eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Current issue Archive About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
 
1/2021
vol. 37
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Review paper

The advances in diagnostic modalities of disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon – review

Maciej Gagat
1
,
Agnieszka Zabrzyńska
2
,
Maria Zabrzyńska
3
,
Wioletta Zielińska
1

1.
Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
2.
Department of Radiology, Multidisciplinary Hospital, Inowroclaw, Poland
3.
Faculty of Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne 2021; 37 (1): 83–90
Online publish date: 2021/03/31
Article file
- The advances.pdf  [0.20 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) are a common source of pain in the anterior shoulder area. They are usually localized at the level of the bicipital groove on the humerus and below towards the elbow [1–3]. LHBT can be divided into intra- and extra-articular portions, which exposes it to various loading patterns [3]. Nevertheless, the intra-articular part is more prone to friction and compressing forces, causing a microtrauma, which initially leads to inflammation with subsequent development of the degeneration process, known clinically as tendinopathy. For this reason, this part of the tendon is more often described in the literature [1]. Moreover, more than 90% of patients with LHB tendinopathy have an additional shoulder pathology. It includes concomitant rotator cuff tears (RCTs), acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disorders, superior labrum anterior to posterior injuries (SLAP), omarthrosis, and subacromial impingement [4–6]. Thus, a detailed medical history of a patient, physical examination, and radiological and histopathological evaluation are crucial for a complete and accurate diagnosis. Mechanical forces and extreme loads are the main causes of widespread biceps tendon pathology. Considering the plague of concomitant RCTs, the advances in LHBT diagnostics are receiving more and more attention nowadays.
The broad spectrum of LHBT disorders can be divided into 3 main categories: inflammatory reactions, degenerative conditions, and instability of the biceps tendon. Clinically, all of them manifest with anterior shoulder pain. Although considering the treatment strategy classification of a disorder as belonging to a certain category may be helpful, from the diagnostic perspective, there is significant overlap among these pathologies. We can clearly say that there is a continuum of disease, starting with acute inflammation and ending with tendinous structure degeneration. The pathomechanism of repetitive traction and friction forces during glenohumeral joint rotation results in short-term inflammation, which in the long-term leads to instability and further tears with degeneration [7, 8].
According to our knowledge, there are no reports reviewing the various pathological alterations observed in LHBT disorders, especially from the ultrastructural and microscopic point of view. Moreover, the diagnostic imaging of LHBT disorders, such as ultrasounds (US) and magnetic resonance (MRI) methods, are usually not comprehensively described in the literature. We believe that an update of the actual knowledge on biceps tendon pathology will improve the choice of treatment strategies. This review aimed to reveal the current state of knowledge in the diagnostics of the broad spectrum of LHBT disorders, with special reference to the following: microscopic examination, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in biceps pathology.

