Contemporary Oncology
eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Ethical standards and procedures Supplements Addendum Special Issues Instructions for authors Publication charge
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2026
vol. 30
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Combined analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics reveals new indicators for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer

Manman Guo
1
,
Bingyu Jin
1

  1. Department of Medical Laboratory, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2026; 30 (1): 77–87
Online publish date: 2026/03/24
Article files
- Combined analysis.pdf  [0.80 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common tumour among all malignant tumours and is also the most common malignant tumour occurring in the digestive system [1]. The number of people worldwide that die from CRC ranks fourth among all malignant tumours, seriously threatening human life and health. Colorectal cancer has a latent onset, is prone to metastasis. There is a serious phenomenon of drug resistance [2]. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to clearly understand the mechanism of drug resistance in CRC cells and to develop corresponding early diagnosis and treatment strategies [1].

Compared with normal cells, heterogeneity is a main feature of tumour cells [3, 4]. Tumour heterogeneity is also an important reason for tumour metastasis and drug resistance [3]. Metabolomics has become a powerful tool to identify tumour heterogeneity, classify tumours and suggest treatment strategies. And with the development of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, metabolomics has increasingly become an important basis and target for tumour diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice [5, 6]. For instance, a metabolomics study on lung cancer tissues revealed that 4 metabolites, including citric acid, are excellent diagnostic markers for lung cancer [7]. One report indicates that the combined metabolomics of breast cancer tissues and urine shows that metabolites such as acetone can serve as biomarkers for breast cancer as well [8]. There are also many studies on plasma metabolomics that indicate that the metabolites in plasma have potential roles in the diagnosis of various malignant tumours such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer [913]. The metabolic heterogeneity of tumours is often an important factor contributing to the tolerance of tumour treatment. Some previous studies have also demonstrated the role of metabolomics in guiding the treatment of tumour drug resistance. A previous study established a model for nine metabolites in breast cancer tissues, which was capable of accurately predicting the treatment tolerance of patients [14]. Furthermore, metabolomics can also play a significant role in the treatment plans for various tumours, including glioma, after drug resistance occurs [12, 15]. In addition, the alterations in tumour metabolism can also affect the tumour microenvironment, suggesting that the combination of metabolic-based treatment and immunotherapy can achieve better results [1618].

In recent years, multi-omics analyses including metabolomics and transcriptomics have provided a more profound explanation for the occurrence and development of tumours. Zhou et al. [13] reviewed the systematic research results of multi-omics in liver metastasis of colon cancer. Metabolomics plays a significant role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of tumours. However, in colorectal cancer, corresponding metabolomics research is still insufficient. In this study, we conducted a combined analysis of the metabolomics and transcriptomics of colon cancer using public databases. We performed dimensionality reduction on CRC and tumour samples using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), and screened for tumour characteristic metabolites based on variable important in projection (VIP) values. Then we conducted a differential analysis of the metabolites, and identified a series of metabolites that were differentially expressed in colorectal cancer. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicates that these metabolites have potential significance for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Next, we conducted an enrichment analysis of these metabolites and performed a combined analysis of enrichment pathways with the differentially expressed genes. We also constructed a prognostic model using the genes included in the co-enriched pathways. Finally, we conducted in-cell validations for some key metabolites and differentially expressed genes. In summary, our research has provided a potential role from the metabolomics perspective for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Material and methods

Data and repositories

The metabolic data of patients with CRC were downloaded from the MetaboLights website (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/, MTBLS8090). It includes 35 tumour samples and 35 normal samples. The transcriptomics data was downloaded from the the cancer genome atlas-colon adenocarcinoma (TCGA-COAD) dataset (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).

Data analysis

Variable important in projection was used to determine characteristic metabolites between groups. The value of VIP was calculated by OPLS-DA analysis. Variable important in projection > 1 was used as the inclusion criterion for all metabolites. Differential analysis was performed on the obtained characteristic metabolites, |log2FC > 0.585| and p < 0.05 were used as the inclusion criteria to obtain the differential characteristic metabolites between the groups. Gene differential analysis was performed in TCGA-COAD patients, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis was performed on differential metabolites and differential genes. Venn analysis was performed on the enriched pathways of the genome and metabolome, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis was performed on the genes in the co-enriched pathways to establish a prognostic model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.

Cell culture

Normal colonic epithelial cell line NCM460, CRC cell lines HCT116 and LoVo were all purchased from the Peking Union Medical College Cell Bank. All cells were cultured in complete dulbecco’s modified eagle medium medium (with 10% Foetal Bovine Serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin) under 37°C, 5% CO2.

ELISA

The levels of estradiol and methionine in the cells were measured by ELISA. Estradiol levels were measured by 17-β-Estradiol ELISA kit (Abcam, ab108667), and methionine levels were measured by methionine assay kit (Abcam, ab234041). All assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Protein extraction and Western blot

Cells were lysed in the following solution: 50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4, 250 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaF, 1× cocktail. The proteins were denatured for 10 min at 95°C and then separated on SDS-PAGE gels. Proteins were subject to electrophoresis for 2 h at 80V, and transferred to NC membrane. Then proteins were incubated overnight in the presence of primary antibodies and for one hour in the presence of secondary antibodies before visualization. The following antibodies were used in this experiment: SLC5A1, Proteintech, 30861-1-AP; formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD), Proteintech, 21959-1-AP.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in R (version 3.5.1) and GraphPad Prism 9.0. The Student t-test was used to analyse the data between the two groups. Multicomponent comparisons were performed by ANOVA analysis. The prognosis was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

Difference metabolites between colorectal cancer and normal tissues

We performed OPLS-DA analysis on all samples. The dimensionality reduction results showed that there were significant group differences between CRC tissues and normal tissues, and there was no overfitting (Figure 1 A, B). Using VIP > 1 as a screen, we obtained 318 metabolites in colon cancer, as shown in Supplementary Table 1. Figure 1 C shows all metabolites with VIP values > 2. After differential expression analysis of these 318 metabolites, we obtained 72 differential metabolites, of which 30 were upregulated and 42 were downregulated in CRC (Figure 2 A, Supplementary Table 2). The most downregulated metabolites were L-, Carnitine C7: DC and methylcysteine (Figure 2 B–D), while oestrogen and D-Ribono-1,4-lactone were the most upregulated in CRC (Figure 2 E, F). To clarify the potential of these metabolites for the diagnosis of colon cancer patients, we plotted ROC curves for all metabolites and calculated the area under the curve (AUC). Using AUC > 0.7 as the criterion, 4 metabolites were identified as potentially critical biomarkers for colon cancer diagnosis (Carnitine C7: DC, AUC = 0.767; N(α)-Acetyl-ε-(2-Propenal)lysine, AUC = 0.762; pyridoxine, AUC = 0.754; 5’-Deoxy-5’-(Methylthio) Adenosine, AUC = 0.718 (Figure 3 A–D).

Figure 1

Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) analysis of metabolites of colorectal cancer. A, B) OPLS-DA analysis of all tissues. C) Display of all metabolites with a variable important in projection value greater than 2

OPLS-DA – orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, VIP – variable important in projection

/f/fulltexts/WO/57665/WO-30-57665-g001_min.jpg
Table 1

Coefficients of six genes

GeneCoefficient
CFTR–0.03392
ABCA70.229545
FTCD0.585924
SLC26A3–0.0795
SLC5A1–0.22801
MAT1A0.275093

[i] FTCD – formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase

Figure 2

Analysis of the differences in characteristic metabolites of colorectal cancer. A) The heatmap shows some of the different metabolites. B–F) The violin plots of the top 5 metabolites that were upregulated or downregulated

CRC – colorectal cancer * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01

/f/fulltexts/WO/57665/WO-30-57665-g002_min.jpg
Figure 3

Joint analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics. A–D) The receiver operating characteristic curves of the four metabolites with an area under the curve value greater than 0.7. E) Enrichment analysis bubble plot of metabolites (DEM). F) Enrichment analysis bubble plot of differentially expressed genes in the cancer genome atlas – colon adenocarcinoma (DEG). G) Venn analysis of enriched pathways in metabolomics and transcriptomics

The red font indicates the common pathway.

/f/fulltexts/WO/57665/WO-30-57665-g003_min.jpg

Multi-omics analysis revealed key molecular pathways in colorectal cancer

We then performed KEGG enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed metabolites. A total of 19 pathways were enriched (DEM). The results showed that the most significantly enriched pathways were ABC transporters, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, protein digestion and absorption, central carbon metabolism in cancer, D-amino metabolism and phenylalanine metabolism (Figure 3 E). These results indicated that there are significant differences in protein metabolic pathways and cell transport pathways between normal tissues and CRC tissues.

We next performed a transcriptomics analysis of colon cancer. We performed gene differential analysis on 39 paracancerous tissues and 398 tumour tissues from the TCGA-COAD dataset. The results showed that 609 genes were upregulated and 500 genes were downregulated in the tumours. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis was performed on these differentially expressed genes. A total of 109 pathways were significantly enriched (DEG). Figure 3 F shows the top 30 enriched pathways. Venn analysis was performed on 19 DEM pathways and 109 DEG pathways and results showed that 5 pathways were co-enriched (ABC transporters, protein digestion and absorption, mineral absorption, one carbon pool by folate and folate transport and metabolism (Figure 3 G). The regulatory relationships of metabolites and differential genes in the corresponding pathways are shown in Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 1.

Figure 4

The upstream and downstream relationships of differential metabolites and differential genes in the co-enriched pathway regulatory network

/f/fulltexts/WO/57665/WO-30-57665-g004_min.jpg

The model of metabolism-related genes suggested the prognosis of patients

Genes from 5 co-enriched pathways were extracted from the expression matrix of TCGA-COAD. Univariate cox regression analysis of these genes was performed, and finally 6 genes related to prognosis were obtained (Table 1, Figure 5 A). We performed LASSO regression model construction for these genes (Table 1, Figure 5 B). According to the calculated risk score, all TCGA-COAD were divided into high and low risk groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the prognosis of the low risk group was significantly better than that of the high risk group (Figure 5 C). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that risk score had high accuracy and sensitivity in predicting the prognosis of patients (Figure 5 D).

Figure 5

Construction of prognostic models for genes in enrichment pathways. A) Univariate Cox analysis of genes in all models. B) Construction of a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model for 6 genes. C) Survival analysis between the high-risk group and the low-risk group. D) Receiver operating characteristic curve for risk score to predict the prognosis

FTCD – formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase

/f/fulltexts/WO/57665/WO-30-57665-g005_min.jpg

We then performed a consensus cluster analysis of TCGA-COAD patients. The patients were divided into two subtypes by consensus clustering (Cluster 1 and Cluster 2). We compared the survival between the two subtypes, and the results showed that Cluster 1 had a significantly worse prognosis (Supplementary Figure 2). Our results suggested the potential value of genes associated with characteristic metabolic pathways in the CRC prognosis and classification.

Validation of metabolites and associated genes at the cellular level

Our results showed that methionine and oestrogen were the most significantly decreased and increased metabolites, respectively, in CRC patients (Figures 2 B, E). To verify this finding, we measured the contents of these metabolites by ELISA in colonic epithelial and CRC cells, respectively. ELISA results showed that methionine was significantly reduced compared with NCM460 cells (Figure 6 A). The major component of oestrogen in the cell is 17-β-estradiol. Therefore, we also measured the estradiol content in the cells by ELISA. The results showed that estradiol content in colon cancer cells was significantly higher than that in normal cells (Figure 6 B).

Figure 6

Validation of levels of differential metabolites and genes in cells. A, B) ELISA of oestrogen and methionine levels in cells. C, D) Measurement of SLC5A1 and formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase protein levels in cells

FTCD – formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase

/f/fulltexts/WO/57665/WO-30-57665-g006_min.jpg

Among the 6 genes related to the prognosis of colorectal cancer, FTCD had the highest hazard ratio, while SLC5A1 was a favourable prognostic factor (Figure 5 A). We examined the expression of both proteins in cells by western blot. The results showed that FTCD was significantly highly expressed in both colon cancer cell lines, while SLC5A1 was inversely expressed (Figure 6 C, D).

Discussion

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours worldwide, with its incidence and mortality rates remaining high [19]. Despite advancements in endoscopy and imaging techniques, early diagnosis, prognosis assessment, and prediction of treatment response remain significant challenges in clinical practice. Metabolomics, as an important component of systems biology, can quantitatively analyse all small molecule metabolites in the body (typically < 1500 Da), providing the most direct and dynamic reflection of the physiological and pathological state of the organism [20].

In recent years, metabolomics has demonstrated great potential in the field of CRC research, offering a unique perspective for revealing the mechanisms of tumour metabolic reprogramming, discovering new biomarkers, and developing new therapeutic targets [21]. The occurrence and development of CRC are accompanied by complex genetic mutations and abnormal signalling pathways, which directly lead to the reprogramming of cellular metabolism (metabolic reprogramming) to meet the energy, biosynthetic precursors and redox balance requirements of rapidly proliferating cancer cells [22]. In addition, CRC cells also undergo significant changes in amino acid, lipid and nucleotide metabolism. Metabolomics techniques, including nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry, can systematically depict these metabolic changes, thereby capturing the specific metabolic fingerprints associated with CRC [21, 23]. The differences in metabolic profiles not only exist between healthy and diseased individuals, but are also closely related to the progression stage, pathological classification and prognosis of CRC. For example, compared with early stage (I/II stage) CRC patients, patients with advanced stage (III/IV stage) CRC have significant differences in energy metabolites and lipid profiles in plasma [24, 25]. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy are important treatment methods for CRC, but drug resistance is widespread. Metabolomics can reveal the dynamic changes in metabolic networks before and after treatment, thereby predicting efficacy and elucidating the mechanism of drug resistance [26]. For instance, it has been found that CRC cell lines resistant to 5-fluorouracil exhibit unique lipid and glutamine metabolic characteristics. By monitoring the evolution of patients’ metabolic profiles during treatment, it is possible to provide a basis for timely adjustment of treatment plans and achieve dynamic efficacy assessment [27, 28].

In this study, we analysed the differential metabolites of colon cancer patients and evaluated their role in the diagnosis of colon cancer. We combined metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses to reveal the molecular mechanisms of CRC heterogeneity at the metabolic and genetic levels, and verified them at the cellular level. In this study, through OPLS-DA analysis, we identified 318 metabolites that contribute to the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer, which is consistent with some previous results. Further analysis of the differences revealed that among the 318 metabolites, 42 were upregulated and 30 were downregulated in colorectal cancer. The most significantly upregula-ted metabolites mainly include oestrogen, D-Ribono-1,4- lactone, cyclo(glu-glu), etc., while the most significantly downregulated metabolites mainly consist of methionine, Carnitine C7: DC, D-erythronolactone, etc. These results reveal the heterogeneity in the metabolic processes of proteins and lipids in CRC cells. To investigate whether the metabolites have potential value for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, we plotted the ROC curves for all 72 different metabolites. Among them, the AUC values of 14 metabolites were greater than 0.6 (data not shown). The area under the curve values of the 4 metabolites were all greater than 0.7, and these metabolites play a significant role in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis revealed that these differential metabolites were primarily enriched in pathways related to cell communication, material transport, and the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. The joint transcriptomics analysis revealed that five pathways were enriched in the differential metabolites and differential genes. These pathways were related to cellular substance exchange, protein metabolism, and one-carbon unit metabolism. We plotted a diagram illustrating the regulatory relationships of the differentially expressed genes and metabolites in specific pathways to further clarify the molecular mechanism. In order to further analyse the impact of cellular metabolism on the prognosis of patients, we constructed the prognosis model using the genes from five metabolic pathways. The model indicates that patients with high-risk scores have a poorer prognosis. Through consensus clustering, we found that metabolic genes can be used to classify patients with colorectal cancer, and there are significant differences in prognosis among the different classifications. Finally, we verified the levels of oestrogen, methionine, SLC5A1 and FTCD in the cells using ELISA and western blot. The results confirmed the previous findings. There have been reports stating that oestrogen has a promoting effect on colorectal cancer. Methionine also plays a significant role in nucleotide metabolism and protein metabolism. Methionine primarily participates in the methionine cycle within cells, providing the methyl reserves required for epigenetic modifications such as the methylation of proteins, DNA, and RNA [29]. However, tumour cells often exhibit impaired methionine synthesis capacity, making them highly dependent on exogenous uptake. Therefore, reduced methionine levels in CRC may indicate that therapeutic strategies targeting methionine transporters could be a potentially effective approach for this type of tumour [30]. SLC5A1 is located on the membrane and is a type of glucose transporter [31, 32]. SLC5A1 has been found to be overexpressed in various tumours such as glioma, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer, but its expression in CRC has been less studied [31, 33, 34]. On the one hand, SLC5A1 interacts with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to maintain tumour cell proliferation and promote migration; however, this mechanism may not apply to CRC due to the distinct localization of EGFR and SLC5A1 in the colorectal epithelium [35]. SLC5A1 transports glucose for aerobic glycolysis in tumour cells, so its low expression in CRC may possibly make CRC more sensitive to therapeutic strategies targeting aerobic glycolysis. Formimi-doyltransferase cyclodeaminase has also been proven to be related to lipid metabolism in some tumours [36].

Conclusions

These results suggest that these pathways may represent potential therapeutic targets. In conclusion, our results suggest that metabolites and related metabolic pathways are potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer.

Disclosures

  1. Institutional review board statement: Not applicable.

  2. Assistance with the article: None.

  3. Financial support and sponsorship: None.

  4. Conflicts of interest: None.

References

1 

Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 524-548.

2 

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 115-132.

3 

Kabbarah O, Chin L. Revealing the genomic heterogeneity of melanoma. Cancer Cell 2005; 8: 439-441.

4 

Torounidou N, Yerolatsite M, Zarkavelis G, Amylidi AL, Karafousia V, Kampletsas E, et al. Treatment sequencing in metastatic colorectal cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2024; 28: 283-290.

5 

Perestrelo R, Luís C. Metabolomics in breast cancer: from biomarker discovery to personalized medicine. Metabolites 2025; 15.

6 

Żok J, Bieńkowski M, Radecka B, Kuchar A, Borowiec S, Streb J, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a Polish retrospective cohort study. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2024; 28: 297-303.

7 

Silva C, Perestrelo R, Silva P, Capelinha F, Tomás H, Câmara JS. Volatomic pattern of breast cancer and cancer-free tissues as a powerful strategy to identify potential biomarkers. Analyst 2019; 144: 4153-4161.

8 

Silva CL, Perestrelo R, Capelinha F, Tomás H, Câmara JS. An integrative approach based on GC-qMS and NMR metabolomics data as a comprehensive strategy to search potential breast cancer biomarkers. Metabolomics 2021; 17: 72.

9 

An R, Yu H, Wang Y, Lu J, Gao Y, Xie X, et al. Integrative analysis of plasma metabolomics and proteomics reveals the metabolic landscape of breast cancer. Cancer Metab 2022; 10: 13.

10 

Li X, Wen X, Luo Z, Tian Y, Qian C, Zhang J, et al. Development of a headspace-solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry method for analyzing volatile organic compounds in urine: application in breast cancer biomarker discovery. Clin Chim Acta 2023; 540: 117236.

11 

Kliuchnikova A, Gordeeva A, Abdurakhimov A, Materova T, Tarbeeva S, Sarygina E, et al. Ovarian cancer: multi-omics data integration. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26: 5961.

12 

Costantini S, Di Gennaro E, Fanelli G, Bagnara P, Argenziano C, Maccanico C, et al. Glioblastoma metabolomics: uncovering biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2025; 44: 230.

13 

Zhou K, Yang C, Li Y. Multi-omics in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: applications and research advances. Cancer Biol Med 2025; 22: 618-638.

14 

Lin X, Xu R, Mao S, Zhang Y, Dai Y, Guo Q,et al. Metabolic biomarker signature for predicting the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7: 670.

15 

Desgres M, Poyraz M, Sari B, Duhoux FP, van Marcke C, Corbet C. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2025; 44: 234.

16 

Chen S, Zhang Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Zeng Y. Driving innovations in cancer research through spatial metabolomics: a bibliometric review of trends and hotspot. Front Immunol 2025; 16: 1589943.

17 

Wang R, Zhuang J, Zhang Q, Wu W, Yu X, Zhang H, et al. Decoding the metabolic dialogue in the tumor microenvironment: from immune suppression to precision cancer therapies. Exp Hematol Oncol 2025; 14: 99.

18 

Yerolatsite M, Torounidou N, Amylidi AL, Zarkavelis G, Hadjigeorgiou L, Lampri E, et al. The role of tumor-associated macrophages and PD-1/PD-L1 networking in colorectal cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2025; 29: 123-130.

19 

Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73: 233-254.

20 

Schmidt DR, Patel R, Kirsch DG, Lewis CA, Vander Heiden MG, Locasale JW. Metabolomics in cancer research and emerging applications in clinical oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 333-358.

21 

Farshidfar F, Weljie AM, Kopciuk KA, Hilsden R, McGregor SE, Buie WD, et al. A validated metabolomic signature for colorectal cancer: exploration of the clinical value of metabolomics. Br J Cancer 2016; 115: 848-857.

22 

Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646-674.

23 

Ohshima K. The landscape of cancer metabolism as a therapeutic target. Pathol Int 2025; 75: 387-402.

24 

Kang C, Zhang J, Xue M, Li X, Ding D, Wang Y, et al. Metabolomics analyses of cancer tissue from patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep 2023; 28: 219.

25 

Cross AJ, Moore SC, Boca S, Huang WY, Xiong X, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, et al. A prospective study of serum metabolites and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer 2014; 120: 3049-3057.

26 

Rawluszko-WEieczorek AA, Horst N, Horbacka K, Bandura AS, Świderska M, Krokowicz P, et al. Effect of DNA methylation profile on OATP3A1 and OATP4A1 transcript levels in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 2015; 74: 233-242.

27 

Sun L, Song L, Wan Q, Wu G, Li X, Wang Y, et al. cMyc-mediated activation of serine biosynthesis pathway is critical for cancer progression under nutrient deprivation conditions. Cell Res 2015; 25: 429-444.

28 

Farge T, Saland E, de Toni F, Aroua N, Hosseini M, Perry R, et al. Chemotherapy-resistant human acute myeloid leukemia cells are not enriched for leukemic stem cells but require oxidative metabolism. Cancer Discov 2017; 7: 716-735.

29 

Sanderson SM, Gao X, Dai Z, Locasale JW. Methionine metabolism in health and cancer: a nexus of diet and precision medicine. Nat Rev Cancer 2019; 19: 625-637.

30 

Bin P, Wang C, Zhang H, Yan Y, Ren W. Targeting methionine metabolism in cancer: opportunities and challenges. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2024; 45: 395-405.

31 

Brosch PK, Korsa T, Taban D, Eiring P, Kreisz P, Hildebrand S, et al. Glucose and inositol transporters, SLC5A1 and SLC5A3, in glioblastoma cell migration. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 5794.

32 

Chen CH, Wang BW, Hsiao YC, Wu CY, Cheng FJ, Hsia TC, et al. PKCdelta-mediated SGLT1 upregulation confers the acquired resistance of NSCLC to EGFR TKIs. Oncogene 2021; 40: 4796-4808.

33 

Gao HF, Chen LY, Cheng CS, Chen H, Meng ZQ, Chen Z. SLC5A1 promotes growth and proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma via glucose-dependent AMPK/mTOR signaling. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11: 3171-3185.

34 

Li X, Wu Z, Yuan L, Chen X, Huang H, Cheng F, et al. Hesperidin inhibits colon cancer progression by downregulating SLC5A1 to suppress EGFR phosphorylation. J Cancer 2025; 16: 876-887.

35 

Koepsell H. The Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporters SGLT1 and SGLT2 are targets for the treatment of diabetes and cancer. Pharmacol Ther 2017; 170: 148-165.

36 

Wang S, Zhou Y, Yu R, Ling J, Li B, Yang C, et al. Loss of hepatic FTCD promotes lipid accumulation and hepatocarcinogenesis by upregulating PPARgamma and SREBP2. JHEP Rep 2023; 5: 100843.

Copyright: © 2026 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.