eISSN: 1897-4252
ISSN: 1731-5530
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2022
vol. 19
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Del Nido versus Bretschneider cardioplegic solution in valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis – a case-control pilot study

Krzysztof Sanetra
1, 2
,
Wojciech Domaradzki
2
,
Krzysztof Białek
2, 3
,
Rajesh Shrestha
2
,
Andrzej Bochenek
2, 3
,
Justyna Jankowska-Sanetra
4
,
Piotr P. Buszman
4, 5, 6
,
Witold Gerber
2, 3

1.
Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
2.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
3.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology, Katowice, Poland
4.
Department of Cardiology, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
5.
Department of Cardiology, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
6.
Center for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
Kardiochirugia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2022; 19 (2): 81-85
Online publish date: 2022/06/29
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
The adequate protection provided by the del Nido cardioplegia has already been proven in trials comparing the solution with blood cardioplegia. However, evidence regarding comparison to the Bretschneider HTK solution is limited.

Aim
To determine the efficacy of the del Nido cardioplegia when compared to Bretschneider HTK solution in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

Material and methods
Ten patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis using the del Nido solution (group 1) were case-control matched to patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the Bretschneider solution (group 2). The observation included: cardioplegia dosage, time to cardiac arrest, cross-clamp and extracorporeal circulation time, ventricular fibrillation (VF) after removing the cross-clamp, gasometry parameters, creatinine kinase (MB isoenzyme – CK-MB) at 24 and 48 h following the surgery and troponin (high‑sensitivity troponin T – hsTnT) at 24 and 48 h.

Results
Patients were no different in terms of comorbidities. Higher incidence of VF occurred in group 2 (3 vs. 9, 30% vs. 90%; p = 0.02). Blood sodium measurements after removing the cross-clamp were significantly higher in group 1 (median 137.0 vs. 130.0; p = 0.0004). Biomarker release trended toward lower values in group 1, but not significantly (median troponin at 24 h: 223.1 pg/ml vs. 294.8 pg/ml; p = 0.4 and 48 h: 208.0 pg/ml vs. 242.5 pg/ml; p = 0.7, median CK-MB at 24 h: 16.6 ng/ml vs. 17.3 ng/ml; p = 0.6, and 48 h: 6.7 ng/ml vs. 5.08 ng/ml; p = 0.3). Peak creatinine trended towards lower values in group 2, but not significantly (1.35 mg/dl vs. 1.05 mg/dl; p = 0.09).

Conclusions
Both del Nido and Bretschneider cardioplegia provide satisfactory myocardial protection. However, del Nido cardioplegia reduces the incidence of VF after declamping the aorta. Further studies are required.

keywords:

cardioplegia, del Nido, Bretschneider HTK, Custodiol

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.