The current state of knowledge considering the histopathology of LHBT

The current approach to tendon pathology assumes the presence of abundant degeneration in tendinous tissue structure [9]. From the microscopic point of view, a degenerative process of LHBT is similar to changes observed in the Achilles tendon, patellar tendon, extensor carpi radialis tendon, and rotator cuff tendons [10]. Tendinopathy is characterized by impaired healing of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the absence of inflammatory cells, altered proteoglycan content, chaotic remodelling of collagen architecture, and increased collagen type III level [3]. The exact aetiology of tendinopathy remains elusive. However, some reports point to abnormalities in the mechanobiological interactions between the tenocytes and the ECM as a possible reason for the chaotic production of tissue matrix [11–13]. Moreover, the exact molecular mediators and signals have not yet been discovered. However, increased activity of, e.g., metalloproteinases (MMP-1, -2, and -13) is often observed in tendinopathy [14–16].
The broad spectrum of LHBT disorders includes tendon inflammation, degeneration, and instability, but it is a continuum of disease, as was presented in the introduction. Tendinitis of the LHB is an acute inflammation of the tendon and its synovium. Commonly its symptoms occur at the level where it is constrained within the bicipital groove of the humerus [6, 17]. The disorder is usually transient and results in complete healing of tendinous tissue, similarly as in the phase of inflammation during connective tissue healing. However, in a minority of cases there is a possibility of tissue degeneration (tendinopathy) as an effect of impaired regeneration. It must be emphasized that the pathology of LHBT starts from its ultrastructure, mainly with the altered morphology of tenocytes and disruption of the ECM architecture [1]. Franchi et al. revealed, based on transmission electron microscopy of healthy tendons, the highly organized and hierarchical structure of the ECM with a modest population of tenocytes with the fusiform morphology [18]. The ultrastructure of the pathological biceps tendon is characterized by advanced tenocytes alterations. They become randomly scattered in the ECM, while their shape is deformed. Moreover, they can be enlarged due to the chaotic production of the matrix. The described morphology can be connected with a disturbed mechanotransduction process and further impaired tendon adaptation to the new load, creating a vicious circle. The transformation of the tenocytes into a more round or oval shape could be evidence of cartilage metaplasia. In turn, this could be a form of adaptation to a new load. The intra-articular portion of the LHBT is exposed to friction, compression forces, and traction, similar to those observed in enthesis. Zabrzyński et al. revealed some advanced changes in the tenocyte morphology based on an electron microscope study of the LHBT [1]. Furthermore, Maffulli et al. showed that the metaplasia of fibroblasts into chondrocytes is characteristic for advanced tendinopathy [19]. Moreover, the apoptotic features in tenocytes were observed in a few studies [1, 20].
Regarding the ECM alterations, a shift in the collagenous/non-collagenous ratio with the accumulation of ground substance between collagen fibrils is observed [1, 21]. Moreover, there is a decrease in the number of crimps – these are elements responsible for the mechanical properties of tendons that act as a shock absorber [1, 22]. The diameter of the collagen fibrils seen with a transmission electron microscope (TEM) is also reduced. Furthermore, the fibrils tend to create a homogenous mass, which does not show adequate mechanical properties. In the case of light microscopy, the biceps tendon pathology focuses mainly on tenocyte alterations, ECM disruption, and neovascularization (Figure 1). Moreover, some authors described a marginal inflammatory response. The total tenocyte population is usually increased. The cells are enlarged and more oval in shape. The nuclei swell while the cytoplasm marginalizes. Moreover, ECM destruction results from increased expression of MMP 1, 3, and 9 [23]. MMPs play an important role in the matrix homeostasis, where they degrade collagen and proteoglycans [23].
The ECM alterations mainly involve disrupted collagen architecture, ground substance deposition with myxoid degeneration, and increased collagen III type/I type ratio [3, 24]. The characteristic crimps or wavy configuration of the collagen fibres disappear. Moreover, the fibres are separated by the foci of the non-collagenous matrix. Shishani et al. identified a myxoid degeneration in all specimens with deposition of the non-collagenous matrix between collagen fibres [2]. The authors observed increased ground substance accumulation [2, 3]. In turn, Mazzocca et al. found a significantly higher number of proteoglycans in the intra-articular portions of the LHBT than in the extra-articular part and control group [25]. The altered ratio of collagen III to collagen I was presented in several studies. Moreover, the intra-articular bicep part, compared to the extra-articular one, was characterized by increased type III collagen [3, 25]. Regarding neovascularization, the groups of capillaries distributed chaotically in the ECM were characteristic for the LHBT pathology [26]. Shishani et al. presented newly formed capillaries invasion in the whole examined population. On the other hand, Zabrzyński et al. observed neovascularization in 78% of investigated specimens [27]. This data shows the strong association between LHBT pathology and the process of neovascularization.
It is interesting that some tendons, such as the Achilles tendon, rotator cuff tendons, and tibialis posterior tendon, contain hypovascular regions, called the critical zones [28]. Similarly, in the LHBT, a hypovascular region was found about 1–3 cm from its origin [4]. Despite the poorly vascularized regions, in the case of the LHBT disorders, there is an abundant angiofibrous response. However, this phenomenon is reduced in heavy smokers. Moreover, there is a positive correlation between the smoking indexes and the intensity of new vessel formation in the tendinous tissue of the biceps [21]. The inflammatory process with a marginal infiltration of the inflammatory cells in the case of LHB tendinopathy was revealed only by a few authors [2, 26, 29, 30]. Shishani et al. observed the evidence of mild chronic inflammation in 2 of 26 specimens [2]. The authors also analysed the tenosynovium and revealed synovial proliferation without any sign of acute or chronic inflammation in the studied material. Thus, they linked the clinically observed pain with the degenerative process, not inflammation. Zabrzyński et al. showed a modest infiltration of inflammatory cells around blood vessels in 3 samples [26]. Moreover, Longo et al. revealed an absence of inflammatory changes observed microscopically, connecting this fact with impaired healing response of the tendon [30].

