ORIGINAL PAPER
The effectiveness of tensioning neural mobilization of brachial plexus in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial
 
More details
Hide details
1
Ministry of Health and Population, Cairo, Egypt
 
2
Department of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
 
3
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
 
 
Submission date: 2019-11-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-03-16
 
 
Publication date: 2021-03-22
 
 
Physiother Quart. 2021;29(1):12-16
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Tensioning neural mobilization (NM) is accomplished through increasing the distance between nerve bed ends via elongation. NM techniques have different biomechanical effects on the nervous system. Evidence for their use in treating certain upper-quarter conditions like cervicobrachial pain is limited. The study was to determine tensioning NM efficacy on unilateral chronic cervical radiculopathy regarding mechanosensitivity of the affected nerve roots and intensity of neck and arm pain.

Methods:
Forty participants with chronic unilateral cervical radiculopathy were randomly assigned to group A (n = 20), receiving traditional physical therapy (manual traction and infrared irradiation), and group B (n = 20), receiving traditional physical therapy in addition to tensioning NM of brachial plexus. Mechanosensitivity of the affected brachial nerve roots and intensity of neck and arm pain were evaluated at baseline and after a 3-week program with the upper limb tension test-1 and visual analogue scale. The normal (Z) test, paired and unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (Mann-Whitney) were used in data analysis.

Results:
There were significant within-group differences in both groups regarding mechanosensitivity and pain intensity (mechanosensitivity: p = 0.001 for group A, p = 0.001 for group B; pain: p < 0.01 for group A, p < 0.01 for group B). There was no statistically significant between-group difference regarding mechanosensitivity (p = 0.07) or pain intensity (p = 0.838).

Conclusions:
The addition of tensioning NM to traditional physical therapy had no significant benefits, although both groups showed decreased post-treatment mechanosensitivity and pain intensity.

 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J. 2011;7(3):265–272; doi: 10.1007/s11420-011-9218-z.
 
2.
Butler DS. Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system: a model for assessment and treatment. Aust J Physiother. 1989;35(4):227–238; doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60511-0.
 
3.
Leoni D, Storer D, Gatti R, Egloff M, Barbero M. Upper limb neurodynamic test 1 on healthy individuals: intra- and intersession reliability of the angle between pain onset and submaximal pain. Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:9607262; doi: 10.1155/2016/9607262.
 
4.
Sharma S, Balthillaya G, Rao R, Mani R. Short term effectiveness of neural sliders and neural tensioners as an adjunct to static stretching of hamstrings on knee extension angle in healthy individuals: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport. 2016;17:30–37; doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.03.003.
 
5.
Shacklock M. Clinical neurodynamics: a new system of musculoskeletal treatment. Edinburgh: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2005.
 
6.
Coppieters MW, Butler DS. Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Man Ther. 2008;13(3):213–221; doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.12.008.
 
7.
Coppieters MW, Alshami AM. Longitudinal excursion and strain in the median nerve during novel nerve gliding exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(7):972–980; doi: 10.1002/jor.20310.
 
8.
Ellis RF, Hing WA. Neural mobilization: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(1):8–22; doi: 10.1179/106698108790818594.
 
9.
Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2003;28(1):52–62; doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014.
 
10.
Sambyal S, Kumar S. Comparison between nerve mobilization and conventional physiotherapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Int J Innov Res Develop. 2013;2(8):442–445.
 
11.
‏Anwar S, Malik AN, Amjad I. Effectiveness of neuromobilization in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Rawal Med J. 2015;40(1):34–36.
 
12.
Schmid AB, Brunner F, Luomajoki H, Held U, Bachmann LM, Künzer S, et al. Reliability of clinical tests to evaluate nerve function and mechanosensitivity of the upper limb peripheral nervous system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10(1):11; doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-11.
 
13.
Kannabiran B, Kumar S, Nagarani R. Neural mobilization for brachial neuralgia among cellulo-teno periosteo myalgic syndrome (CTPMS) patients. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol. 2015;2(1):00033; doi: 10.15406/mojor.2015.02.00033.
 
14.
Chiu TTW, Lam T-H, Hedley AJ. A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine. 2005;30(1):E1–E7; doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000149082.68262.b1.
 
15.
Goyal M, Kumar A, Sethi R. Functional disability and grip strength of cervical radiculopathy patients before and after cervical collar use and traditional physiotherapy treatment. J Exerc Sci Physiother. 2012;8(2):119–122.
 
16.
Butler DS. Mobilisation of the nervous system. Elsevier Health Sciences; 1991.
 
17.
Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, George SZ. Effects of upper extremity neural mobilization on thermal pain sensitivity: a sham-controlled study in asymptomatic participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(6):428–438; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2954.
 
18.
Su Y, Lim ECW. Does evidence support the use of neural tissue management to reduce pain and disability in nerve-related chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(11):991–1004; doi: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000340.
 
19.
Langevin P, Desmeules F, Lamothe M, Robitaille S, Roy JS. Comparison of 2 manual therapy and exercise protocols for cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial evaluating short-term effects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(1):4–17; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5211.
 
20.
Marks M, Schöttker-Königer T, Probst A. Efficacy of cervical spine mobilization versus peripheral nerve slider techniques in cervicobrachial pain syndrome – a randomized clinical trial. J Phys Ther. 2011;4(1):9–17.
 
21.
Gupta R, Sharma S. Effectiveness of median nerve slider’s neurodynamics for managing pain and disability in cervicobrachial pain syndrome. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2012;6(1):127–132.
 
eISSN:2544-4395
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top