eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Clinical research

The association of FMR1 gene (CGG)n variation with idiopathic female infertility

Adele Grasmane, Dmitrijs Rots, Zane Vitina, Valerija Magomedova, Linda Gailite

Arch Med Sci 2019; 15,
Online publish date: 2019/05/15
Article file
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Infertility is a global problem and undoubtedly not only implicates health problems, but also has negative social and psychological consequences [1]. Infertility is a dynamic disorder and can be caused by a variety of female (e.g. ovulatory disorders, tubal and uterine pathologies, endocrine disorders, etc.) as well as male factors or both of them [2], but the etiology of infertility is still an open issue – approximately 20–30% of pairs have idiopathic infertility [3].
The FMR1 gene encodes the protein FMRP (fragile X mental retardation protein), which plays an important role in brain development and in the regulation of ovarian function [4, 5]. The FMR1 gene is located on the X chromosome and contains trinucleotide (CGG) repeats in the 5-untranslated region, which regulates the expression of FMRP [5]. The region containing more than 200 CGG repeats associated with abnormal methylation and is defined as a full mutation and causes fragile X syndrome [6]. The repeat numbers between 55 and 200 CGG are defined as premutation and can cause premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) [7, 8]. Moreover, the premutation allele is unstable and can expand to a full mutation in subsequent generations. The number of repeats below 55 CGG is defined as normal length (associated with normal gene expression); however, recent studies have stirred up the discussion as to whether all these repeats are really normal. Some authors reported that just a small number of the repeats (26–34 CGG) are actually normal and have normal FMRP expression and that the “high-normal” (35–54 CGG) and “low-normal” (< 26 CGG) repeat alleles have decreased levels of protein expression [9] and are associated with increased risks of DOR and POI, polycystic ovarian syndrome and therefore infertility [4, 10, 11]. However, the results of many studies on this association with ovarian reserve are contradictory [12] and the clinical utility for the FMR1 gene CGG repeat testing in patients with idiopathic infertility and the interpretation of “high- and low-normal” alleles are still to be determined.
In this context, we aimed to investigate the impact of CGG variation in the FMR1 gene on the development of idiopathic DOR, primary and secondary infertility in Latvian women.

Material and methods

Study design and patients

To analyze the impact of the FMR1 (OMIM#309550, NCBI Gene ID 2332) gene CGG variation (ClinVar allele ID 25011) on the development of idiopathic infertility in women we performed a case-control study. Primary and secondary infertility were defined using the definitions provided by the World Health Organization [1]. The DOR was defined as described before [13]. We enrolled in the study women diagnosed with primary and secondary idiopathic infertility and DOR from the infertility treatment clinics. Women with known causes of infertility were excluded from the study (e.g. patients with endometriosis, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, uterine tube obstruction or known male factor). Testing for the most common hereditary thrombophilias (factor V variation c.1691G>A [rs6025] and factor II c.*97G>A [rs1799963] variant) was performed for all infertile patients, and in the case of a positive result, the patient was excluded from the subsequent analysis. A total of 161 women with primary and secondary idiopathic infertility, 12 females with DOR were included in our study and 129 healthy women with children and without endocrine disorders who were selected from the Genome Database of the Latvian Population [14] were used as the control group.

Ethics

All patients signed a written informed consent form. The study was approved by the Central Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Latvia. The patients were referred for genetic counseling to a medical geneticist where necessary.

Molecular analysis

The patients’ DNA was extracted from the peripheral venous blood samples using the innuPREP blood DNA kit (Analytik Jena, Germany) to establish the CGG repeat alleles triplet repeat primed polymerase chain reaction (TP-PCR) with capillary electrophoresis, adapted from the literature [15]. This method allows detection of carriers of expanded alleles (> 100 CGG). The testing and interpretation were confirmed by the external quality assessment scheme for normal range alleles with Sanger sequencing.

Statistical analysis

To assess the impact of high- and low- normal alleles on the development of infertility, following FMR1 gene CGG repeats testing, the patients with the premutation allele were excluded from further statistical analysis. The FMR1 CGG alleles and genotypes were stratified as described previously [16]. For the analysis of the allelic mode of inheritance, CGG repeats were stratified as low-normal (< 26 CGG), high-normal (35–54 CGG) and normal (26–34 CGG) alleles. The association with genotypes was evaluated in dominant and genotypic modes of inheritance (recessive mode of inheritance was not analyzed because of the low frequency of homozygous genotypes). The statistical analysis was performed using 2 and Fisher’s exact tests using the SPSS v24.0 software.

Results

Study group

Out of 173 included patients with idiopathic infertility, 66 had primary and 30 had secondary infertility, 12 were suffering from infertility and DOR, but for 65 patients the type of infertility was not specified.

Frequency of permutation

The analysis of FMR1 CGG repeats revealed that one infertile patient is a carrier of a 61 CGG repeat allele. She is suffering from secondary infertility. The frequency of premutation carriers in the infertile female group is 1/173 (0.6%), but in the secondary infertility group it is 1/30 (3.3%). No patient with DOR had a premutation allele.
To our surprise, one control group patient also carried a premutation allele (63 CGG). The frequency of premutation among the healthy Latvian female population is 1/129 (7.8%).

Association with infertility

The distribution of the FMR1 gene alleles in infertility, DOR and control groups is shown in Table I. The frequency of low-normal and high-normal alleles is similar in all three analyzed groups (p > 0.05). The different FMR1 genotypes were not statistically significantly associated (p > 0.05) with infertility and DOR in the analyzed modes of inheritance (data not shown).
When separately analyzing the association with primary and secondary infertility (Table I) we found that the frequency of high-normal alleles is statistically significantly more common in the secondary infertility group than in the control group (12% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.03, OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.1–8.3). The analysis of the role of FMR1 genotypes revealed that the patients with secondary infertility have more than three times higher odds of having a genotype with a high-normal allele (p = 0.02, OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5–9.3) in the dominant mode of inheritance. The distribution of high-normal alleles and genotypes did not differ between patients with primary infertility and controls (p > 0.05). Low-normal allele and genotype frequencies did not differ between the primary and secondary infertility groups and the control group (p > 0.05).

Discussion

There is still an ongoing extensive debate on how the FMR1 gene, mRNA and FMRP influence the ovarian function and cause premature ovarian insufficiency. It is known that patients with FMR1 low-normal and high-normal alleles have altered protein expression levels [9]. FMRP regulates translation and RNA transport in cells [17]. FMRP is expressed in granulosa cells and plays an important role in the signaling pathway in oocyte maturation [9, 18, 19]. Previous studies suggest that FMRP participates in the regulation of follicular development and the changes in the FMRP expression levels are associated with increased follicle atresia and the initial decrease of ovarian reserve [20]. In addition, FMRP is expressed in the brain and there are speculations that this protein can influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and critical regions of hormonal regulation [20]. The carriers of premutation and high-normal alleles also have higher FMR1-mRNA levels which could lead to the RNA-toxicity effects and to increased follicle atresia or a reduced number of growing follicles [21, 22].
Analyzing the impact of the FMR1 gene CGG repeats on the development of infertility, we found that the patients who suffer from secondary infertility are more frequently carriers of high-normal alleles. Several studies have also found an association between infertility and high-normal allele [5, 11], but they were not specifically addressing secondary infertility. A recent study suggested that the decline in ovarian reserve could be one of the etiological factors for idiopathic female infertility [23]. We did not find an association between FMR1 alleles and patients diagnosed with DOR, possibly because of the small number of patients included, but we hypothesize that the high-normal allele increases the risk of secondary infertility by decreasing the ovarian reserve. Unfortunately, our study did not cover the assessment of ovarian reserve in our patients. As the prevalence of secondary infertility increases with age and the patients suffering from secondary infertility are older than the primary infertility patients, the study outcomes could be explained by the accumulation of mRNA with years and subsequent RNA toxicity and diminished ovarian reserve.
On the other hand, low-normal alleles were not statistically significantly associated with infertility. Prior studies have reported conflicting results on low-normal alleles – some of them claim that these alleles have the most negative effects on reproduction and ovarian reserve [24, 25], while other studies at the same time did not demonstrate any significant differences between the carriers of low-normal alleles and women with normal range alleles [26, 27].
A considerable number of females are being tested for the FMR1 gene CGG repeat worldwide, e.g. patients with POI, DOR, infertile patients, asymptomatic oocyte donors and also those subject to newborn screening studies [11, 28]. Approximately 5% and 20% are carriers of high-normal and low-normal alleles, respectively. The knowledge on the impact of these alleles on the ovarian function and reserves could affect the reproductive decision-making in patients carrying the mentioned alleles, e.g. deciding to perform oocyte cryopreservation or to bear a child at an earlier age. The outcomes of our study also suggest an increased risk of secondary infertility. Further prospective cohort studies are necessary to evaluate the FMR1 gene low-normal and/or high-normal allele carrier reproductive outcomes. Nowadays the FMR1 premutation testing in clinical practice is recommended only for patients with POI [6, 8]. There is accumulating evidence that this testing could be expanded also for other phenotypes, e.g. the results of our study suggests FMR1 CGG testing also in patients with secondary infertility in Latvia, because premutation allele carriers were common among this group (3.3%) and premutation allele frequency could be higher among the healthy general population of Latvia than in other general populations (1/128 vs. 1/250–500) [28]. Detection of premutation in these patients could explain the cause of infertility and in case of use of assisted reproductive technologies or if pregnancy is achieved spontaneously, the embryo or fetus should be tested for the expansion of the premutation to full mutation. Also, identification of one patient could allow cascade testing of family members, increasing the utility of the test.
This study has several limitations. The main limitation was that the main information we had was that the patients have idiopathic infertility, as mentioned in the methods; however, we lacked other clinical information (e.g. ovarian reserve), and for one third of patients no information was available regarding the specific type of infertility. Another limitation that could affect the outcomes is that the study involved a limited number of patients and controls. The study should be continued with enlarged patient and control groups. Moreover, infertility is a dynamic process and can develop or resolve at any point of time throughout the reproductive age, and it is hard to define and recruit a control group with excluded infertility for similar types of studies. We have used healthy controls with children, but it is impossible to exclude that they had or will have infertility in their lifetime.
In conclusion, secondary infertility is associated with the FMR1 gene high-normal CGG repeat allele. It is necessary to undertake further studies to understand the mechanism of high-normal allele association with secondary infertility. According to the outcomes of our study, the frequency of FMR1 gene premutation allele carriers in Latvia may be higher than in other European populations. The study should be continued with increased patient and control groups.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Genome Database of the Latvian Population and the infertility treatment clinics “VASU” SIA and “Clinic EGV” SIA for providing patient and control samples for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001356.
