RESEARCH PAPER
Vigilance for HIV/AIDS: a cross-sectional study of 2 million adults in the United States
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, Greece
 
 
Submission date: 2020-05-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2020-09-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-09-30
 
 
Publication date: 2021-06-30
 
 
HIV & AIDS Review 2021;20(2):96-101
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This work aimed at studying human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well as the characteristics of individuals who have been tested for HIV in the United States during 2009-2018, with the ultimate goal to be found statistically significant predictors for HIV testing.

Material and methods:
Statistical methods used to extract the results of this work were χ2 and oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. A multiple logistic regression analysis was applied with odds ratio (OR) to find statistically significant prognostic factors for HIV testing.

Results:
As specified by multiple logistic regression analyses, individuals aged 18-44 were eight times more likely to be tested for HIV (OR = 8.18), while Black or African Americans were three times more likely to be tested for the virus (OR = 2.78). In addition, those who employ full-time (OR = 2.17), and living with a partner (OR = 1.80) were twice as likely to be tested for HIV. Finally, females (OR = 1.24), who live in a large metropolitan statistical area (OR = 1.61), with some college education status (OR = 1.05), and living in a poor financial situation (OR = 1.34) were more likely to be tested for the virus.

Conclusions:
The results of this work highlight the prognostic characteristics of individuals, who are more likely to be tested for HIV, which reflects the vigilance for this incurable virus. Moreover, individuals with a higher degree of vigilance for HIV are more likely to be females in the age group of 18-44, financially independent, with a high level of education. On the contrary, individuals with a lower degree of vigilance for HIV, and therefore in high-risk groups, are more likely to be males, with less than a high school diploma education status, not poor, divorced or separated, with a private health insurance coverage, who do not employ and has never worked, living in the Midwest.

 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
WHO. HIV/AIDS, 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/....
 
2.
CDC. Diagnoses of HIV Infection in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2018. HIV Surveillance Report 2020; 31.
 
3.
Tladi L. Poverty and HIV/AIDS in South Africa: an empirical contribution. SAHARA J 2006; 3: 369-381.
 
4.
Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Jooste S, Zungu N, et al.
 
5.
South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behavior survey, 2012. HSRC Press, Cape Town 2014.
 
6.
Weine SM, Kashuba AB. Labor migration and HIV risk: a systematic review of the literature. AIDS Behav 2012; 16: 1605-1621.
 
7.
Gilbert L, Selikow TA. The epidemic in this country has the face of a woma: gender and HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res 2011; 10 (Suppl): 325-334.
 
8.
Williams DR, Priest N, Anderson NB. Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: patterns and prospects. Health Psychol 2016; 35: 407-411.
 
9.
Shisana O, Zungu N, Evans M, Rehle T, Risher K, Celentano D. The case for expanding the definition of ‘key populations’ to include high-risk groups in the general population to improve targeted HIV prevention efforts. S Afr Med J 2015; 105: 664-669.
 
10.
Pascoe SJS, Langhaug LF, Mavhu W, Hargreaves J, Jaffar S, Hayes R, et al. Poverty, food insufficiency and HIV infection and sexual behaviour among young rural Zimbabwean women. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0115290.
 
11.
Awoleye OJ, Thron C. Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Nigeria: a synthesis of the literature.
 
12.
J AIDS HIV Res 2015; 7: 117-129.
 
13.
Sia D, Onadja Y, Nandi A, Foro A, Brewer T. What lies behind gender inequalities in HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan African countries: evidence from Kenya, Lesotho and Tanzania. Health Policy Plan 2013; 29: 938-949.
 
14.
Zembe YZ, Townsend L, Thorson A, Ekström AM. “Money talks, bullshit walks” interrogating notions of consumption and survival sex among young women engaging in transactional sex in post-.
 
15.
apartheid South Africa: a qualitative enquiry. Global Health 2013; 9: 28.
 
16.
National Center for Health Statistics. Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2016. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.....
 
17.
Szumilas M. Explaining odds ratios [published correction appears in J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Winter;24(1):58].
 
18.
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 19: 227-229.
 
19.
Reniers G. Marital strategies for regulating exposure to HIV. Demography 2008; 45: 417-438.
 
20.
Osuafor GN, Mturi J. Attitude towards sexual control among women in conjugal union in the era of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Mahikeng, South Africa. Afr Popul Stud 2014; 28: 538.
 
21.
Hunter M. The changing political economy of sex in South Africa: the significance of unemployment and inequalities to the scale of the AIDS pandemic. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 689-700.
 
22.
Wabiri N, Taffa N. Socio-economic inequality and HIV in South Africa. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 1037.
 
23.
Mah TL, Halperin DT. Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: evidence to move forward. AIDS Behav 2010; 14: 11-16.
 
24.
Pellowski JA, Kalichman SC, Matthews KA, Adler N. A pandemic of the poor: social disadvantage and the U.S. HIV epidemic. Am Psychol.
 
25.
2013; 68: 197-209.
 
eISSN:1732-2707
ISSN:1730-1270
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top