@Article{Giannakopoulos2026,
journal="Biology of Sport",
issn="0860-021X",
year="2026",
title="Change-of-direction ability in soccer is angle-specific: implications for multi-angle testing and speed deficit calculation",
abstract=" The ability to change direction is crucial in soccer due to the high frequency of rapid movement\&nbsp;adjustments\&nbsp;during match play. This study examined the effects of change-of-direction (COD) angle (45°, 90°,\&nbsp;\&nbsp;180°) and limb dominance on sprint speed in 18\&nbsp;experienced male soccer players using a\&nbsp;multi-angle field based assessment. Athletes completed a\&nbsp;20\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;linear sprint and three 20\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;COD sprints, each incorporating a\&nbsp;single directional change at 15\&nbsp;m. Mean speed was assessed across the 0–10\&nbsp;m, 10–20\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;(COD speed), 10–13\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;(entry speed), and 13–20\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;segments, and percentage COD speed deficit relative to linear sprinting (%CODD) was calculated. Mean speed in the 0–10\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;segment was identical between linear and COD sprints (5.18 ± 0.28\&nbsp;to 5.28 ± 0.28\&nbsp;m · s−1). Using the linear 0–10\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;speed as a\&nbsp;comparator, %CODD values were positive or near-zero for 45° and 90° (+21.0 ± 12.7% and −2.9 ± 7.7%, respectively), indicating greater COD speed than linear, with a\&nbsp;negative value only for 180° (−25.2 ± 4.3%). When COD ability was quantified relative to the 10–20\&nbsp;m\&nbsp;segment of the linear sprint (7.53 ± 0.37\&nbsp;m · s−1), a\&nbsp;clear and progressively greater\&nbsp;%CODD\&nbsp;was observed across angles (45°: −15.6 ± 7.6%; 90°: −32.2 ± 4.7%; 180°: −47.7 ± 2.7%; all p\&nbsp;\&lt;\&nbsp;0.001). Entry speed declined from 45° to 90° COD (6.55 ± 0.45\&nbsp;to 5.77 ± 0.34\&nbsp;m · s−1, p\&nbsp;\&lt;\&nbsp;0.001), with no difference between 90° and 180° (5.79 ± 0.31\&nbsp;m · s−1, p\&nbsp;= 1.0). Kendall’s tau correlations showed moderate agreement in %CODD between adjacent angles, but not between 45° and 180°, with no effect of limb dominance (all p\&nbsp;\&gt;\&nbsp;0.05). In conclusion, %CODD should be calculated using matched linear segments. Angle-dependent\&nbsp;and\&nbsp;individual\&nbsp;variability in %CODD support multi-angle, rather than single-direction, assessment and training. ",
author="Giannakopoulos, Georgios-Marios
and Thomakos, Pierros
and Tsoukos, Athanasios
and Bogdanis, Gregory",
pages="1465--1472",
doi="10.5114/biolsport.2026.162048",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2026.162048"
}