eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 14
Cardiac surgery
Original paper

Transapical beating heart mitral valve repair with the NeoChord system: early outcomes of a single-center experience

Krzysztof Wróbel, Katarzyna Kurnicka, Marcin Zygier, Dariusz Zielinski, Wojciech Dyk, Ryszard Wojdyga, Zbigniew Juraszynski, Piotr Pruszczyk, Andrzej Biederman

Videosurgery Miniinv 2019; 14 (2): 320–325
Online publish date: 2019/02/05
Article file
- transapical.pdf  [0.08 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) affects approximately 2% of the total population and 9% of the population older than 75 years old [1]. In the majority of degenerative mitral valves the regurgitation is caused by flail segment either from a rupture or elongation of chords. Surgical mitral valve (MV) repair is the current treatment of choice for degenerative flail/prolapse (DLP) [2]. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has become a routine procedure in many leading institutions [3, 4]. Gammie et al. [5]. recently published report on isolated mitral valve surgery based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. There were 87 214 isolated primary mitral operations performed during 2011–2016 in the United States with less invasive operations in 23% of these patients. Concurrently, robot-assisted approaches were used in 12% of patients. Although there has been a small increase in the percentage of cases performed in a less invasive manner, there seems to be a plateau in enthusiasm for these approaches in many centers. Comparatively, leading centers can achieve impressive results with on-pump MV surgery with mortality of 0.1%, a success rate of 99.9%, and median hospital stay of 6 days [6]. However, in the real world STS database group, the DLP repair rate was approximately 80% with a mortality of 1.2%, a stroke rate of 1.1% and prolonged ventilation at 6.1%.

Trans-apical beating heart off-pump MV repair is a novel surgical technique to treat mitral valve prolapse without concomitant annuloplasty [7, 8]. The main benefits of this approach are MV repair under physiological conditions and avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), providing the potential for lower perioperative complications rates. However, limited data regarding early surgical results and the initial learning curves are available [811]. Therefore, we report a single-center series of consecutive patients treated using the trans-apical chordal replacement technique.


The objective of this study was to present the early outcomes of the single-center experience with transapical beating heart mitral valve repair with the NeoChord system.

Material and methods

This is an analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2018 in 37 patients with severe symptomatic MR treated with NeoChord technique. Our patients’ mean age was 62.3 ±13.4 years (nine of them were older than 75). These were predominantly men (78%). Patients were considered suitable for trans-apical chordal implantation if severe MR was present due to prolapse or flail of 1 leaflet and had the potential for good coaptation without requiring a prosthetic annuloplasty. We evaluated the early surgical success of the procedure as well as standard cardiac surgery perioperative complications and those related directly to the NeoChord technique.

Preoperatively, all patients underwent a trans-thoracic (TTE) as well as trans-esophageal (TEE) echocardiography with 3D reconstruction to confirm the mechanism and severity of MR along with the suitability for NeoChord implantation. Preoperative and follow-up images were obtained using the iE 33 machine (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts). Intra-operative TEE views were obtained the using EPIQ 7 system (Phillips, Eindhoven, NL) and the trans-esophageal X7-2t Live 3D xMATRIX array transducer.

The MR severity was described according to the EACVI recommendations for the assessment of native valvular regurgitation [12]. Severe MR was diagnosed based on complex qualitative and quantitative criteria, including an evaluation of color flow regurgitant jet, vena contracta width, convergence zone, signal of regurgitant jet in continuous wave Doppler, an effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) and regurgitant volume. The left ventricle (LV) morphology and function were assessed routinely.

Operative technique

Echo-guided trans-apical implantation of artificial chordae on a beating heart with the NeoChord DS 1000 system is a novel technique designed to treat degenerative MR. It was the first trans-apical repair technique approved by the EMA for patients with MR due to prolapse or leaflet flail. After institutional approval all patients signed informed consent, which entailed the current state of the art for mitral repair, surgical risks, known clinical results, and alternative approaches. We used the NeoChord DS1000 system (NeoChord, Inc., St. Louis Park, MN, USA) to restore normal leaflet motion under real-time two (2D)- and three (3D)-dimensional trans-esophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance. With this technique, chordal implantations and length adjustments are possible without the use of CPB. The detailed technique used by our team has been published [13].

Outcome definitions

Early surgical success was defined as the reduction of MR to less than moderate by implantation of at least 2 neochordae. Safety measures included standard cardiac surgery and perioperative complications. Major adverse events were death, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Minor events included wound infection, preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) episode, acute renal failure, pericardial or pleural effusion, blood transfusions and surgical re-exploration for bleeding. Additional complications considered were related to the NeoChord technique and included a leaflet perforation or significant leaflet tear, native chord rupture, ventricular apex rupture, and left atrial perforation, which all would have resulted in hemodynamic instability, due to bleeding or arrhythmia, or acute LV dysfunction, all requiring implementation of CPB.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median and range. Qualitative data were shown as counts and percentages.


Patients’ baseline characteristics

Baseline clinical characteristics and preprocedural basic echocardiographic data are described in Table I. Operated patients were low in surgical risk with a mean EuroSCORE II of 0.92%. The predominant pathology was posterior leaflet prolapse and/or flail of the posterior leaflet P2 segment.

Table I

Patients’ characteristics (n = 37)

Age [years]62.3 ±13.4
Male gender, n (%)29 (78)
EuroSCORE II0.92 (0.56–3.73)
Arterial hypertension, n (%)20 (54)
COPD, n (%)2 (5)
Preoperative creatinine [mg%]0.97 (0.61–1.8)
Leaflet pathology, n (%):
 Posterior35 (95)
 Anterior2 (5)
Type of pathology, n (%):
 A (isolated central posterior leaflet prolapse P2)25 (67.6)
 B (multiple prolapsing segments)8 (21.6)
 C (commissural involvement, anterior leaflet)4 (10.8)
Cardiac structure/function:
 LVEF (%)65 (45–70)
 LVEDD [mm]56 (40–71)
 LVESD [mm]42 (34–49)
 LA [mm]43 (33–57)
 TRPG [mm Hg]32 (13–68) in 4 patients > 50

[i] Data are expressed as mean and SD, median and range (min., max.) or percentage; COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDD – left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVESD – left ventricular end-systolic diameter, LA – left atrium, TRPG – tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient.

Procedure characteristics

All procedures were performed by the same surgeon and echocardiographer in the cardiac operating room. Single lumen intubation and general anesthesia were used in all patients. Cardiac access was achieved in the majority of patients (in 2–3 cases it was the 6th, but never the 4th) through the fifth intercostal space just lateral to the nipple. In all patients the apical purse string suture technique was a double U perpendicular 3-0 Prolene Teflon pledget suture. After the completion of neochordae implantation all Gore-tex sutures were passed through additional Teflon at the cardiac apex pledgets. The median procedure time was 115 min. The number of chords implanted were as follows: 28 (76%) patients 3–4 chords, 4 (11%) patients 2 chords, in 4 (11%) patients 5 chords and in 1 (3%) patients 6 chords. In 90% of patients we were able to conclude the operation with trace, trace to mild or mild MR. In 3 (8%) patients the MR was mild to moderate and in 1 (2%) patient moderate. The median length of stay in the ICU was 32 h. Patients were discharged after a median postoperative hospital stay of 7 days. Surgical results are summarized in Table II.

Table II

Surgical results

Implanted chords per patient3 (2–6)
Number of implanted chords:
 24 (11)
 320 (54)
 48 (22)
 54 (11)
 61 (3)
Last 10 cases3.5 (2–5)
Operative time [min]115 (65–175)
Troponin T [ng/ml]268 (73–811)
Blood loss [ml]300 (100–1280)
Last 10 cases [ml]200 (100–400)
Difference between admission and discharge hemoglobin values [g%]1.7 (0–3.9)
ICU length of stay [h]:
Total32 (22–100)
 < 2417 (46)
 24–4815 (40)
 > 485 (14)
Post procedure length of stay [days]7 (4–17)

[i] Data are expressed as median and range and percentage.

Major and minor perioperative complications

There were no major adverse events including death, stroke or AMI. Nine (24%) patients developed a peri-operative AF episode. Two patients developed pleural effusions and 2 patients had superficial local would infection with only 1 patient requiring blood transfusion.

Procedure-related issues

There were no NeoChord technique-related safety issues such as leaflet perforation or significant leaflet tear, or major native chord rupture, which would require implantation of a new chord, ventricular apex rupture, or left atrial perforation. All of these would have resulted in conversion to conventional heart surgery. We observed no acute LV dysfunction requiring implementation of CPB or hemodynamic instability due to bleeding or arrhythmia. Intra- and perioperative events are shown in Table III.

Table III

Intra- and perioperative events (n = 37)

Surgical complications, n (%):
 Surgical revision for bleeding0
 Conversion to conventional surgery0
 Apex bleeding or rupture0
Major events, n (%):
Minor events, n (%):
 Pericardial effusion0
 AF episode9 (24)
 Pleural effusion2 (5)
 Wound infection2 (5)
 Acute renal failure0
 Blood transfusion1 (2.5)

[i] Data are expressed as percentage. AF – atrial fibrillation, AMI – acute myocardial infarction.

Transapical approach (troponins, ECG)

We had no significant problems related to the transapical approach. Due to surgical implantation through the ventricular apex, troponin T release was observed in all patients (median: 268 pg/ml). In some patients we observed transient changes of the ST segment. No patient was diagnosed with perioperative AMI according to the standard definitions.

Blood loss

Since the procedure requires a mini-thoracotomy and a trans-apical puncture without a dedicated sheath there is a potential for blood loss. Even with the purse strings tightened on tourniquets during chord implantation there was continuous back bleeding around the device and through the channel for the needle. The amount of blood loss is associated with the time the NeoChord device is inserted inside the LV as well as the number of chords needed to be implanted. For this reason a cell saver device was used routinely to recover blood loss, which was auto-transfused. Overall the median blood loss for the procedure was 300 ml or approximately 100 ml per chord. In last 10 patients this was reduced to a median of 200 ml with 3.5 chords per patient (60 ml per chord). After auto-transfusion the median drop of hemoglobin of 1.7 g% for the series was observed.


The classic surgical mitral valve repair was described by Carpentier and involved a quadrangular resection of a leaflet prolapsing/flail segment with/without a sliding valvuloplasty, followed by a ring annuloplasty [14]. Replacing diseased chordae tendinae with PTFE sutures was first described by Frater et al. [15]. Neo-chordal replacement was later popularized by David et al. [16]. To simplify this technique, Oppel and Mohr used pre-measured PTFE loops [17]. Neochordae implantation has provided excellent short- and long-term results. Falk et al. showed that PTFE chord implantation created a significantly longer coaptation line and larger mitral orifice area when compared with the resection technique [18]. The modified Chitwood “haircut technique” supported P2, using chord bearing leaflet tissue “flaps” or PTFE neochordae [19]. The “respect rather than resect” approach has changed surgical thinking and repair strategies for posterior leaflet prolapse. Instead of focusing on the site of resection, our goal is to preserve and remodel the posterior leaflet to create the best surface of coaptation possible [20]. A generally accepted principle of MV repair operations has been that a mitral annuloplasty is required to increase the area of leaflet coaptation, which leads to improved durability. Nevertheless, preliminary data by Kiefer et al. [21] revealed that the lack of an annuloplasty ring does not lead to ongoing annular dilatation and does not induce recurrent MR. A study by Maisano et al. showed that 20% of patients referred for a repair do not require annular downsizing [22]. This patient group should benefit from less invasive repair approaches such as trans-apical chordal implantation with the NeoChord device. In order to become the “first choice” treatment for DLP the procedure needs to be as safe, effective, and as durable as a traditional repair.

Our initial experience with trans-apical chordal implantation using the NeoChord device proves that the procedure can be performed with minimal patient risk. Early safety outcome results in our cohort show that the risk of major complications, as well as fatal events, requiring conversion to open surgery is minimal. There were no major adverse events or conversions in our group. Yet the risk still exists, but probably it is more related to the learning curve and patient selection as previously shown by Colli et al. [9]. This is at least comparable to contemporary series of MV repair patients [5, 23]. There were no strokes in our cohort. Patients with higher risk for perioperative stroke could have benefited from this approach. But this needs to be proven in randomized studies.

Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass is one of the potential advantages of this approach, especially for patients with coronary artery disease, advanced aortic atherosclerosis, obstructive pulmonary disease, and kidney failure. Moreover, procedural times are shorter, especially when compared to the other minimally invasive procedures needing CPB [23]. Median operative time in our series was 115 min. The trans-apical approach has been considered more invasive than the trans-femoral/ trans-septal approach because of the need for thoracotomy and surgical management of the apex incision. Our data show that even without a sheath this approach can be safe, but requires obligatory use of a cell-saver device. Only 1 (2.7%) patient in our cohort required a blood transfusion. In comparison sternotomy-based surgery operations require transfusions in approximately 10–20% of patients, but can be dependent on the institutional protocols [23]. Postoperative AF incidence was comparable with the conventional approach. We observed AF in 9 (24%) patients, whereas it was 26% in the DLP group from the STS database [5]. The length of ICU stay and postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different from the conventional approach group. Unfortunately, length of stay has been affected by local standards (delay in transfer home or rehabilitation unit).

Successful placement of at least 2 chords was feasible in all our patients. This compares favorably to data from the TACT trial [8] as well as the initial experience from Padua and Vilnius surgical groups [9] as well as a multicenter experience [24]. Procedural times and techniques have improved significantly over time and may have been related to bio-simulator training as well as increased experience with proctoring [25]. This device enables the team to practice the procedure multiple times before clinical application. In 90% of our patients we were able to conclude the operation with trace, trace to mild or mild MR. In 3 (8%) patients it was mild to moderate and moderate in 1 (2%) patient. This proves that in well-selected patients it is possible to achieve comparable early results to the overall population with a concomitant annuloplasty. From the STS database Gammie showed either moderate or severe MR was 3.2% at discharge for mitral repair patients who had degenerative leaflet prolapsed [5]. Thus, our initial results show safety and technique feasibility as well as the potential for restoration of the proper mitral valve function in selected patients. More follow-up data are needed in order to optimally select patients for the potential of a durable result [26].


Transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with the NeoChord system is a safe, minimally invasive procedure, with few minor complications. In well-selected candidates it allows for successful treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation. Results are anatomy dependent, so preoperative patient selection is crucial. Patients require adequate long-term follow-up in order to determine the durability of this approach.

Conflict of interest

Two authors disclose proctoring for NeoChord.

Others authors declare no conflict of interest.



Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skeleton TN, et al. , authors. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006. 368:p. 1005–11


Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. , authors. ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017. 38:p. 2739–91


Davierwala P, Seeburger J, Phannmueller B, et al. , authors. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: “The Leipzig experience”. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. 2:p. 744–50


Chitwood WR Jr , author. Robotic mitral valve surgery: overview, methodology, results and perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. 5:p. 544–55


Gammie J, Chikwe J, Badhwar V, et al. , authors. Isolated mitral valve surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018. 106:p. 716–27


Castillo JG, Anyanwu AC, Fuster V, Adams DH , authors. A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012. 144:p. 308–12


Colli A, Zucchetta F, Torregrossa G, et al. , authors. Transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with Neochord implantation (TOP-MINI): step-by-step guide. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. 4:p. 295–7


Seeburger J, Rinaldi M, Nielsen SL, et al. , authors. Off pump transapical implantation of artificial chordae to correct mitral regurgitation (TACT trial) – proof of concept. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. 63:p. 914–9


Colli A, Manzan E, Rucinskas K, et al. , authors. Acute safety and efficacy of the NeoChord procedure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015. 20:p. 575–80


Rucinskas K, Janusauskas V, Zakarkaite D, et al. , authors. Off-pump transapical implantation of artificial chordae to correct mitral regurgitation: early results of a single-centre experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. 147:p. 95–9


Gammie J, Wilson P, Bartus K, et al. , authors. Transapical beating-heart mitral valve repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene cordal implantation device. Circulation. 2016. 134:p. 189–97


Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. , authors. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. 14:p. 611–44


Wróbel K, Kurnicka K, Zygier M, et al. , authors. Transapical off-pump mitral valve repair. First experience with the NeoChord system in Poland (report of two cases). Kardiol Pol. 2017. 75:p. 7–12


Carpantier A , author. Cardiac valve surgery – the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983. 86:p. 323–37


Frater RW, Vetter HO, Zussa C, et al. , authors. Chordal replacement in mitral valve repair. Circulation. 1990. 82:p. IV125–30


David TE, Bos J, Rakowski H , authors. Mitral valve repair by replacement of chordae tendineae with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991. 101:p. 495–501


Oppell UO, Mohr FW , authors. Chordal replacement for both minimally invasive and conventional mitral valve surgery using premeasured Gore-Tex loops. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000. 70:p. 2166–8


Falk V, Seeburger J, Borger MA, et al. , authors. How does the use of polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae for posterior mitral valve prolapse (loop technique) compare with leaflet resection? A prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. 136:p. 1205


Chitwood WR Jr , author. Haircut mitral valve repair: posterior leaflet-plasty. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. 4:p. 387–92


Perrier P, Hohenberger W, Lakew F, et al. , authors. Toward a new paradigm for the reconstruction of posterior leaflet prolapse: midterm results of the “respect rather than resect” approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. 86:p. 718–25


Kiefer P, Meier S, Noack T, et al. , authors. Durability of transapical mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018. 106:p. 440–6


Maisano F, La Canna G, Grimaldi A, et al. , authors. Annular-to-leaflet mismatch and the need for reductive annuloplasty in patients undergoing mitral repair for chronic mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol. 2007. 99:p. 1434–9


Goldstone AB, Atluri P, Szeto WY, et al. , authors. Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. 145:p. 748–56


Colli A, Manzan E, Aidietis A, et al. , authors. An early European experience with transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with NeoChord implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018. 54:p. 460–6


Leopaldi AM, Wrobel K, Speziali G, et al. , authors. The dynamic cardiac biosimulator: a method for training physicians in beating-heart mitral valve repair procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. 155:p. 147–55


Colli A, Manzan E, Besola L, et al. , authors. One-year outcomes after transapical echocardiography-guided mitral valve repair. Circulation. 2018. 138:p. 843–5

Copyright: © 2019 Fundacja Videochirurgii This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe