eISSN: 2299-0046
ISSN: 1642-395X
Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
6/2023
vol. 40
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Predictors of excessive short-acting b2-agonist use and asthma exacerbations: a retrospective analysis of a Polish prescription database

Maciej Kupczyk
1
,
Wojciech Barg
2
,
Grażyna Bochenek
3
,
Grzegorz Brożek
4
,
Piotr Dąbrowiecki
5
,
Dorota Brzostek
6
,
Andrzej Dąbrowski
7
,
Rafał Dobek
8
,
Radosław Gawlik
9
,
Aleksandra Kucharczyk
10
,
Izabela Kupryś-Lipińska
1
,
Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas
11
,
Marek L. Kowalski
12

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
  2. Department of Human Physiology, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszow, Poland
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University School of Medicine, Krakow, Poland
  4. Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  5. Department of Infectious Diseases and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  6. AstraZeneca Pharma Poland Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland
  7. Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumonology and Allergology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
  8. Department of Lung Diseases, Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Warsaw, Poland
  9. Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  10. Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumonology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  11. Department of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  12. Department of Immunology, Rheumatology and Allergy, Chair of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Healthy Ageing Research Center, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Adv Dermatol Allergol 2023; XL (6): 790-797
Online publish date: 2024/01/08
Article files
- Predictors.pdf  [0.16 MB]
- Predictors (1).pdf  [0.16 MB]
Get citation
 
 

Introduction

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and bronchodilators are the mainstay of treatment for asthma. Regular use of ICS controls the underlying airway inflammation and consequently decreases the risks of asthma exacerbation and death [1, 2]. In contrast, bronchodilators, such as inhaled β2-agonists, quickly relieve asthma symptoms, but do not alleviate the underlying inflammation [3, 4]. Unfortunately, overreliance on bronchodilators without ICS can mask the progression of asthma, thereby increasing the risk of serious exacerbations [5, 6]. In particular, frequent use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) has been linked with poor outcomes in patients with asthma, including increased risks of hospital admission, disease exacerbation, and death [711].

Aim

Although current treatment guidelines warn against overreliance on SABA in asthma, large studies in North America and Europe have shown that SABA are still frequently overused [1215]. However, there is little evidence, on the risk factors for SABA overuse in asthma [16]. Identifying these factors could help develop strategies to improve patient outcomes. Within a range of anylyses performed within SABINA project [12], we aimed to analyse a nationwide database of prescription purchase records to investigate the risk factors for SABA overuse and asthma exacerbations among patients with asthma in Poland.

Material and methods

Study design

We analysed prescription purchase records in the PEX PharmaSequence database that includes 5,172 pharmacies with a geographic distribution representative for Poland. Medication name, quantity, form, and dose; specialty of the prescriber; and patient’s sex and age were available from the purchase records. In the database, information on the prescriber’s specialty was missing at random in about 25% of records for blinding reasons in line with local law regulations. The records did not include the indications (diseases) for prescriptions. Patient allocation to the predefined cohort was based on a pattern of prescriptions for inhaled respiratory medications described below.

Patient selection

We selected patients aged 18–64 years with ≥ 1 prescription purchase for ICS (excluding nebulized ICS), SABA, leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) or short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMA), or combinations thereof, in the two following periods: January to June 2018 and July to December 2018 (Figure 1) [15]. We excluded patients who only purchased long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in any quarter of 2018 as these patients were likely undergoing treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, we selected subjects in whom asthma diagnosis was highly probable. Among the patients with asthma, we analysed those with ≥ 1 prescription purchase of SABA. Additionally, to confirm the applicability of our findings to asthma, we performed sensitivity analyses in a sub-group of patients aged 18–35 years in whom COPD was unlikely (reported in the Supplementary materials). As this study was a retrospective analysis of anonymised data, ethics approval was not needed.

Figure 1

Selection criteria and patient disposition

/f/fulltexts/PDIA/51961/PDIA-40-51961-g001_min.jpg

Variables

Variables were obtained based on the data available from prescription records. Secondary care was defined as ≥ 1 prescription from a pulmonologist or allergist. The number of SABA puffs per year was calculated as the total number of individual SABA doses in all canisters purchased by a patient. One canister was defined as 200 inhalations [15]. To evaluate SABA prescriptions, we adopted two levels of SABA purchase per year: SABA overuse and excessive SABA use [15, 16]. Excessive SABA use was defined as ≥ 12 SABA canisters purchased over a year [17]. SABA overuse was defined as ≥ 3 SABA canisters purchased over a year. The number of prescriptions for oral corticosteroids (OCS) during the study period was taken as a proxy of asthma exacerbations. The dose of OCS was calculated in prednisone equivalents according to standard equations (http://www.medcalc.com/steroid.html).

Statistical analysis

We used descriptive statistics in accordance with data distribution. Quasi-Poisson regression was used to study the association of age, sex, type of inhaled treatment (“SABA without steroids” as reference), secondary care (primary care as reference), and place of residence (< 100,000 inhabitants as reference) to excessive SABA use and SABA overuse. Patients with prescriptions for 1–2 SABA canisters were the reference group. Negative binomial regression was used to analyse the association of excessive SABA use and SABA overuse with the number of prescriptions for OCS. We analysed the risk of asthma exacerbation (OCS prescription) in two negative binomial regression models: among all patients and among patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. All calculations were completed in the R software (version 3.5.5).

Results

Patient characteristics and SABA use

In total, 91,763 patients met the inclusion criteria for asthma (Figure 1). Of them, 42,189 (46%) had concomitant prescriptions for SABA (SABA users). These patients had a mean age of 47 years, and were mostly female (58%). Of the SABA users, 20% did not use ICS, 11% used SABA and ICS, and 69% used SABA, ICS, and LABA (Figure 1, Table 1).

Table 1

Patient characteristics

ParameterSABA without ICS (n = 8,425)SABA and ICS
(n = 4,759)
SABA, ICS, and LABA
(n = 29,005)
All SABA users
(N = 42,189)
Women, n (%)4428 (53)3031 (64)16933 (58)24392 (58)
Age, mean ± SD [years]48 ±13.544 ±13.548 ±12.747 ±13.0
Other medications, n (%):
 LABA2021 (24)0 (0)29005 (100)31026 (74)
 LAMA263 (3)77 (2)119 (0)459 (1)
 SAMA2816 (33)931 (20)8518 (29)12265 (29)
 LTRA1394 (17)1194 (25)10178 (35)12766 (30)
 SABA only3435 (41)n/an/a3435 (8)
Number of SABA canisters:
 Mean ± SD5.1±6.92.8±4.13.4±5.03.7±5.4
 Median (IQR)3.0 (4.0)1.0 (2.0)2.0 (3.0)2.0 (3.0)
 Excessive SABA use (≥ 12 canisters), n (%)836 (10)152 (3)1371 (5)2359 (6)
 SABA overuse (≥ 3 canisters), n (%)3749 (44)1172 (25)9224 (32)14145 (34)
 Patients with prescriptions for OCS, n (%)818 (10)365 (8)4108 (14)5291 (13)
Prescriptions for OCS:
 Mean ± SD2.7 ±2.62.0 ±2.01.9 ±1.82.1 ±2.0
 Median (IQR)1.0 (2.0)1.0 (1.0)1.0 (1.0)1.0 (1.0)
Dose of OCS in mg of prednisone:
 Mean ± SD1186 ±1734782 ±1101741 ±967811 ±1139
Median (IQR)600 (1048)400 (600)400 (600)450 (700)
SABA puffs per year:
 Mean ± SD880 ±1192505 ±766594 ±864641 ±937
 Median (IQR)400 (800)200 (320)400 (400)400 (570)
 Secondary care, n (%)990/5582 (18)1167/3123 (37)9311/21229 (44)11468/29934 (38)
Place of residence with < 100,000 inhabitants, n (%)5114 (61)2587 (54)16821 (58)24522 (58)

[i] IQR – interquartile range, LABA – long-acting β2-agonist, LAMA – long-acting muscarinic antagonist, LTRA – leukotriene receptor antagonist, OCS – oral corticosteroids, SABA – short-acting β2-agonist, SAMA – short-acting muscarinic antagonist, SD – standard deviation.

Of the 42,189 SABA users, 14,145 (34%) purchased ≥ 3 SABA canisters (SABA overuse), and 2,359 (6%) purchased ≥ 12 SABA canisters (excessive SABA use). SABA use was most frequent among patients who did not use ICS, including the largest number of purchased SABA canisters and the percentages of excessive SABA use and SABA overuse (Table 1).

In all study groups, most prescriptions for all medications, including SABA, were issued by general practitioners (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Prescriptions by specialty for all medications (A) and SABA (B) for patients with different types of inhaled treatment

/f/fulltexts/PDIA/51961/PDIA-40-51961-g002_min.jpg

The percentage of patients with prescriptions for OCS was the greatest among patients who used SABA, ICS, and LABA, but the number of prescriptions and the total dose of OCS were highest among those who did not have prescriptions for ICS (Table 1).

Predictors of excessive SABA use and SABA overuse

Older age was associated with a higher risk of excessive SABA use (risk ratio (RR) = 1.06, p < 0.001), whereas the risk was lower in women (RR = 0.63, p < 0.001), patients treated by specialists within secondary care (RR = 0.60, p < 0.001), and patients who used ICS without LABA (RR = 0.41, p < 0.001) or with LABA (RR = 0.52, p < 0.001). Place of residence was not significantly related to excessive SABA use or SABA overuse. The predictors of SABA overuse were similar to those for excessive SABA use (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Predictors of excessive SABA use (≥ 12 canisters) and SABA overuse (≥ 3 canisters) by quasi-Poisson regression. Patients with prescriptions for < 12 or < 3 SABA canisters were respective reference groups. Predictors: age (per 10 years); male sex (vs. female); ICS (vs. SABA only); ICS and LABA (vs. SABA only); secondary care (vs. otherwise); place of residence with > 100,000 inhabitants (vs. ≤100,000 inhabitants). Error bars show 95% confidence intervals

/f/fulltexts/PDIA/51961/PDIA-40-51961-g003_min.jpg

Predictors of asthma exacerbations

Excessive SABA use was the strongest predictor of asthma exacerbations both in the model that included all patients (RR = 3.24, p < 0.001) or patients with ≥ 1 OCS prescription (RR = 1.60, p < 0.001; Figure 4). In the entire cohort, the risk of exacerbation was increased in older patients (RR = 1.34, p < 0.001), women (RR = 1.14, p = 0.001), patients in secondary care (RR = 1.19, p < 0.001), patients who used ICS with LABA (RR = 1.14, p = 0.009), and patients who lived in places with < 100,000 inhabitants (RR = 1.24, p < 0.001); the risk of exacerbation was lower in patients who used ICS without LABA (RR = 0.74, p < 0.001; Figure 4).

Figure 4

Predictors of asthma exacerbations by negative binomial regression among all patients and patients with ≥ 1 prescriptions for oral corticosteroids. Model with ≥ 12 SABA canisters. Predictors: age (per 10 years); male sex (vs. female); ICS (vs. SABA only); ICS and LABA (vs. SABA only); secondary care (vs. otherwise); place of residence with > 100,000 inhabitants (vs. ≤ 100,000 inhabitants); ≥ 12 SABA canisters (vs. < 12 canisters). Error bars show 95% confidence intervals

/f/fulltexts/PDIA/51961/PDIA-40-51961-g004_min.jpg

Among patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation, the risk of exacerbation was lower in women (RR = 0.93, p = 0.009), patients in secondary care (RR = 0.95, p = 0.051), and patients who used ICS without LABA (RR = 0.85, p = 0.006) or with LABA (RR = 0.77, p < 0.001; Figure 4); the risk of exacerbation was higher among older patients (RR = 1.09, p < 0.001) and in patients who lived in places with < 100,000 inhabitants (RR = 1.08, p = 0.007; Figure 4).

Similar results were found in the models that included SABA overuse (i.e., ≥ 3 SABA canisters; Figure 5). Sensitivity analyses among patients aged 18–35 years (Supplementary materials) showed essentially the same findings as the main analysis.

Figure 5

Predictors of asthma exacerbations by negative binomial regression among all patients and patients with ≥ 1 or more prescriptions for oral corticosteroids. Model with ≥ 3 SABA canisters. Predictors: age (per 10 years); male sex (vs. female); ICS (vs. SABA only); ICS and LABA (vs. SABA only); secondary care (vs. otherwise); place of residence with > 100,000 inhabitants (vs. ≤ 100,000 inhabitants); ≥ 3 SABA canisters (vs. < 3 canisters). Error bars show 95% confidence intervals

/f/fulltexts/PDIA/51961/PDIA-40-51961-g005_min.jpg

Discussion

We found that 46% of patients with asthma in Poland used SABA, of whom 20% used SABA without concomitant ICS or ICS/LABA prescriptions. Moreover, 6% of patients used SABA excessively, and 34% overused SABA. The risk of excessive SABA use was twice as high in patients who did not use ICS. Excessive SABA use was the strongest predictor of asthma exacerbation, tripling the risk.

In the study period (i.e., 2018), the use of SABA without ICS could be expected in selected patients with very mild disease in line with the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations at that time (GINA 1). However, we found that patients who did not use ICS had the poorest asthma control, as indicated by the greatest consumption of SABA and OCS (which we used as a proxy of asthma exacerbations). Thus, we hypothesize that this group of patients included those with severe disease, who did not receive adequate maintenance treatment.

Our results also showed there is a substantial proportion of patients with asthma who use SABA excessively. The percentage of excessive SABAs users in our study (6%) was similar to that observed in France (~5%), lower than in the United Kingdom (~10%), but higher than in Canada (~1%) [13, 16]. Moreover, in our study, about one-third of patients could be defined as SABA overusers (≥ 3 canisters), which is similar to a recent study from Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom [15]. In Poland, SABAs are available on prescription only; thus, SABA overuse is most likely related to overprescription. Importantly, a survey in a primary care setting in Poland showed that physicians tend to prescribe SABA on patients’ request (“physician acceptance”, data not published).

Although it is well accepted that ICS are currently the most effective medications for controlling asthma-related inflammation in the airways, data on the association between ICS treatment and the risk of excessive SABA use are scarce. Indeed, to our knowledge, only one previous study showed that “appropriate use of ICS” substantially decreased the risk of excessive SABA use [16]. Similarly in our cohort, a lack of prescription for ICS was the strongest predictor of excessive SABA use, with the risk doubled compared to patients who used ICS. These findings strongly support the new GINA recommendations to use ICS whenever SABAs are used [1]. This recommendation should reduce the prevalence of excessive SABA use and its consequences such as a lack of asthma control, asthma exacerbations, and asthma-related deaths [18, 19].

We also found that secondary care provided by an asthma specialist was associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of excessive SABA use, in line with the published work [20]. This indicates that non-specialists, primarily general practitioners, may under-prescribe ICS to people with asthma. Thus, excessive SABA use could be reduced through education of general practitioners or by increasing the availability of secondary care. In line with reported data, excessive SABA use was also associated with older age and male sex, which could be due to more severe disease in older people and to better adherence to controller medications among women [16, 21].

In our study, excessive SABA use best predicted asthma exacerbations, tripling the risk in the entire cohort, and increasing it by 60% among the patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation. Similarly, SABA overuse doubled the risk of asthma exacerbation in the entire cohort, and increased it by one-third among patients with exacerbations. Our results agree with previous studies in which the overuse of SABA was the single most important predictor of asthma exacerbations [8, 22]. Importantly, the use of ICS was associated with a decreased risk of asthma exacerbations independently of excessive SABA use (by about 20%). In the entire cohort, the exacerbation risk was increased among patients who used ICS and LABA, which likely reflects a more severe disease course in this group. Indeed, the analysis among patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation (indicating similar disease severity) showed that concomitant ICS and LABA use was associated with an even lower risk than the use of ICS alone. This is in line with recent findings of four prospective, randomized, controlled trials, in which ICS/LABA combination was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbation (by ~20%) [23]. Similarly, secondary care seemed to be an indicator of more severe disease in the entire cohort [24], with an increased risk of exacerbations. In contrast, secondary care was associated with a reduced exacerbation risk among patients with similar disease severity (≥ 1 exacerbation).

Our results confirm previous findings that the risk of asthma exacerbation seems to be greater among older people and in women, who tend to have more severe disease [22, 25]. Interestingly, among patients with similar disease severity (≥ 1 exacerbation), women had a lower risk of exacerbation, which could be due to better adherence to controller medications [21]. We also found that living in a place with < 100,000 inhabitants was related to a higher risk of exacerbation, which could reflect reduced access to secondary care outside large cites.

The limitations of our study need to be mentioned. First, we analysed data from individual prescriptions that did not include information on the diagnosis (e.g., asthma, COPD), and defined “asthma” based on a typical pattern of prescriptions. Second, we did not have access to the clinical characteristics of patients, such as asthma severity or comorbidities. Third, the selection of older patients (45–64 years) might be associated with the risk of including patients with COPD or the asthma-COPD syndrome; however, sensitivity analyses among patients aged 18–35 years (Supplementary materials) showed essentially the same findings as the main analysis. Fourth, because the data were obtained from pharmacy records, our analysis was limited to out-patient events. Fifth, the asthma exacerbation was defined as a prescription for an OCS, which could underestimate the number of exacerbations. On the other hand, OCS can be prescribed for other reasons than an asthma exacerbation. Finally, in contrast to previous studies, we could not analyse other outcomes such as hospitalizations or deaths [11].

A large cohort of patients is an important strength of our study. We also used a database of purchased medications, which is a more reliable approach than considering issued prescriptions only that may or may not be filled. Therefore, estimates of SABA consumption from our study seem to accurately reflect the real use of these medications. Moreover, our database allowed for multivariate analyses of study predictors of SABA overuse and its relationship to asthma exacerbations.

Conclusions

The frequency of SABA overuse was high in Poland, as observed previously in other European countries [15]. SABA overuse is an important predictor of unfavourable asthma outcomes and, therefore, efforts should be made to decrease its frequency. SABA overuse should be flagged in electronic quality control systems to identify patients at risk and physicians who overprescribe SABA. Our data add important evidence that ICS-based controller treatment is essential to reduce SABA overuse. Thus, our results support the new GINA recommendations to use ICS-based controller treatment in all patients with asthma [1]. Other ways of reducing excessive SABA use should also be considered, such as educating physicians on the treatment guidelines, expanding access to secondary care for patients with asthma, and educating patients on the risks of SABA overreliance.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an educational grant from AstraZeneca Pharma Poland.

We thank Proper Medical Writing (Rafał Szot), for help with the preparation of the manuscript, and PEX PharmaSequence (Edyta Zagrajek, Agata Domska), for assisting with data analyses.

Conflict of interest

P. D¹browiecki received consultancy fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Sandoz, lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Polpharma, Berlin Chemie, Adamed, and financial or material grants for research from Novartis. D. Brzostek is a permanent employee of AstraZeneca. A. D¹browski received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca. R. Dobek received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and financial or material grants for research (as a clinical trial principal investigator) from Genentech-Roche, Gossammer Bio. R. Gawlik received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, HAL Allergy, ALK, Novartis, Chiesi, Allergopharma, Mylan. I. Kupryś-Lipińska received consultancy fees fromGlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Nexter, Novartis, financial or material grants for research from AstraZeneca, and congress fees from Zentiva. A. Mastalerz-Migas received consultancy and lecture fees from AstraZeneca. M. L. Kowalski received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Uriach, lecture fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sandoz, Chiesi, Novartis, Uriach, and financial or material grants for research from GlaxoSmithKline. The remaining authors declare no relevant conflict of interests.

References

1 

Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention http://www.ginasthma.org Accessed 3 Jan 2020.

2 

O’Byrne P, Fabbri LM, Pavord ID, et al. Asthma progression and mortality: the role of inhaled corticosteroids. Eur Respir 2019; 54: 1900491.

3 

Johnston SL, Edwards MR. Mechanisms of adverse effects of β2-agonists in asthma. Thorax 2009; 64: 739-41.

4 

Swystun VA, Gordon JR, Davis EB, et al. Mast cell tryptase release and asthmatic responses to allergen increase with regular use of salbutamol. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 106: 57-64.

5 

Donohue JF. Safety and efficacy of beta agonists. Respir Care 2008; 53: 618-24.

6 

Patel M, Pilcher J, Hancox RJ, et al. The use of β2-agonist therapy before hospital attendance for severe asthma exacerbations: a post-hoc analysis. Prim Care Respir Med 2015; 25: 14099.

7 

Pearce N, Hensley MJ. Epidemiologic studies of beta agonists and asthma deaths. Epidemiol Rev 1998; 20: 173-86.

8 

Stanford RH, Shah MB, D’Souza AO, et al. Short-acting β-agonist use and its ability to predict future asthma-related outcomes. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012; 109: 403-7.

9 

Gonem S, Cumella A, Richardson M. Asthma admission rates and patterns of salbutamol and inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in England from 2013 to 2017. Thorax 2019; 74: 705-6.

10 

Azzi EA, Kritikos V, Peters MJ, et al. Understanding reliever overuse in patients purchasing over-the-counter short-acting beta 2 agonists: an Australian community pharmacy-based survey. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e028995.

11 

Nwaru BI, Ekström M, Hasvold P, et al. Overuse of short-acting β2-agonists in asthma is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and mortality: a nationwide cohort study of the global SABINA programme. Eur Respir J 2020; pii: 1901872.

12 

Quint JK, Anetorp S, Kocks JWK, et al. Short-acting beta-2-agonists exposure and severe asthma exacerbations: SABINA findings from Europe and North America. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2022; 10: 2297-309.

13 

Belhassen M, Nibber A, Van Ganse E, et al. Inappropriate asthma therapy – a tale of two countries: a parallel population-based cohort study. Prim Care Respir Med 2016; 26: 16076.

14 

Sadatsafavi M, Tavakoli H, Lynd L, FitzGerald JM. Has asthma medication use caught up with the evidence? Chest 2017; 151: 612-8.

15 

Janson C, Menzies-Gow A, Nan C, et al. SABINA: An overview of short-acting β2-agonist use in asthma in European countries. Adv Ther 2020; 37: 1124-35.

16 

Tavakoli H, FitzGerald JM, Lynd LD, Sadatsafavi M. Predictors of inappropriate and excessive use of reliever medications in asthma: a 16-year population-based study. BMC Pulm Med 2018; 18: 33.

17 

LAMB C. Reducing short acting beta agonist overuse in the asthma population*1. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113: S338.

18 

Anderson HR, Ayres JG, Sturdy PM, et al. Bronchodilator treatment and deaths from asthma: case-control study. BMJ 2005; 330: 117.

19 

Hasford J, Virchow JC. Excess mortality in patients with asthma on long-acting 2-agonists. Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 900-2.

20 

Blanchette CM, Culler SD, Ershoff D, Gutierrez B. Association between previous health care use and initiation of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist combination therapy among US patients with asthma. Clin Ther 2009; 31: 2574-83.

21 

Sundberg R, Torén K, Franklin KA, et al. Asthma in men and women: treatment adherence, anxiety, and quality of sleep. Respir Med 2010; 104: 337-44.

22 

Yang JF, Chaudhuri R, Thomson NC, et al. Insights into frequent asthma exacerbations from a primary care perspective and the implications of UK National Review of Asthma Deaths recommendations. Prim Care Respir Med 2018; 28: 35.

23 

Busse WW, Bateman ED, Caplan AL, et al. Combined analysis of asthma safety trials of long-acting β2-agonists. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2497-505.

24 

Cho EY, Oh KJ, Rhee CK, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and management of asthma by types of health care in South Korea. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: 3269-76.

25 

Zein JG, Erzurum SC. Asthma is different in women. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2015; 15: 28.

Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.