2. Gelbaya TA, Potdar N, Jeve YB, Nardo LG. Definition and epidemiology of unexplained infertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014; 69: 109-15.
3. Sadeghi MR. Unexplained infertility, the controversial matter in management of infertile couples. J Reprod Infertil 2015; 16: 1-2.
4. Gleicher N, Yu Y, Himaya E, et al. Early decline in functional ovarian reserve in young women with low (CGGn < 26) FMR1 gene alleles. Transl Res 2015; 166: 502-7.e1-2.
5. De Geyter C, M’Rabet N, De Geyter J, et al. Similar prevalence of expanded CGG repeat lengths in the fragile X mental retardation I gene among infertile women and among women with proven fertility: a prospective study. Genet Med 2014; 16: 374-8.
6. Biancalana V, Glaeser D, McQuaid S, Steinbach P. EMQN best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic testing and reporting of fragile X syndrome and other fragile X-associated disorders. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23: 417-25.
7. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad DH. Effects of race/ethnicity on triple CGG counts in the FMR1 gene in infertile women and egg donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20: 485-91.
8. Man L, Lekovich J, Rosenwaks Z, Gerhardt J. Fragile X-associated diminished ovarian reserve and primary ovarian insufficiency from molecular mechanisms to clinical manifestations. Front Mol Neurosci 2017; 10: 290.
9. Schuettler J, Peng Z, Zimmer J, et al. Variable expression of the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene in patients with premature ovarian failure syndrome is not dependent on number of (CGG)n triplets in exon 1. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1241-51.
10. Maslow BS, Davis S, Engmann L, Nulsen JC, Benadiva CA. Correlation of normal-range FMR1 repeat length or genotypes and reproductive parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 33: 1149-55.
11. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Kim A, Barad DH. Comparison of ovarian FMR1 genotypes and sub-genotypes in oocyte donors and infertile women. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29: 529-32.
12. Pastore LM, McMurry TL, Williams CD, Baker VL, Young SL. AMH in women with diminished ovarian reserve: potential differences by FMR1 CGG repeat level. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 1295-301.
13. Pastore LM, Christianson MS, Stelling J, Kearns WG, Segars JH. Reproductive ovarian testing and the alphabet soup of diagnoses: DOR, POI, POF, POR, and FOR. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35: 17-23.
14. Rovite V, Wolff-Sagi Y, Zaharenko L, Nikitina-Zake L, Grens E, Klovins J. Genome Database of the Latvian Population (LGDB): design, goals, and primary results. J Epidemiol 2018; 28: 353-60.
15. Hantash FM, Goos DG, Tsao D, et al. Qualitative assessment of FMR1 (CGG)n triplet repeat status in normal, intermediate, premutation, full mutation, and mosaic carriers in both sexes: implications for fragile X syndrome carrier and newborn screening. Genet Med 2010; 12: 162-73.
16. Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Weghofer A, Barad DH. How the FMR1 gene became relevant to female fertility and reproductive medicine. Front Genet 2014; 5: 284.
17. Bhakar AL, Dolen G, Bear MF. The pathophysiology of fragile X (and what it teaches us about synapses). Annu Rev Neurosci 2012; 35: 417-43.
18. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Oktay K, Barad D. Relevance of triple CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene to ovarian reserve. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19: 385-90.
19. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad DH. Ovarian reserve determinations suggest new function of FMR1 (fragile X gene) in regulating ovarian ageing. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20: 768-75.
20. Criado B, Arrieta I. Study of the genetic etiology of primary ovarian insufficiency: FMR1 gene. Genes (Basel) 2016; 7 (12). pii: E123.
21. Sullivan AK, Marcus M, Epstein MP, et al. Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 402-12.
22. Willemsen R, Levenga J, Oostra BA. CGG repeat in the FMR1 gene: size matters. Clin Genet 2011; 80: 214-25.
23. Yücel B, Kelekci S, Demirel E. Decline in ovarian reserve may be an undiagnosed reason for unexplained infertility: a cohort study. Arch Med Sci 2016; 14: 527-31.
24. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Lee IH, Barad DH. FMR1 genotype with autoimmunity-associated polycystic ovary-like phenotype and decreased pregnancy chance. PLoS One 2010; 5: e15303.
25. Kushnir VA, Yu Y, Barad DH, et al. Utilizing FMR1 gene mutations as predictors of treatment success in human in vitro fertilization. PLoS One 2014; 9: e102274.
26. Lledo B, Guerrero J, Ortiz JA, et al. Intermediate and normal sized CGG repeat on the FMR1 gene does not negatively affect donor ovarian response. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 609-14.
27. Gleicher N, Kim A, Barad DH, et al. FMR1-dependent variability of ovarian aging patterns is already apparent in young oocyte donors. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013; 11: 80.
28. Tassone F. Newborn screening for fragile X syndrome. JAMA Neurol 2014; 71: 355-9.
Copyright: © 2019 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
FEATURED PRODUCTS
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe