Abstract
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of bonding agents in cervical cavities after using desensitizing agents: an in vitro study
- Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, India
Introduction:
Dentinal hypersensitivity is a painful condition of multifactorial etiology. The use of desensitizing agents has been incorporated as a routine approach in most adhesive restorative procedures irrespective of bonding agent. However, the effect of desensitizers on bond strength is still controversial.
Objectives:
To evaluate and compare the pull-out bond strength of 5th and 7th generation bonding agents after using two desensitizing agents.
Material and methods:
Twenty-four extracted teeth were collected and stored in saline. Class V cavities were prepared using SI-47 diamond points. After dentin conditioning, samples were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: treatment with Shield Activ – sub-group 1A: application of 5th generation bonding agent, sub-group 2A: application of 7th generation bonding agent. Group B: treatment with Gluma, sub-group 1B – application of 5th generation bonding agent, sub-group 2B: application of 7th generation bonding agent. The cavities were then restored with composites, and samples were subjected to pull-out bond strength testing using universal testing machine.
Results:
When comparing the pull-out bond strength of group A, it was found that sub-group 2A (Shield Activ + Single Bond Universal) performed better. When comparing the pull-out bond strength of group B, sub-group 2B (Gluma+ Single Bond Universal) performed better. When comparing the pull-out bond strength of all groups, sub-group 2B (Gluma + Single Bond Universal) performed the greatest.
Conclusions:
Gluma with Single Bond Universal shows the highest value of the pull-out bond strength.
>Keywords
dentin hypersensitivity, etch-and-rinse, Gluma, HEMA, self-etch
Integrated with
