Abstract
2/2010
vol. 18
Acceptance of situation involved with health status of patients from the pregnancy pathology and obstetrics departments
Ginekologia Praktycznia nr 2 (105)/2010; 31-35
Online publish date: 2010/09/14
Introduction: Each disease, in spite of its degree, creates some problems to its adaptation.
The aim of the study: The assessment of acceptance of health status of patients from the department of pregnancy pathology and obstetrics.
Material and methods: The study included 200 patients from departament of pregnancy pathology (94) and obstetrics (106). We used the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS).
Results: Almost 29.5% of respondents were hospitalized due to status post cesarean sectio, physiological delivery – 23.5%, gestational diabetes – 13.5%, prematurity delivery – 11.5%, multiple pregnancy – 4.5%, risk of abortion – 2.5%, spontaneous abortion – 8.5%, or pregnancy-induced hypertension – 6.5%. The acceptance of illness score of patients was (23.6 ±6.99). Significant difference (p = 0.002) between mean AIS score of patients from departments of pregnancy pathology 22.5 ±6.1), and obstetrics (24.5 ±2.3) was found. Women with multiple pregnancies had a high AIS score (32.2 ±9.5). Women with pregnancy-induced hypertension had mean value of AIS score (27.0 ±3.10), after physiological delivery (26.7 ±1.8), gestational diabetes (25.5 ±9.5) or post cesarean sectio (22.2 ±1.7). Patients with risk of abortion (15.0 ±1.8), after spontaneous abortion (17.3 ±1.5) or risk of prematurity delivery (18.2 ±1.7) had no acceptance of illness.
Conclusions: Significant difference between mean AIS score of patients from the departments was found. Women with multiple pregnancies had a high AIS score, and women with risk of abortion, after spontaneous abortion, and risk of prematurity delivery had lack acceptance of illness.
The aim of the study: The assessment of acceptance of health status of patients from the department of pregnancy pathology and obstetrics.
Material and methods: The study included 200 patients from departament of pregnancy pathology (94) and obstetrics (106). We used the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS).
Results: Almost 29.5% of respondents were hospitalized due to status post cesarean sectio, physiological delivery – 23.5%, gestational diabetes – 13.5%, prematurity delivery – 11.5%, multiple pregnancy – 4.5%, risk of abortion – 2.5%, spontaneous abortion – 8.5%, or pregnancy-induced hypertension – 6.5%. The acceptance of illness score of patients was (23.6 ±6.99). Significant difference (p = 0.002) between mean AIS score of patients from departments of pregnancy pathology 22.5 ±6.1), and obstetrics (24.5 ±2.3) was found. Women with multiple pregnancies had a high AIS score (32.2 ±9.5). Women with pregnancy-induced hypertension had mean value of AIS score (27.0 ±3.10), after physiological delivery (26.7 ±1.8), gestational diabetes (25.5 ±9.5) or post cesarean sectio (22.2 ±1.7). Patients with risk of abortion (15.0 ±1.8), after spontaneous abortion (17.3 ±1.5) or risk of prematurity delivery (18.2 ±1.7) had no acceptance of illness.
Conclusions: Significant difference between mean AIS score of patients from the departments was found. Women with multiple pregnancies had a high AIS score, and women with risk of abortion, after spontaneous abortion, and risk of prematurity delivery had lack acceptance of illness.
Keywords
acceptance of illness, obstetrics department, pregnancy pathology department
Integrated with
