eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2023
vol. 25
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

The rise of telemedicine in primary care: understanding patients’ and healthcare workers’ perspectives on acceptability of the COVID-19 remote care model

Matic Mihevc
1, 2, 3
,
Diana Podgoršek
2
,
Jakob Gajšek
4
,
Samanta Mikulet
5
,
Vesna Homar
2
,
Marko Kolšek
2
,
Marija Petek Šter
2

  1. Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  3. Primary Health Centre Trebnje, Trebnje, Slovenia
  4. Primary Health Centre Vrhnika, Vrhnika, Slovenia
  5. Primary Health Centre Postojna, Postojna, Slovenia
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2023; 25(3): 297–301
Online publish date: 2023/09/30
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Background
Remote monitoring of vital signs combined with teleconsultations has been proposed as an effective method of care for COVID-19 patients. However, the acceptability of the remote care model has yet to be explored.

Objectives
To explore patients’ and healthcare workers’ views and experiences with the COVID-19 remote care programme using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and identify challenges for further dissemination.

Material and methods
A qualitative study was conducted with 25 patients and 5 healthcare workers from three primary care centres in Slovenia who participated in the COVID-19 remote care programme. In-depth interviews, informed by the TFA, were conducted by phone or face-to-face, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed by two independent researchers using a template content analysis guided by seven TFA domains, with the possibility of inductively adding codes from the text as needed.

Results
The remote care model proved acceptable to patients and healthcare workers in all seven TFA domains. For patients, the remote care model provided a sense of security, physician interest and the ability to detect deterioration in health early, while healthcare workers found it useful for triaging and protecting against disease transmission. However, both reported the additional burden and risk of unreliable pulse oximetry readings.

Conclusions
The remote care model proved acceptable and scalable to other respiratory diseases in primary care. Key challenges to further scaling include the complexity of system design and data sharing, the uncertain role of registered nurses and family members and the need to implement follow-up programmes focusing on self-management behaviours.

keywords:

patient acceptance of health care, telmemedicine, primary health care, chronic disease, oximetry

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.