eISSN: 2299-551X
ISSN: 0011-4553
Journal of Stomatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
5/2020
vol. 73
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Rare primary craniofacial clefts: pattern, challenges, and management in a Nigerian population

Rowland Agbara
1
,
Benedict O. Akintububo
2
,
Benjamin Fomete
3
,
Kelvin U. Omeje
4
,
Yusuf T. Sambo
2
,
Ngeh Mangai
1
,
Enoch A. Idowu
5

1.
University of Jos/Jos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
2.
Federal Teaching Hospital Gombe, Nigeria
3.
Ahmadu Bello University/Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
4.
Bayero University/Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
5.
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jos, Nigeria
J Stoma 2020; 73, 5: 240-245
Online publish date: 2020/11/11
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
There is inconsistent clinical presentation of rare orofacial clefts, and its low number has resulted in most studies on rare craniofacial clefts to be retrospective in nature, with significant amount published as case reports.

Objectives
To study the pattern, challenges, and management of rare craniofacial clefts in a Nigerian population.

Material and methods
This is a retrospective observational study of patients with rare facial clefts, who visited private health institutions between January 2009 and August 2018. Data retrieved was analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results
cial clefts, with typical to rare craniofacial cleft ratio of 46.3 : 1. The prevalence rate of rare craniofacial cleft was 22.2 per 1,000 cases. Age of patients ranged from 0.04 to 37.00 years, with median age of 3.50 ± 36.96 years. There were 10 males and 10 females, with male to female ratio of 1 : 1. Tessier number 0 had the highest frequency (n = 9, 36.0%), followed by Tessier number 7 (n = 3, 12.0%) and 2 (n = 3, 12.0%). Repair was achieved using local tissue advancement and direct closure techniques under general anesthesia in 10 patients and local anesthesia in 6 patients. Coloboma of the eyelid was the most common abnormality noted.

Conclusions
The prevalence of rare craniofacial clefts is low in this environment and Tessier 0 cleft is the commonest type seen. Treatment is generally challenging due to inadequate manpower.

keywords:

craniofacial abnormalities, health resources, local advancement, surgery

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.