Journal of Stomatology
eISSN: 2299-551X
ISSN: 0011-4553
Journal of Stomatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2026
vol. 79
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Effect of increasing tip distances of polywave light curing unit on microhardness profiles of bulk-fill composites containing different photoinitiator systems

Saloni Tyagi
1
,
Padmanabh Jha
1
,
Vineeta Nikhil
1

  1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College and Hospital, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, UP, India
J Stoma 2026; 79, 1: 17-24
Online publish date: 2026/03/15
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Resin composites offer aesthetic and adhesive advantages, but polymerization efficiency can be affected by tip distance and photoinitiator compatibility. This study evaluated the effect of increasing curing distances of a polywave light curing unit (LCU) on microhardness of bulk-fill composites with different photoinitiator systems. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the sorption and solubility of a contemporary light-cured resin luting cement with those of resin-modified glass ionomer and self-adhesive resin luting cements, when immersed in distilled water and artificial saliva.

Material and methods
Standardized cylindrical specimens (4 mm thick × 4 mm in diameter) were prepared and light-polymerized using a polywave LCU at 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm distances. Samples (n = 80) were divided randomly into two equal groups (n = 40 per group), depending on the type of photoinitiator present in the composite: camphoroquinone (CQ)-containing composite, SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable (n = 40), and composite containing a combination of CQ and Ivocerin, i.e., Tetric N-Ceram (n = 40). Vickers microhardness (VHN) was measured on top and bottom surfaces after 24 hours of dark storage. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and independent t-test (p < 0.05).

Results
Tetric N-Ceram showed significantly higher microhardness values than SDR at all distances. Increasing tip distance led to a reduction in VHN for both materials, more markedly in SDR. The difference in microhardness between top and bottom surfaces was non-significant for Tetric N-Ceram at all distances tested. However, for SDR, the difference in microhardness between top and bottom surface was significant at tip distances of 4 mm and 6 mm.

Conclusions
Curing tip distance negatively affects microhardness in bulk-fill composites. Tetric N-Ceram outperformed SDR when cured with polywave LCU.

keywords:

microhardness, bulk-fill composites, polywave light curing unit, photoinitiators

 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.