Recent advances in sonography of the LHBT

The use of US in the diagnostics of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders, especially shoulder examination, started in the 1980s, and its use is still increasing. Ultrasound modality in LHBT pathology examination is presented in Table 1 [7, 8, 31–40]. Ultrasonography is a simple, fast, cost-effective, radiation-free, and non-invasive diagnostic method for the evaluation of the shoulder [29]. Moreover, US can potentially be used for dynamic examination and is characterized by high sensitivity and specificity [31, 32]. However, it must be emphasized that it is a highly operator-dependent imaging modality. Lewis et al. revealed that the best diagnostic tool for detecting LHB pathology is US [32]. The sensitivity of US in detecting the LHBT pathology is between 50% and 96%, while its specificity reaches 98–100% compared to MR arthrography and arthroscopy, retrospectively [31, 33, 34]. However, some authors proved the relatively low sensitivity of the US in biceps pathology detection. Chen et al. showed sensitivity of US in 39.1% of patients with isolated LHBT pathology and in 55.3% with coexisting rotator cuff injury [31]. On the other hand, Skendzel et al. revealed that the sensitivity of US in healthy biceps tendon detection is very high (90%) [35]. In their study of 66 patients examined sonographically, none of those identified as healthy biceps tendons showed signs of pathology during the shoulder arthroscopy. Another advantage of US is its possible use to provide guided injections of steroids, hyaluronic acid, or PRP into the synovial sheath. Moreover, with power Doppler signal processing, it is a useful tool in the assessment of hyperaemia, inflammation, and the neovascularization process [8, 36, 41]. Additionally, in some circumstances, such as the presence of metal implants, pacemakers, and claustrophobia, MRI is prohibited and US can be introduced instead [31]. The most common pathological changes observed in US of the biceps tendon are hypoechogenicity of the tendinous structure, the presence of fluid in the area of the bicipital groove, thickening of the tendon with increased transverse diameter, calcification, pathological vascularization, and dislocation of the tendon or subluxation during dynamic examination [8, 31, 38] (Figure 2). Zabrzyński et al. in their study of the biceps pathology revealed an increased transverse LHBT diameter (> 5 mm) measured in the bicipital groove in all included subjects. Moreover, there were hypoechogenic areas in the tendon structure in 95% of the population. All of the cases were assessed arthroscopically and confirmed microscopically [8]. The authors concluded that the distortion in the highly organized tendon structure can result in decreased reflection of ultrasound waves within the tendon during sonographic examination, which can be visible as hypoechoic areas [8]. Moreover, they showed an important limitation of the sonographic examination because it does not allow for the visualization of the entire intracapsular part of the LHBT. Huang and Wang examined a total of 336 shoulder pain patients with suspected biceps tendinitis. The authors evaluated the tissue echogenicity using greyscale pixel data of the range of interest (ROI) in both the transverse and longitudinal views of the biceps [38]. Moreover, they determined a certain threshold when the echogenicity counted as ROI values in different planes of examination corresponded to LHB tendinopathy. Various authors set a limit of the maximal transverse diameter of the biceps tendon examined sonographically as ≥ 4.6 mm for women and ≥ 5.5 mm for men [8, 31, 37, 38]. Increased diameter of the tendon is a common pathology, presented by numerous authors. Increased thickness is classified as a pathological abnormality and is often linked with local oedema, inflammation, and degeneration of tendinous structure [8, 42]. On the other hand, the increased size and diameter of the tendon may result from age and sports activities [37, 38]. The sonographic examination was presented as a very precise modality to identify subluxation, dislocation, and instability of the biceps tendon, with high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (96%) [8, 31, 33]. Overall the presence of tendinopathy is often linked with overuse or instability of the tendon [6]. The LHBT instability with dislocation or subluxation can occur dynamically during both external and internal rotation of the arm. However, the advanced instability may cause a deformation of the bicipital groove, with irregularities on the bony walls, leading to a full-thickness tear [8]. It was suggested that instability can be hidden and occur without dislocation beside the bicipital groove [7, 8, 39]. Microinstability, leading unavoidably to gradual development of tendinopathy, may not be initially detected in a sonographic examination. Furthermore, it can gradually progress, with concomitant supraspinatus or subscapularis tendon tears, to dynamic subluxation or dislocation [40].

