eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


4/2018
vol. 13
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

W-type suture in Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a novel approach to an old technique

Dawid Janczak, Urszula Szydełko, Wojciech Apoznański, Wojciech Panek, Tomasz Szydełko

Videosurgery Miniinv 2018; 13 (4): 512–517
Online publish date: 2018/05/30
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
Anderson-Hynes (A-H) dismembered pyeloplasty has remained nearly unchanged since its introduction in 1949. The authors present a modification of the uretero-pelvic anastomosis as described by Anderson and Hynes. The new approach, called the W-type suture, is thought to be more watertight and associated with fewer complications than the original.

Aim
To assess the effectiveness of the modification of Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty named the W-type suture.

Material and methods
The research is a retrospective study of 99 patients who underwent laparoscopic A-H pyeloplasty. In 49 patients unmodified laparoscopic A-H pyeloplasty was carried out. Fifty patients underwent laparoscopic A-H pyeloplasty with the anastomosis made using the aforementioned W-type suture. To assess the effectiveness of the W-type suture, we compared urine leakage duration – a direct indicator of anastomosis tightness – and frequency of postoperative complications.

Results
The mean duration of urinary leakage was 3 ±1.16 days for the W-type suture anastomosis group and 3.57 ±1.14 days for the unmodified A-H pyeloplasty group (p < 0.05). The frequency of post-operative complications did not statistically significantly differ between the groups except for fever (18.4% vs. 4%; p < 0.05).

Conclusions
The analysis of the collected data showed that the W-type suture might be a promising alternative to a traditional approach of performing the ureteropelvic anastomosis. Further research should be done to minimize biases present in this study, which might have influenced our results.

keywords:

pyeloplasty, anastomosis, Anderson-Hynes, dismembered

references:
Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 1949; 21: 209-14.
Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-9.
Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 2002; 60: 509-13.
Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1891-4.
Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 430-52.
Strother MC, Mucksavage P. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of adult UPJ obstruction. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17: 39.
Talner L. Urinary obstruction. In: Clinical Urography: An Atlas and Textbook of Urological Imaging. Vol. 2. W.B. Saunders 1990; 1535-628.
Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the society for fetal urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23: 478-80.
Szydełko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W, et al. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered Y-V laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with primary hydronephrosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 7-12.
Jacobs BL, Seelam R, Lai JC, et al. Cost analysis of treatments for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Endourol 2017; 31: 204-9.
Adam A, Smith GHH. Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: are we all really on the same page? ANZ J Surg 2016; 86: 143-7.
Ou ZY, Chen JB, Chen Z, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: modification of the procedure and our experience. Urol J 2014; 11: 1763-767.
  
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe