eISSN: 1897-4317
ISSN: 1895-5770
Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac
NOWOŚĆ
Portal dla gastroenterologów!
www.egastroenterologia.pl
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2017
vol. 12
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
więcej
 
 
streszczenie artykułu:
Artykuł oryginalny

Comparative effectiveness of aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s solution and rectal indomethacin therapy in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double blind randomised controlled clinical trial

Abdolrahim Masjedizadeh, Payman Fathizadeh, Nima Aghamohamadi

Data publikacji online: 2017/12/14
Pełna treść artykułu
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 


Introduction: There is growing evidence indicating the aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation (IVFR) can decrease the rate of pancreatitis; however, to the best of our knowledge it has not been well studied in a post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) setting.

Aim: To compare the effects of aggressive IVFR and rectal indomethacin (RI) in preventing pancreatitis after ERCP.

Material and methods: This is a double blind randomised controlled clinical trial on 186 patients undergoing ERCP in Ahvaz, Iran. The inclusion criteria were ERCP for standard clinical indications such as choledocholithiasis, bile duct leak, and biliary obstruction. The IVFR group (n = 62) received a bolus of 20 ml/kg of body weight lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS) immediately after ERCP, followed by 3 ml/kg/h maintenance for 8 h. The RI group (n = 62) received 50 mg rectal indomethacin immediately before procedure and 12 h after ERCP. The control group (n = 62) did not receive any treatment.

Results: Post-ERCP pancreatitis in IVFR, rectal indomethacin, and control groups occurred in 8 (12.9%), 16 (25.8%), and 20 (32.3%) patients (p = 0.036). Pancreatic pain was reported in 13 (21%), 21 (33.9%), and 27 (43.5%) patients in the IVFR, RI, and control group (p = 0.046). The serum amylase level increased over 24 h after intervention in all three groups. The mean serum amylase level 8 h after intervention in the IVFR patients was lower than the RI and control groups.

Conclusions: Intravenous fluid resuscitation with LRS was more effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in comparison to the rectal indomethacin and control group.
referencje:
Elmunzer BJ. Aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: finally on the right track. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 308-10.
Andriulli, A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-8.
Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-47.
Buxbaum J, Yan A, Yeh K, et al. Aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer’s solution reduces pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 303-7 e1.
Badalov N, Tenner S, Baillie J. The prevention, recognition and treatment of post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP 2009; 10: 88-97.
George S, Kulkarni A, Stevens G, et al. Role of osmolality of contrast media in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2004; 49: 503-8.
Ding X, Chen M, Huang S, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1152-9.
Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 799-815.
Wu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, et al. Lactated Ringer’s solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 710-7.e1.
Shaygan-nejad A, Masjedizadeh AR, Ghavidel A, et al. Aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer’s solution as the prophylactic intervention for postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Res Med Sci 2015; 20: 838-43.
Luo H, Zhao L, Leung J, et al. Routine pre-procedural rectal indometacin versus selective post-procedural rectal indometacin to prevent pancreatitis in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 2293-301.
Levenick JM, Gordon SR, Fadden LL, et al. Rectal indomethacin does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in consecutive patients. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 911-7.
Hanna MS, Portal AJ, Dhanda AD, et al. UK wide survey on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Frontline Gastroenterol 2014; 5: 103-10.
Yaghoobi M, Rolland S, Waschke KA, et al. Meta-analysis: rectal indomethacin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 995-1001.
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe