eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


1/2014
vol. 9
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results

Piotr Wałęga, Jakub Kenig, Piotr Richter

Videosurgery Miniinv 2014; 9 (1): 40–45
Online publish date: 2014/01/30
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction: Rectum-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established treatment for T1 rectal cancer (RC). However, it is associated with an increased rate of local recurrence in comparison with extended resection. In most cases this failure is linked to inappropriate case selection and the presence of clinically non-detectable metastases in the regional lymph nodes. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection (EPMR) makes it possible to remove the relevant lymphatic drainage of the lower third of the rectum in a minimally invasive way, which in turn can help in adequate tumor staging.

Aim: To evaluate the long-term clinical results and influence of combined TEM and EPMR treatment on the anorectal functions.

Material and methods: Ten consecutive patients with T1 RC were operated on using TEM and EPMR as a two-stage procedure between 2007 and 2009.

Results: After a median follow-up of 42.6 (range: 36–80) months, none of our patients complained of symptoms of incontinence apart from one female patient with gas incontinence diagnosed preoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in basal anal pressure, squeeze anal pressure, high pressure zone length or fecal continence assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index before and in follow-up months after the procedure. Postoperative morbidity consisted of one hematoma formation and one male patient complaining about sexual dysfunction until 6 months postoperatively. There was no evidence of locoregional recurrence.

Conclusions: Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection in combination with TEM appears to be safe, feasible and with no impact on the basic anorectal functions in the 3-year follow-up.
keywords:

transanal endoscopic microsurgery, rectal cancer, endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection

references:

Stipa F, Burza A, Lucandri G, et al. Outcomes for early cancer managed with transanal endoscopic microsurgery. A 5-year follow-up study. Sur Endosc 2006; 20: 541-5.

Kenig J, Richter P. Definition of the rectum and level of the peritoneal reflection – still a matter of debate? Videosurgery Miniinv 2013; 8: 183-6.

Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Monson JRT. Transanal endosccopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 97-102.

Witkiewicz W, Zawadzki M, Rzaca M, et al. Robot-assisted right colectomy: surgical technique and review of the literature. Videosurgery Miniinv 2013; 8: 253-7.

Michalik M, Bobowicz M, Frask A. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Videosurgery Miniinv 2012; 7: 118-21.

Borschitz T, Heintz A, Junginger T. The influence of histopatologic criteria on the long-term prognosis of locally excised pT1 rectal carcinomas: result of local excision (TEM) and immediate reoperation. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1492-506.

Hazard LJ, Sklow B, Pappas L, et al. Local excision vs. radical resection in T1-2 rectal carcinoma: results of a study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry Data. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2009; 3: 105-14.

. Zerz A, Muller-Stich BP, Beck J, et al. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection after transanal local excision of T1 carcionomas of the lower third of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 919-24.

Tarantino I, Hetzer FH, Warschkow R, et al. Local excision and endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection versus low anterior resection in T1 rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 375-80.

Mac Donald A, Smith A, McNeill AD, et al. Manual dilatation of the anus. Br Surg 1992; 79: 1381-2.

Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Haug V, et al. Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1116-21.

Banerjee AG, Jehle EC, Kreis ME, et al. Prospective study of the proctographic and functional consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 211-3.

Hemingway D, Flett M, McKee RF, et al. Sphincter function after transanal endoscopic microsurgical exision of rectal tumors. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 51-2.

Walega P, Kenig J, Richter P, et al. Functional and clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection for the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1604-8.

Koeninger J, Mueller-Stich BP, Autschbach F, et al. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection as an otion to combne local treatment of early stage rectal cancer with partial mesorectal lymphadenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2007; 392: 567-71.

Wu ZY, Zhao G, Chen Z, et al. Oncological outcomes of transanal local axcision for high risk T1 rectal cancers. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 4: 84-8.

Yao YF, Wang L, Liu YQ, et al. Lymph node distribiution and pattern of metastases in the mesorectum following total mesorectal excision using the modified fat clearing technique. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64: 1073-7.

Doornebosch PG, Ferenschild FT, de Wilt JH, et al. Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1234-9.
  
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe