ Jr, Byrne M, Deshmukh R, Lohr J. Prediction of amputation wound healing with skin perfusion pressure. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 823-8.
Mehta K, Hobson RW 2nd, Jamil Z, Hart L, O’Donnell JA. Fallibility of Doppler ankle pressure in predicting healing of transmetatarsal amputation. J Surg Res 1980; 28: 466-70.
Watanabe Y, Onozuka A, Obitsu Y, et al. Skin perfusion pressure measurement to assess improvement in peripheral circulation after arterial reconstruction for critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Dis 2011; 4: 235-40.
Okamoto S, Iida O, Nakamura M, et al. Postprocedural skin perfusion pressure correlates with clinical outcomes 1 year after endovascular therapy for patients with critical limb ischemia. Angiology 2015; 66: 862-6.
Kawasaki T, Uemura T, Matsuo K, et al. The effect of different positions on lower limbs skin perfusion pressure. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46: 508-12.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe