eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
6/2017
vol. 13
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Basic research

Up-regulation of the long non-coding RNA RMRP contributes to glioma progression and promotes glioma cell proliferation and invasion

Wenxian Feng
,
Li Li
,
Xuchang Xu
,
Yunqi Jiao
,
Wei Du

Arch Med Sci 2017; 13, 6: 1315–1321
Online publish date: 2017/03/23
Article file
- up-regulation.pdf  [0.32 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Glioma is one of the most common types of primary brain tumor in adults, and represents one of the most aggressive and lethal human cancer types [1]. Despite great progress in therapeutic technologies, such as surgery, radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and chemotherapy, the clinical outcome of patients with gliomas remains poor [2, 3]. Therefore, it is critical to understand the molecular mechanisms involved in glioma progression, to identify reliable biomarkers and therapeutic targets for glioma patients.
With the development of whole-genome sequencing technology, it was determined that less than 2% of the mammalian genome is in protein encoding regions and the remainder is in non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) [4]. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of ncRNA transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides and are implicated in a number of important events, such as epigenetic regulation, transcriptional regulation, and post-transcriptional regulation [5, 6]. More and more evidence suggests that lncRNAs play a critical role in glioma progression and may serve as a therapeutic target. For example, Ma et al. found that lncRNA MALAT1 was increased in glioma and associated with the malignant status and poor prognosis in glioma patients [7]. Wang et al. reported that lncRNA MEG3 was decreased in glioma tissues and ectopic expression of MEG3 inhibited cell proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis in glioma cells [8]. Shi et al. showed that lncRNA H19 promoted glioma cell invasion by deriving miR-675 [9].
LncRNA RMRP, a newly identified lncRNA, was first found to show dysregulated expression in gastric cancer [10]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that lncRNA RMRP promoted carcinogenesis by acting as a miR-206 sponge and could be used as a novel biomarker for gastric cancer [11]. However, the prognostic role of lncRNA RMRP in cancer is still unclear, and fewer studies have examined the expression levels and underlying molecular mechanism in glioma.
In this study, we determined lncRNA RMRP expression and its correlation with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with glioma. Furthermore, the biological function of lncRNA RMRP was investigated in glioma cells in vitro.

Material and methods

Human tissue samples

Thirty-nine glioma tissues and 11 normal brain tissues (NBTs) were obtained from the Department of Neurosurgery, Zhumadian Central Hospital during 2010–2013. All samples had confirmed pathological diagnosis and were divided into low grade (grade I–II) and high grade (grade III–IV) according to the WHO classification by neuropathologists. Informed consent was obtained from all patients, and this study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee at the Zhumadian Central Hospital (No. Z20160501A).

Cell culture

The human glioma U87 and U251 cell lines were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Life Technologies) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 IU/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

siRNA transfection

Cells were transfected with siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacture’s protocol. The sequence of siRNA for the RMRP was 5-CCUAGGCUACACACUGAGGACUTT-3 (si-RMRP) [11]. The sequence of negative control siRNA (si-NC) was 5-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3 [11]. The chemically modified siRNAs were synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA of tissues or cells was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Life Technologies). RNA was reversed transcribed into cDNAs using the Primer-Script one step RT-PCR kit (TaKaRa). The cDNA template was amplified by real-time RT-PCR using the SYBR Premix Dimmer Eraser kit (TaKaRa). GAPDH was used as an internal control, and RMRP values were normalized to GAPDH. qRT-PCR reactions were performed by the ABI7500 system (Applied Biosystems). The relative expression fold change of mRNAs was calculated by the 2−Ct method. The primer sequences were as follows: lncRNA RMRP: 5-ACTCCAAAGTCCGCCAAGA-3 and 5-GTAACTAGA­GGGAGCTGAC-3; GADPH: 5-GTCAA-CGGATTTGGTCTGTATT-3 and 5-AGTCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGAT-3 [11].

CCK8 assay

Cells at a concentration of 5 × 103 per well were seeded in the 96-well plate and incubated for 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h. Cell proliferation viability was measured with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8, Beyotime) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance was then recorded at 450 nm using Elx800 Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments).

Flow cytometric analysis

Cells transfected with the desired siRNA were plated in 6-well plates. After 48 h incubation, the cultures were incubated with propidium iodide for 30 min in the dark. Cultures were collected and analyzed for the cell cycle using a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur) after propidium iodide staining. The cultures were also stained with annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate, and the cell apoptosis was analyzed using a flow cytometer.

Wound-healing assay

Cells were plated into a 12-well plate and cultured at 37°C for 24 h. Wounds were created in monolayers of cells using a 10 µl pipette tip. Cells were washed to remove cellular debris and incubated in DMEM without FBS at 37°C. Images were taken at 48 h following wounding. The wound area was measured and the percentage of the wound healing was calculated by Image J software.

