ISSN: 2451-0629
Archives of Medical Science - Atherosclerotic Diseases
Current volume Archive About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Official journal of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)
vol. 4
Clinical research

The association of quantitative insulin sensitivity indices (HOMA-IR and QUICKI) with anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators in adolescents

Yaser Mirzaalian
Mozhgan Nourian
Maryam Gholamalizadeh
Saeid Doaei
Mahshid Hatami
Akbar Hassanzadeh
Gholamreza Askari
Raheleh Farahi

Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis 2019; 4: e32–e37
Online publish date: 2019/04/09
Article file
- the association.pdf  [0.15 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Diabetes mellitus is the most common glandular disease in the world and yearly is responsible for 4 million deaths [1]. The number of people with diabetes rose from 108 million in 1980 to 422 million in 2014 [2]. Diabetes is a metabolic disease that is associated with a disorder in insulin sensitivity throughout the body. Several studies suggest that body fat distribution can play a major role in metabolic abnormalities associated with obesity, related to the strong relationship that abdominal obesity has with insulin resistance, metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease [35]. Body mass index (BMI), waist measurement (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), waist to hip circumference, sagittal abdominal diameter and neck circumference are the most commonly used anthropometric indices for obesity monitoring [68].

Though some mechanisms have been proposed in the field of insulin sensitivity, more extensive studies are needed to precisely identify factors correlating with insulin resistance [9]. Although many studies have already been conducted on adult populations, there are few studies in child and adolescent populations [10]. As insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are found in children and adolescents before maturity, it is clear that we should seek the cause of this disorder in that course [11]. Although insulin resistance in adults has the strongest association with abdominal circumference, determination of the association between insulin resistance and anthropometric measurements at an earlier age requires further studies [12, 13].

Several indicators are now used for assessment of insulin sensitivity/resistance. For example, the homoeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index has recently been used in many studies. This index indicates insulin resistance based on the amount of fasting plasma glucose and insulin. Moreover, some recent studies suggest that the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) can be a good alternative for HOMA-IR and it is believed that HOMA-IR shows insulin resistance less than the truth [14, 15].

Thus, according to the available studies, lack of sufficient evidence and absence of any study conducted in Iran on the association between QUICKI and HOMA-IR with anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators in adolescents, the aim of our study was to investigate the association between insulin sensitivity indices (QUICKI and HOMA-IR) and anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators in 12 to 13 year-old adolescents in Isfahan, Iran.

Material and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 teenagers aged 12 to 13 years old (40 boys and 40 girls) in collaboration with the Cardiovascular Research Center of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in Isfahan, Iran. The subjects were selected from one high school of Isfahan city by simple randomized sampling. The inclusion criteria included: age 12 to 13 years, have reached sexual maturity, and consent to participate in the study. After collecting written consent from the students and their parents, the subjects were invited to the Cardiovascular Research Center for data collection. A socio-demographic questionnaire was completed and anthropometric indices (including height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, neck circumference, and wrist circumference) were measured using the following methods. To measure the body weight, subjects were made to stand motionless on a Seca scale with minimal clothes and without shoes. The scale was calibrated to zero before each reading. Height was measured by height measuring systems (least count 0.5 cm) and subjects were made to stand in a straight position, keeping heels together and without shoes. Waist circumference (WC) and neck circumference were measured in a standing position with an elastic plastic measuring tape without any pressure on it with the least count 0/1 cm. The WC was measured in the middle of the lowest rib and the highest part of the pelvis [16]. The maturity of all subjects was assessed by a medical doctor.

We also collected blood samples from the participants after at least 10 h overnight fasting and the fasting glucose, fasting insulin, triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), TGs and total cholesterol levels were assessed. We applied a validated protocol of blood pressure measurement.

This testing provided a measurement of the serum concentrations of total cholesterol, TG, HDL-C, and calculated LDL-C. The Friedewald formula was used to calculate LDL-C from total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-C. This formula calculates LDL-C by subtracting the sum of HDL-C and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) (triglycerides/5 from total cholesterol). Moreover, insulin sensitivity was calculated by the following formulas according to QUICKI and HOMA-IR [17]: QUICKI= 1/(log(fasting insulin µU/ml) + log(fasting glucose mg/dl)), HOMA-IR = (fasting insulin µm/ml) + (fasting glucose mg/dl)/405.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (code: IR.MUI.REC.1395.3.369).

Statistical analysis

In this study, we used SPSS software, version 20 for statistical analysis of the data. Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The significance level for all analysis was considered as p < 0.05.


The general characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table I. All of the participants were 12 to 13 years old. The participants had a wide range of BMI, but the average BMI of the subjects was within the normal range based on the WHO charts for age and sex (mean BMI = 19.18 kg/m2).

Table I

Mean and standard deviation of anthropometric and cardiometabolic characteristics of children participating in the study (n = 80)

Boys (n = 40)Girls (n = 40)
Age [years]12.750012.72500.893
Weight [kg]45.012547.43750.385
Height [cm]1.55171.53600.359
SBP [mm Hg]10.775010.81250.899
DBP [mm Hg]6.36256.46250.615
Wrist circumference [cm]15.845015.60000.410
Waist circumference [cm]67.907570.78750.151
Neck circumference [cm]30.900032.48750.007
Triglyceride [mg/dl]1.03201.02500.948
Total cholesterol [mg/dl]1.47321.60620.057
LDL [mg/dl]88.62751.01120.045
HDL [mg/dl]37.487538.85000.580
Fasting glucose [mg/dl]83.675085.12500.311
Fasting insulin [µU/ml]0.62250.51750.085
Height to wrist ratio9.82599.90630.609
Waist circumference to height ratio0.43750.46040.045

[i] BMI – body mass index, SBP – systolic blood pressure, DBP – diastolic blood pressure, LDL – low-density lipoprotein, HDL – high-density lipoprotein, QUICKI – quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index, HOMA-IR– homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, NS – not significant.

The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was normal (10.8 ±1.3 and 6.40 ±0.88 respectively). Normal levels of TG (102.85 ±47.64), total cholesterol (153.98 ±31.28), LDL-C (94.88 ±27.98) and HDL-C (38.17 ±10.91) were reported by comparing the blood lipid levels with the CEP standard values.

The values of insulin resistance indices by sex are also presented in Table II. All subjects were in the normal range of QUICKI (> 0.38) and HOMA-IR (< 2.5) indices. The independent t-test indicated that the mean QUICKI in girls was higher than boys (p = 0.04), but the mean HOMA-IR.

Table II

Comparison of QUICKI and HOMA-IR in boys and girls using t-test

VariableGirls (n = 40)Boys (n = 40)P-value

Association of anthropometric and biochemical indicators with insulin resistance indices

After adjustment for sex, there were significant negative correlations between QUICKI and all of the anthropometric indicators including weight, BMI, WC, neck circumference, waist circumference to height ratio, neck circumference to height ratio, waist circumference to neck circumference ratio and neck circumference to wrist circumference ratio (all p < 0.003). Among cardiometabolic indices, TG levels had a significant negative correlation with QUICKI. The association of other cardiometabolic indicators with QUICKI were not statistically significant. Regarding anthropometric indices, there were significant positive correlations between most anthropometric indicators including weight, BMI, WC, neck circumference, waist circumference to height ratio, neck circumference to height ratio, waist circumference to neck circumference ratio and neck circumference to wrist circumference ratio with HOMA-IR index (all p < 0.0001). Among cardiometabolic indicators, SBP and TG levels had positive correlations with HOMA-IR index (p < 0.0001), while it was not statistically significant for other cardiometabolic indicators (Table III).

Table III

Association of anthropometric and biochemical indicators with QUICKI and HOMA-IR after adjustment for sex (n = 80)

Weight [kg]–0.480.00010.570.0001
BMI [kg/m2]–0.450.00010.540.0001
Waist circumference [cm]–0.450.00010.570.0001
Neck circumference [cm]–0.430.00010.520.0001
Waist circumference to height ratio–0.370.00010.500.0001
Neck circumference to height ratio–0.320.0020.450.0001
Waist circumference to neck circumference ratio–0.28NS0.360.0001
Neck circumference to wrist circumference ratio0.21NS–0.27NS
SBP [mm Hg]–0.27NS0.340.0001
DBP [mm Hg]–0.21NS0.26NS
Triglyceride [mg/dl]–0.330.0020.460.0001
Total cholesterol [mg/dl]–0.19NS0.28NS
LDL [mg/dl]–0.12NS0.19NS
HDL [mg/dl]–0.21NS–0.27NS

[i] BMI – body mass index, SBP – systolic blood pressure, DBP – diastolic blood pressure, LDL – low-density lipoprotein, HDL – high-density lipoprotein, QUICKI – quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index, HOMA-IR – homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, NS – not significant.

By comparing QUICKI and HOMA-IR, we found that these two indices are correlated with all of the anthropometric and biochemical indicators, except for waist circumference to neck circumference ratio and systolic blood pressure, which had a significant positive correlation with HOMA-IR, but did not show a significant relationship with QUICKI.


The results of the present study indicated significant negative correlations between QUICKI and most anthropometric indicators such as weight, BMI, WC, neck circumference, waist circumference to height ratio, and neck circumference to height ratio, and also significant positive correlations between these anthropometric indicators and HOMA-IR. Moreover, among cardiometabolic indicators, there was only a negative correlation between TG and QUICKI and a positive correlation between TG, SBP and HOMA-IR. Other cardiometabolic indicators did not correlate with insulin resistance indices.

Our results for anthropometric indicators were similar to the results of other studies. Szapary et al. [17] reported that higher values of HOMA-IR were associated with development of metabolic syndrome, obesity, and lower serum HDL levels in adolescents under 18 years old. Our study also demonstrated that individuals with higher HOMA-IR had higher weight and BMI values.

Similar findings were reported in another study performed on 691 healthy teenagers (295 with normal BMI, 205 overweight and 199 obese) indicating a significant positive correlation between HOMA-IR and BMI [18].

In the study done by De Luis et al. [19], a significant positive correlation between HOMA-IR and BMI was found, and those who were obese had higher HOMA-IR levels than people with normal BMI. Moreover, in the study from Webber et al. [20], HOMA-IR had a significant positive correlation with BMI, and in subjects with BMI above the 85th percentile, who were considered as overweight, HOMA-IR levels were higher than in those under the 85th percentile, which confirms our results.

The results of a study conducted by Murdock et al. [21], to determine the effect of BMI on insulin and lipid resistance on 125 children before puberty and 122 children after puberty, a significant negative correlation between BMI and QUICKI values in teenagers was observed that was in line with our results.

In another study conducted on women with gestational diabetes mellitus, HOMA-IR levels were associated with low QUICKI levels and high BMI values [22]. The findings of another study conducted on 259 healthy and obese adults and 47 healthy and obese immature adolescents to determine the insulin resistance via QUICKI indicated that patients with a history of glucose intolerance, diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia have a lower QUICKI than healthy people and also QUICKI was not significantly correlated with BMI in obese children [23]. In contrast, there was a significant negative correlation between QUICKI and BMI in the present study. The difference may be due to the BMI of the teenagers. This study was performed on obese adolescents, while in contrast, the BMI of our adolescents was under the 85th percentile. It is likely that the association between QUICKI and BMI will be significant only if the overweight individuals are compared to those with normal weight. Concerning the association between HOMA-IR and QUICKI with cardiometabolic indicators, a study of 522 children (286 obese children and 236 children with normal BMI) showed that HOMA-IR was associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but in our study there was no relationship between diastolic blood pressure and HOMA-IR. On the other hand, it revealed that the QUICKI in obese children was lower than in normal children. It is necessary to note that the study was conducted on children aged 6 to 15 years [24], which differed from our age range. Stagakis et al. [25], in a prospective study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, observed a significant positive correlation between HOMA-IR levels and systolic blood pressure, which confirms the results of the present study. The present study revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between WC and HOMA-IR and a negative correlation between WC and QUICKI.

Two other studies investigating the association of insulin resistance indices demonstrated a significant negative correlation between WC and QUICKI. Similar to the results of this study, in another study, a significant positive correlation between WC and HOMA-IR levels and a significant negative correlation between and QUICKI were observed [26, 27].

In a study by Chen et al. [28], which was conducted to evaluate the level of insulin resistance in men with erectile dysfunction (ED), the QUICKI was associated with BMI. Also in this study, LDL/HDL had a significant negative correlation with the QUICKI, which was not significant in our study. Perhaps the high insulin resistance index of individuals is the reason for this mismatch, which in turn reduces NO release, endothelin level elevation and subsequently affects the LDL/HDL levels.

In another study of 99 children before puberty and 118 children after puberty, subjects with higher levels of TG/HDL had higher HOMA-IR levels and lower QUICKI [29], which were also confirmed in the present study.

In general, our study was conducted on adolescents of both genders and the relationships of both insulin resistance indices (QUICKI and HOMA-IR) with anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators were investigated and compared. In addition to the mentioned advantage, this study has some limitations. The cross-sectional nature of the study makes it impossible to establish a cause and effect relationship between the variables. We also did not collect data on diet and physical activity, which can have a role as confounders. Our sample size was small and a longitudinal study with larger sample size is recommended in further studies to achieve transparency and certainty in the results.

In conclusion, in the present study, all anthropometric indicators including weight, BMI, WC, neck circumference, waist circumference to height ratio and neck circumference to height ratio had significant negative correlations with QUICKI and significant positive correlations with HOMA-IR. Moreover, among cardiometabolic indicators there was a significant negative correlation between TG and QUICKI whereas systolic blood pressure and TG had a significant positive correlation with HOMA-IR.


This work was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, and the authors thank the personnel department. This study was extracted from an MSc dissertation which was approved by the School of Nutrition & Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 3125).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. , authors. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017. 128:p. 40–50


Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE , authors. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014. 103:p. 137–49


Skyler JS, Bakris GL, Bonifacio E, et al. , authors. Differentiation of diabetes by pathophysiology, natural history, and prognosis. Diabetes. 2017. 66:p. 241–55


Hasanvand B, Karami K, Khodadi A, Valipour M , authors. Impact determination of strength and resistance training on Glycoside hemoglobin and blood sugar on patients with type II diabetes”. Yafteh. 2011. 13:p. 75–81


Thrasher J , author. Pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: available therapies. Am J Cardiol. 2017. 120 1 Suppl:p. S4–16


Hruschka DJ, Hadley C , authors. How much do universal anthropometric standards bias the global monitoring of obesity and undernutrition? Obes Rev. 2016. 17:p. 1030–9


Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M , authors. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0.5 could be a suitableglobal boundary value. Nutr Res Rev. 2010. 23:p. 247–69


Kalantari N, Mohammadi NK, Rafieifar S, et al. , authors. Indicator for success of obesity reduction programs in adolescents: body composition or body mass index? Evaluating a school-based health promotion project after 12 weeks of intervention. Int J Prev Med. 2017. 8:p. 73


Chan TF, Lin WT, Huang HL, et al. , authors. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Nutrients. 2014. 6:p. 2088–103


Kim B, Feldman EL , authors. Insulin resistance as a key link for the increased risk of cognitive impairment in the metabolic syndrome. Exp Mol Med. 2015. 47:p. e149


Wu S, Gao H, Ma Y, Fu L, Zhang C, Luo X , authors. Characterisation of betatrophin concentrations in childhood and adolescent obesity and insulin resistance. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016. 17:p. 53–60


Klein DJ, Aronson Friedman L, Harlan WR, et al. , authors. Obesity and the development of insulin resistance and impaired fasting glucose in black and white adolescent girls: a longitudinal study. Diabetes Care. 2004. 27:p. 378–83


Anhê FF, Roy D, Pilon G, et al. , authors. A polyphenol-rich cranberry extract protects from diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance and intestinal inflammation in association with increased Akkermansia spp. population in the gut microbiota of mice. Gut. 2015. 64:p. 872–83


Sarafidis PA, Lasaridis AN, Nilsson PM, et al. , authors. Validity and reproducibility of HOMA-IR, 1/HOMA-IR, QUICKI and McAuley’s indices in patients with hypertension and type II diabetes. J Hum Hypertens. 2007. 21:p. 709–16


Jayagopal V, Kilpatrick E, Jennings PE, Hepburn D, Atkin S , authors. Biological variation of homeostasis model assessment-derived insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002. 25:p. 2022–5


Geeta A, Jamaiyah H, Safiza MN, et al. , authors. Reliability, technical error of measurements and validity of instruments for nutritional status assessment of adults in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2009. 50:p. 1013–8


Szapary PO, Bloedon LT, Samaha FF, et al. , authors. Effects of pioglitazone on lipoproteins, inflammatory markers, and adipokines in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006. 26:p. 182–8


Singh Y, Garg MK, Tandon N, Marwaha RK , authors. A study of insulin resistance by HOMA-IR and its cut-off value to identify metabolic syndrome in urban Indian adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013. 5:p. 245–51


de Luis DA, Izaola O, Primo D, de la Fuente B, Aller R , authors. Polymorphism rs3123554 in the cannabinoid receptor gene type 2 (CNR2) reveals effects on body weight and insulin resistance in obese subjects. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición. 2017. 64:p. 440–5


Webber LS, Srinivasan SR, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS , authors. Tracking of serum lipids and lipoproteins from childhood to adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1991. 133:p. 884–99


Murdock DK, Olson KJ, Juza RM, Hendricks BL , authors. Effect of body mass index on insulin resistance and lipids in prepubertal and postpubertal children: SCHOOL observations. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2006. 1:p. 242–7


Alptekin H, Çizmecioğlu A, Işık H, Cengiz T, Yildiz M, Iyisoy MS , authors. Predicting gestational diabetes mellitus during the first trimester using anthropometric measurements and HOMA-IR. J Endocrinol Investig. 2016. 39:p. 577–83


Hřebíček J, Janout V, Malinčíková J, Horáková D, Čížek L , authors. Detection of insulin resistance by simple quantitative insulin sensitivity check index QUICKI for epidemiological assessment and prevention. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2002. 87:p. 144–7


Olza J, Rupérez AI, Gil-Campos M, et al. , authors. Leptin receptor gene variant rs11804091 is associated with BMI and insulin resistance in spanish female obese children: a case-control study. Int J Mol Sci. 2017. 18:p. 1690


Stagakis I, Bertsias G, Karvounaris S, et al. , authors. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy improves insulin resistance, beta cell function and insulin signaling in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with high insulin resistance. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2012. 14:p. R141


Landi Masquio DC, de Piano Ganen A, Munhoz da Silveira Campos R, et al. , authors. Cut-off values of waist circumference to predict metabolic syndrome in obese adolescents. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2015. 31:p. 1540–4


Pimentel GD, Moreto F, Takahashi MM, Portero-McLellan KC, Burini RC , authors. Sagital abdominal diameter, but not waist circumference is strongly associated with glycemia, triacilglycerols and HDL-C levels in overweight adults. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2011. 26:p. 1125–9


Chen S, Wu R, Huang Y, et al. , authors. Insulin resistance is an independent determinate of ED in young adult men. PLoS One. 2013. 8:p. e83951


Olson K, Hendricks B, Murdock DK , authors. The TG to HDL ratio and its relationship to insulin resistance in pre-and postpubertal children: observation from the Wausau SCHOOL project. Cholesterol. 2012. 2012:p. 794252

Copyright: © 2019 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe