Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej

Full text

2/2026 vol. 22
Short communication

Observe Coronaries Before Making the Report (OCBMR): a structured mnemonic framework for coronary artery anomalies

  1. Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

  2. Department of Radiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

  3. Interventional Cardiology Department, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Institute (ICCYC), Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Adv Interv Cardiol 2026; 22, 2 (84): 283–285

Data publikacji online: 2026/05/19
Article file
Observe Coronaries Before.pdf

Introduction

Anomalous coronary arteries (ACA) represent a heterogeneous group of congenital variants occurring in approximately 0.5–1.5% of the population and encompassing a wide anatomical spectrum (Figure 1). While many anomalies are incidental findings with limited clinical impact, selected patterns are associated with myocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death. Despite their potential clinical relevance, communication and management of ACA remain inconsistent, largely due to the absence of standardized, clinically oriented reporting. Existing classification systems [1, 2], most notably Angelini’s framework, provide a scientifically robust anatomical description focused on coronary origin, course, and intrinsic morphology. However, their complexity and limited integration with risk stratification and procedural planning have contributed to underutilization in everyday clinical practice. To address these limitations, we propose the OCBMR mnemonic – Origin, Course, Branching, Morphology, Risk (“Observe Coronaries Before Making the Report”) – as a structured and practical framework that integrates detailed anatomical description with clinical and procedural relevance. OCBMR is intended as both an educational tool and a standardized reporting approach for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA), while remaining fully compatible with established classification systems.

Figure 1

Invasive coronary angiography. A – Anomalous origin of the left circumflex coronary artery from the right coronary artery (OCBMR coding: Q2-C2-B1-M1-R0); B – Duplication of the right coronary artery (OCBMR coding: O1-C1-B2-M1-R0); C – Quadrifurcation of the left main coronary artery (OCBMR coding: O1-C1-B4-M1-R0); D – Aneurysm of the intermediate branch of the left coronary artery (OCBMR coding: O1-C1-B1-M4-R1); E – Large fistula from the right coronary artery to right atrium (OCBMR coding: O1-C1-B1-M5-R2); F – Fistula from the right coronary artery to the pulmonary trunk (OCBMR coding: O1-C1-B1-M5-R1)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/58084/PWKI-22-2-58084-g001_min.jpg

OCBMR

The OCBMR Framework OCBMR is applied sequentially, progressing from Origin to Course, Branching, Morphology, and Risk (Table I).

Table I

The OCBMR framework of coronary artery anomalies

DomainSubtypesKey clinical notes
Origin (O)O1: Normal origin
O2: Opposite sinus
O3: Single coronary artery
O4: ALCAPA
O5: ARCAPA
O2–O3 often require CCTA; may complicate PCI or surgery
Course (C)C1: Prepulmonic
C2: Retroaortic
C3: Interarterial
C4: Proximal intramural
C3–C4 are associated with ischemia and SCD; often require surgical consideration
Branching (B)B1: Standard
B2: Duplicated branches
B3: Complex branching (trifurcation)
B4: Complex branching quadrifurcation)
B5: Complex branching (pentafurcation)
B3–B5 complicate PCI planning; IVUS or OCT recommended
Morphology (M)M1: Normal ostium
M2: High take-off
M3: Slit-like/multiple ostia
M4: Aneurysm
M5: Fistula
M2–M3 increase difficulty during cannulation, surgery, transplantation
Risk (R)R0: Benign/incidental
R1: Intermediate risk
R2: High risk/malignant
R2 anomalies (e.g. C3/C4, slit-like ostium with ischemia) may require surgery

[i] ACA – anomalous coronary arteries, ALCAPA – anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, ARCAPA – anomalous right coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, CCTA – coronary computed tomography angiography, ICA – invasive coronary angiography, IVUS – intravascular ultrasound, OCT – optical coherence tomography, OCBMR – Origin → Course → Branching → Morphology → Risk (Observe Coronaries Before Making the Report), PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, SCD – sudden cardiac death.

Origin (O)

  • O1: Normal origin from the appropriate sinus

  • O2: Origin from the opposite sinus

  • O3: Single coronary artery

  • O4: Anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA)

  • O5: Anomalous right coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ARCAPA)

Precise definition of origin is critical for surgical and interventional planning [36], and CCTA is the preferred modality in stable patients [7, 8], although not always possible in urgent cases [9].

Course (C)

  • C1: Prepulmonic

  • C2: Retroaortic

  • C3: Interarterial (between the aorta and pulmonary artery)

  • C4: Proximal intramural course within the aortic wall

C3 is considered potentially malignant [10], with highest risk when combined with C4, slit-like ostium, or ischemia. Myocardial bridging is excluded from C4.

Branching (B)

  • B1: Standard bifurcation

  • B2: Duplication

  • B3: Complex branching (trifurcation)

  • B4: Complex branching (quadrifurcation)

  • B5: Complex branching (pentafurcation)

Although B3 is a common anatomical variant, it is included due to its significant impact on the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention [11, 12].

Morphology (M)

  • M1: Normal ostium

  • M2: High take-off

  • M3: Slit-like, fish-mouth, or multiple ostia

  • M4: Aneurysmal dilation

  • M5: Coronary fistula

M1–M3 describe ostial morphology, while M4–M5 represent associated structural abnormalities relevant for intervention.

Risk (R)

  • R0: Benign anatomy without symptoms or ischemia

  • R1: Intermediate risk anatomy or equivocal findings

  • R2: High-risk anatomy and/or documented ischemia, arrhythmia, or cardiac events

Risk classification integrates anatomy, clinical presentation, and functional testing.

Clinical application

OCBMR is primarily derived from CCTA and ICA, supplemented by intracoronary imaging when necessary. A typical report follows the sequence O®C®B®M®R, ensuring completeness.

For example: O2-C3-C4-B1-M3-R2 describes an anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus with interarterial and intramural course, slit-like ostium, and high-risk classification (Figure 1).

Advantages

OCBMR standardizes reporting, enhances interdisciplinary communication, and directly links anatomy to procedural and clinical implications. Its mnemonic structure facilitates teaching and rapid adoption.

Limitations

OCBMR is not a validated prognostic score and does not include all anatomical modifiers, such as intramural length or acute take-off angle. Borderline cases may be subject to interpretive variability. Images from ICA may be inconclusive for exact OCBMR coding. In doubtful cases, evaluation with CCTA is necessary.

Conclusion

OCBMR provides a structured, clinically meaningful, and educational framework for reporting coronary artery anomalies. By integrating anatomical detail with clinical relevance, it complements existing classifications and supports consistent communication and patient-centered decision-making.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies: an entity in search of an identity. Circulation 2007; 115: 1296–305.

2 

Rigatelli G, Rigatelli A, Cominato S, et al. Congenital coronary artery anomalies angiographic classification revisited. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003; 19: 361–8.

3 

Brothers JA, Frommelt MA, Jaquiss RDB, et al. Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: management guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153: 1440–57.

4 

Cheezum MK, Liberthson RR, Shah NR, et al. Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery from the inappropriate sinus of Valsalva. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 1592–608.

5 

Kołsut P, Tyczyński P, Michałowska I, et al. Coronary anomalies in patients with acquired significant aortic stenosis. Kardiol Pol 2024; 82: 431–3.

6 

Dzielińska Z, Tyczyński P, Leśnowolski Ł, et al. Coronary anomalies in patients operated for mitral valve defects. Kardiol Pol 2025; 83: 1324–6.

7 

Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1864–94.

8 

Kim SY, Seo JB, Do KH, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECGgated multidetector CT findings. Radiographics 2006; 26: 317–34.

9 

Tyczyński P, Kukuła K, Pietrasik A, et al. Anomalous origin of culprit coronary arteries in acute coronary syndromes. Cardiol J 2018; 25: 683–90.

10 

Gräni C, Kaufmann PA, Windecker S, et al. Interarterial course of anomalous coronary arteries and clinical outcome. Interv Cardiol 2019; 14: 83–8.

11 

Tyczyński P, Wolny R, Pręgowski J, et al. Acute coronary syndrome due to culprit lesions located in unprotected left main coronary artery multifurcations. Kardiol Pol 2024; 82: 984–7.

12 

Tyczyński P, Wolny R, Łazarczyk H, et al. Pentafurcation of left main coronary artery. Adv Interv Cardiol 2016; 12: 377–9.

Copyright: © 2026 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
without publication fees