MRI evaluation of the LHBT

MRI is considered a gold standard for the examination of soft tissue injuries. However, it was presented that in the case of the biceps tendon it has a relatively low sensitivity [43, 44]. Tendon degeneration diagnosis in MRI is based on changes in tendon diameter and alterations in the signal of its structure. However, the changes can be subtle and recognized as an artifact or simply missed [45]. The accuracy of MRI in the diagnose of partial LHBT tears and inflammation has been questioned by numerous authors [46]. Mohtadi et al. observed a poor correlation between MRI findings and arthroscopic examination, especially for LHBT tears [47]. Moreover, low sensitivity for detecting partial-thickness tears and LHBT instability was shown by Carr et al. They noted a 27% sensitivity and 86% specificity for detecting partial LHB tears by MRI scan, while complete tears were diagnosed in 54% [44]. Dubrow et al. revealed similar results, in which the MRI modality identified 43.9% of patients as having a pathologic lesion of the biceps despite the fact that the arthroscopy confirmed tears in 89.4% [48].
Mucoid degeneration found in abnormal tendinous tissue is characterized by hyperintense signal compared with fatty infiltration in T2-weighted fat-saturated images, and hyperintense compared with magic-angle artifacts in proton density-weighted fat-saturated images. Buck et al. compared the histological findings with MRI alterations showing the agreement between these two methods [45]. Pathological changes in tendinous tissue, such as accumulation of myxoid substances and collagen fibre disruption, unavoidably lead to microtears, partial-tears, and subsequently to complete tears of the bicep tendon. On the other hand, the exact connection between intra-tendinous alterations and MRI findings is not entirely understood. Obese patients can be misdiagnosed with ultrasound. In such cases, MRI is advised [31]. MRI diagnostics also prevails in patients with other concurrent injuries of the shoulder, to plan surgery, or in those with SLAP lesions. Alternatively, the MR arthrogram may be used if the LHBT pathology is connected with SLAP lesions, with sensitivity of 89–92% and specificity of 56–81% [6, 46, 49]. The MRI modality in the LHBT pathology examination is summarized in Table 2 [6, 31, 44–50].

