eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Clinical research

Stool antigen detection versus 13C-urea breath test for non-invasive diagnosis of pediatric Helicobacter pylori infection in a limited resource setting

Mortada El-Shabrawi, Nabil Abd El-Aziz, Tarek Zakaria El-Adly, Fetouh Hassanin, Ayman Eskander, Maha Abou-Zekri, Hala Mansour, Safa Meshaal

Arch Med Sci 2018; 14, 1: 69–73
Article file
- stool antigen.pdf  [0.08 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common bacterial infections in humans, having a worldwide distribution and affecting nearly 50% of the world’s population [1]. The majority of persons infected with H. pylori develop chronic gastritis, but they are often asymptomatic [2]. The infection is mainly acquired during childhood or adolescence [3]. This acquisition early in life has been reported to increase the risk of peptic ulcer [4] and gastric cancer in adulthood [4, 5]. Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of both duodenal and peptic ulcers and is associated with the risk of developing gastric cancer.
The prevalence of H. pylori is inversely related to socioeconomic status [6], and in many developing countries it is over 80%, which is substantially higher than in industrialized countries, where it is under 40% [7]. The prevalence of infection with H. pylori among Egyptian children aged 2–17 years in the city of Cairo is 46% [8].
In view of all the aforementioned issues, identification and accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children are essential. Several invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests are used for the detection of H. pylori infection [9]. Endoscopic diagnosis coupled with biopsy of the gastric tissue for culture and the urease test is considered rather inconvenient, invasive and expensive, with potential complications [10]. The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) has largely replaced endoscopy and become the gold standard diagnostic investigation for H. pylori infection [11]. The UBT is non-invasive, accurate and relatively expensive. It requires mass spectrometric analysis, which may not be available at small centers in developing countries with limited resources. However, the 13C-UBT can now be performed using a more compact infrared spectrophotometer, which is less expensive and easier to use than mass spectrometry [12]. Recently, a potential role for alcohol dehydrogenase class IV isoenzyme as a marker for H. pylori infection has been suggested, with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 90%, respectively [13].
Non-invasive methods for detection of H. pylori infection are required to study its incidence, transmission, and clearance. They should be easy to perform and inexpensive, have a high diagnostic accuracy and be well tolerated, especially in infants and toddlers. Detection of H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) is becoming an alternative, non-invasive, simple and cost-effective diagnostic test; however, its accuracy in developing countries, particularly in children, has not yet been well-established. To the best of our knowledge, comparison between the UBT and HpSA has not been reported in Egyptian children. The aim of this study was to compare, prospectively, the reliability, specificity and sensitivity of HpSA testing, using rapid lateral flow immunoassay, with the 13C-UBT as the gold standard method for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in a cohort of symptomatic Egyptian children, in a limited resource setting.

Material and methods

Patient population

We prospectively enrolled 60 symptomatic and dyspeptic children selected from the tropical pediatric clinic at Cairo University Children’s Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from June 2012 to March 2013. They were 30 males and 30 females. Written consent was obtained from the parents of eligible children. The study was ethically approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. Patients enrolled were complaining of recurrent abdominal pain, persistent vomiting, hematemesis and growth failure, either separately or in different combinations. Children receiving antimicrobial therapy or proton pump inhibitors within the preceding one month were excluded from the study. All patients underwent careful history taking, thorough clinical examination and laboratory investigations including complete blood picture, urine and stool analysis, UBT and HpSA.


The UBT required that the child be brought to the laboratory following an overnight fast to collect a baseline sample of expired breath in a double way test bag. The child was then fed 50 mg of 13C-labeled urea substrate on a citric acid base (fresh pure orange juice) as the UBT meal. Thirty minutes after ingestion, a breath sample was collected again and analyzed using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (12/13 CO2-breath test analyzer FANci2, Fischer Analysen Instrumente GmbH, Steingrund Dreieich, Germany). The test was considered positive when the delta over baseline (DOB) value was > 4.0%.

HpSA test

The HpSA test was less time-consuming. Stool specimens were tested using the One step H. pylori antigen test device (IHP-602, ACON Laboratories, Inc., San Diego, USA; Prime diagnostics, São Paulo, Brazil) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (94.9–100% sensitivity and 95.1–100% specificity, according to the manufacturer). The one step test is a qualitative, lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of HpSA in human fecal specimens. In this test, the membrane is pre-coated with anti-H. pylori antibodies in the test line region. During testing, the specimen reacts with the anti-H. pylori antibodies. The mixture migrates upwards on the membrane by capillary action and reacts with the anti-H. pylori antibodies on the membrane. This generates a colored line across the central window of the cassette. The presence of this colored line in the test region T indicates a positive result, while its absence indicates a negative one. To serve as a procedural control, a colored line should always appear in the control region C, indicating that the proper volume of the specimen has been added.
In order to obtain maximum antigens, we collected a sufficient quantity of feces (1–2 ml or 1–2 g) in a clean, dry specimen container. The assay was performed within 6 hours after stool collection. Small samples collected from three different sites of the stool specimen were transferred into a specimen collection tube containing extraction buffer and then shaken vigorously. The tube was left for two minutes, then two full drops of the extracted specimen were transferred into the specimen wells of the test device. Results were read after 10 min of incubation at room temperature. Based on the appearance of colored lines across the central window of the cassette, the appearance of two lines, C and T, indicated a positive result. A pale colored line in T was also considered as positive. The appearance of only one line in C indicated a negative test.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 16.0 for Windows. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was calculated for quantitative data and percentage for categorical variables. Numbers and percentages were compared by the 2 test. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated, and the  coefficient was used as a measure of agreement for categorical data.


The ages of the 60 children enrolled in this study ranged from 2 to 15 years, with a mean age ± SD of 7.2 ±3.7 years. The performance of the HpSA test was assessed using the UBT as the gold standard method, to define H. pylori-positive and -negative groups. Out of the 60 pediatric patients studied, 38 had a positive UBT and were therefore considered as having H. pylori infection. The HpSA test was positive in 34 (89.5%) of the 38 patients (true-positive) and negative in four (false-negative) (Table I), indicating a sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 75.2–97.1%) (Table II). The remaining 22 children who were negative according to the UBT were considered H. pylori-negative and were diagnosed as having functional dyspepsia. The HpSA test was negative in 21 cases (95.5%) (true-negative) and positive in one (false-positive) (Table I), denoting a specificity of 95.5% (95% CI: 77.2–99.9%) (Table II). Considering that there were 34 true-positive and one false-positive test results, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1–99.9%); and as there were 21 true-negative and 4 false-negative tests, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 84% (95% CI: 63.9–95.5%) (Table II). Our findings revealed a strong measure of agreement between the HpSA test and the UBT ( = 0.83, 95% CI: 68–97%, p < 0.001).
The HpSA test gave 34 true outcomes per 60 tested, for a cost of US $431.65 for 60 tests, and a mean cost of $12.70 per true positive test, while the UBT had 38 true outcomes, for a cost of $906.47 for 60 tests and a mean cost of $23.85 per true positive test (Table III). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the UBT when compared with the HpSA test was $118.71; this is the difference in cost ($906.47 minus $431.65) divided by the gain of 4 true positive outcomes.


The economic, ethical, and public health implications of the presence of H. pylori infection in children have motivated the search for accurate, non-invasive tests [14]. The ease of administration and ability to test large numbers of children in a short time have made non-invasive tests the assays of choice for diagnosing H. pylori, especially in epidemiologic studies. In our study, out of the 60 dyspeptic children, 38 (63.3%) were diagnosed as H. pylori-positive by the UBT.
According to Baumann [15], HpSA testing is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a non-invasive diagnostic test of H. pylori infection and as a test to monitor the response to treatment. We observed a high sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy for the HpSA test (89.5, 95.5 and 91.7%, respectively), showing a strong measure of agreement between the HpSA test and the UBT ( = 0.83, 95% CI: 68–97%, p < 0.001). Our findings are consistent with those of Silva et al. [2], who tested the rapid lateral flow chromatography stool antigen assay using the 13C-UBT as the gold standard method and detected a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 87.5%, respectively, presenting a substantial agreement with the breath test ( = 0.75). The stool antigen test may be performed by conventional enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using polyclonal antibodies, showing a sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% to 98.3% and 94% to 100%, respectively, in children [10, 16–18], and a sensitivity and specificity of 79% to 91.9% and 80.5% to 100%, respectively, in adults [19–21]. A slightly lower sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 78.9%, respectively, were detected by Syam et al. [22] in adults.
The false-negative test results of HpSA might have been due to low colonization of bacteria in the stomach leading to a low concentration of antigens of H. pylori in the feces and the inability to react in the test [9]. The false-positive result might have been caused by the presence of the coccoid form of H. pylori, i.e., the morphologic manifestation of bacterial cell death, which does not denote an infection [23]. It is important to note that the possibility of external contamination could not be excluded, although stools were collected in clean sterile containers. It is also hard to rule out the positive antigen detection from the intestinal flora due to the stool sample source. The cross-reaction among the polyclonal antibodies of the test with antigens of bacteria from the intestinal flora may explain the false-positive result.
The diagnostic accuracy of the HpSA test, particularly the sensitivity, is reduced by upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and a negative test result should be confirmed by further diagnostic methods [24]. When the rapid lateral flow fecal antigen tests were evaluated in adults, the incubation time was observed to be an important factor for the reading of the result. Readings at 30 min (76.9%) and 60 min (78.6%) had higher sensitivity than after 20 min (59.1%), suggesting a new reading strategy to increase the sensitivity: the first interpretation at 15–20 min, then a longer incubation time of 30 minutes when negative results occur after 20 min, with a possible interpretation at a final reading of 60 min for the very low percentage of undetermined results at 30 min [25].
The stool antigen test by lateral flow immunoassay performed well in children. It is readily available in many hospitals and medical centers, can be performed in any laboratory and is useful for small laboratories that work with few samples or do not have the equipment for performing EIA. It is faster than conventional EIA, which takes more than two hours to be performed [26]. On the other hand, the UBT, while being more accurate than the fecal test, was time-consuming and more cumbersome to perform, as collection of air was very difficult in very young children. Thus, it was not well tolerated by pediatric patients. The lack of availability of the UBT due to the high cost of the test and, in particular, the need for expensive analytical instrumentation limits the usefulness of this method, making the rapid lateral flow stool antigen test cheaper and more affordable. Single testing, as recommended by the manufacturer, is a safe approach and will reduce the costs of the test. Thus, the stool antigen test seems to be a cost-effective method. This is in agreement with other investigators [27] who, on the basis of cost-effectiveness analysis, stated that the fecal antigen test, when compared to serology and the UBT, is the preferable strategy for diagnosis of H. pylori in primary care.
In conclusion, the lateral flow HpSA test is a reliable method for the primary diagnosis of H. pylori infections in children, though not as accurate as the 13C-UBT. It is more affordable, more practical and simpler to perform, and more tolerable. It represents a viable alternative to the UBT, especially in developing countries.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1. Perez-Perez GI, Rothenbacher D, Brenner H. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2004; 9: 1-6.
2. Silva JM, Villares CA, Monteiro Mdo S, Colauto C, dos Santos AF, Mattar R. Validation of a rapid stool antigen test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2010; 52: 125-8.
3. Ni YH, Lin JT, Huang SF, Yang JC, Chang MH. Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by stool antigen test and 6 other currently available tests in children. J Pediatr 2000; 136: 823-7.
4. Biernat MM, Poniewierka E, Błaszczuk J, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori isolates from Lower Silesia, Poland. Arch Med Sci 2014; 10: 505-9.
5. Mattar R, Monteiro MS, Marques SB, Zilberstein B, Hashimoto CL, Carrilho FL. Association of LEC and tnpA Helicobacter pylori genes with gastric cancer in a Brazilian population. Infect Agents Cancer 2010; 5: 1.
6. Ahmed KS, Khan AA, Ahmed I, et al. Impact of household hygiene and water source on the prevalence and transmission of Helicobacter pylori: a South Indian perspective. Singapore Med J 2007; 48: 543-9.
7. Kusters JG, van Vilt AHM, Kuipers EJ. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006; 19: 449-90.
8. Sherif M, Mohran Z, Fathy H, Rockabrand D, Rozmajzl PJ, Frenck RW. Universal high-level primary metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolated from children in Egypt. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 4832-4.
9. Kuloğlu Z, Kansu A, Kirsaçlioğlu CT, et al. A rapid lateral flow stool antigen immunoassay and (14)C-urea breath test for the diagnosis and eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 62: 351-6.
10. Gulcan EM, Varol A, Kutlu T, et al. Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test. Indian J Pediatr 2005; 72: 675-8.
11. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut 2007; 56: 772-81.
12. Kato M, Saito M, Fukuda S, et al. 13C-urea breath test, using a new compact nondispersive isotope-selective infrared spectrophotometer: comparison with mass spectrometry. J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 629-34.
13. Jelski W, Laniewska-Dunaj M, Strumnik A, Szmitkowski M. The alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzyme alcohol dehydrogenase IV as a candidate marker of Helicobacter pylori infection. Arch Med Sci 2014; 10: 951-5.
14. Torres J, Leal-Herrera Y, Ramos I, Madrazo-de la Garza A, Monath T, Muñoz O. Comparison of H. pylori reinfection and primary acquisition in children from a community with high prevalence of infection. Gut 1999; 45 (Suppl III): A95.
15. Baumann AJ. Helicobacter pylori antigen test. Philadelphia, USA: Department of internal Medicine Albert Einstein Medical Center; 2014. Available from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2117821-overview. Accessed July 23rd, 2015.
16. de Carvalho Costa Cardinali L, Rocha GA, Rocha AM, et al. Evaluation of [13C]urea breath test and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children from a developing country. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 3334-5.
17. Konstantopoulos N, Rüssmann H, Tasch C, et al. Evaluation of the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSA) for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 677-83.
18. Kato S, Nakayama K, Minoura T, et al. Comparison between the 13C-urea breath test and stool antigen test for the diagnosis of childhood Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 1045-50.
19. Domínguez J, Forné M, Blanco S, et al. Comparison of a monoclonal with a polyclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay stool test in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection before and after eradication therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 1735-40.
20. Veijola L, Myllyluoma E, Korpela R, Rautelin H. Stool antigen tests in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection before and after eradication therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 7340-4.
21. Hooton C, Keohane J, Clair J, et al. Comparison of three stool antigen assays with the 13C-urea breath test for primary diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and monitoring treatment outcome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 595-9.
22. Syam AF, Rani AA, Abdullah M, et al. Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 386-8.
23. Blanco S, Forné M, Lacoma A, et al. Comparison of stool antigen immunoassay methods for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection before and after eradication treatment. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 61: 150-5.
24. Peitz U, Leodolter A, Kahl S, et al. Antigen stool test for assessment of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 1075-84.
25. Krausse R, Müller G, Doniec M. Evaluation of a rapid new stool antigen test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult patients. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 2062-5.
26. Yang HR, Seo JK. Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) tests in children before and after eradication therapy: comparison of rapid immunochromatographic assay and HpSA ELISA. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 2053-8.
27. Elwyn G, Taubert M, Davies S, Brown G, Allison M, Phillips C. Which test is best for Helicobacter pylori? A cost-effectiveness model using decision analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 401-3.
Copyright: © 2016 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe