eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2014
vol. 10
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:

Methods and techniques
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation with radiofrequency energy during ongoing tachycardia: is it feasible?

Basri Amasyali
,
Ayhan Kilic
,
Kutsi Kabul
,
Murat Unlu

Postep Kardiol Inter 2014; 10, 4 (38): 301–307
Online publish date: 2014/11/17
View full text Get citation
 
Introduction: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is conventionally performed during sinus rhythm.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological features and the short- and long-term results of slow pathway RF ablation during ongoing AVNRT.

Material and methods: A total of 282 consecutive patients with AVNRT undergoing RF catheter ablation were analysed. Patients whose tachycardia episodes could not be controlled during RF energy application and who underwent slow pathway ablation or modification during ongoing tachycardia formed the study group (group 1, n = 16) and those ablated during sinus rhythm formed the control group (group 2, n = 266).

Results: Of the clinical characteristics, only the frequency of tachycardia attacks was higher in group 1 (3.3 ±1.2 vs. 2.1 ±0.9 attacks/month, p < 0.001). Among the baseline electrophysiological measurements, the echo zone lasted significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (78 ±25 ms vs. 47 ±18 ms; p < 0.001). The immediate procedural success rate was 100% in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the mean number of radiofrequency energy applications (5.2 ±4.2 vs. 5.8 ±3.9), total procedure times (42.4 ±30.5 min vs. 40.2 ±29.4 min) and fluoroscopy times (11.4 ±8.5 min vs. 12.2 ±9.3 min) (p > 0.050 for all). All patients were followed-up for 29 ±7 months; only 2 patients (< 1%) in group 2 recurred (p > 0.050). No permanent atrioventricular block was observed.

Conclusions: The RF catheter ablation or modification of the slow pathway during ongoing AVNRT is feasible with acceptable short- and long-term efficacy and safety. However, this approach needs to be clarified with large-scale studies.
keywords:

atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, catheter ablation, supraventricular tachycardia, slow pathway ablation

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.