ORIGINAL PAPER
Understanding the relationship between family communication and the development of weight stigma
1
Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, USA
2
University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA
Submission date: 2015-12-15
Final revision date: 2016-02-01
Acceptance date: 2016-02-01
Online publication date: 2016-02-08
Publication date: 2016-02-22
Health Psychology Report 2016;4(3):213-223
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
This study examined the relationship between family communication and weight stigma. The Family Communication Patterns Theory was used as a framework to explain the relationships between two dimensions of family communication (i.e., conversation orientation and conformity orientation) and antifat attitudes (i.e., physical unattractiveness and weight blame).
Participants and procedure
A total of 585 college-aged participants completed an on-line questionnaire. We used the following instruments: body mass index (BMI), Antifat Attitudes Scale (AFAT), Revised Family Communication Patterns Scale (RFCP).
Results
Significant relationships were found between the two dimensions of family communication and antifat attitudes. Conversation orientation was negatively associated with antifat attitudes and conformity orientation was positively associated with antifat attitudes. In addition, pluralistic families were less likely to stigmatize the overweight and obese by demonstrating less discrimination with physical attraction and personal weight blame.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the important association between family communication and antifat attitudes. Families that endorse a pluralistic family type (i.e., high conversation orientation and low conformity orientation) appear to engage in the least amount of discrimination with regard to weight stigma. These families are not only less discriminating of others, they perhaps bring about more awareness and information to family members as compared to other family types.
This study examined the relationship between family communication and weight stigma. The Family Communication Patterns Theory was used as a framework to explain the relationships between two dimensions of family communication (i.e., conversation orientation and conformity orientation) and antifat attitudes (i.e., physical unattractiveness and weight blame).
Participants and procedure
A total of 585 college-aged participants completed an on-line questionnaire. We used the following instruments: body mass index (BMI), Antifat Attitudes Scale (AFAT), Revised Family Communication Patterns Scale (RFCP).
Results
Significant relationships were found between the two dimensions of family communication and antifat attitudes. Conversation orientation was negatively associated with antifat attitudes and conformity orientation was positively associated with antifat attitudes. In addition, pluralistic families were less likely to stigmatize the overweight and obese by demonstrating less discrimination with physical attraction and personal weight blame.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the important association between family communication and antifat attitudes. Families that endorse a pluralistic family type (i.e., high conversation orientation and low conformity orientation) appear to engage in the least amount of discrimination with regard to weight stigma. These families are not only less discriminating of others, they perhaps bring about more awareness and information to family members as compared to other family types.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
Al Sabbah, H., Vereecken, C. A., Elgar, F. J., Nansel, T., Aasvee, K., Abdeen, Z., Ojala, K., Ahluwalia, N., & Maes, L. (2009). Body weight dissatisfaction and communication with parents among adolescents in 24 countries: International cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 9, 52–62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-52.
2.
Anderson, J. (2013). Communicating stigma about body size. Health Communication, 28, 603–615. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.706792.
3.
Andreyeva, T., Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans: 1995-1996 through 2004-2006. Obesity, 16, 1129–1134. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.35.
4.
Arroyo, A., & Segrin, C. (2013). Family interactions and disordered eating attitudes: The mediating roles of social competence and psychological distress. Communication Monographs, 80, 399–424. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2013.828158.
5.
Baiocchi-Wagner, E. A., & Talley, A. E. (2013). The role of family communication in individual health attitudes and behaviors concerning diet and physical activity. Health Communication, 28, 193–205. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.674911.
6.
Berge, J. M., Wall, M., Larson, N., Loth, K. A., & Nuemark-Sztainer, D. (2013). Family functioning: Associations with weight status, eating behaviors, and physical activity in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.006.
7.
Botta, R. A., & Dumlao, R. (2002). How do conflict and communication patterns between fathers and daughters contribute to or offset eating disorders? Health Communication, 14, 199–219. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1402_3.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). About adult BMI. Retrieved January 27, 2016 from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweig....
9.
Crandall, C. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882.
10.
Crandall, C. S., & Moriarty, D. (1995). Physical illness stigma and social rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 67–83. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01049.x.
11.
Cooley, E., Toray, T., Wang, M. C., & Valdez, N. N. (2008). Maternal effects on daughters’ eating pathology and body image. Eating Behaviors, 9, 52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.03.001.
12.
Coomber, K., & King, R. M. (2008). The role of sisters in body image dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Sex Roles, 59, 81–93. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9413-7.
13.
Dhurandhar, N. V. (2013). Obesity stigma: A persistent problem, a possible solution. International Journal of Obesity, 37, 1413–1414. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.34.
14.
Ebneter, D. S., Latner, J. D., & O’Brien, K. S. (2011). Just world beliefs, casual beliefs, and acquaintance: Associations with stigma toward eating disorders and obesity. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 618–622. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.029.
15.
Elwood, T. D., & Schrader, D. C. (1988). Family communication patterns and communication apprehension. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 493-502.
16.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 159–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00324.x.
17.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Gorber, S. C., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007). A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 8, 307–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00347.x.
19.
Hansson, L. M., & Rasmussen, F. (2014). Attitudes towards obesity in the Swedish general population: The role of one’s own body size, weight satisfaction, and controllability beliefs about obesity. Body Image, 11, 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.10.004.
20.
Hinshaw, S. P. (2007). The mark of shame: Stigma of mental illness and an agenda for change. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Hinshaw, S. P., & Stier, A. (2007). Stigma as related to mental disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 367–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141245.
22.
Joiner, T. E., Heatherton, T. E., Rudd, M. D., & Schmidt, N. B. (1997). Perfectionism, perceived weight status, and bulimic symptoms: Two studies testing a diathesis-stress model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 145–153. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.145.
23.
Katz, D. (2014). Health: The medicalization of fat. Nature, 510, 34. doi: 10.1038/510034a.
24.
Kluck, A. S. (2010). Family influence on disordered eating: The role of body image dissatisfaction. Body Image, 7, 8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.09.009.
25.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48, 59–75. doi: 10.1080/10510979709368491.
26.
Koerner, A. F. & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002a). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12, 70–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x.
27.
Koerner, A. F. & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002b). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Communication Yearbook, 26, 36–68. doi: 10.1207/s15567419cy2601_2.
28.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In: D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781452204420.n4.
29.
Koerner, A. F., & Schrodt, P. (2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 1–15. doi: 10.1207/S15327698JFC0202_01.
30.
Latner, J. D., O’Brien, K. S., Durso, L. E., Brinkman, L. A., & MacDonald, T. (2008). Weighing obesity stigma: The relative strength of different forms of bias. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 1145–1152. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.53.
31.
Latner, J. D., & Stunkard, A. J. (2003). Getting worse: The stigmatization of obese children. Obesity Research, 11, 452–456. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.61.
32.
Levine, P. (1996). Eating disorders and their impact on family systems. In: F. W. Kaslow (ed.), Handbook of relational diagnosis and dysfunctional family patterns (pp. 463–476). New York: Wiley.
33.
Lewis, R. J., Cash, T. F., Jacobi, L., & Bubb-Lewis, C. (1997). Prejudice toward fat people: The development and validation of the anti-fat attitudes test. Obesity Research, 11, 452–456. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00555.x.
34.
Mond, J. M., Robertson-Smith, G., & Vetere, A. (2006). Stigma and eating disorders: Is there evidence of negative attitudes towards anorexia nervosa among women in the community? Journal of Mental Health, 15, 519–532. doi: 10.1080/09638230600902559.
35.
Musher-Eizenman, D. R., Holub, S. C., Miller, A. B., Goldstein, S. E., & Edwards-Leeper, L. (2004). Body size stigmatization in preschool children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 613–620. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh063.
36.
O’Brien, K. S., Danielsdottir, S., Olafsson, R. P., Hansdottir, I., Fridjonsdotti, T., G., & Jonsdottiir, H. (2013). The relationship between physical appearance concerns, disgust, and anti-fat prejudice. Body Image, 10, 619–623. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.012.
37.
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2012). Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS data brief, no 82. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
38.
Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788–905. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.108.
39.
Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2003). Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: Toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias. Obesity Reviews, 4, 213–227. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00122.x.
40.
Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2006). Confronting and coping with weight stigma: An investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity, 14, 1802–1815. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.208.
41.
Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17, 941–964. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636.
42.
Puhl, R. M., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Weight stigmatization and bias reduction: perspectives of overweight and obese adults. Health Education Research, 23, 347–358. doi: 10.1093/her/cym052.
43.
Roehrig, J. P., & McLean, C. P. (2010). A comparison of stigma toward eating disorders versus depression. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43, 671–674. doi: 10.1002/eat.20760.
44.
Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523–544. doi: 10.1177/009365090017004007.
45.
Rush, L. L. (1998). Affective reactions to multiple social stigmas. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 421–430. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600397.
46.
Schrodt, P., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2007). Communication processes that mediate family communication patterns and mental well-being: A mean and covariance structures analysis of young adults from divorced and non-divorced families. Human Communication Research, 33, 330–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00302.x.
47.
Schrodt, P., Ledbetter, A. M., & Ohrt, J. K. (2007). Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children’s mental well-being. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 23–46. doi: 10.1080/15267430709336667.
48.
Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Messersmith, A. S. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their association with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75, 248–269. doi: 10.1080/03637750802256318.
49.
Segrin, C. (2006). Family interactions and well-being: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 3–21. doi: 10.1207/s15327698jfc0601_2.
50.
Segrin, C., & Flora, J. (2011). Family communication (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
Smith, R. A. (2007). Language of the lost: An explication of stigma communication. Communication Theory, 17, 462–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00307.x.
52.
Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Carretta, H., & Terracciano, A. (2015). Percieved discrimination and physica, cognitive, and emotional health in older adulthood. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.03.007.
53.
Taniguchi, E., & Aune, R. K. (2013). Communication with parents and body satisfaction in college students. Journal of American College Health, 61, 387–396. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.820189.
54.
Tomiyama, A. J., Finch, L. E., Belsky, A. C. I., Buss, J., Finley, C., Schwartz, M. B., & Daubenmier, J. (2015). Weight bias in 2001 versus 2013: Contradictory attitudes among obesity researchers and health professionals. Obesity, 23, 46-53. doi: 10.1002/oby.20910.
55.
Townsend, L. (2009). The moralizing of obesity: A new name for an old sin? Critical Social Policy, 29, 171–190. doi: 10.1177/0261018308101625.
56.
Wonderlich, S. (1992). Relationship of family and personality factors in bulimia. In: J. H. Crowther, D. L. Tennenbaum, S. E. Hobfoll, & M. A. P. Stephens (eds.), The etiology of bulimia nervosa: The individual and familial context (pp. 103–126). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-5571 |
| ISSN: | 2353-4184 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
