RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM

Diane Spicer; Maria Respondek-Liberska; Robert Anderson

Abstract

2/2015

Editorial

RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM

Diane E. Spicer ¹

,

Maria Respondek-Liberska ^{2, 3}

,

Robert H. Anderson ⁴

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, and Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Department of Prenatal Cardiology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute,Lodz, Poland
Department of Diagnoses and Prevention Fetal Malformations Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Institute of Genetic Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom

PRENAT CARDIO 2015 JUN;5(2):6-10

Online publish date: 2021/01/18

View full text

AMA

Spicer DE, Respondek-Liberska M, Anderson RH. RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM. Prenatal Cardiology. 2015;(2):6-10.

APA

Spicer, D. E., Respondek-Liberska, M., & Anderson, R. H. (2015). RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM. Prenatal Cardiology, (2), 6-10.

Chicago

Spicer, Diane E, Maria Respondek-Liberska, and Robert H Anderson. 2015. "RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM". Prenatal Cardiology (2): 6-10.

Harvard

Spicer, D., Respondek-Liberska, M., and Anderson, R. (2015). RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM. Prenatal Cardiology, (2), pp.6-10.

MLA

Spicer, Diane et al. "RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM." Prenatal Cardiology, no. 2, 2015, pp. 6-10.

Vancouver

Spicer D, Respondek-Liberska M, Anderson R. RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM. Prenatal Cardiology. 2015;(2):6-10.

Abstract

RELATIVE CERTAINTY AS OPPOSED TO UNCERTAINTY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ISOMERISM

Share

Integrated with

Editorial Policies