Transwell invasion assay

Cell invasion was performed using 24-well transwell plates (Corning) pre-coated with Matrigel (BD). Cells were seeded in the upper chambers of inserts at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well with serum-free DMEM. DMEM supplement with 10% serum was added to lower chambers. After being cultured for 48 h, invasion cells were stained by violet crystalline solution according to the protocol. In order to count cell numbers in five random fields, phase contrast microscopy was employed.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences among groups. P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

lncRNA RMRP expression and clinicopathologic features in glioma

Expression levels of lncRNA RMRP in 39 glioma tissues and 11 normal brain tissues were examined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR data showed that lncRNA RMRP was significantly increased in glioma tissues compared with normal brain tissues (Figure 1 A, p < 0.05). Furthermore, correlation of lncRNA RMRP expression with clinicopathologic features of glioma patients revealed a significant association between lncRNA RMRP up-regulation with advanced tumor grade and low Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) (Figures 1 B and C, p < 0.05). Those data indicated that lncRNA RMRP up-regulation may be involved in glioma progression.
We divided the 39 glioma patients into a high expression group (n = 19) and a low expression group (n = 20) according to the median expression level of lncRNA RMRP. Clinicopathologic features were analyzed in the high and low expression groups (Table I). Our data showed that high RMRP expression was observed to be closely correlated with advanced tumor grade and low KPS. However, there were no significant correlations between lncRNA RMRP expression and other clinicopathologic features, such as patients’ age, gender, and tumor size (Table I, p > 0.05).

Statistical analysis

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test using patient post-operative survival were performed to further evaluate the correlation between lncRNA RMRP expression and glioma patients’ prognosis. We found that overall survival of the high lncRNA RMRP expression group was significantly poorer than that of the low lncRNA RMRP expression group (Figure 1 D, p < 0.05). Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that lncRNA RMRP expression was an independent prognostic indicator for overall survival of glioma patients (Table II, p < 0.05). Thus, these results suggested that lncRNA RMRP might have important roles in glioma progression and development.

Knockdown of lncRNA RMRP inhibits glioma cell proliferation in vitro

To further investigate the function of RMRP in glioma cells, RMRP siRNA was transfected into U87 and U251 cell lines. To avoid off-target effects and ensure the efficiency of interference, we used an interference target sequence of RMRP validated as effective according to a previous study [11]. qRT-PCR showed that lncRNA RMRP expression was significantly reduced both in U87 and U251 cell lines (Figure 2 A, p < 0.05). Then the CCK8 assay showed that knockdown of lncRNA RMRP expression significantly inhibited cell proliferation both in U87 and U251 cell lines compared with the negative control group (si-NC) (Figure 2 B, p < 0.05). Next, flow cytometric analysis was used to explore whether RMRP affected cell proliferation by altering cell cycle progression or apoptosis. We found that decreased expression of lncRNA RMRP significantly stalled glioma cells at the G1/G0 phase and induced glioma cell apoptosis (Figure 2 C and D, p < 0.05). These data suggested that down-regulated expression of lncRNA RMRP might inhibit glioma cell proliferation via arresting cells in G0/G1 phase and induce cell apoptosis.

Knockdown of lncRNA RMRP inhibits glioma cell migration and invasion

The wound-healing assay and Transwell invasion assay were performed to assess the effect of lncRNA RMRP on the invasiveness of glioma cells. The wound-healing assay showed that U87 and U251 cells transfected with si-RMRP displayed lower migration capacity than the si-NC group (Figure 3 A, p < 0.05). The Transwell invasion assay indicated that the invasion ability of si-RMRP transfected U87 and U251 cells was reduced compared to the si-NC group (Figure 3 B, p < 0.05). These findings demonstrated that down-regulated lncRNA RMRP expression might suppress the migration and invasion ability of glioma cells.

Discussion

LncRNA dysregulation may affect epigenetic information and provide a cellular growth advantage, resulting in progressive and uncontrolled tumor growth [12, 13]. Effective control of both cell survival and cell proliferation is critical to the prevention of oncogenesis and to successful cancer therapy [14]. Therefore, identification of cancer associated lncRNAs and investigation of their clinical significance and functions may provide a missing piece of the well-known oncogenic and tumor suppressor network puzzle.
The RNA component of mitochondrial RNA processing endoribonuclease (RMRP), a lncRNA, was first discovered in cartilage-hair hypoplasia (CHH), an autosomal recessive inherited disease [15]. RMRP is primarily identified in the nucleus, nucleolus and mitochondria [16]. It is highly expressed in a wide range of human tissues and is essential for development at early stages of embryogenesis [17]. In mitochondria, RMRP helps endonuclease to cleave mitochondrial RNA at a priming site of mitochondrial DNA replication [18]. While in nucleoli, RMRP carries out an essential function in the final step of 5.8S rRNA processing [19]. Recent studies showed that knockdown of RMRP significantly inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Acting as a miR-206 sponge, RMRP modulated the cell cycle by regulating cyclin D2 expression. It was suggested that RMRP plays a crucial role in gastric cancer occurrence and could be used as a novel biomarker for gastric cancer [11]. However, the function of lncRNA RMRP in the development and progression of glioma remains unclear.
In the present study, our data showed that lncRNA RMRP was up-regulated in glioma tissues compared to normal brain tissues. The high expression level of lncRNA RMRP in glioma was correlated with advanced tumor grade and low KPS. Furthermore, the up-regulated expression of lncRNA RMRP in glioma was associated with poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that lncRNA RMRP expression level could serve as a prognostic indicator in glioma patients. These findings indicated that lncRNA RMRP played a direct role in the modulation of cancer progression, and might be useful as a novel prognostic or progression biomarker for glioma.
To further explore the biological function of lncRNA RMRP in glioma, we determined the effects of loss of function of lncRNA RMRP on various aspects of glioma biology. The CCK8 assay showed that knockdown of lncRNA RMRP significantly decreased the proliferation ability of glioma cells in vitro. Flow cytometric analysis showed that decreased expression of lncRNA RMRP stalled glioma cells at the G1/G0 phase and induced glioma cell apoptosis. In addition, the wound-healing assay and Transwell invasion assay revealed that knockdown of lncRNA RMRP significantly reduced the metastasis capability of glioma cells in vitro. Those findings suggested that a decreased expression level of lncRNA RMRP might inhibit the malignant phenotypes of glioma cells, including cell proliferation, migration and invasion.
In conclusion, in the present study, we demonstrated that lncRNA RMRP was overexpressed in glioma and could be considered as an independent prognostic biomarker in glioma patients. lncRNA RMRP played a key role in the progression of glioma by regulating cell proliferation and metastasis. Our findings demonstrated that lncRNA RMRP could be a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for the treatment of glioma in future.

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the key scientific and technological plan funding project of Zhumadian Central Hospital (No. 16604).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
2. Schwartzbaum JA, Fisher JL, Aldape KD, et al. Epidemiology and molecular pathology of glioma. Nature Clin Pract Neurol 2006; 2: 494-503.
3. Milano MT, Johnson MD, Sul J, et al. Primary spinal cord glioma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database study. J Neurooncol 2010; 98: 83-92.
4. Mattick JS, Makunin IV. Non-coding RNA. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15 (Suppl 1): R17-29.
5. Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nature Rev Genet 2009; 10: 155-9.
6. Fatica A, Bozzoni I. Long non-coding RNAs: new players in cell differentiation and development. Nature Rev Genet 2014; 15: 7-21.
7. Ma K, Wang H, Li X, et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 associates with the malignant status and poor prognosis in glioma. Tumor Biol 2015; 36: 3355-9.
8. Wang P, Ren Z, Sun P. Overexpression of the long non-coding RNA MEG3 impairs in vitro glioma cell proliferation. J Cell Biochem 2012; 113: 1868-74.
9. Shi Y, Wang Y, Luan W, et al. Long non-coding RNA H19 promotes glioma cell invasion by deriving miR-675. PLoS One 2014; 9: e86295.
10. Song H, Sun W, Ye G, et al. Long non-coding RNA expression profile in human gastric cancer and its clinical significances. J Transl Med 2013; 11: 225.
11. Shao Y, Ye M, Li Q, et al. LncRNA-RMRP promotes carcinogenesis by acting as a miR-206 sponge and is used as a novel biomarker for gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 37812-24.
12. Lee JT. Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Science 2012; 338: 1435-9.
13. Mercer TR, Mattick JS. Structure and function of long noncoding RNAs in epigenetic regulation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013; 20: 300-7.
14. Evan GI, Vousden KH. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature 2001; 411: 342-8.
15. Rogler LE, Kosmyna B, Moskowitz D, et al. Small RNAs derived from lncRNA RNase MRP have gene-silencing activity relevant to human cartilage–hair hypoplasia. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23: 368-82.
16. Li K, Smagula CS, Parsons WJ, et al. Subcellular partitioning of MRP RNA assessed by ultrastructural and biochemical analysis. J Cell Biol 1994; 124: 871-82.
17. Rosenbluh J, Nijhawan D, Chen Z, et al. RMRP is a non-coding RNA essential for early murine development. PloS One 2011; 6: e26270.
18. Chang DD, Clayton DA. A novel endoribonuclease cleaves at a priming site of mouse mitochondrial DNA replication. EMBO J 1987; 6: 409.
19. Schmitt ME, Clayton DA. Nuclear RNase MRP is required for correct processing of pre-5.8 S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13: 7935-41.
Copyright: © 2017 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
FEATURED PRODUCTS
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe