eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Preliminary results of Polish national multicenter study on colostomy reversal – LICO (Liquidation of Colostomy) study

Michał Kisielewski
1, 2
,
Tomasz Wojewoda
1, 2
,
Karolina Richter
3
,
Michał Wysocki
4
,
Michał Jankowski
5, 6
,
Wiktor Krawczyk
7
,
Jakub Wantulok
7
,
Karolina Jeleńska-Bieńkowska
8
,
Michał Stańczak
9
,
Ewa Grudzińska
10
,
Bartosz Molasy
11
,
Andrzej Komorowski
12, 13
,
Michał Zdrojewski
14
,
Tomasz Sachańbiński
15, 16
,
Paulina Franczak
17
,
Mateusz Wierdak
18
,
Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz
19
,
Wojciech M. Wysocki
1, 2, 20

1.
Chair of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
2.
Department of Oncological Surgery, 5th Military Clinical Hospital, Krakow, Poland
3.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
4.
Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Krakow, Poland
5.
Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier’s Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
6.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
7.
Clinical Department of General, Colorectal and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
8.
Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine, National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
9.
Division of Oncological Propedeutics, Medical University of Gdansk and Surgical Oncology, Oncological Center, Gdynia, Poland
10.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
11.
Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowki Universitz, Kielce, Poland
12.
Department of Surgical Oncology, J. Śniadecki Specialist Hospital, Nowy Sącz, Poland
13.
College of Medicine, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland
14.
Oncological Surgery Clinic, MSWiA Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland
15.
Oncological Surgery Department with a Sub-department of Breast Diseases, Tadeusz Koszarowski Oncology Centre in Opole, Opole, Poland
16.
Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
17.
Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ceynowa Hospital, Wejherowo, Poland
18.
2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
19.
Department of General, Minimally Invasive, and Elderly Surgery, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
20.
National Institute of Oncology Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial, Warsaw, Poland
Videosurgery Miniinv
Online publish date: 2024/04/10
Article file
- Preliminary results.pdf  [0.09 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Horesh N, Rudnicki Y, Dreznik Y, et al. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: still a complicated operation. Techn Coloproctol 2018; 22: 81-7.
2. Salusjärvi JM, Koskenvuo LE, Mali JP, et al. Stoma reversal after Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis. Surgery 2023; 173: 920-6.
3. Lee JM, Bai P, Chang J, et al. Hartmann’s procedure vs primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for acute diverticulitis: nationwide analysis of 2,729 emergency surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229: 48-55.
4. Lee Y, McKechnie T, Samarasinghe Y, et al. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy versus Hartmann’s procedure for acute complicated diverticulitis: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2015-2019. Int J Colorect Dis 2023; 38: 156.
5. Reali C, Landerholm K, George B, et al. Hartmann’s reversal: controversies of a challenging operation. Minim Invasive Surg 2022; 2022: 7578923.
6. Chen Z, Nair N, Hanif U. Outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open reversal of hartmann’s procedure: a single centre experience. Cureus 2021; 13: e17242.
7. Yang PF, Morgan MJ. Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 965-9.
8. Horesh N, Lessing Y, Rudnicki Y, et al. Timing of colostomy reversal following Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis. J Visc Surg 2020; 157: 395-400.
9. Park W, Park WC, Kim KY, Lee SY. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hartmann colostomy reversal. Ann Coloproctol 2018; 34: 306-11.
10. Kolasiński W. Surgical site infections – review of current knowledge, methods of prevention. Pol Przegl Chirur 2018; 91: 41-7.
11. Kisielewski M, Rubinkiewicz M, Pędziwiatr M, et al. Are we ready for the ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery? Videosurgery Miniinv 2017; 12: 7-12.
12. Willis MA, Toews I, Soltau SL, et al. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 2: CD014909.
13. Dorrance M, Copp M. Perioperative fasting: a review. J Periop Pract 2020; 30: 204-9.
14. Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Matłok M, et al. Randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of preoperative oral carbohydrate loading versus placebo on insulin resistance and cortisol level after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pol Przegl Chirurg 2015; 87: 402-8.
15. Jin Z, Hu J, Ma D. Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 492-504.
16. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (4): CD004423.
17. Borycka-Kiciak K, Dib N, Janaszek Ł, et al. Laparoscopically assisted ileo-colonic resection in patients with Crohn’s disease: preliminary report. Pol Przegl Chirurg 2013; 85: 505-10.
18. Kwiatkowski A, Stępińska G, Stanowski E, Paśnik K. Implementation of laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery – a single center’s experience. Videosurgery Miniinv 2018; 13: 27-32.
19. Giuseppe R, Id FN, Serafino M, et al. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a single-center experience. Asian J Endosc Surg 2019; 12: 486-91.
20. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 759-66.
21. Pędziwiatr M, Kisialeuski M, Pisarska M, et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol – compliance improves outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 21: 75-81.
22. Zhang W, Wang F, Qi S, et al. An evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Videosurgery Miniinv 2023; 18: 565-77.
23. Schineis C, Fenzl T, Aschenbrenner K, et al. Stapled intestinal anastomoses are more cost effective than hand-sewn anastomoses in a diagnosis related group system. Surgeon 2021; 19: 321-8.
24. Warsinggih, Akil F, Lusikooy RE, et al. The comparison of anastomosis strength and leakage between double-layer full-thickness and single-layer extramucosal intestine anastomosis. Ann Med Surg 2023; 85: 3912-5.
25. Bains MS, Nar AS, Jabbal HS, et al. A prospective study of ‘circumferential purse-string approximation’ vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal. Pan African Med J 2022; 42: 287.
26. Borejsza-Wysocki M, Bobkiewicz A, Francuzik W, et al. Effect of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on incidence rate of surgical site infection after stoma reversal: a pilot study. Videosurgery Miniinv 2021; 16: 686-96.
27. Rausa E, Kelly ME, Sgroi G, et al. Quality of life following ostomy reversal with purse-string vs linear skin closure: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34: 209-16.
28. Carrano FM, Maroli A, Carvello M, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy after stoma reversal in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BJS Open 2021; 5: zrab116.
29. Challine A, Lefèvre JH, Creavin B, et al. Can a local drainage salvage a failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis? A prospective cohort of 54 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63: 93-100.
30. Meyer J, Naiken S, Christou N, et al. Reducing anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: the old dogmas and the new challenges. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25: 5017-25.
31. Whitney S, Gross BD, Mui A, et al. Hartmann’s reversal: factors affecting complications and outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35: 1875-80.
32. Ferko A, Rejholoc J, Škrovina M, et al. Colorectal anastomosis dehiscence: a call for more detailed morphological classification. Videosurgery Miniinv 2021; 16: 98-109.
33. Liu J, Wang X, Chen H, et al. Risk factors, quality of life, and oncological effects of refractory anastomotic leakage for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38: 1934-41.
34. Fabulas F, Paisant P, Dinomais M, et al. Pre-habilitation before colorectal cancer surgery could improve postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery: a case-matched study. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2022; 407: 1595-603.
35. Rucinska M, Osowiecka K. Prehabilitation as an extra approach to usual care for cancer patients. Nowotwory. J Oncol 2022; 72: 294-302.
36. Molenaar CJL, Minnella EM, Coca-Martinez M, et al. Effect of multimodal prehabilitation on reducing postoperative complications and enhancing functional capacity following colorectal cancer surgery: the PREHAB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158: 572-81.
Copyright: © 2024 Fundacja Videochirurgii This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
  
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.