Medical Studies
eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

Open access

without publication fees
1/2026
vol. 42
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

The influence of auditory stimuli (shots) and visual stimuli (SMS texting) on the parameters of the detection of the centre of gravity and the reaction of the ground forces in the static and dynamic test on the stabilometric platform – cohort studies

Marlena Krawczyk-Suszek
1
,
Blanka Martowska
1
,
Marzena Mańdziuk
1
,
Martyna Majda
2
,
Alicja Rodak
2

  1. Medical College, University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszow, Poland
  2. Student Scientific Circle “RehSCIENCE”, Medical College, University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszow, Poland
Medical Studies 2026; 42 (1): 66–79
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/ms.2026.160575
Online publish date: 2026/04/20
Article file
- The influence.pdf  [1.41 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Lockhart TE, Frames CW, Soangra R, Lieberman A. Effects of obesity and fall risk on gait and posture of community-dwelling older adults. Int J Progn Health Manag. 2019; 10(1): 019.
2. Rogers MW, Mille ML. Balance perturbations. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Day BL, Lord SR (eds.). Elsevier, London 2018; 85-105.
3. Takakusaki K. Functional neuroanatomy for posture and gait control. J Mov Disord. 2017; 10(1): 1-17.
4. Błaszczyk J. Biomechanika kliniczna, podręcznik dla studentów medycyny i fizjoterapii. PZWL, Warszawa 2004.
5. Kędziorek J, Błażkiewicz M. Nonlinear measures to evaluate upright postural stability: a systematic review. Entropy. 2020; 22(12): 1357.
6. Ocetkiewicz T, Skalska A, Grodzicki T. Badanie równowagi przy użyciu platformy balansowej – ocena powtarzalności metody. Geront Pol. 2006; 14(3): 144-148.
7. Krawczyk-Suszek M, Martowska B, Sapuła R. Analysis of the stability of the body in a standing position when Shooting at a stationary target – a randomized controlled trial. Sensors. 2022; 22(1): 368.
8. Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Hortobágyi T, Kressig RW, Muehlbauer T. The importance of trunk muscle strength for balance, functional performance, and fall prevention in seniors: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013; 43(7): 627-641.
9. Błaszczyk JW, Czerwosz L. Stabilność posturalna w procesie starzenia. Geront Pol. 2005; 13(1): 25-36.
10. Mileti I, Taborri J, Rossi S, Del Prete Z, Paoloni M, Suppa A, Palermo E. Reactive postural responses to continuous yaw perturbations in healthy humans: the effect of aging. Sensors. 2019; 20(1): 63.
11. Zampogna A, Mileti I, Palermo E, Celletti C, Paoloni M, Manoni A, Mazzetta I, Dalla Costa G, Pérez-López C, Camerota F, Leocani L, Cabestany J, Irrera F, Suppa A. Fifteen years of wireless sensors for balance assessment in neurological disorders. Sensors. 2020; 20(11): 3247.
12. Jenek B, Skorupińska A. Review of body balance research methods. Rehabil Med. 2018; 22(3): 50-56.
13. Kostiukow A, Rostkowska E, Samborski W. Badanie zdolności zachowania równowagi ciała. Roczniki Pomorskiej Akademii Medycznej w Szczecinie. 2009; 55(3): 102-109.
14. Domagalska-Szopa M, Szopa A, Czamara A. Dependence of gait deviation on weight-bearing asymmetry and postural instability in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10): e0165583.
15. Kiefer AW, Armitano-Lago CN, Cone BL, Bonnette S, Rhea CK, Cummins-Sebree S, Riley MA. Postural control development from late childhood through young adulthood. Gait Posture. 2021; 86: 169-173.
16. Subramaniam S, Faisal AI, Deen M.J. Wearable sensor systems for fall risk assessment: a review. Front Digit Health. 2022; 4: 921506.
17. Lewko J, Kamińska KM, Doroszkiewicz H, Talarska D, Sierakowska M, Krajewska-Kulak E. Ocena narażenia na upadki a wydolność funkcjonalna wśród osób starszych w środowisku zamieszkania. Probl Pielęg. 2014; 22(2): 159-164.
18. Mandalidis DG, Karagiannakis DN. A comprehensive method for assessing postural control during dynamic balance testing. Methods X. 2020; 7: 100964.
19. Bourlon C, Lehenaff L, Batifoulier C, Bordier A, Chatenet A, Desailly E, Fouchard C, Marsal M, Martinez M, Rastelli F, Thierry A, Bartolomeo P, Duret C. Dual- tasking postural control in patients with right brain damage. Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 188-193.
20. Salavati M, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Ebrahimi I, Jafari AH, Kazemnejad A, Parnianpour M. Effect of dual-tasking on postural control in subjects with nonspecific low back pain. Spine. 2009; 34(13): 1415-1421.
21. Rebold MJ, Croall CA, Cumberledge EA, Sheehan TP, Dirlam M T. The impact of different cell phone functions and their effects on postural stability. Perform Enhanc Health. 2017; 5(3): 98-102.
22. Lee JH, Lee MH. The effects of smartphone multitasking on gait and dynamic balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018; 30(2): 293-296.
23. Onofrei RR, Amaricai E, Suciu O, David VL, Rata AL, Hogea E. Smartphone use and postural balance in healthy young adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9): 3307.
24. Bekkers EMJ, Dockx K, Devan S, Van Rossom S, Verschueren SMP, Bloem BR, Nieuwboer A. The impact of dual-tasking on postural stability in people with Parkinson’s disease with and without freezing of gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018; 32(2): 166-174.
25. Crowley P, Madeleine P, Vuillerme N. Effects of mobile phone use during walking: a review. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2016; 28(1-2): 101-119.
26. Noll WP, Phan V, Lee H. Modern smartphone usage can negatively impact postural balance while standing on dynamically challenging grounds. Gait Posture. 2024; 107: 233-239.
27. Cho SH, Choi MH, Goo BO. Effect of smart phone use on dynamic postural balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014; 26(7): 1013-1015.
28. Mańdziuk M, Martowska B, Krawczyk-Suszek M, Kubicka K, Szpunar P, Kołodziej K, Bednarski J. The impact of sound on a fixed spectrum and intensity on selected parameters of stability. J Health Study Med. 2020; 71-91.
29. Hojan-Jezierska D, Kawałkiewicz W, Peeckhaus A, Marcinkowska-Gapińska A, Urbaniak-Olejnik M, Majewska A, Loba W, Stieler O, Kubisz L. The effects of acoustic and optokinetic stimulus on the postural stability. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022; 7(4): 1091-1097.
30. Xu H, Ohgami N, He T, Hashimoto K, Tazaki A, Ohgami K, Takeda K, Kato M. Improvement of balance in young adults by a sound component at 100 Hz in music. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 16894.
31. Jiang W, Zhao F, Guderley N, Manchaiah V. Daily music exposure dose and hearing problems using personal listening devices in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Int J Audiol. 2016; 55: 197-205.
32. Serra MR, Biassoni EC, Hinalaf M, Abraham M, Pavlik M, Villalobo JP, Curet C, Joekes S, Yacci MR, Righetti A. Hearing and loud music exposure in 14-15 years old adolescents. Noise Health. 2014; 16: 320-330.
33. Zebris Medical GmbH, “http://www.zebris.de,” Zebris Medical GmbH (online: 31.05.2023).
34. Park S, Ko YM, Park JW. The correlation between dynamic balance measures and stance sub-phase COP displacement time in older adults during obstacle crossing. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013; 25(9): 1193-1196.
35. Han TR, Paik NJ, Im MS. Quantification of the path of center of pressure (COP) using an F-scan in-shoe transducer. Gait Posture. 1999; 10(3): 248-254.
36. Gross KD, Felson DT, Niu J, Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Dufour AB, Gensure RH, Hannan MT. Association of flat feet with knee pain and cartilage damage in older adults. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63(7): 937-944.
37. de Bengoa Vallejo RB, Iglesias MEL, Zeni J, Thomas S. Reliability and repeatability of the portable EPS-platform digital Pressure-Plate System. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013; 103(3): 197-203.
38. de Castro ML, Godinho MM, de Oliveira LAF, Santos CO, Grecco LAC, Neto HP. Influência de tarefas cognitivas sobre o equilíbr, io estático de indivíduos saudáveis. ConScientiae Saúde. 2016; 15(2): 273-280.
39. Schedler S, Abeck E, Muehlbauer T. Relationships between types of balance performance in healthy individuals: role of age. Gait Posture. 2021; 84: 352-356.
40. Kędziorek J, Błażkiewicz M. Effect of voluntary muscle contraction on postural stability in healthy adults. Postepy Rehabil. 2021; 35(4): 33-37.
41. Błażkiewicz M, Kędziorek J, Wit A. The relationship between personality and postural control in young adults – a pilot study. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(10): 4978.
42. Kümmel J, Kramer A, Giboin LS, Gruber M. Specificity of balance training in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016; 46: 1261-1271.
43. Krasovsky T, Weiss PL, Kizony R. A narrative review of texting as a visually-dependent cognitive-motor secondary task during locomotion. Gait Posture. 2017; 52: 354-362.
44. Krasovsky T, Weiss PL, Kizony R. Older adults pay an additional cost when texting and walking: effects of age, environment, and use of mixed reality on dual-task performance. Phys Ther. 2018; 98(7): 549-559.
45. Park JH, Kang SY, Lee SG, Jeon HS. The effects of smart phone gaming duration on muscle activation and spinal posture: pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017; 33(8): 661-669.
46. Tian Y, Huang Y, He J, Wei K. What affects gait performance during walking while texting? A comparison of motor, visual and cognitive factors. Ergonomics. 2018; 61(11): 1507-1518.
47. Laatar R, Kachouri H, Borji R, Rebai H, Sahli S. The effect of cell phone use on postural balance and mobility in older compared to young adults. Physiol Behav. 2017; 173: 293-297.
48. Fukaya Y, Kawaguchi M, Kitamura T. Does everyday conversation contribute to cognitive functioning? A comparison of brain activity during task-oriented and life-worldly communication using near-infrared spectroscopy. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2020; 6: 2333721420980309.
49. Hamacher D, Hamacher D, Törpel A, Krowicki M, He- rold F, Schega L. The reliability of local dynamic stability in walking while texting and performing an arithmetical problem. Gait Posture. 2016; 44: 200-3.
50. Stavrinos D, Pope CN, Shen J, Schwebel DC. Distracted walking, bicycling, and driving: systematic review and meta-analysis of mobile technology and youth crash risk. Child Dev. 2018; 89(1): 118-128.
51. Espy DD, Yang F, Bhatt T, Pai YC. Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk. Gait Posture. 2010; 32(3): 378-382.
52. Bovonsunthonchai S, Ariyaudomkit R, Susilo TE, Sangiamwong P, Puchaphan P, Chandee S, Richards J. The impact of different mobile phone tasks on gait behaviour in healthy young adults. J Transp Health. 2020; 19: 100920.
53. Schwenk M, Howe C, Saleh A, Mohler J, Grewal G, Armstrong D, Najafi B. Frailty and technology: a systematic review of gait analysis in those with frailty. Gerontology. 2014; 60(1): 79-89.
54. Kim SH, Jung JH, Shin HJ, Hahm SC, Cho HY. The impact of smartphone use on gait in young adults: cognitive load vs posture of texting. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10): e0240118.
55. Yu W, Yang C, McGreavy C, Triantafyllidis E, Bellegarda G, Shafiee M, Ijspeert, AJ, Li Z. Identifying important sensory feedback for learning locomotion skills. Nat Mach Intell. 2023; 5(8): 919-932.
56. Edd SN, Vida Martins N, Bennour S, Ulrich B, Jolles BM, Favre J. Changes in lower limb biomechanics when following floor-projected foot placement visual cues for gait rehabilitation. Gait Posture. 2020; 77: 293-299.
57. Shoja O, Shojaei M, Hassanlouei H, Towhidkhah F, Amiri M, Boroomand H, Rahimi N, Zhang L. Lack of visual information alters lower limb motor coordination to control center of mass trajectory during walking. J Biomech. 2023; 155: 111650.
58. Schaffert N, Braun Janzen T, Mattes K, Thaut MH. A review on the relationship between sound and movement in sports and rehabilitation. Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 244.
59. Ross JM, Warlaumont AS, Abney DH, Rigoli LM, Balasubramaniam R. Influence of musical groove on postural sway. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016; 42(3): 308-319.
60. Belluscio V, Cartocci G, Terbojevich T, Di Feo P, Inguscio BMS, Ferrari M, Quaresima V, Vannozzi G. Facilitating or disturbing? An investigation about the effects of auditory frequencies on prefrontal cortex activation and postural sway. Front Neurosci. 2023; 17: 1197733.
61. Timofeeva OP, Andreeva IG. Human postural responses to single sound signals with different emotional content. J Evol Biochem Phys. 2022; 58: 1262-1274.
62. Ley-Flores J, Alshami E, Singh A, Bevilacqua F, Bianchi-Berthouze N, Deroy O, Tajadura-Jiménez A. Effects of pitch and musical sounds on body-representations when moving with sound. Sci Rep. 2022; 12: 2676.
Copyright: © 2026 Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.