|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2026
vol. 79 abstract:
Original paper
Effect of increasing tip distances of polywave light curing unit on microhardness profiles of bulk-fill composites containing different photoinitiator systems
Saloni Tyagi
1
,
Padmanabh Jha
1
,
Vineeta Nikhil
1
J Stoma 2026; 79, 1: 17-24
Online publish date: 2026/03/15
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
Resin composites offer aesthetic and adhesive advantages, but polymerization efficiency can be affected by tip distance and photoinitiator compatibility. This study evaluated the effect of increasing curing distances of a polywave light curing unit (LCU) on microhardness of bulk-fill composites with different photoinitiator systems. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the sorption and solubility of a contemporary light-cured resin luting cement with those of resin-modified glass ionomer and self-adhesive resin luting cements, when immersed in distilled water and artificial saliva. Material and methods Standardized cylindrical specimens (4 mm thick × 4 mm in diameter) were prepared and light-polymerized using a polywave LCU at 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm distances. Samples (n = 80) were divided randomly into two equal groups (n = 40 per group), depending on the type of photoinitiator present in the composite: camphoroquinone (CQ)-containing composite, SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable (n = 40), and composite containing a combination of CQ and Ivocerin, i.e., Tetric N-Ceram (n = 40). Vickers microhardness (VHN) was measured on top and bottom surfaces after 24 hours of dark storage. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and independent t-test (p < 0.05). Results Tetric N-Ceram showed significantly higher microhardness values than SDR at all distances. Increasing tip distance led to a reduction in VHN for both materials, more markedly in SDR. The difference in microhardness between top and bottom surfaces was non-significant for Tetric N-Ceram at all distances tested. However, for SDR, the difference in microhardness between top and bottom surface was significant at tip distances of 4 mm and 6 mm. Conclusions Curing tip distance negatively affects microhardness in bulk-fill composites. Tetric N-Ceram outperformed SDR when cured with polywave LCU. keywords:
microhardness, bulk-fill composites, polywave light curing unit, photoinitiators |