Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska

Abstract

3/2026 vol. 23
Review paper

Cardiac rehabilitation: from historical milestones to technological integration and global implementation

  1. Department of Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mother Teresa Hospital, Tirana, Albania

  2. Second Department of Surgery, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

  3. Department of Surgery, University of Medicine of Tirana, Albania

  4. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa, Greece

  5. Department of Oncology, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece

  6. Department of Vascular Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece

  7. First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece

  8. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria

  9. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece

  10. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Westpfalz Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany

Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2026; 23 (3): 252-269

Online publish date: 2026/10/12
View full text

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death globally, accounting for approximately 20.5 million deaths annually, with a disproportionate burden in low- and middle-income countries. As the prevalence of CVD continues to increase, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has emerged as a cornerstone of secondary prevention and long-term management. This narrative review examines the historical evolution, current practices, and future directions of CR, with particular emphasis on patients undergoing cardiac surgery – a population with unique recovery challenges and increased vulnerability. Global case studies illustrate the diversity of CR systems, and emerging trends such as telehealth, artificial intelligence, and culturally adapted care are discussed as tools to expand access and personalize care. Barriers to CR implementation – including socioeconomic inequities, referral gaps, and policy limitations – are analyzed, alongside proposed solutions supported by implementation science frameworks. The review concludes that expanding and modernizing CR programs is both a clinical imperative and a global health priority.

Share
without publication fees
without publication fees