Conclusions

The pathology of the LHBT starts from its ultrastructure with alterations of both tenocytes as well as ECM. Furthermore, this is reflected in light microscopy investigations, where the pathology is focused on the increased tenocyte population, increased neovascularization process, disorganization of the collagenous ECM, and accumulation of the non-collagenous elements. It should be accented that there is a marginal inflammatory response. The ultrasound modality is useful in the detection of LHBT instability, dynamic examination the tendon, the examination of hypoechogenic areas, and increased tendon diameter. Moreover, the power Doppler function allows the detection of extensive vascularization and early inflammation. A standard non-contrast MRI of the shoulder is essentially limited in LHBT pathology detection, specifically in the case of partial tears. However, the MRI modality with contrast agents is useful in LHBT and SLAP injury detection. Based on the current knowledge, ultrasound and MRI diagnostics modalities should be simultaneously used in the examination of LHBT disorders.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Zabrzyński J, Gagat M, Paczesny Ł, Łapaj Ł, Grzanka D. Electron microscope study of the advanced tendinopathy process of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon treated arthroscopically. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018; 77: 371-377.
2. Shishani Y, Streit J, Rodgers M, Gobezie R. Tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon: histopathologic analysis of the extra-articular biceps tendon and tenosynovium. OAJSM 2015; 6: 63-70.
3. Joseph M, Maresh CM, McCarthy MB, Kraemer WJ, Ledgard F, Arciero CL, Anderson JM, Nindl BC, Mazzocca AD. Histological and molecular analysis of the biceps tendon long head post-tenotomy. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 1379-1385.
4. Ditsios K, Agathangelidis F, Boutsiadis A, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos. Long head of the biceps pathology combined with rotator cuff tears. Adv Orthop 2012; 2012: 405472.
5. Krupp RJ, Kevern MA, Gaines MD, Kotara S, Singleton SB. Long head of the biceps tendon pain: differential diagnosis and treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 55-70.
6. Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89-B: 1001-1009.
7. Zappia M, Carfora M, Romano AM, Reginelli A, Brunese L, Rotondo A, Castagna A. Sonography of chondral print on humeral head. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45: 35-40.
8. Zabrzyński J, Paczesny Ł, Zabrzyńska A, Grzanka D, Łapaj Ł. Sonography in the instability of the long head of the biceps tendon confronted with histopathologic and arthroscopic findings. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018; 77: 583-590.
9. Abate M, Silbernagel KG, Siljeholm C, Di Iorio A, De Amicis D, Salini V, Werner S, Paganelli R. Pathogenesis of tendinopathies: inflammation or degeneration? Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: 235.
10. Khan KM, Cook JL, Bonar F, Harcourt P, Astrom M. Histopathology of common tendinopathies. Update and implications for clinical management. Sports Med 1999; 27: 393-408.
11. Wang JHC. Mechanobiology of tendon. J Biomech 2006; 39: 1563-1582.
12. Sharma P, Maffulli N. Biology of tendon injury: healing, modeling and remodeling. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006; 6: 181-190.
13. Lavagnino M, Arnoczky SP. In vitro alterations in cytoskeletal tensional homeostasis control gene expression in tendon cells. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 1211-1218.
14. Ireland D, Harrall R, Curry V, Holloway G, Hackney R, Hazleman B, Riley G. Multiple changes in gene expression in chronic human Achilles tendinopathy. Matrix Biol 2001; 20: 159-169.
15. Fu SC, Chan BP, Wang W, Pau HM, Chan KM, Rolf CG. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) in 11 patients with patellar tendinosis. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 658-662.
16. Alfredson H, Lorentzon M, Bäckman S, Bäckman A, Lerner UH. cDNA-arrays and real-time quantitative PCR techniques in the investigation of chronic Achilles tendinosis. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 970-975.
17. Nho SJ, Strauss EJ, Lenart BA, et al. Long Head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2010; 18: 645-656.
18. Franchi M, Fini M, Quaranta M, De Pasquale V, Raspanti M, Giavaresi G, Ottani V, Ruggeri A. Crimp morphology in relaxed and stretched rat Achilles tendon. J Anat 2007; 210: 1-7.
19. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Franceschi F, Rabitti C, Denaro V. Movin and bonar scores assess the same characteristics of tendon histology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 1605-1611.
20. Xu Y, Murrell GAC. The basic science of tendinopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 1528-1538.
21. Zabrzynski J, Gagat M, Paczesny L, Grzanka D, Huri G. Correlation between smoking and neovascularization in biceps tendinopathy – a functional preoperative and immunohistochemical study. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2020; 11: 204062232095641.
22. Zabrzyński J, Łapaj Ł, Paczesny Ł, Zabrzyńska A, Grzanka D. Tendon – function-related structure, simple healing process and mysterious ageing. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018; 77: 416-427.
23. Lakemeier S, Schwuchow SA, Peterlein CD, Foelsch C, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Archontidou-Aprin E, Paletta JRJ, Schofer MD. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1, 3, and 9 in degenerated long head biceps tendon in the presence of rotator cuff tears: an immunohistological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 271.
24. Glait SA, Mahure S, Loomis CA, Cammer M, Pham H, Feldman A, Jazrawi LM, Strauss EJ. Regional histologic differences in the long head of the biceps tendon following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients with rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 2481-2489.
25. Mazzocca AD, McCarthy MBR, Ledgard FA, Chowaniec DM, McKinnon Jr WJ, Delaronde S, Rubino LJ, Apolostakos J, Romeo AA, Arciero RA, Beitzel K. Histomorphologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon in common shoulder pathologies. Arthroscopy 2013; 29: 972-981.
26. Zabrzyński J, Paczesny Ł, Łapaj Ł, Grzanka D, Szukalski J. Is the inflammation process absolutely absent in tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon? Histopathologic study of the long head of the biceps tendon after arthroscopic treatment. Pol J Pathol 2017; 68: 318-325.
27. Zabrzyński J, Paczesny Ł, Łapaj Ł, Grzanka D, Szukalski J. Process of neovascularisation compared with pain intensity in tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon associated with concomitant shoulder disorders, after arthroscopic treatment. Microscopic evaluation supported by immunohistochemical. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018; 77: 378-385.
28. Fenwick SA, Hazleman BL, Riley GP. The vasculature and its role in the damaged and healing tendon. Arthritis Res 2002; 4: 252-260.
29. Paynter KS. Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2004; 15: 511-528.
30. Longo UG, Loppini M, Marineo G, Khan W, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Tendinopathy of the tendon of the long head of the biceps. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2011; 19: 321-332.
31. Chen HS, Lin SH, Hsu YH, Chen SC, Kang JH. A comparison of physical examinations with musculoskeletal ultrasound in the diagnosis of biceps long head tendinitis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 1392-1398..
32. Lewis JS, Raza SA, Pilcher J, Heron C, Poloniecki JD. The prevalence of neovascularity in patients clinically diagnosed with rotator cuff tendinopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 163.
33. Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T, Clark AM, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 7-11.
34. Le Corroller T, Cohen M, Aswad R, Pauly V, Champsaur P. Sonography of the painful shoulder: role of the operator’s experience. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 979-986.
35. Skendzel JG, Jacobson JA, Carpenter JE, Miller BS. Long head of biceps brachii tendon evaluation: accuracy of preoperative ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 942-948.
36. Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H. Neovascularisation in Achilles tendons with painful tendinosis but not in normal tendons: an ultrasonographic investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9: 233-238.
37. Ptasznik R, Hennessy O. Abnormalities of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 409-414.
38. Huang SW, Wang WT. Quantitative diagnostic method for biceps long head tendinitis by using ultrasound. Sci World J 2013; 2013: 948323.
39. Kao JT, Chiu CH, Hsu KY, Chang SS, Chan YS, Chen ACY. Biceps tendon instability with or without pulley tears: an arthroscopic diagnostic study. In Review 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.24703/v1.
40. Ricci V, Özçakar L. Windshield wiper in the shoulder: ultrasound imaging for the proximal rotator cuff interval. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-900000000-98450.
41. Gisslén K, Alfredson H. Neovascularisation and pain in jumper’s knee: a prospective clinical and sonographic study in elite junior volleyball players. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 423-428.
42. Singh R, Singla M, Tubbs RS. Macro/micro observational studies of fibres maintaining the biceps brachii tendon in the bicipital groove: application to surgery, pathology and kinesiology. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2015; 74: 439-446.
43. Khazzam M, George MS, Churchill RS, Kuhn JE. Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 136-145.
44. Carr RM, Shishani Y, Gobezie R. How accurate are we in detecting biceps tendinopathy? Clin Sports Med 2016; 35: 47-55.
45. Buck FM, Grehn H, Hilbe M, Pfirrmann CWA, Manzanell S, Hodler J. Degeneration of the long biceps tendon: comparison of mri with gross anatomy and histology. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1367-1375.
46. Lewis RB, Reyes BA, Khazzam MS. A review of recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment modalities for long head of bicep tendinopathy. Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine 2016; 7: CMTIM.S39404.
47. Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fick GH, Burton PJ. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 258-265.
48. Dubrow S, Streit J, Shishani Y, Robbin MR, Gobezie R. Diagnostic accuracy in detecting tears in the proximal biceps tendon using standard nonenhancing shoulder MRI. OAJSM 2014; 5: 81-87.
49. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, Hodler J. Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1557-1561.
50. Khazzam M, George MS, Churchill RS, Kuhn JE. Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 136-145.
Copyright: © 2021 Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe