Pediatric Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism
en POLSKI
eISSN: 2083-8441
ISSN: 2081-237X
Pediatric Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2025
vol. 31
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Long-term effects of growth hormone on body composition and metabolic  parameters in girls with Turner syndrome

Ewa Błaszczyk
1
,
Anna-Mariia Shulhai
2
,
Joanna Gieburowska
1
,
Aneta Gawlik-Starzyk
1

  1. Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Endocrinology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  2. I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2025; 31 (4): 161-168
Online publish date: 2026/01/27
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Women with Turner syndrome (TS) are more frequently obese, with a central distribution of adiposity [1]. Adult TS patients have lower total lean body mass, while fat mass is elevated [2]. In girls with TS, higher waist circumference and a thicker layer of subcutaneous adipose tissue are also observed [3]. Turner syndrome is characterized by the frequent occurrence of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism disorders. Many studies indicate that metabolic disorders are more common in female TS patients than in the general population and are noticeable already in childhood [1]. Compared to the general population, women with TS have a two-fold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes and a 4.5-fold higher risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance [4]. Girls with TS are also more likely than the general population to have impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance [5] as well as reduced insulin sensitivity compared to age-matched controls [6]. The majority of girls with TS are treated with growth hormone (GH). Our previous study demonstrated impaired development of insulin resistance and carbohydrate metabolism during GH therapy in girls with TS [7]. On the other hand, a beneficial effect on body composition (BC) has been reported [8].

As obesity can lead to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and, in consequence, to increased mortality, the improvement of BC may reduce the risk of CVD in TS patients (8). This is particularly important because congenital heart diseases and components of metabolic syndrome lead to shorter life expectancy in adult TS patients [9].

The study aimed to investigate the effect of GH therapy on BC and establish the relationship between BC parameters and metabolic syndrome components in girls with TS during a 5-year follow-up.

Material and methods

In this prospective study, 21 patients with TS, confirmed by karyotyping with routine G-banding (according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics), who started GH therapy between 2007 and 2019 at the Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Endocrinology with a dose of 47–66 µg/kg/day according to the Polish Drug Program, were enrolled. The criteria for inclusion into the study group were: TS, age from 5 to 18 years, the onset and continuation of GH therapy at our center, and lack of coexisting diseases that could temporarily affect test results (severe infections). Exclusion criteria were a lack of consent of the legal guardian and/or the patient to participate in the study, and/or taking medications that could temporarily affect the measured and laboratory parameters.

For each patient, auxological, BC, and biochemical parameters were measured before starting GH treatment. Then, clinical and biochemical parameters were monitored every 3–6 months according to the protocol of the Polish Drug Program until the end of GH therapy. Data before the start of GH therapy (V0) were obtained from 21 subjects, then after the first year (V1) of GH therapy in 21 patients, the third (V3) year in 20 patients, and the fifth (V5) year of GH therapy in 13 patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1

The course of the study

BF – body fat; BMI – body mass index; FFM – fat-free mass; fT4 – free thyroxine; HC – hip circumference; HOMA-IR – index of insulin resistance; hSDS – height standard deviation; IGF-1 – insulin-like growth factor 1; MM – muscle mass; WC – waist circumference; WHR – ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference; WHtR – ratio of waist circumference to height; TBW – total body water; TSH – thyroid-stimulating hormone

/f/fulltexts/PEDM/57424/PEDM-31-57424-g001_min.jpg

The anthropometric characterization was based on weight and height measurements, along with body mass index (BMI) calculation, using the standard formula of weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared, and evaluated on the chart for healthy girls [6].

Weight was measured with a TANITA MC-980 device with a precision of 100 g, and height with a Harpenden stadiometer with a graduation of 0.1 cm. Height was expressed as standardized values (height standard deviation score – hSDS) and was calculated using the following formula: hSDS = child’s height − height for 50th percentile/0.5 × height 50th percentile − height 3rd percentile. Based on the age, sex, BMI, and the appropriate reference standard, the BMI Z-score was calculated using the international (International Obesity Task Force; IOTF) body mass index (BMI) cut-offs [10]. Tanner staging was used for puberty assessment [11].

The measurements of waist and hip circumference were obtained in an upright position, midway between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest, and at the widest point of the hips, respectively, to the nearest 0.1 cm using an inelastic tape. The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) were calculated by dividing both values.

The body composition was measured using a TANITA MC-980 BC analyzer, which is intended for professional use in hospitals and medical facilities, as well as universities for scientific research. The current flows at six frequencies (1 kHz/5 kHz/50 kHz/250 kHz/500 kHz/1000 kHz), which maximizes measurement accuracy. The following parameters were taken into account: body weight in kilograms, body fat (BF) mass in percentages, muscle mass (MM) in kilograms, total body water (TBW) content in kilograms, and free-fat mass (FFM) in kilograms.

Morning fasting venous blood samples were collected to measure the concentrations of total cholesterol (TCh), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG). TCh, HDL-C, and TG levels were analyzed enzymatically (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). An oral glucose load test of 1.75 g/kg was performed, with the determination of glucose and insulin levels at two time points: 0' and 120'. An enzymatic test (hexokinase method) was used for the quantitative determination of glucose (Beckman Coulter). Insulin was determined using a chemiluminescence immunoassay on an IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. Insulin resistance (IR) was measured using the HOMA index (HOMA-IR), calculated as fasting glucose [mg/dl] × fasting insulin [µUI/ml] /405 [12]. The fasting insulin [mIU/l]-to-glucose [mg/dl] ratio was also used as an index of IR, with a ratio > 0.3 considered indicative of IR [13].

Additionally, TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone), free thyroxine (fT4), and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were also determined. Serum concentrations of fT4 and TSH were measured with a chemiluminescent immunometric assay (IMMULITE 2000 Free T4 and IMMULITE 2000 Third Generation TSH, respectively; Siemens), and IGF concentration was measured by solid-phase enzyme-labeled chemiluminescent immunometric assays (IMMULITE, DPC).

Statistical analysis

Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA v.13 (license No. JPZ804I382130ARCN10J) software and Microsoft Excel (2013). The distribution of quantitative values was evaluated according to the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Given the non-normal distribution of quantitative variables, their descriptive statistics were presented as the median (Me) and lower (Lq) and upper (Uq) quartiles. Comparative analysis of quantitative indicators in three or more groups was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test, which was considered significant at p < 0.05.

Comparisons of groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction to assess the level of statistical significance.

The Pearson chi-square test (χ2) was used to analyze frequencies. To evaluate the possible associations between the studied data, Spearman correlation coefficients were determined. The significance of the differences between the values was considered significant at p < 0.05.

Bioethical standards

The study followed the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2013, as well as national laws. Patient safety rules and the ethical standards and procedures for research on human beings were followed. The idea of evaluating metabolic parameters and body mass composition in girls with TS was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia (resolution number NN-013-96/I/03 and KNW/0022/KB1/162/15/16).

Results

The study group consisted of 21 TS patients with median age 10 ±2.8 years. None of the patients had hypertension at the start of therapy. Of the 13 patients continuing therapy after 5 years (mean age 14.7 ±2.8 years), arterial hypertension was observed in 1 girl.

The only BC parameter that increased significantly during GH therapy, apart from weight and height, was FFM. The details related to clinical and laboratory parameters are demonstrated in Tables I and II.

Table I

Dynamics of changes in anthropometrical parameters in patients with TS depending on GH therapy duration (Lq; Uq)

Auxological and body composition componentsDuration of GH therapyKruskal-Wallis test (H) pp Mann-Whitney U-test
To 3 years V3 (n= 20)To 5 years V5 (n= 13)
Weight, kg28.4030.6035.2043.10H = 8.25pV0-V1= 0.634
(23.70; 38.00)(24.10; 38.80)(26.15; 45.75)(32.90; 45.70)p= 0.041*pV0-V3= 0.187
pV0-V5= 0.017*
Height, cm126.0128.2136.1144.2H = 11.34pV0-V1= 0.352
(111.8; 135.6)(117.5; 141.5)(124.8; 146.5)(137.2; 149.0)p= 0.01*pV0-V3= 0.065
pV0-V5= 0.003*
hSDS–2.39–2.36–2.35–1.77H = 4.68pV0-V1= 0.409
(3.63; –2.05)(3.45; –1.83)(–3.32; –1.64)(–3.21; –1.54)p= 0.196pV0-V3= 0.104
pV0-V5= 0.052
BMI, kg/m218.0118.3818.8919.84H = 1.22pV0-V1= 0.896
(16.49; 21.58)(16.38; 20.51)(16.26; 21.58)(18.02; 20.45)p= 0.748pV0-V3= 0.825
pV0-V5= 0.394
BMI Z–score0.490.590.080.38H = 0.041pV0-V1= 0.776
(–0.69; 1.39)(–0.62; 1.01)(–0.370; 1.09)(–0.21; 1.09)p= 0.997pV0-V3= 0.817
pV0-V5= 0.997
WC, cm60.061.062.062.5H = 2.01pV0-V1= 0.542
(58.0; 61.5)(58.2; 66.5)(58.0; 67.0)(58.5; 69.2)p= 0.569pV0-V3= 0.573
pV0-V5= 0.453
HC, cm70.071.073.573.0H = 1.17pV0-V1= 0.352
(69.5; 74.0)(70.0; 79.5)(70.0; 79.0)(69.0; 81.5)p= 0.759pV0-V3= 0.426
pV0-V5= 0.474
WHR0.850.840.840.85H = 0.447pV0-V1= 0.838
(0.83; 0.86)(0.81; 0.88)(0.83; 0.86)(0.83; 0.88)p= 0.930pV0-V3= 0.815
pV0-V5= 0.639
WHtR0.500.470.470.45H = 3.21pV0-V1= 0.257
(0.46; 0.52)(0.35; 0.48)(0.45; 0.51)(0.44; 0.47)p= 0.360pV0-V3= 0.410
pV0-V5= 0.217
BF, %25.4020.0022.5024.30H = 4.01pV0-V1= 0.088
(20.50; 28.70)(18.20; 23.20)(20.45; 25.60)(21.05; 25.75)p= 0.261pV0-V3= 0.345
pV0-V5= 0.648
MM, kg20.4025.0025.2024.70H = 3.94pV0-V1= 0.136
(15.60; 27.23)(21.00; 28.90)(19.65; 26.27)(22.42; 29.92)p= 0.267pV0-V3= 0.238
pV0-V5= 0.102
TBW, kg15.6018.0019.4019.05H = 5.63pV0-V1= 0.081
(11.90; 17.95)(16.30; 22.30)(15.25; 20.22)(17.35; 23.07)p= 0.130pV0-V3= 0.108
pV0-V5= 0.055
FFM, kg21.3024.6026.5026.05H = 8.20pV0-V1= 0.057
(16.40; 24.55)(22.20; 30.50)(20.77; 27.67)(23.67; 31.55)p= 0.042*pV0-V3= 0.086
pV0-V5= 0.038*

* p < 0.05 – statistically significant difference

hSDS – height standard deviation; BMI – body mass index; BMI Z-score – body mass index Z-score; WC – waist circumference; HC – hip circumference; WHR – ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference; WHtR – ratio of waist circumference to height; BF – body fat; MM – muscle mass; TBW – total body water; FFM – fat-free mass

Changes in carbohydrate and lipid parameters in the course of GH therapy included an increase in insulin and insulin 120' levels, as well as an increase in insulin resistance during treatment, without statistically significant differences in glucose concentration during GH treatment. Total cholesterol decreased during therapy, with no statistically significant changes in its individual fractions. An increase in IGF-1 concentration was also observed during treatment (Table II). The correlation between BC characteristics and metabolic parameters is presented in Figure 2. Apart from the clear correlation between BC and duration of therapy, no significant correlations were found between BC, glucose, and cholesterol levels during the GH 5-year follow-up.

Figure 2

Correlation between body composition characteristics and metabolic parameters (heat map)

BF – body fat; FFM – fat-free mass; HC – hip circumference; HDL – high-density lipoprotein; MM – muscle mass; WC – waist circumference; TBW – total body water; Tch – total cholesterol; TG – triglicerydes

/f/fulltexts/PEDM/57424/PEDM-31-57424-g002_min.jpg
Table II

Dynamics of carbohydrate and lipid parameters in patients with TS depending on GH therapy duration (Lq; Uq)

VariablesDuration of GH therapyKruskal-Wallis test (H) pp Mann-Whitney U-test
Therapy onset V0 (n = 21)To 1 year V1 (n = 21)To 3 years V3 (n= 20)To 5 years V5 (n= 13)
Glucose 0', mg/dl90.00 (84.50; 96.25)95.00 (84.00; 99.00)92.50 (87.00; 96.00)95.00 (88.00; 101.00)H = 2.77 p= 0.428pV0-V1 =0.354
pV0-V3 =0.745
pV0-V5 =0.113
Glucose 120', mg/dl114.5 (101.5; 122.0)122.0 (102.0; 130.5)120.5 (107.5; 131.0)114.0 (104.0; 128.0)H = 1.32 p= 0.725pV0-V1 =0.375
pV0-V3 =0.291
pV0-V5 =0.518
Insulin 0', UI/I3.00 (1.50; 5.85)9.70 (6.10; 13.90)10.60 (8.50; 13.50)14.10 (9.90; 16.42)H = 24.94 p= 0.000*pV0-V1 =0.003*
pV0-V3 =0.000*
pV0-V5 =0.000*
Insulin 120', UI/I30.70 (19.95; 57.93)50.10 (32.35; 75.85)67.65 (37.17; 88.80)69.70 (58.40; 86.40)H = 11.13 p= 0.011*pV0-V1 =0.089
pV0-V3 =0.019*
pV0-V5 =0.011*
Insulin/ glucose0.035 (0.019; 0.063)0.110 (0.070; 0.140)0.125 (0.080; 0.150)0.140 (0.090; 0.160)H = 24.18 p= 0.000*pV0-V1 =0.002*
pV0-V3 =0.000*
pV0-V5 =0.000*
HOMA-IR0.66 (0.32; 1.46)2.04 (1.33; 3.52)2.29 (1.84; 3.08)3.22 (2.41; 4.05)H = 24.11 p= 0.000*pV0-V1 =0.003*
pV0-V3 =0.000*
pV0-V5 =0.000*
HbA1c, %5.30 (5.30; 5.65)5.40 (5.10; 5.60)5.40 (5.05; 5.50)5.30 (5.00; 5.45)H = 0.47 p= 0.926pV0-V1 =0.859
pV0-V3 =0.741
pV0-V5 =0.696
TCh, mg/dl178.0 (166.25; 191.75)175.0 (165.0; 192.7)160.0 (148.5; 168.5)155.0 (139.0; 177.0)H = 13.32 p= 0.003*pV0-V1 =0.555
pV0-V3 =0.003*
pV0-V5 =0.009*
HDL-C, mg/dl60.30 (55.80; 69.58)59.45 (54.67; 65.92)56.60 (53.75; 64.55)56.90 (53.20; 61.60)H = 2.69 p= 0.441pV0-V1 =0.575
pV0-V3 =0.302
pV0-V5 =0.169
TG, mg/dl74.50 (69.25; 103.75)87.50 (66.75; 103.25)88.00 (66.00; 108.75)97.00 (82.00; 108.00)H = 0.98 p= 0.806pV0-V1 =0.599
pV0-V3 =0.611
pV0-V5 =0.395
non-HDL-C, mg/dl114.00 (105.00; 142.00)108.00 (100.00; 144.00)108.00 (89.00; 124.00)94.00 (81.00; 124.00)H = 5.40 p= 0.145pV0-V1 =0.740
pV0-V3 =0.079
pV0-V5 =0.166
fT4, ng/dl1.38 (1.25; 1.51)1.29 (1.11; 1.51)1.30 (1.22; 1.41)1.37 (1.27; 1.49)H = 2.24 p= 0.523pV0-V1 =0.935
pV0-V3 =0.223
pV0-V5 =0.736
TSH, μIU/ml2.70 (1.78; 3.53)2.68 (1.76; 3.49)3.20 (2.63; 3.93)2.20 (1.63; 3.30)H = 2.37 p= 0.498pV0-V1 =0.767
pV0-V3 =0.273
pV0-V5 =0.619
IGF-1, ng/ml185.00514.00559.00616.00H = 27.48pV0-V1= 0.000*
(122.00; 270.75)(380.50; 560.00)(452.00; 707.50)(448.00; 827.00)p= 0.000*pV0-V3= 0.000*
pV0-V5= 0.000*

* p < 0.05 – statistically significant difference.

HOMA-IR – index of insulin resistance; HbA1c – glycated hemoglobin; TC – total cholesterol; HDL-C – high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG – triglycerides; fT4 – free T4; TSH – thyroid-stimulating hormone; IGF-1 – insulin-like growth factor 1

Pubertal changes were associated with key markers of BC, such as MM and FFM (p = 0.001).

Discussion

Patients treated with GH, while achieving accelerated growth and attaining an appropriate final height, gain beneficial effects on BC [1416]. The same effect was observed in TS patients. Wooten et al. reported that abdominal adiposity was significantly lower in GH-treated vs. untreated TS girls, with an increase in the volume of MM and improvement of the proportion of MM to BF in treated girls. The study also revealed that effects were independent of estrogen exposure and were still observed in girls who finished GH treatment at least one year after the end of therapy [17]. Research by Polish authors on a group of TS patients after GH treatment vs. untreated patients revealed that a decrease in BF persists for several years after finishing GH treatment [18], which confirms the beneficial effect of the therapy.

It is known that inadequate BC is a predictor of cardiovascular risk, including TS patients [16]. Therefore, it seems that the effect of GH treatment has a protective effect in the context of cardiovascular diseases. However, it should not be forgotten that although GH therapy is associated with favorable changes in body composition, it is also connected with relative impairment of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity [19]. Our study revealed an increase in insulin, insulin 120', as well as insulin resistance. These are expected effects of GH treatment, especially since we use supra-substitution doses of GH in patients with TS. Thus, glucose metabolism should be monitored carefully during long-term GH treatment in these patients.

We also observed a decrease in TCh concentration during therapy. Individual lipid fractions did not show statistically significant changes. Similarly to our previous study with a 10-year follow-up, we did not observe a statistically significant difference in the serum triglycerides and HDL-C levels during GH therapy [7]. Bannink et al. revealed that TCh, LDL, and HDL increased after GH treatment discontinuation compared to 6 months after GH treatment. The atherogenic index remained constant, though lower than in controls; hence, GH therapy in girls with TS seems to have beneficial effects on serum lipids, visible even a few years after discontinuation of GH therapy [20].

In our study, no significant correlations were found between BC parameters, glucose, and TCh during the GH 5-year follow-up. This study may be limited by the small number of participants, potentially affecting the generalizability of the findings to the larger TS population. This limitation might reduce the statistical power and precision of the results. Variability in age during inclusion in the study and pubertal status among participants may also add some confounding variables.

The strength of our study is that it is a long-term prospective observation in patients with a rare disease carried out at one center, following a uniform protocol.

In addition to the clear effect of GH on the growth of treated patients, GH therapy also seems to be important in the context of cardiometabolic disturbances. Its positive influence is visible in the context of BC. However, parameters of carbohydrate metabolism should be monitored due to the increase in insulin resistance during GH therapy. Additionally, exercise should be promoted as a general component of a healthy lifestyle. Current recommendations for children with TS include at least 60 minutes of daily moderate to vigorous activities [21], especially as they have lower total lean body mass, and their VO2max and physical activity levels are significantly lower compared to controls [2]. At our center, there is also good cooperation with a dietitian and a psychologist to strongly emphasize the importance of lifestyle.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all patients and their families for participating in this study.

Conflict of interest

non declared.

Funding

none.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland (approval No.: NN-013-96/I/03 and KNW/0022/KB1/162/15/16).

Partial results were reported as an abstract at the 61st Annual European Society of Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) Meeting held on 21–23 September 2023, The Hague, Netherlands.

References

1 

Gravholt CH, Andersen NH, Conway GS, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: Proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting. Eur J Endocrinol 2017; 177: G1–70. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0430.

2 

Gravholt CH, Hjerrild BE, Mosekilde L, et al. Body composition is distinctly altered in Turner syndrome: Relations to glucose metabolism, circulating adipokines, and endothelial adhesion molecules. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 155: 583–592. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02267.

3 

O’Gorman CS, Syme C, Lang J, Bradley TJ, Wells GD, Hamilton JK. An evaluation of early cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents with Turner syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013; 78: 907–913. doi: 10.1111/cen.12079.

4 

Gravholt CH, Juul S, Naeraa RW, Hansen J. Morbidity in Turner syndrome. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Feb 1;51(2):147–158. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00237-0.

5 

Caprio S, Boulware S, Diamond M, et al. Insulin Resistance: An Early Metabolic Defect of Turner’s Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991; 72: 832–836. doi: 10.1210/jcem-72-4-832.

6 

Radetti G, Pasquino B, Gottardi E, et al. Insulin sensitivity in Turner's syndrome: influence of GH treatment. Eur J Endocrinol 2004; 151: 351–354. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1510351.

7 

Błaszczyk E, Shulhai AM, Gieburowska J, et al. Components of the metabolic syndrome in girls with Turner syndrome treated with growth hormone in a long term prospective study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1216464. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1216464.

8 

Mondal S, Gargari P, Bose C, Garg MK, Chowdhury S, Mukhopadhyay S. Abnormal Body Composition Increases the Cardiometabolic Risk in Adolescents and Young Adults With Turner Syndrome. Endocr Pract 2024; 30: 259–269. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.11.013.

9 

Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, et al; United Kingdom Clinical Cytogenetics Group. Mortality in Women with Turner Syndrome in Great Britain: A National Cohort Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 4735–4742. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1049.

10 

Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes 2012; 7: 284–294. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00064.x.

11 

Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child 1969; 44: 291–303. doi: 10.1136/adc.44.235.291.

12 

Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28: 412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883.

13 

Cutfield WS, Jefferies CA, Jackson WE, et al. Evaluation of HOMA and QUICKI as measures of insulin sensitivity in prepubertal children. Pediatr Diabetes 2003; 4: 119–125. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-5448.2003.t01-1-00022.x.

14 

Doknic M, Stojanovic M, Markovic A. Transition Period and Young Adulthood in Patients with Childhood Onset Growth Hormone Deficiency (COGHD): Impact of Growth Hormone Replacement on Bone Mass and Body Composition. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25: 10313. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910313.

15 

Bengtsson BÅ, Brummer RJ, Bosaeus I. Growth Hormone and Body Composition. Horm Res 1990; 33 (Suppl. 4): 19–24. doi: 10.1159/000181579.

16 

Ferruzzi A, Vrech M, Pietrobelli A, et al. The influence of growth hormone on pediatric body composition: A systematic review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1093691. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1093691.

17 

Wooten N, Bakalov VK, Hill S, Bondy CA. Reduced abdominal adiposity and improved glucose tolerance in growth hormone-treated girls with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 2109–2114. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2266.

18 

Gnacińska M, Magnuszewska H, Sworczak K. Metabolic consequences of recombinant human growth hormone therapy in patients with Turner syndrome. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2022; 29: 16–21. doi: 10.5114/pedm.2022.123204.

19 

Gravholt CH, Naeraa RW, Brixen K, et al. Short-Term Growth Hormone Treatment in Girls With Turner Syndrome Decreases Fat Mass and Insulin Sensitivity: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 889–896. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.889.

20 

Bannink EMN, van der Palen RLF, Mulder PGH, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SMPF. Long-Term Follow-Up of GH-Treated Girls with Turner Syndrome: Metabolic Consequences. Horm Res Paediatr 2009; 71: 343–349. doi: 10.1159/000223419.

21 

Gravholt CH, Andersen NH, Christin-Maitre S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: Proceedings from the 2023 Aarhus International Turner Syndrome Meeting. Eur J Endocrinol 2024; 190: G1–G70. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0430.

 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.